30 Comments

How does he calculate the injections protected from anything. I don’t believe it

Expand full comment

Indeed, how does anybody think that injecting something designed to make one ill, even if only mildly, can ever be any good.

"Because it trains the body. " Yeah, and pigs might fly.

Expand full comment

I heard about the virus when a friend called me in panic telling me in the next month 500,000 people in the uk world be killed by a new virus 🦠 I laughed at him. He got very upset we fell out over the coming months as he fell lock step in line with what ever the twats told him to do. Jab masks locked in. He was in one of the most famous punk bands. He rebelled all our life’s. Yet fell for the c19 bs. I still do not understand how so many intelligent people fell for this shit. But they did. Hopefully we all learned something. And sadly lots more people will die before their time.

Expand full comment

It is so sad. I loved much of the energy of punk music if nothing else, but the fact that so-called rebels fell for the government crap is mind boggling. It was all guidance even if common sense was missing.

But I suppose one needs common sense to double check anyway. From my WordPress site.

https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2023/09/23/g-is-for-guidance/

Expand full comment

TBH I went along with it all at the start. Why would the experts lie? But I was trained as an auditor and started to check the data… didn’t take long to get Red-pilled. Hang about - isn’t that what journalists should have done? (Yes and they didn’t then and haven’t since) Trust in “authority” totally shattered. Can’t see it ever being recovered. And I guess I am not alone. But surrounded by a blue-pilled family.

Expand full comment

As soon as this Germ Theory clown stated the virus SARS COV-2 exists, and used the word transmission I stopped reading

Expand full comment

I agree. This article is flawed and hence, unhelpful.

Expand full comment

All a mass hallucination, was it?

Expand full comment

I recall being being nextdoor having a social get together with our neighbours at the time when the first lockdown was announced for the UK back in 2020...

They cheered and looked "relieved" that measures were being taken to "protect us"...

I am self-employed, I knew right then & there it would tank the economy and destroy small businesses - I said as much and was met with confusion and disbelief...

What transpired over the next 2 years, at the hand of self-serving, power mad politicians, was nothing short of criminal...

Expand full comment

Let's just dive into the nitty gritty...(as Shirley Ellis did some 61 years ago)...the covid pandemic, like all its various pandemic predecessors, was a complete FAKEOUT. There can be no other answer or conclusion for the simple fact that the PCR assessment (or testing method) given to billions of people was also completely faked. There were no standards of cycles and no previous testing to verify its effectiveness for detecting covid. No cases = no pandemic. Covid is now a closed and shut non-event.

Expand full comment
Nov 15·edited Nov 15

All a mass hallucination, was it?

What's this about PCR? I never saw one, but am led to believe it's some sort of amplification technique for ethidium fluorescence. Why do you pretend this PCR, whatever it is, had something to do with widespread sickness? (Or lack thereof, as you suggest.)

Expand full comment

The PCR test was used as the “gold standard” to determine a Covid case or death. Someone who was perfectly healthy who “tested positive” with one of these tests was made to isolate etc. someone who died in a car crash but had “tested positive” was counted as a Covid death. PCR just tests for sequences of genetic material. The origin of the sequences used is controversial. Every cycle of the test doubles the amount of sample. Test were run at up to a cycle count of 45. Work out 2 to the power of 45. Finding minute traces of genetic material does not indicate a viable virus. PCR’s inventor said it can’t be used for that purpose. It also originally had to find three separate sequences. Later this was dropped to 2 and even 1 with no transparency. Different test labs used different methods and different cycle counts and quality control was suspect or non-existent. PCR tests “drove” the Covid event, and weren’t allowed to be critiqued.

Expand full comment

It doesn't exist! PCR is just a preparation for the actual testing.

Expand full comment

PCR is the cover for archiving the DNA of the populace.

Expand full comment

a virus is not a living thing but a soluble solution in a cell .Read the winner of noble prize for PCR testing , Dr. Kary Mullis. He said you can not find a disease using PCR test. This is what the world media gave as fear factor. So many cases a day .Hoax. $ billions made from pandemic by politicians/doctors /media/ hospitals/pharma/pharmacy. Children's health/development was stopped!

Expand full comment

''Failed to control COVID-19'' Really?

I personally would not commend this work at all in 2024 for failing to recognise ''COVID'' is based on NOTHING but fear and hysteria as the following pressures were thrust upon the most frail of our society. No-one in the ''freedom'' movement wants to write any papers on this on give big speeches. Token coverage only. Despite all this REAL evidence people still believe we had a pandemic? =Face palm.

https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing

https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newexclusiveannes-law-consultation

Expand full comment

Hysteria and the mass delusion of crowds, was it?

