Most folk are blind to what these globalist bastards have done to their lives. I sincerely pray that they all wake up and start pushing back. It's like watching a steam roller careering around a school yard with the kids all still playing marbles.
Dec 7, 2023·edited Dec 15, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley
As time goes by I am feeling slightly more optimistic for the future because the oppressions being imposed on us by the political class are becoming so obvious and absurd that the penny must be starting to drop with even the most brainwashed of the general public.
As for voting the incumbent political class out, I worry that this could fail through a sort of inversion of the Scotland situation where the wretched SNP have been in power since 2007. The separatist SNP keep winning because the unionist vote gets split three ways (Con/Lab/Lib). By similar arithmetic, the globalist Uniparty will win if the opposition vote is split between Reform, Reclaim, Heritage and assorted independents.
And the WEF, CIA and MI5 and SBU and Mossad will completely ignore your democratic politicians and elections because that's what they've always done! Just ask JFK and RFK and one or two millions hit in other countries.
A great idea Joel. But, first we have to 'Heal ourselves'. Too often in Human culture, a few do all the work and the rest drink beer in front of the entertainment...Like maggots on a corpse. Pretty soon things start to stink and fall apart.
From my observation, most humans don't want to be personally accountable? And without personal accountability, there can be no just government...........We are back to where we started.
Both Brand and McGregor have misunderstood the role of President in Ireland. It is a mostly powerless, ceremonial role with no influence on policy or legislation. Sure his election would result in a strong signal to the government from the electorate and McGregor would get to strut about the place for a while but politically he would be less than powerless - any public utterances and daily agenda of shaking hands with charity workers would be entirely set by the government of the day.
Bear in mind that McGregor called enthusiastically for vx's masks and lockdowns during the "pandemic". He is no champion of liberty but rather of his own self-aggrandisement
"President" of Ireland bears no relation to positions with the same title in the US, France, Russia etc. It is a ceremonial role with very little executive power.
The first thing we must do is take back our local school boards and get the woke, liberal, communist manifesto bullshit agenda out of our public education curriculum! When we do that and then raise a generation of kids that don’t believe that lopping off your boobs or Weiner to change their gender is a good idea, that there are only two genders, and not fifty different pronouns, that children should not be attending drag queen shows, that man-made climate change is bull shit meant to tax you into the poor house and bloat government and not sound science, that we shouldn’t be separating our classrooms AGAIN by skin color like we did back in the 1950’s, what the Constitution IS AND WHY WE NEED TO FOLLOW IT PROPERLY; we will be able to begin to take back our country and change where we are headed!!!
The present voting system deprives the electorate of any precise voice in the polling booth and is rigged to favour large parties. Many citizens do not feel able to vote even remotely in accordance with their convictions and judgement. The First-Past-The-Post system with individual constituencies makes most votes count for nothing.
The following is how a serious representative system would look taking the present system as a starting point.
* Require all candidates to obtain for election a certain number of votes to be determined by the size of the electorate, traditional turnout and the target number of seats.
* Install electronic voting at polling stations. The voter is provided on a first screen with the choice of constituency candidates they would currently see on the paper ballot. Voters discontent with this selection would have the option of moving to a second screen which would show all candidates in a larger area, say their county or a region.
* There would be a process where candidates falling far short of the threshold would redistribute their contingents of votes to candidates closer to the threshold. Similarly, very popular candidates would redistribute their surplus votes. This way no vote need go wasted while voters would have a much wider choice of candidate and so no longer vote for the least bad option.
This would diminish the power of parties while still according them an important role. Such a system of “transferable power of political attorney” would make parliament vastly more representative, reward outstanding candidates with the loyalty of supporters outside their narrow constituency while retaining a geographical anchor, and restore trust in democracy.
I have called this system FuzzyDemocracy with details and answers to objections at a dot.eu site.
True democracy.... where it's one person one vote?
I'm thinking... that would be a total disaster.... given 6 billion who injected a substance cuz the TEEv said to... and cuz they got a free donut coupon. I'd suggest I don't want these 6B anywhere near a decision-making process that goes beyond using an app to vote for contestants in Dancing with Stars and American Idol....
Unless you are assuming the 6B will die and the remaining 2B will get true democracy?
It's NOT about "governments" ... it's about Human Beings and HOW Human Beings become corrupted.
Here is one perspective attempting to answer that FUNDAMENTAL question...
