Thank you for this data/information. What exactly is it going to take? If I hear one more person utter the “covid mantra” I may start screaming and never stop. Fatigue sets in, when anyone who just had covid announces “it would have been much worse if I had not had the vaccines”. I automatically remind them the current variant is mild, this is how nature works and the jabs didn’t make any difference. They look at me like I have two heads and am nuts. Sometimes I think I am for even bothering to say anything. 😂
You are on a hiding to nothing, these people are so invested in the covid narrative and its 'solutions', no matter how you explain the harm done by lockdowns, covering your face, injecting toxic agents into people's bodies (particularly the aged/infirm and the young), they will not have any of it. Even when presented with governments own data direct from source they won't accept it or change their minds.
US 2021 excess working age deaths impacted the 35-44 y.o. group the hardest, with about a third being due to covid and most of the rest due to heart disease, cancer, and stroke, which are typically diseases of the elderly.
Deaths and Ballots matter not to those tallying the score. The dark-triad of BigGov, BigMedia, and BigTech, decide the outcome, then messuage the data to fit the narrative through slight-of-hand “data science” and 24/7 propaganda messaging.
Thank you for trying to clear up the data, seek out the truth, and freely share you findings with the world.
"This gun is not so much smoking as still burning as bright as a supernova."
Yet another proof that something is terribly wrong with these "vaccines". So, how can we help the brainwashed see the bright light? I was thinking, for those of us on social media, that all posts should include a comment something like this: "If you want to learn what Big Tech is not allowing you to see, compare a Google search to a Presearch search."
Not by an means an expert here, but in reading, wondering if this sentence contains an error -- if not, it does not make sense to me (in that case, I need to think about it more):
On a macro level, COVID does not (did not) materially affect anyone over the age of 44. No intervention whatsoever could be merited for anyone under 45 on the basis of any cost/benefit analysis.
I'm wondering if it should say ".....does not (did not) materially affect anyone UNDER the age of 44."
IMHO the impact on the older age groups is directly caused by the interventions, it's as if it were done to cause a death spike so a 'pandemic' could be delcared. Doing absolutey nothing different to usual would have saved tens of thousands of lives in the elderly/infirm/isolated.
Now we have even more deaths from doing something in all age groups and it won't ever relent just based on increases in cancer deaths alone. 69% increase in suicides reported by London Ambulanc service in 2020 compared to 2019, the list is endless as to how 'doing something' has had a huge impact on people being dead/dead earlier than they should have, hence the increase in life years lost early doors due to those interventions and again when you inject posisons/toxic agents into people.
Joel, what's your take on Edward Dowd's latest "500K excess deaths" in the US, in both 2020 and 2021: https://gettr.com/post/p120pa3d8e6 Am I reading him correctly?
I've been following you since 2020 and don't recall you showing even 50K excess deaths for 2020 in the US. I'm nervous that Dowd is getting bad data even though it says CDC. We know from the insurance companies that death claims for working age are up ~40% for many companies, which goes with your analysis here. We don't want the message to get sidetracked by bad data.
Thanks. We need to sort out cause of death. 502K excess deaths in 2020 seems too large. Need to look at total mortality and see how they made their baseline.
I calculate 100,000 UK excess deaths between mid March 2020 and mid-March 2021 against the 5-year average 2015-2019.
Also, for the age group 15-19 excess deaths in the UK were a negative value. That was before the jabs really got going. My best guess is that after the third jab, a workable figure is 80 deaths per million.
Ill check that link out tomorrow, I typically stay strictly with CDC to avoid any "where did you get your data" pushback. This dataset (https://imgur.com/a/4LSvwsz) is probably very cluttered (esp viewed on a phone), but shows Total deaths compared to Covid deaths, by age group, for 2020, 2021, with comparison to 2017. The % columns (D, G, J, L) are just showing running percent of the column, i.e., in 2020 Covid deaths under 35 were .88% of total Covid deaths.