Expand full comment

Covid was not "Influenza-like." It WAS Influenza. Note that all influenza statistics actually refer to ILI - Influenza Like Illness.

Expand full comment

Quit lying. Amantadine didn't touch it! This has been beyond tiresome for coming on 5 years. (I took a large dose of amantadine on 29 February 2020 when I came down with Covid. No effect!)

Expand full comment

“In May 2021 the more virulent Delta variant evolved, possibly due to the vaccination programmes via a Marek’s disease type effect. This led to more severe infections in the unvaccinated.”

What is the evidence for this? Remember that the definition of vaccinated at the time was 2 weeks after the 2nd dose in a 2 dose series. In the US, at least, there was little distinction between dying with and of covid. Sick with stage 4 cancer and caught a cold? Died of covid. Killed in a car accident? Died of covid, sadly. Death by suicide from the grinding isolation and despair? Sorry you lost your loved one to covid.

And once people met the definition of fully vaccinated, *they stopped testing them for covid when they came into the hospital*. This was policy. I’m not sure if we’ll ever get an accurate accounting of this policy-and-testing-driven so called pandemic, but the only good thing that came of the covid vaccination program is a dramatic increase in skepticism toward the existing vaccine schedule.

Expand full comment

see also Fenton, Quinn et al at the University of Ulster, SWPR, Rancourt et al, Herby et al

Expand full comment

I would to see the evidence before believing that the vaccines saved the elderly for any amount of time.

Expand full comment

As Hugh mentions above, any assertion that “vaccine” effectiveness at preventing serious outcomes and that the effectiveness waned after a while can be explained by the artefact of categorising the vaxxed as unvaxxed for a full 21 days, and by similar delayed death reporting. Just simple miscategorising based on the flawed logic that because the vaccine takes time to work, and the vaxxed should not consider themselves protected for 21 days, leads to the recently vaccinated being labelled unvaccinated. Martin Neil and Norman Fenton’s work. Leaving that aside, most harm was probably intubating and ventilating early/unnecessarily to protect staff/get a bigger payout to the hospital (in the US). Combined with end of life drug protocols in nursing homes in the US, UK and various parts of the world. Plus PCR fraud - altering the CT at various stages to amplify fear or show vaccine effectiveness etc. if the disease is real or not (I believe some harmful entity was circulating, probably viral but could be anything) the “pandemic” needed no actual pathogen to happen, as many in the comments have said. It is an interesting question to which there doesn’t need to be an answer to know the pandemic was driven by propaganda, fear, and fraud on a mass scale, with most oblivious to their role

Expand full comment

.

Our Government

Is Printing

Fiat People.

Not Backed By

Natural Immunity.

.

Expand full comment

"Initially provided temporary protection against severe illness"

Initially? What is that, the first 3 or 4 months of 2021?

Temporary protection? Is that like a couple of weeks, a month, a month and a half? And what about the people permanently injured from this temporary protection?

And did it provide this initial temporary protection in the first months of 2021 to young people, or anyone who had already had covid? No.

Expand full comment

"A seasonal influenza-like illness"

It was the influenza, that was the whole point. It was rebranded as happens every so often to when big pharma profits are falling. It is a standard business practice.

Lockdowns had pros as well as cons in as much as some people stopped to think why are we rushing around like headless chickens. But ultimately it was brain dead stupid and as I keep saying, people did not stop to think and obeyed without common sense.

In short they forgot to love. From my WordPress site.

https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2021/09/05/pros-and-cons-of-lockdowns/

Masks are generally pointless at best, generating volumes of yet more often plastic waste.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/m-is-formasks?utm_source=publication-search

Vaccines were NOT effective against COVID 19 in the elderly, poisoning oneself in the vain attempt to achieve present or future health is moronic, the anagram of omicron, the anagram.

Vaccines are designed to make you ill with a, hopefully, mild form of disease, but that is all they ever do. Any belief in 'training' the body is blind foolishness, a cultic faith in big pharma that it has any wish for you to be healthy.

If you are not sick you will not be a customer, and that is bad business.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/why-vaccines-do-not-work-in-a-nutshell?utm_source=publication-search

On adjuvants (part of vaccine ingredients).

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/adjuvants-and-immune-response-what?utm_source=publication-search

Martin Sewell sees some of the issues but really need to get a proper grip on things as he fails to see the full picture. And he still believes in virology as currently understood by the mainstream.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/coronavirus-is-it-really-a-monster?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment