“A recent study of particular objects known as "nanotubes," revered for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity, demonstrated that such objects tend to clump within the lungs, causing suffocation.”
“Take the experience of researchers at DuPont, who are testing microscopic tubes of carbon, known as nanotubes, valued for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity.
When the researchers injected nanotubes into the lungs of rats in the summer of 2002, the animals unexpectedly began gasping for breath. Fifteen percent of them quickly died. ''It was the highest death rate we had ever seen,''
said David B. Warheit, the research leader, who began his career studying asbestos and has been testing the pulmonary effects of various chemicals for DuPont since 1984.
Research shows that nanoparticles deposited in the nose can make their way directly into the brain.
“[in 2015] Günter Oberdörster and co-authors published what is possibly the most comprehensive review of carbon nanotube toxicology studies to date. Focusing on inhalation of nanotubes, they document evidence of transient pulmonary inflammation, and rapid and persistent development of granulomatous lesions and interstitial fibrosis on exposure to single- and multiwalled carbon nanotubes in rodents. They cite data indicating that inhaled long and thin multiwalled carbon nanotubes can move to the lining surrounding the lungs and penetrate it, where they can potentially cause mesothelioma. Furthermore, the authors indicate that carbon nanotubes can act as a cancer promoter — with inhalation increasing the probability of developing lung cancer from exposure to other carcinogens.”
Li et al. (2007a) compared the pulmonary response of mice exposed to purified MWCNT by IT instillation versus inhalation.
Intratracheal instillation produced inflammation and severe destruction of alveolar structures, while inhalation predominately resulted in moderate pathology consisting of alveolar wall thickening and cell proliferation but general alveolar structure was retained. This study demonstrated significant differences in the type and degree of pulmonary responses to MWCNT in mice between bolus-type IT instillation and inhalation, with higher doses deposited in lung by inhalation resulting in only moderate effects compared to severe lesions induced by instillation of lower doses. (!!!!!) - SO-CALLED "PCR TEST"...
ChemSec announced the addition of carbon nanotubes to the SIN (‘Substitute It Now’) list1. Carbon nanotubes were added as an entire material class that “should be restricted or banned in the EU.”
The SIN List now includes carbon nanotubes, one of the more well-studied nanomaterials. First engineered in the 1990s, they are used to make durable, lightweight materials, for electrical conductivity, as a super black pigment and for water purification, among other uses.
“Several studies have shown that carbon nanotubes cause lung cancer. The small tubes induce inflammation in a somewhat similar way to asbestos. Reprotoxic properties have also been observed. Up until now, the debate about the safety of nano has focused on the fact that more research is needed. However, here is a perfect example of where there is enough science to say that these materials should not be used”, says Dr. Lennquist.
“And then here Internet of BioNano Things - this are for the health applications. I did also research on that for the last 15 years; Bio nano scale machines, but these are for the injecting into the body and always monitoring the health problems.
And that is also going really well with these Covid vaccines. It’s going that direction. These mRNAs are nothing than small scale nanoscale machines. They are programed and they are injected.
After 24 h, besides being present in the olfactory bulbs, trace quantities of us-GO translocated to more distant structures, such as the cortex, striatum, hippocampus, midbrain, cerebellum, and the pons and medulla.
GRAPHENE FAMILY NANOPARTICLES can be delivered into bodies by intratracheal instillation, oral administration, intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection and subcutaneous injection. GFNs can induce acute and chronic injuries in tissues by penetrating through the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier, and blood-placenta barrier etc. and accumulating in the lung, liver, and spleen etc. For example, some graphene nanomaterials aerosols can be inhaled and substantial deposition in the respiratory tract, and they can easily penetrate through the tracheobronchial airways and then transit down to the lower lung airways, resulting in the subsequent formation of granulomas, lung fibrosis and adverse health effects to exposed persons.
In addition, several typical mechanisms underlying GFN toxicity have been revealed, for instance, physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis.
While Martina Vijver, a professor of toxicology at the Leiden University, states that the nanoparticles are the new asbestos, they are actually used as therapeutics!!!
Nanotechnology has emerged as one of the most promising technologies on account of its ability to deal with viral diseases in an effective manner, addressing the limitations of traditional antiviral medicines.