“The total neglect or trivialization of the childhood factor operative in the context of violence and the way it evolves in early infancy sometimes leads to explanations that are not only unconvincing and abortive but actively deflect attention away from the genuine roots of violence."
ANYTHING that does NOT address FUNDAMENTAL issues, will ALWAYS be IN-EEFFECT-IVE in the long run, because fiddling around with symptoms and effects is NEVER going to change ANYTHING.
If the present is replaced by true direct democracy, things might get much worse. When the Covid hysteria was on, more than half of the people were all for forced vaccinations.
First of all, peopple should inform themselves about the origin of the political parties.
Then they would know that they are nothing more nor else than lobbying entities established with agendas that have nothing to do with people good but to hyhpnotize and enslave them using specific rhetoric.
All political parties have their own parties' bodies which are never to be seen officially nor named.
They are the real and invisible authority of each and all political parties.
Another thing to never forget is that when someone is elected as a member of a party, this person is under no obligation to consult his constituents before voting however important may be the issue at play.
Given that a jury that is empowered to sentence someone to death if decided so ( in some countries at least ) and that those persons are selected by chance, why not use the same method for seleecting the so-called representatives ?
There could be a list of persons which are; recognized citizens, without any criminal records, from which names would be selected by pure chance for each ministry and then they would be asked if they accept the responsibilities that ensue for such an appointment.
If yes, they got it.
BUT ....
They would be in charge for no more than 4 years .
They would have no more than one appointment in all their life.
They would have to go back to their previous job and employer for at least 10 years before submitting for a job as public servant.
Their previous employer would not be allowed to have any kind of contract with the government as long as they are on duty. while they are in charge.
And...
At the end of their one-time-for-life engagement, they would have to appear before a review court which would examine each of their decisions in detail to ensure that everything was done according to the rules and, in the event of a breach of the rules, the person would be held personally liable for all the consequences that would have resulted from the said decisions.
Most folk are blind to what these globalist bastards have done to their lives. I sincerely pray that they all wake up and start pushing back. It's like watching a steam roller careering around a school yard with the kids all still playing marbles.
Conor McGregor fancies his chances, I do too - GO IRELAND!!!
Yes, big changes are coming. But brace yourselves, it's going to be quite a ride.
As time goes by I am feeling slightly more optimistic for the future because the oppressions being imposed on us by the political class are becoming so obvious and absurd that the penny must be starting to drop with even the most brainwashed of the general public.
As for voting the incumbent political class out, I worry that this could fail through a sort of inversion of the Scotland situation where the wretched SNP have been in power since 2007. The separatist SNP keep winning because the unionist vote gets split three ways (Con/Lab/Lib). By similar arithmetic, the globalist Uniparty will win if the opposition vote is split between Reform, Reclaim, Heritage and assorted independents.
And the WEF, CIA and MI5 and SBU and Mossad will completely ignore your democratic politicians and elections because that's what they've always done! Just ask JFK and RFK and one or two millions hit in other countries.
Direct democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for lunch.
".. to be replaced with true direct democracy."
A great idea Joel. But, first we have to 'Heal ourselves'. Too often in Human culture, a few do all the work and the rest drink beer in front of the entertainment...Like maggots on a corpse. Pretty soon things start to stink and fall apart.
From my observation, most humans don't want to be personally accountable? And without personal accountability, there can be no just government...........We are back to where we started.
Both Brand and McGregor have misunderstood the role of President in Ireland. It is a mostly powerless, ceremonial role with no influence on policy or legislation. Sure his election would result in a strong signal to the government from the electorate and McGregor would get to strut about the place for a while but politically he would be less than powerless - any public utterances and daily agenda of shaking hands with charity workers would be entirely set by the government of the day.
Bear in mind that McGregor called enthusiastically for vx's masks and lockdowns during the "pandemic". He is no champion of liberty but rather of his own self-aggrandisement
"President" of Ireland bears no relation to positions with the same title in the US, France, Russia etc. It is a ceremonial role with very little executive power.
Conor McGregor for king of Ireland!
The first thing we must do is take back our local school boards and get the woke, liberal, communist manifesto bullshit agenda out of our public education curriculum! When we do that and then raise a generation of kids that don’t believe that lopping off your boobs or Weiner to change their gender is a good idea, that there are only two genders, and not fifty different pronouns, that children should not be attending drag queen shows, that man-made climate change is bull shit meant to tax you into the poor house and bloat government and not sound science, that we shouldn’t be separating our classrooms AGAIN by skin color like we did back in the 1950’s, what the Constitution IS AND WHY WE NEED TO FOLLOW IT PROPERLY; we will be able to begin to take back our country and change where we are headed!!!