Expanding up to age 54, they were 7.4%, add in the next age range of 55-64, now ages 0-64 account for 19.27% of all Covid Deaths.
But in 2021, 0-64 now accounts for 30.79% of the assumed Covid deaths. (I'm sure using the Jordan Haynes Driver standard of measurement too)
The "Rough Excess Deaths" is just straight subtracting from 2017 as baseline, which isn't completely realistic, I just like that year because it was the most recent time CDC published a detailed ICD10 death report that was easy to refer to back when I got interested in this (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_09-508.pdf)
ANYWAY, if by "working age deaths" you mean the age groups 15-64, then note that in 2020 the excess deaths was somewhere around 125,000 and in 2021 that jumped up to 220,000. Crazy.
Here is a table I made from mortality.org summing total deaths for 2015-2021 for selected countries (it has Germany and Sweden highlighted as I was discussing different ways to make forecasts with someone else when I put this together - two different types of forecasts in columns J and K) https://imgur.com/a/1dfxFSi
The US did have 500,000 more deaths than usual in the US, 350K of which were attributed to Covid. The breakdown of causes is still unclear, though we know at the very least there was an increase in accidental deaths by ~37000 in 2020 and that also held true in 2021.
To Joel's point on LLE (Loss of Life Expectancy), those extra 37000 deaths caused more loss of years than the 350,000 Covid deaths since the average age of Covid death was ~78.
minus the 96% minimum of false positives of 'cases' (based on 35cycles of PCR) and the deliberate;y falsely attributeing because there's a financial incentive to label someone as a 'covid'(tm) death ...
Interesting. US had about a 20% bump in 2020, then again in 2021. Germany, about 6% both years, but Sweden bumped up after a low year, then went back to normal in 2021. A few other countries got around 20%. Thanks for the info.
Interestingly Sweden has zero excess deaths for ages 0-64, miniscule excess deaths age 65-79. All excess deaths were over 80. See this table https://imgur.com/a/lJzh87w
*If you are wondering why the totals are ~2500 higher each year than mortality.org, I pulled this from a Swedish cite which includes "unknown date of death" and I think Mortality.org, since its source is deaths per week, would include the deaths not tracked to a specific date.
Sweden did something wrong, no doubt! The 2019 dip is interesting. If you take 92K as a rough baseline on total deaths, 2019 is down 3K while 2020 is up 6 K. A 3K net excess is very small.
Imagine! No lockdowns, no masks, no vents, no remdesivir or medazolam, early treatment everywhere. What would have transpired in the US? (I still find 500K for 2020 hard to believe.)
I don't know, imagine you were asked as a hypothetical to model all the things we did in response and predict the impact, I would have thought at least a 25%-50% increase in deaths would have resulted. The fact it was only 20% surprised me.
Forcing nursing homes residents to essentially stay in their room for a year with minimal contact I thought would have killed 10% of that population (200k) alone.
If you google what impacts immune system to fight up flus, respiratory viruses, etc, prior to 2020 the old "Swiss Cheese" model included "Eat Healthy", "Lower Stress", "Get lots of exercise", "Build Social Connections (Marta Zaraska relased a book with hundreds of citations "Growing Young" on this theory just as the pandemic hit which was largely ignored), "Reduce Alcohol Consumption", "Get lots of Vitamin D", etc, etc...
We literally followed a strategy that did the exact opposite of all of that.
In NYC, and I have never seen this covered anywhere, heart attacks average 340 per week. Immediately once lockdown started, skyrocketed up to 1700 by the first week of April. The previous record was 492 heart attacks the 2nd week of 2018. Any argument that these were "missed Covid deaths" is ridiculous as you would have seen a steady increase throughout 2020 as Covid spread through our population instead of an immediate spike following the lockdown. (Closest you get is the articles like "where have all the heart attacks gone" stories where Cardiologists wonder why their offices in NYC are empty)
As for "why the US did so worse than other countries", it is a valid question. The answer lies in the quality of health in our elderly population.
Our elderly are more obese, hypertensive, sickly than any other country. What's more, we have the most advanced life extending medical apparatus in the world. I'm married to one. Wife is a vascular surgeon, and every day she uses techniques that extend the lives of people who would never have made it to this advanced age just a few decades ago.
Excellent points. Yes, nursing homes - so very sad. And evil.
What a wife - knows your heart inside and out! That gets to another major medical killing field - the diet / cholesterol / atherosclerosis hoax. That's still leading in total deaths over decades. Glad I quit sugar and white flour junk food 25 years ago.
Isolating those in the vulnerable groups, never mind removing their healthcare is how you kill lots of humans in a very short space of time more than normal, the doing something literally causes the death spike that is criminally described as a viral pandemic when it simply isn't.
Loads of research on how mental health in the aged/vulnerable causes them to die prematurely, I saw just in a short space of time with my own community based service by not delivering meals into folks homes and having virtually no contact with them, that they deteriorated rapidly in their overall health, it was sickening and yet so obvious what was happening.
So are you just calculating this YLL proxy by multiplying the ONS table life expectancies by the count of people of that age who died?
If I understand correctly, legit YLL calculation is Bayesian, right? Fenton made a video to this effect I believe. Say a 60 year old might be expected to live another 25 years. But, conditioned on the fact that he died today, that increases the probability he was already ill and would not have lived 25 years in the first place. Hence, true YLL would be much lower than your proxy YLL. Is this your understanding as well?
This is great. Very convincing evidence that the vaccine is killing people. The change in life years lost from 19/20 to 20/21 is lowest(no change at all) in the group that did not get vaccinated(1-14 yo). The life years lost is also less increased from 19/20 to 20/21 in the older age groups that had the most deaths in 19/20 from Covid. Also, this data is consistent with the vaccine danger being far less age dependent than Covid danger. Since Covid kills few under 65, the vaccine caused deaths are actually very noticable in those age groups. But since Covid kills quite a few more in the over 65s the vaccine caused deaths are not causing a noticable increase. And, to the extent that the vaccine does have some mitigation of disease severity (which it does seem to), any death-reducing effects that is has will be the greatest in the oldest age groups that have the highest Covid risk.
There are good and credible estimates from Drs. McCullough and Cole that "Covid" mortality could be reduced 85% and 60% respectively with proper early treatment and adequate Vitamin D supplementation.
The "PreVaxx" excess mortality was medical malpractice and ignorance, buttressed with threats and disinformation. As a peon GP, I was aware from early 2020 that Vitamin D was important in reducing Covid mortality and morbidity. I offered a Loonie to anyone who could recall political or medical advice to supplement Vitamin D, I had two winners who refused their coins.
There is a recent article proving Vit D ineffective. They studied Britons with levels under 65 ng/dl. GMAB! I didn't even bother to look at their data, I may at some point. At 50 you are well protected, under 30 vulnerable. This is reminiscent of the Hydroxychloroquine studies where they used cardiotoxic doses of HCQ and failed to kill all the subjects.
you mean covid positive deaths right, because only just over 6000 over 2 years are 'covid' deaths, the rest are WITH 'covid'
The deaths FROM jabbing people up in the older groups massively exceeds all 'covid' deaths frm all age groups, that's before you even get to the insanely high false positives (96% at 35 cycles of PCR) that even johnson and Hancock admitted to on TV (that most simply ignored)
Maybe, I am just not seeing it but this data to me seems like it is showing in some age brackets, the mRNA vaccine isn't cause any excess deaths. Its very odd.