The initial part of the paper focuses on some important proteins of influenza, Ebola, HIV, herpes, Zika, dengue, and corona virus and those of the host cells important for their entry and replication into the host cells. This is followed by different types of nanomaterials which have served as delivery vehicles for the antiviral drugs. It includes various lipid-based, polymer-based, lipid–polymer hybrid–based, carbon-based, inorganic metal–based, surface-modified, and stimuli-sensitive nanomaterials and their application in antiviral therapeutics. The authors also highlight newer promising treatment approaches like nanotraps, nanorobots, nanobubbles, nanofibers, nanodiamonds, nanovaccines, and mathematical modeling for the future.
In recent times, there have been outbreaks of several viral infections caused by corona virus, Nipah virus, Ebola virus, Zika virus, dengue virus, chikungunya virus and different strains of influenza virus—H5N1 (avian flu) and H1N1 and H3N2 (swine flu).
Application of nanotechnology in antiviral therapeutics
With the advent of nanotechnology, it has been possible to comprehend the cellular mechanisms of the living cells and to develop relevant technologies which facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of various viral infections
Lipid nanoparticles for siRNA delivery
Polymer-based nanoformulations
Polymer drug conjugates
Dendrimers
Antimicrobial peptides with antiviral activities
Carbon-based nanoformulation - Carbon-based nanoformulations are comprise of carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide nanoparticles, and fullerenes.
Carbon nanotubes - Though CNTs are widely explored for delivering chemotherapeutic agents at the target site, their overall application in the biomedical field is limited due to pulmonary toxicity and high hydrophobicity [160]. The proposed mechanisms for toxicity are uptaken by macrophages with subsequent generation of ROS and inflammatory mediators.
CNTs were considered to be good candidates for vaccine delivery [164].
Further, functionalized CNTs were used for the transport of peptides (such as foot-and-mouth virus peptide) for vaccination [165].
Graphene - One of the most promising carbon-based nanomaterials with great potential for antiviral application is graphene.
Graphene (G) is a two-dimensional (2-D) planar sheet of hexagonally arranged sp2-hybridized carbon atoms obtained from its three-dimensional (3-D) material of graphite [166]. It is chemically oxidized to graphene oxide (GO) to acquire oxygen bearing functional groups like hydroxyl, epoxide, and carboxylic acids [167]. Graphene-based nanomaterials (GBNs) have high surface area, high loading capacity, and superior mechanical strength which make them attractive candidates for carrying antiviral agents [168]. The oxygen-containing functional groups allow surface functionalization and conjugation strategies and show biocompatibility, reduced toxicity, and good dispersibility [169].
Recently, Pokhrel et al. studied the interactions between graphene and VP40 (viral matrix protein) of Ebola virus using molecular dynamics simulations and graphene pelleting assay.
They proposed the use of graphene-based nanoparticle solutions as disinfectant to prevent the Ebola epidemic [172].
In another study, 18 sulfonated magnetic nanoparticles were anchored onto reduced graphene oxide (SMRGO) sheets and used to trap and destroy HSV-1 photothermally, upon their irradiation with near-infrared light. It was found to be effective against 28 viral infections including HSV. It was found that SMRGO has higher entrapment efficiencies in comparison to magnetic nanoparticles due to increased entrapping efficiency, larger surface area, unique sheet-like structure, and outstanding photothermal characteristics shown by graphene [173].
Fullerenes
Fullerenes are among the first discoveries in symmetric carbon nanostructures and have received considerable attention in the case of antiviral research. Fullerenes are comprised fully of carbon atoms forming a nanosized caged hollow sphere. Buckminster fullerene (C60), also known as buckyball, is the most common form of fullerenes with 60 carbon atoms arranged in a spherical structure showing high symmetry [174].
Few studies aimed at screening fullerene derivatives for anti-influenza activity.
Inorganic-based nanoformulations
Quantum dots (QDs) (2–10 nm) are semiconductor nanocrystals having the shape of dots.
They are comprised of a semiconductor core, overcoated by a shell, and a cap leading to improved solubility in aqueous buffers [190]. Fundamental semiconducting character and unique optical and electronic properties are attributed to the presence of the inorganic core consisting of semiconducting materials like silicon, cadmium selenide, cadmium sulfide, or indium arsenide [191]. Quantum dots find interesting applications in biomedical imaging due to its limited light scattering, narrow emission bands, and low tissue penetration. Quantum dots have been widely explored as theranostic platforms for simultaneous sensing, imaging, and therapy [192]. The advantages of quantum dots as a drug carrier system include improved bioavailability and stability of drugs, increased circulation times, active targeting, and localized therapy. In addition to this, QDs can be surface modified with targeting ligands [193, 194].
Metal and metal oxide nanoparticles have been widely explored for their antiviral activity. Among the various metal nanoparticles showing high efficacy are silver and gold, and among the various metal oxides are CuO, SiO2, TiO2, and CeO2. These nanoparticles have shown great efficacy against a broad spectrum of viruses like influenza (H3N2 and H1N1), HBV, HSV, HIV-1, HSV, dengue virus type-2, foot-and-mouth disease virus, and vesicular stomatitis virus [196].
Lipid–polymer hybrid nanoformulations
Nanovaccines
Nanotechnological approaches currently under investigation against SARS-CoV2
The majority of these patents are on diagnostic technology followed by RNAi therapeutics, vaccines, and nanomaterial-based filters [292]. (!!!!!)
ALL THESE "PANDEMICS" ARE NANO TECHNOLOGY TOXICITY PANDEMICS.
PCR INSTILLS THESE NANO PARTICLES VIA OLFACTORY AND CRANIAL NERVE IN THE BRAIN
I made this comment in response to a previous 'stack by someone, maybe even you, Joel, but it bears repeating. There WAS a pandemic. A pandemic is a political designation delivered by the WHO, period. They can declare it whenever they like, assuming some set of guidelines which they also control, and that declaration has repercussions worldwide. What you are stating, and what Denis is stating--and with which I agree wholeheartedly--is that the declaration of "a pandemic" was more about politics and control than about safety and the threat of death due to a "novel" virus. That much is absolute fact. However, and this is something else I said, repeatedly, throughout what I have been calling The Great Covid Dumpster Fire, this was NEVER, EVER, about facts and science. Bureaucrats, many of them the type of evil bastard personified by Dr. Fauci and the CEO of Pfizer, used this opportunity to enrich themselves and increase their power and reach. They took what Bad Cat would call, "the low energy path" and actually reaped benefits from it. CDC made mistake after mistake, and I am sure no one will be called to task for it. People like Hancock in UK are STILL saying they should have been more stringent in their applications of power, e.g., imposing lockdowns. Facts be damned! Unsure if this rant was helpful, but as I so often say, at least it's off my chest.
Yes, but that doesn't mean publishing the facts and revealing the truth is not important. I take solace in the truth even if it is just for me. If others benefit too then that's even better. The "fact" that the majority never will is something that I am resigned to.
Much of the 2020 swindle rested on a foundation laid by the WHO in 2009, when they revised the criteria for evoking the Powerful Magic Words "Phase 6 Pandemic™", which in the case of many (most?) nations, both opens the funding floodgates and raises the indemnity shields, as provided for in pre-loaded contracts between the nations and their pharma partners.
Here's a choice quote from an enlightening 2010 piece in Der Spiegel (article linked below):
"In fact, the vast majority of experts on epidemics automatically associate the term "pandemic" with truly aggressive viruses. On the WHO Web site, the answer to the question "What is a pandemic?" included mention of "an enormous number of deaths and cases of the disease" -- until May 4, 2009. That was when a CNN reporter pointed out the discrepancy between this description and the generally mild course of the swine flu. The language was promptly removed."
Abso-effing-lutely! The declaration of "pandemic" leads to conference of other authorities upon the politically connected and their acolytes. Spoiler Alert: organizations like the WHO are largely a scam and pretty much have always been such. They are just getting better and better at monetizing that scam. #GetsBumpyFromHere
Hi Fabian, I am in Australia. Our borders were closed to non residents/citizens in March 2020 and there was a staged reopening in November 2021. This staged re-opening occurred after we reached the target of vaccinating 95% of the population with 2 doses.
The vaccine rollout first began with health workers in March 2021. The rollout for the public began July 2021. There was a mad push with mandates to reach the 95% target prior to re-opening international and interstate borders.