The present voting system deprives the electorate of any precise voice in the polling booth and is rigged to favour large parties. Many citizens do not feel able to vote even remotely in accordance with their convictions and judgement. The First-Past-The-Post system with individual constituencies makes most votes count for nothing.
The following is how a serious representative system would look taking the present system as a starting point.
* Require all candidates to obtain for election a certain number of votes to be determined by the size of the electorate, traditional turnout and the target number of seats.
* Install electronic voting at polling stations. The voter is provided on a first screen with the choice of constituency candidates they would currently see on the paper ballot. Voters discontent with this selection would have the option of moving to a second screen which would show all candidates in a larger area, say their county or a region.
* There would be a process where candidates falling far short of the threshold would redistribute their contingents of votes to candidates closer to the threshold. Similarly, very popular candidates would redistribute their surplus votes. This way no vote need go wasted while voters would have a much wider choice of candidate and so no longer vote for the least bad option.
This would diminish the power of parties while still according them an important role. Such a system of “transferable power of political attorney” would make parliament vastly more representative, reward outstanding candidates with the loyalty of supporters outside their narrow constituency while retaining a geographical anchor, and restore trust in democracy.
I have called this system FuzzyDemocracy with details and answers to objections at a dot.eu site.
True democracy.... where it's one person one vote?
I'm thinking... that would be a total disaster.... given 6 billion who injected a substance cuz the TEEv said to... and cuz they got a free donut coupon. I'd suggest I don't want these 6B anywhere near a decision-making process that goes beyond using an app to vote for contestants in Dancing with Stars and American Idol....
Unless you are assuming the 6B will die and the remaining 2B will get true democracy?
Not so sure Russell is a real friend. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3tgjHtml4M
Russell Brand With His Cuddle Buddy And "Beautiful Person" Yuval Noah Harari
I can't look at either of them without wanting to, as we used to say, barf.
It's NOT about "governments" ... it's about Human Beings and HOW Human Beings become corrupted.
Here is one perspective attempting to answer that FUNDAMENTAL question...
“The total neglect or trivialization of the childhood factor operative in the context of violence and the way it evolves in early infancy sometimes leads to explanations that are not only unconvincing and abortive but actively deflect attention away from the genuine roots of violence."
~ Alice Miller
Full article
http://psychohistory.com/articles/the-political-consequences-of-child-abuse/
***
ANYTHING that does NOT address FUNDAMENTAL issues, will ALWAYS be IN-EEFFECT-IVE in the long run, because fiddling around with symptoms and effects is NEVER going to change ANYTHING.
Governments are SYMPTOMS.
WAR is a SYMPTOM.
Tyranny is a SYMPTOM.
BLIND compliance and obedience is a SYMPTOM.
If the present is replaced by true direct democracy, things might get much worse. When the Covid hysteria was on, more than half of the people were all for forced vaccinations.
First of all, peopple should inform themselves about the origin of the political parties.
Then they would know that they are nothing more nor else than lobbying entities established with agendas that have nothing to do with people good but to hyhpnotize and enslave them using specific rhetoric.
All political parties have their own parties' bodies which are never to be seen officially nor named.
They are the real and invisible authority of each and all political parties.
Another thing to never forget is that when someone is elected as a member of a party, this person is under no obligation to consult his constituents before voting however important may be the issue at play.
Given that a jury that is empowered to sentence someone to death if decided so ( in some countries at least ) and that those persons are selected by chance, why not use the same method for seleecting the so-called representatives ?
There could be a list of persons which are; recognized citizens, without any criminal records, from which names would be selected by pure chance for each ministry and then they would be asked if they accept the responsibilities that ensue for such an appointment.
If yes, they got it.
BUT ....
They would be in charge for no more than 4 years .
They would have no more than one appointment in all their life.
They would have to go back to their previous job and employer for at least 10 years before submitting for a job as public servant.
Their previous employer would not be allowed to have any kind of contract with the government as long as they are on duty. while they are in charge.
And...
At the end of their one-time-for-life engagement, they would have to appear before a review court which would examine each of their decisions in detail to ensure that everything was done according to the rules and, in the event of a breach of the rules, the person would be held personally liable for all the consequences that would have resulted from the said decisions.