If you were to convert the tables broken down by age (Figure 5) into %s... for say.... August 19 to August 20 (during covid but pre-vaccination) versus August 20 to August 21 (post 1st and 2nd shots in most locales), for say the 65-74 age bracket, you'd have 1726139 / 1699723 = 1.016 or a 1.6% increase. For the 75-84 age bracket, its like a 1.6% decrease or 98.4% the expected. For 85+? 94.7% the expected deaths or a 5.3% decrease. Also, a decrease from ages 01-14.... and then a small increase for 45-64 year olds.
So it seems from this data, it is kind of a tie? Half the categories are decreases by about a 4% average and half the categories are an increase by about a 3% average. Deaths seemed to go down some places, up some other places, overall not much change. If anything, it shows the mRNA vaccine did not save lives but not necessarily it was super-dangerous/super-murderous. I expected to see many more vaccine related deaths. People keep talking about ADE or depopulation, etc as part of the don't-get-the-vaccine narrative. I don't really see it from this data.
The all cause mortality life years lost seems pretty much the same as covid-19 was pre-vaccination versus post-vaccination and its only a small margin (~6%) higher than Aug 18 to Aug 19 and 5% higher than Aug 17 to Aug 18. If their goal was mass depopulation, making the death rate in terms of years-lost increase by a mere 5-6% compared to standard seems like an awfully slow way to make any kind of significant impact.
I thought mRNA was causing "80% increase in excess deaths from all cause mortality!!" according to say Ed Dowd or some life insurance CEOs saying 40+ increase. However, even in the worst age bracket of 15 to 44, it seems like a 8% increase according to your data. If that were the case, we'd expect that 885k in say Sep-18 or 884k in Sep 17th number to grow to about 1.4 million. Instead it grew from 885k to 902k and 980k in the covid-pandemic and vaccine-demic. Higher but not the 80% claims from Ed Dowd or 40% from OneAmerica Life Insurance.
Is this data rigged/faked by the government?? or is OneAmerica and Ed Dowd way off by thinking it was the vaccine? or was Ed Dowd/OneAmerica's observed excess mortality increase not due to the vaccine but remdesivir killing patients? plus lockdown leading to suicides/drug ODs?
Could you clarify more Joel if this is somehow worse than I'm interpreting in %? Honestly, with all this talk about death-death-death-incoming-death-from-VAIDS, etc I was quite worried for my double vaccinated + boosted parents. I'm still unvaccinated and plan to remain that way, but this data honestly makes me feel far less concerned about my parents being vaccinated at ages in the mid 60s with a 1.6 increase/1.6% decrease in the amount of deaths in their age bracket respectively.
If it were like 100% increase or 80% increase, I'd be going OH CRAP! and start planning the funeral but 1.6% inc/dec respectively? Eh.... the loss of life is saddening but I am not overly concerned anymore. I know that probably makes me seem heartless.
I think many of the overt vaccine deaths had little time left to live anyway. So ya, in that sense, just as covid is not as costly as claimed among those nearing death anyway, covid vaccine harms may not be as costly as claimed either. However, the long-term harms of vaccines may lead to mildly increased mortality rates for decades to come. That will be harder to detect and could potentially amount to a lot of lost life among younger generations.
Thank you once again, Joel.
I'll allow myself one proofreader's note:
What was formerly known as "2015" is now referred to as "5 B.C."
Thank you for this data/information. What exactly is it going to take? If I hear one more person utter the “covid mantra” I may start screaming and never stop. Fatigue sets in, when anyone who just had covid announces “it would have been much worse if I had not had the vaccines”. I automatically remind them the current variant is mild, this is how nature works and the jabs didn’t make any difference. They look at me like I have two heads and am nuts. Sometimes I think I am for even bothering to say anything. 😂
You are on a hiding to nothing, these people are so invested in the covid narrative and its 'solutions', no matter how you explain the harm done by lockdowns, covering your face, injecting toxic agents into people's bodies (particularly the aged/infirm and the young), they will not have any of it. Even when presented with governments own data direct from source they won't accept it or change their minds.
After Fig 12, point #1
"over the age of 44" under?