NSW went into lockdown in August 2021 due to an outbreak. Lockdown ended for the vaccinated 11 October 2021 - "freedom day"! Of course cases then began to soar as the "protected vaccinated" people began mingling. Bless them, they were all in shock when they caught Covid after going to "safe" venues that only allowed the fully vaccinated in with their vax passports to ensure they didn't mingle with the dirty unvaccinated sewer rats.
The unvaccinated were finally allowed out of lockdown a few days before Christmas 2021. By lockdown I mean that we were unable to travel more than 10kms from our home and we were only allowed to go to an essential service such as a grocery store.
It's just heart wrenching what happened to your society. Even worse to what happened in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. But at least you've got a resistance movement now that isn't all "doom and gloom". We don't.
You'd need the data. Maybe that Aussie politician could assist, Malcom Roberts is his name? Whether he is truly for the people I really couldn't say anymore as I've only recently learned about how the world really works and new vocab like shill, controlled op, false flag, limited hang out etc!
Western Australia had closed borders including the one with E. Aus. They had just a handful of cases till after they started vaxxing. Likewise New Zealand where I seem to recall 20 deaths.
In case you didn't take the time to understand all that, here is the essence of it:
The number of sequenced patient samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 per population count was almost exactly the same between the USA and Australia throughout 2020.
Boom!
This comes as an absolute shock to me btw. I have to digest this. It changes everything I thought I knew.
There were 18,524 sequenced patient samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 in 2020.
In the USA there were 235,687 sequenced samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 in 2020.
If you multiply that by the population ratio you get...
18,243
So the rate of sequenced samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 per population is actually slightly lower in the USA! (98.5% compared to Australia)
In the USA the pre-vaccine ratio between sequenced samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 and cases was around 85:1. (slightly over 20mio cases in 2020 per 235,687 SC2-positive sequenced samples)
Yet Australia only registered 28,425 cases throughout 2020, resulting in a ratio of 1.5:1.
My family members that died months before any vaccine was in development. Another was a 17 yo high school athlete contracted SARS/Cov2, and died of heart failure within a week of diagnosis. He didn't have pneumonia, so no ventilator was used in his treatment plan. Since at the time of these deaths no vaccine was in development, your assertion is they died from from mass hysteria or time traveling vaccinations.
Human trials on SARS/Cov2 vaccines did not start until July 2020 and ended in Jan 2021. That was Pfizer and BioNTech. Mass vaccination programs Started in Jan 2021, not in March 2020 as you stated. The millions of deaths from COVID symptoms before Jan 2021 can only be attributed to the SARS/Cov2 virus.
These are the facts: there is a genetic disposition to symptom severity from the SARS/Cov2 virus. If the disposition becomes is active or becomes active due to epigenetic influences, there was and still is nothing anyone can do to save that life. The vaccine and other mitigations only delayed the enviable deaths. Yes, a political response, to keep 3% of the population from dying in a few months and having millions of bodies; parents, children, in-laws, cousins, aunts and uncles burned en masse in pyres at city parks, town squares, vacant lots, farms and garbage incinerators.
Ignorance, sheer stupidity and listening to empty headed morons that think they know how to interpret VAERS data, move a small population of easily swayed people with an inane fear of lost control over their destiny. These are the morons that exploit other's fears and move them farther and farther from the truth.
That 1918 H1N1 virus was killing people well into the late 1930s as people aged, much like how the elderly are susceptible to new strains and variants of other viruses and influenzas. That 1918 virus is still in the population. We are the survivors, the ones that have an immunity to that strain. Normal healthy people don't often die from bacterial infections unless their immune system is compromised. Anyone with a basic understanding of infectious disease and epidemiology knows this fact. 1918 H1N1 decimated peoples' immune systems and left them susceptible to secondary infection, much like how influenzas killed our aged populations today.
You are wrong about mRNA vaccines, and wrong about vaccinated people spreading disease. The people that died from the SARS/Cov2 virus and side effects from vaccines were already dead. They are dead because we cannot save them, we didn't know how.
People with a genetic disposition towards symptom severity, ones that will die in the future from SARS/Cov2 virus and vaccine side effects are ,again, already dead because we don't know how to save them. They, and you, just don't know they will be dead from COVID symptoms.