Good morning Joel, again thank you for the analysis. I truelly appreciate your work.
Outstanding analysis. Conclusion is vaccines do more harm than good, correct? Insanity.
Whichever way you look at it. Unless, of course, you work in public health then you don't look at all it seems?
😂😂😂
US 2021 excess working age deaths impacted the 35-44 y.o. group the hardest, with about a third being due to covid and most of the rest due to heart disease, cancer, and stroke, which are typically diseases of the elderly.
And now typically diseases of the vaccinated. There are none so blind as those who do not see.
The only thing worse than those that do not see is those who believe that they do see.
Deaths and Ballots matter not to those tallying the score. The dark-triad of BigGov, BigMedia, and BigTech, decide the outcome, then messuage the data to fit the narrative through slight-of-hand “data science” and 24/7 propaganda messaging.
Thank you for trying to clear up the data, seek out the truth, and freely share you findings with the world.
"This gun is not so much smoking as still burning as bright as a supernova."
Yet another proof that something is terribly wrong with these "vaccines". So, how can we help the brainwashed see the bright light? I was thinking, for those of us on social media, that all posts should include a comment something like this: "If you want to learn what Big Tech is not allowing you to see, compare a Google search to a Presearch search."
The brainwashed have their hands firmly planted over their eyes. I see no way of helping them.
🙈🙉🙊
Not by an means an expert here, but in reading, wondering if this sentence contains an error -- if not, it does not make sense to me (in that case, I need to think about it more):
On a macro level, COVID does not (did not) materially affect anyone over the age of 44. No intervention whatsoever could be merited for anyone under 45 on the basis of any cost/benefit analysis.
I'm wondering if it should say ".....does not (did not) materially affect anyone UNDER the age of 44."
IMHO the impact on the older age groups is directly caused by the interventions, it's as if it were done to cause a death spike so a 'pandemic' could be delcared. Doing absolutey nothing different to usual would have saved tens of thousands of lives in the elderly/infirm/isolated.
Now we have even more deaths from doing something in all age groups and it won't ever relent just based on increases in cancer deaths alone. 69% increase in suicides reported by London Ambulanc service in 2020 compared to 2019, the list is endless as to how 'doing something' has had a huge impact on people being dead/dead earlier than they should have, hence the increase in life years lost early doors due to those interventions and again when you inject posisons/toxic agents into people.
Great work. Thank you
Thanks for all your time and work Joel
Thank you great work. Point #1 conclusion needs revision.
Good stuff, thanks.
Joel, what's your take on Edward Dowd's latest "500K excess deaths" in the US, in both 2020 and 2021: https://gettr.com/post/p120pa3d8e6 Am I reading him correctly?
I've been following you since 2020 and don't recall you showing even 50K excess deaths for 2020 in the US. I'm nervous that Dowd is getting bad data even though it says CDC. We know from the insurance companies that death claims for working age are up ~40% for many companies, which goes with your analysis here. We don't want the message to get sidetracked by bad data.
He's solid. 50k is a UK number. With similar demographics and COVID policies, US easily scales to 500k.
Thanks. We need to sort out cause of death. 502K excess deaths in 2020 seems too large. Need to look at total mortality and see how they made their baseline.
Thanks Joel.
I calculate 100,000 UK excess deaths between mid March 2020 and mid-March 2021 against the 5-year average 2015-2019.
Also, for the age group 15-19 excess deaths in the UK were a negative value. That was before the jabs really got going. My best guess is that after the third jab, a workable figure is 80 deaths per million.
In the US in 2021 (comparing with 2019):
Working age has 208k excess deaths.
65-74 y.o. has 150k excess deaths.
75-84 has 124k excess deaths.
85+ has 47k excess deaths.
529k excess deaths
I used the numbers from https://deadorkicking.com/death-statistics/us/2021/
Right - working age deaths. What a horror. Thanks for the breakdown. I hope this breaks out all over, and soon.
Ill check that link out tomorrow, I typically stay strictly with CDC to avoid any "where did you get your data" pushback. This dataset (https://imgur.com/a/4LSvwsz) is probably very cluttered (esp viewed on a phone), but shows Total deaths compared to Covid deaths, by age group, for 2020, 2021, with comparison to 2017. The % columns (D, G, J, L) are just showing running percent of the column, i.e., in 2020 Covid deaths under 35 were .88% of total Covid deaths.
Expanding up to age 54, they were 7.4%, add in the next age range of 55-64, now ages 0-64 account for 19.27% of all Covid Deaths.
But in 2021, 0-64 now accounts for 30.79% of the assumed Covid deaths. (I'm sure using the Jordan Haynes Driver standard of measurement too)
The "Rough Excess Deaths" is just straight subtracting from 2017 as baseline, which isn't completely realistic, I just like that year because it was the most recent time CDC published a detailed ICD10 death report that was easy to refer to back when I got interested in this (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_09-508.pdf)
ANYWAY, if by "working age deaths" you mean the age groups 15-64, then note that in 2020 the excess deaths was somewhere around 125,000 and in 2021 that jumped up to 220,000. Crazy.
Here is a table I made from mortality.org summing total deaths for 2015-2021 for selected countries (it has Germany and Sweden highlighted as I was discussing different ways to make forecasts with someone else when I put this together - two different types of forecasts in columns J and K) https://imgur.com/a/1dfxFSi
The US did have 500,000 more deaths than usual in the US, 350K of which were attributed to Covid. The breakdown of causes is still unclear, though we know at the very least there was an increase in accidental deaths by ~37000 in 2020 and that also held true in 2021.
To Joel's point on LLE (Loss of Life Expectancy), those extra 37000 deaths caused more loss of years than the 350,000 Covid deaths since the average age of Covid death was ~78.
Bear in mind that official covid attribution in the US uses a wide net and that more accurate figures use a 0.75 adjustment.
With the adjustment, covid deaths in 2021 were about 260k, leaving another 260k being due to other causes.
Are you insinuating that Jordan Driver Haynes didn’t die of Covid?!?!
minus the 96% minimum of false positives of 'cases' (based on 35cycles of PCR) and the deliberate;y falsely attributeing because there's a financial incentive to label someone as a 'covid'(tm) death ...
Interesting. US had about a 20% bump in 2020, then again in 2021. Germany, about 6% both years, but Sweden bumped up after a low year, then went back to normal in 2021. A few other countries got around 20%. Thanks for the info.
Interestingly Sweden has zero excess deaths for ages 0-64, miniscule excess deaths age 65-79. All excess deaths were over 80. See this table https://imgur.com/a/lJzh87w
*If you are wondering why the totals are ~2500 higher each year than mortality.org, I pulled this from a Swedish cite which includes "unknown date of death" and I think Mortality.org, since its source is deaths per week, would include the deaths not tracked to a specific date.
Sweden did something wrong, no doubt! The 2019 dip is interesting. If you take 92K as a rough baseline on total deaths, 2019 is down 3K while 2020 is up 6 K. A 3K net excess is very small.
Imagine! No lockdowns, no masks, no vents, no remdesivir or medazolam, early treatment everywhere. What would have transpired in the US? (I still find 500K for 2020 hard to believe.)
I don't know, imagine you were asked as a hypothetical to model all the things we did in response and predict the impact, I would have thought at least a 25%-50% increase in deaths would have resulted. The fact it was only 20% surprised me.
Forcing nursing homes residents to essentially stay in their room for a year with minimal contact I thought would have killed 10% of that population (200k) alone.