The question "allow the 10s of millions to die quickly or is it more cruel to delay the inevitable and allow the susceptible to spend time with their families, make a living for a short while, contribute to society by allowing them to die over time ?"
Look at the anti-vaccers that died from SARS/Cov2 virus. They weren't jabbed, and they are all still just as dead as the jabbed who were susceptible to severe symptoms.
You should feel lucky and grateful that little genetic switch in you hasn't been flipped on, yet. If it does turn on in the near future, you will suffer the same fate as my family members and unfortunately today there is nothing anyone can do to save you.
Yes you are right on most of what you say. I just had doubts for a while there, due to glitches in the data, which I now all chalk up to typos. The entire cover-up around early delta and omicron sightings is a cover-up of the agencies' sloppiness nothing else.
Invalidating my suspicions was quite a relief, because virology makes perfect sense again now.
However:
- Human trials of BNT162b1 started on April 23rd 2020 in Germany.
- Freshly vaccinated people did spread the disease and I will provide strong evidence for this. Transmission was INCREASED in case of an early post-vaccination infection or an infection at the time of vaccination. I have been busy with the US data for 6 months now. Just wait. There is not a doubt in my mind about this anymore at this point. If you want to catch a glimpse look at my latest notes.
Regarding the dangerousness of the virus: I am not denying that and I am very tired of people downplaying it. So you are kinda barking up the wrong tree there, but I can see how my post might've given off the impression of this being adequate.
VAERS is grossly misinterpreted. I have a proper VAERS analysis up on my website https://pervaers.com btw. This to me is the gold standard of creating safety profiles from post-approval data (spontaneous reports).
The worst part about sloppy VAERS analysis is that people never discriminate between breakthrough reports and regular AE reports. Deaths that occur in specific batches in large numbers are breakthrough reports. Batches were distributed during different times of the pandemic and hence have a very different proportion of breakthrough reports. Especially those administered during Delta have a very large number of breakthrough reports with outcome death registered.
Thank you for the reply. I really like your VAERS tracking website !! It led me to your substack :)
Admittedly, I'm a bit tired and highly sensitive to downplayed narratives about CoV2 impotence. I just barely made it through Feb 2020 and never fully recovered. Other family members weren't so lucky. So yeah, I'm knowingly and unapologetically a bit sensitive.
I'll share a bit... When defining the policies and procedures surrounding COVID clinical data collection, we found substantial, alternate interpretation of instructions and classifications. Not all cultures, political policies, or individuals interpret terms and actions the same way. Which, leads to unpredicted variation in analytic outcomes and interpretation. VAERS data is no exception.
One interesting artifact of covid reporting was the large increase in cases each Monday. That issue was caused by the data processing and reporting process. Data from end of business Friday and over the weekend were batched until Monday. We can all agree batch reports require careful scrutiny.
VAERS is only an indicator, think of it as an adverse symptom with an underlying cause. It's not good enough to say certain manufactures and batches are more deadly than others and allowing readers to draw invalid conclusions, although strong emotional responses from readers are good for recurring site visits and participation..
What bothers me about VAERS detail is misinterpretation. In some cases, adverse events 'could' simply be a cluster phenomenon. Areas may have similar DNA profiles caused by familiar and/or common, environmental epigenetic influencing factors creating unrecognized/unaccounted immunotypes. And, then again it could be some minor variation in the manufacturing process, i.e. ingredients chirality (physical shape of the molecules). Funding research studying underlying cause of events will become increasing important as mRNA vaccines become more common.
Agreed, infection rates of certain SARS/CoV2 variants did increase after vaccination programs were initiated. Conversely, transmission of other variants decreased. This is relationship is merely a correlation, not an indication of causality. Variant success had little if nothing to do with vaccines. The vaccine not the issue pertaining to containing SARS/CoV2 spread, it is the human immune system. The virus reproduced at a rate that greatly exceeded the tempo of immune response. Response delay allows pathogens to reproduced unchecked, significantly increasing viral loads in a short period of time.