If you google what impacts immune system to fight up flus, respiratory viruses, etc, prior to 2020 the old "Swiss Cheese" model included "Eat Healthy", "Lower Stress", "Get lots of exercise", "Build Social Connections (Marta Zaraska relased a book with hundreds of citations "Growing Young" on this theory just as the pandemic hit which was largely ignored), "Reduce Alcohol Consumption", "Get lots of Vitamin D", etc, etc...
We literally followed a strategy that did the exact opposite of all of that.
In NYC, and I have never seen this covered anywhere, heart attacks average 340 per week. Immediately once lockdown started, skyrocketed up to 1700 by the first week of April. The previous record was 492 heart attacks the 2nd week of 2018. Any argument that these were "missed Covid deaths" is ridiculous as you would have seen a steady increase throughout 2020 as Covid spread through our population instead of an immediate spike following the lockdown. (Closest you get is the articles like "where have all the heart attacks gone" stories where Cardiologists wonder why their offices in NYC are empty)
As for "why the US did so worse than other countries", it is a valid question. The answer lies in the quality of health in our elderly population.
Our elderly are more obese, hypertensive, sickly than any other country. What's more, we have the most advanced life extending medical apparatus in the world. I'm married to one. Wife is a vascular surgeon, and every day she uses techniques that extend the lives of people who would never have made it to this advanced age just a few decades ago.
Excellent points. Yes, nursing homes - so very sad. And evil.
What a wife - knows your heart inside and out! That gets to another major medical killing field - the diet / cholesterol / atherosclerosis hoax. That's still leading in total deaths over decades. Glad I quit sugar and white flour junk food 25 years ago.
Isolating those in the vulnerable groups, never mind removing their healthcare is how you kill lots of humans in a very short space of time more than normal, the doing something literally causes the death spike that is criminally described as a viral pandemic when it simply isn't.
Loads of research on how mental health in the aged/vulnerable causes them to die prematurely, I saw just in a short space of time with my own community based service by not delivering meals into folks homes and having virtually no contact with them, that they deteriorated rapidly in their overall health, it was sickening and yet so obvious what was happening.
up 40% in the 3rd qrtr 2021
So are you just calculating this YLL proxy by multiplying the ONS table life expectancies by the count of people of that age who died?
If I understand correctly, legit YLL calculation is Bayesian, right? Fenton made a video to this effect I believe. Say a 60 year old might be expected to live another 25 years. But, conditioned on the fact that he died today, that increases the probability he was already ill and would not have lived 25 years in the first place. Hence, true YLL would be much lower than your proxy YLL. Is this your understanding as well?
This is great. Very convincing evidence that the vaccine is killing people. The change in life years lost from 19/20 to 20/21 is lowest(no change at all) in the group that did not get vaccinated(1-14 yo). The life years lost is also less increased from 19/20 to 20/21 in the older age groups that had the most deaths in 19/20 from Covid. Also, this data is consistent with the vaccine danger being far less age dependent than Covid danger. Since Covid kills few under 65, the vaccine caused deaths are actually very noticable in those age groups. But since Covid kills quite a few more in the over 65s the vaccine caused deaths are not causing a noticable increase. And, to the extent that the vaccine does have some mitigation of disease severity (which it does seem to), any death-reducing effects that is has will be the greatest in the oldest age groups that have the highest Covid risk.
I am very tired of this analysis.
You assume that "Covid Deaths" are inevitable.
There are good and credible estimates from Drs. McCullough and Cole that "Covid" mortality could be reduced 85% and 60% respectively with proper early treatment and adequate Vitamin D supplementation.
The "PreVaxx" excess mortality was medical malpractice and ignorance, buttressed with threats and disinformation. As a peon GP, I was aware from early 2020 that Vitamin D was important in reducing Covid mortality and morbidity. I offered a Loonie to anyone who could recall political or medical advice to supplement Vitamin D, I had two winners who refused their coins.