Virus success is based on 1) virus kinetics (number reproduced per infected cell and shorter incubation period) and, 2) efficacy penetrating host cells. Virus shedding is directly proportion to the host's viral load. Some variants displaced others though improved success. The faster reproducing variants displaced the slower reproducing variants. The original variant started shedding after 4.6-6.7 days. Delta between 3.7-4 days and BA.1 between 3-3.4 days. Even apparently small changes in shedding profiles seemed to significantly effect success. (arbitrary interpretation of the term small)
I'm not sure where the narrative started that vaccines halt virus proliferation, but it's an incorrect premise. Vaccines are not indented to halt virus proliferation. Vaccines are only intended to hasten a person's immune response to minimize deadly symptoms. Quickened immune response slows infection rates by minimizing viral loads, and subsequent amounts and time window of virus shed. Reduced infection rates are side-effect of faster immune response.
Indeed, the jabs were not released to the public until December 2020 or even later, depending on the brand and country, but they were first created many months earlier, so by March 2020 was probably when the clinical trials began in earnest. If enough participants turned into superspreaders of whatever it was, that would have been enough to seed an outbreak even before the general public was jabbed.
Note that every single new scariant originated in a country where significant clinical trials of jabs were taking place, with the possible lone exception of Gamma in Manaus, Brazil (IF that's where it really originated).
Interesting indeed. And even Omicron was supposedly much older than they claim as well. Like Delta, it was taken from the reject pile, albeit a different reject pile shortly afterward.
I have completely lost my trust in the medical community. I was seeing a doctor here in Calgary for an upcoming hernia operation. (March 2021.) He was angry at me for not being vaccinated and told me that his daughter was a nurse at one of the local hospitals and that the "body bags were piling up". His nurse then proceeded to grill me as well, and when I told her about Drs. Malone and Vanden Bossche's theories about mass vaccination during a pandemic, she told me that she was no longer interested in talking to me and to wear an N-95 mask.
Jun 28, 2023·edited Jun 28, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley
Exactly my conclusions having looked at the Scottish data since 2020. No pandemic. All funeral data from the 32 councils shows only 950 more funerals than average in 2020 yet they were reporting 6,000 COVID deaths. All cause mortality increases post jab 2021-2022 and into 2023 excess deaths are now DOUBLE 2021 and TREBLE 2022 rates.
I remain convinced that in late 2019/early 2020 there was a circulating virus, at least somewhat novel, that was relatively lethal to those who were in very poor metabolic health (i.e. had months to live, whether they knew it or not).
There most certainly was a PANdemIC, caused by governments' reactions to the virus, abandoning best practices and advocating known ineffective or inappropriate measures.
There most certainly was a PLANdemic, though I am not sure how much of the plan was well-laid pre-2020 and how much was an opportunistic capitalization on the the circulating virus.
Thank-you for sharing and to all of those who reposted it appreciated. My wish is that more people realized that things are not what they seem. That as a person, you have choices. The National Citizens Inquiry is doing a great job to get the word out. Something that was truly under wraps in Canada, like in many other countries. I appreciate all the empirical (real) data and all the personal stories shared. May the truth be told.
We need to consider the possibility that these countermeasures/bioweapons are being given to people by the disguise of common flu shots. The authorities have been discovered to be enormous liars about so much that I wouldn't put it past them.
Simple and concise, well done. Just shared on LinkedIn, where C Level execs will excoriate me for my "conspiracist pureblooded psychosis" as their brain fog and myocarditis wipes them out 20 years early.
Hail Victory! And, schadenfreude! I honestly smile, at each quad jabbed obituary!
I pulled down my LinkedIn profile and deleted my account after Robert Malone was censored. Amazingly, despite doing that years ago, I still continue to get job inquiries from LinkedIn related connections, leading me to believe they have NOT deleted my info as requested. I wonder if that can be the basis of a lawsuit? (It was used against the Ashley Madison web site, following their embarrassing breach a few years back.)
I changed the settings in LinkedIn to zero notifications, twice! I am still getting job notices. Would there be the possibility of a class-action lawsuit here?
Lots of corruption available here. Not in order, but among that corruption is major media control, faulty testing practices, data obfuscation and perhaps worst is Government incentivized treatment protocols designed to sell more toxins and to kill the patients. As stated by Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, faith is the currency of the medical system. Currently that system is broke.