There is a recent article proving Vit D ineffective. They studied Britons with levels under 65 ng/dl. GMAB! I didn't even bother to look at their data, I may at some point. At 50 you are well protected, under 30 vulnerable. This is reminiscent of the Hydroxychloroquine studies where they used cardiotoxic doses of HCQ and failed to kill all the subjects.
you mean covid positive deaths right, because only just over 6000 over 2 years are 'covid' deaths, the rest are WITH 'covid'
The deaths FROM jabbing people up in the older groups massively exceeds all 'covid' deaths frm all age groups, that's before you even get to the insanely high false positives (96% at 35 cycles of PCR) that even johnson and Hancock admitted to on TV (that most simply ignored)
Maybe, I am just not seeing it but this data to me seems like it is showing in some age brackets, the mRNA vaccine isn't cause any excess deaths. Its very odd.
If you were to convert the tables broken down by age (Figure 5) into %s... for say.... August 19 to August 20 (during covid but pre-vaccination) versus August 20 to August 21 (post 1st and 2nd shots in most locales), for say the 65-74 age bracket, you'd have 1726139 / 1699723 = 1.016 or a 1.6% increase. For the 75-84 age bracket, its like a 1.6% decrease or 98.4% the expected. For 85+? 94.7% the expected deaths or a 5.3% decrease. Also, a decrease from ages 01-14.... and then a small increase for 45-64 year olds.
So it seems from this data, it is kind of a tie? Half the categories are decreases by about a 4% average and half the categories are an increase by about a 3% average. Deaths seemed to go down some places, up some other places, overall not much change. If anything, it shows the mRNA vaccine did not save lives but not necessarily it was super-dangerous/super-murderous. I expected to see many more vaccine related deaths. People keep talking about ADE or depopulation, etc as part of the don't-get-the-vaccine narrative. I don't really see it from this data.
The all cause mortality life years lost seems pretty much the same as covid-19 was pre-vaccination versus post-vaccination and its only a small margin (~6%) higher than Aug 18 to Aug 19 and 5% higher than Aug 17 to Aug 18. If their goal was mass depopulation, making the death rate in terms of years-lost increase by a mere 5-6% compared to standard seems like an awfully slow way to make any kind of significant impact.
I thought mRNA was causing "80% increase in excess deaths from all cause mortality!!" according to say Ed Dowd or some life insurance CEOs saying 40+ increase. However, even in the worst age bracket of 15 to 44, it seems like a 8% increase according to your data. If that were the case, we'd expect that 885k in say Sep-18 or 884k in Sep 17th number to grow to about 1.4 million. Instead it grew from 885k to 902k and 980k in the covid-pandemic and vaccine-demic. Higher but not the 80% claims from Ed Dowd or 40% from OneAmerica Life Insurance.
Is this data rigged/faked by the government?? or is OneAmerica and Ed Dowd way off by thinking it was the vaccine? or was Ed Dowd/OneAmerica's observed excess mortality increase not due to the vaccine but remdesivir killing patients? plus lockdown leading to suicides/drug ODs?
Could you clarify more Joel if this is somehow worse than I'm interpreting in %? Honestly, with all this talk about death-death-death-incoming-death-from-VAIDS, etc I was quite worried for my double vaccinated + boosted parents. I'm still unvaccinated and plan to remain that way, but this data honestly makes me feel far less concerned about my parents being vaccinated at ages in the mid 60s with a 1.6 increase/1.6% decrease in the amount of deaths in their age bracket respectively.
If it were like 100% increase or 80% increase, I'd be going OH CRAP! and start planning the funeral but 1.6% inc/dec respectively? Eh.... the loss of life is saddening but I am not overly concerned anymore. I know that probably makes me seem heartless.
I think many of the overt vaccine deaths had little time left to live anyway. So ya, in that sense, just as covid is not as costly as claimed among those nearing death anyway, covid vaccine harms may not be as costly as claimed either. However, the long-term harms of vaccines may lead to mildly increased mortality rates for decades to come. That will be harder to detect and could potentially amount to a lot of lost life among younger generations.