Yes!!!! Brilliant accurate list! I have been particular ranting about number 4 on your list since the beginning and have only found one person before this who agreed.. Now I know two people who agree.
Thank you, Allen! But, if you come to this conclusion, after years of diligent investigation, exploring all possible hypotheses, it carries more weight?!
You are very welcome. I've been doing exactly that for much longer and in much greater detail than Mr. Rancourt in fact.
The problem comes with the veil of "expertise" and of course it certainly is time-consuming to sort through the flotsam and jetsam.
I cut my teeth on the massive amount of corruption and profiteering and Pharma con jobs back in 2005 with the Avian Flu hoax. They tried the same con, with mostly the same cast of characters, in 2009/10 with the Swine Flu hoax.
I spent a lot of time in both instances trying to alert people throughout the community to the realities of these frauds. Each time there was tremendous push back followed by acknowledgement that these were indeed scams. However it seems that there is a bizarre psychotic thirst for this hysteria in our present culture as after each fraud was proven it only needed a few years passing for these very same folks to become ready to accept a new fraud.
Once you have explored the details of these frauds it is easy to identify the scam as it is happening.
The playbook is pretty much the same, they simply refine the techniques. Not so easy to convince others of the scam as they are bombarded with fear porn 24/7.
I have to say that the "messaging" was far more comprehensive, insidious and sophisticated with Operation Covidius than all others before by quantum leaps.
That and they produced the cadavers this time through an array of medical democides (remdesivir, neglect, midazolam, ventilators, etc.) which solidified the fear mechanisms in the masses.
What happened in 2020 was simply that the flu was re-branded and repurposed- the term "Covid-19" was invented to turn the seasonal virus into the equivalent of the mythical “Al-Qaeda” to terrorize the population with yet another media constructed boogeyman.
The Virus™ is superfluous, just like the Swine Flu scamdemic of 2009. All they needed to do was create the perception of a pandemic/mass panic with staged Hollywood productions, doomsday models, and the fraudulent PCR test to manufacture the cases/falsely attributed as “Covid deaths.”
From there use the newly minted "nudge units" and "insight teams" and the swarming social media beehives to catapult the fear across the globe in nanoseconds.
So, Allen, I too have been going down multiple rabbit holes daily for the last 3+ years. I agree with you on many elements above, I've read Virus Mania, Turtles, Illusions, The Real Fauci, State of Fear etc + substacks, videos, podcasts, films etc - It has become my life. I remain unvaxxed!!
BUT I am still stuck on one point: if viruses don't exist (I don't know...) WHAT was the US spending $$ millions on in Wuhan (and elsewhere, like Ukraine)? Fauci certainly believes he is responsible because he tried to cover his ass. What was making people initially sick? Medics said it wasn't normal flu.
Perhaps what they really were doing in the Wuhan lab was making the bioweapon vaccine.
The globalist's most important thing is maintaining the control of the narrative. They maintain control of the narrative through presenting two false ideas (lab leak and natural virus). And the simple people think one or the other must be true. But in realty neither are true. It's used to distract our attention from what's really going on.
What happened in Lombardia - I'm an American living in northern Italy. What happened in Italy is that not all of Italy was hit by the "virus", and not even the whole of northern Italy, where 3/4 of all deaths occurred. The epicentre of the covid virus was in Lombardia which accounts for 2/3 of all the victims. Why there? Well, in January, 2020, Lombardy implemented a major vaccination campaign against meningococcus, following a mini epidemic of bacterial meningitis that affected just 6 people (with 2 deaths). The regional authorities decided on a massive and free-of-charge vaccination of the whole population. Within a few weeks, more than 33,000 people were vaccinated in Lombardy.
Within two months, Lombardy was experiencing the majority of "covid" deaths and was the first area of a Western country that was locked-down.
Could it be that the meningitis vaccine in Lombardy (and even the 2019 flu vaccine given in Western countries) caused these "covid" deaths? Or made those injected more vulnerable to getting "covid"? The Lombardy epicentre of "covid" deaths and the timing of the meningitis vaccine seems to show correlation. Another point is that the 2019 flu vaccine, which the majority of people over 65 take, was the largest group dying from "covid" in 2020.
Cathleen, That is very interesting; thank you for taking the trouble.
All I've read about northern Italy is that it has an older, sicker population and lots of Chinese come over to work there, so they could have spread 'it' (whatever 'it' is).
The patents for the vaccines were allegedly filed in US way before the start of the scamdemic, so who knows. And the flu all but disappeared for two + years too. And apparently victims in Italy were literally just left to die. Few were tested or confirmed.
I'm reading a Dr Mark Bailey (from NZ) essay on Goodbye To Virology: he doesn't believe there was any virus; it's all down to false testing and murderous protocols.
actually, the majority of elderly Italians are pretty healthy - (it's the wine and food :-) Those sick in hospitals and nursing homew with other aliments weren't treated for their aliments they had (cancer, high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes) and were left alone to die (then counted as a covid19 death). The National Health Institute in Italy recalculated the Covid death toll since February 2020. It was 130,468. Now it thinks only 3,783 were directly due to COVID-19 ~3% of the total.
Yes, Dr. David Martin and Karen Kingston has talked about the patents filed.
I also thought it was the Chinese workers in the garment industry in Milan, but there is also a large garment industry with Chinese workers in Tuscany (leather goods) and no virus outbreak there. So....?
I'm no authority on these things, but this matches well with what I was able to cobble together from a variety of sources during the first couple of months or so of the declared "pandemic" in 2020. I knew enough about the immune system to find the "novel virus" claim unbelievable from the start and I began to investigate. I remember coming across a research report that described experiments involving PCR and cycle thresholds (CTs). I already knew about PCR, but not about PCR "tests" and CTs, and oh what a discovery once I understood how PCR was being used.
Once I understood that, I began following the local PCR-based "case" statistics and noticing that there was no epidemic in my county in California, at any time. Just media-inspired hysteria, and all the harm caused by the "lockdown" and school closures.
It took considerably longer to piece together what was happening in the hospitals and care homes, perhaps because it was almost beyond belief. Warning anyone about any of this was nearly impossible, between online censorship and people's gullibility, and my worldview changed for good. I did get through in time to a couple of people close to me.
I realize that most people wouldn't have had the background in biology that I have (high-level only, but enough to see what was happening), and unless they were (left) unemployed, they wouldn't have had the time. I also avoid commercial news media like the plague, and have for years, relying upon alternative sources and not expecting it all to be "free", and I usually recognize gaslighting when I see it. The media gaslighting was over the top and easy to identify, but I had to learn about the full extent of medical gaslighting, another major discovery.
I am semi-retired, working part time still as a consultant, and I paused my work for four months in 2020 to just do research and study relevant topics in biology and other fields. It was apparent that the perpetrators understood the limitations that the general public would have, and leveraged them to full advantage.
As a humble normal working in person I can only report on what I’ve seen and experienced.
I work in a chippy, here in the U.K. I was classed as an essential worker when lockdown was announced, have to say I was slightly baffled to how takeaway places were classed as essential in the midst of the plague we were about to endure.
Have to say working was better than sitting at home as it gave me an eye view of what was really going on and it didn’t tally with anything being pumped out of the tv 24/7.
I have to say I was honestly sceptical from the word go and within a couple of weeks my suspicions were confirmed by a neighbour who worked on the covid ward at the local hospital.
Being the typical nosey Yorkshire twat I am I wondered out on seal night to see who was stupid enough to fall for the manipulation tactics.I spotted my neighbour and made a beeline for her asking how she was going working with so many seriously ill people.
That night she stood there and confirmed my suspicions in one short sentence.
The daily updates had informed us that even if you had this deadly disease, there was no immunity and you could catch it again, thus sending the public into a panic.
What my neighbour told me contradicted everything they were pumping out to the public. She said they got to see people at their worst and their best when, wait for it… they came back out of icu onto the covid ward to recover before being discharged home.
So there you have it the disease that was promoted as the most deadly infectious disease to man, had hospitals bring the most vulnerable back from icu to either finish them off, or they’d created immunity to it that was told to be none existent.
As someone who was working in a cash only business at the time, serving hundreds of people a week, just like my other eight co workers not one of us caught the lurgy until August of 2021
How could this be?
I’d already said to some of my colleagues pre lockdown, that if it really was that infectious it would have swept through all of us without knowing having so much contact with the public. This would have happened well before they even announced anything, as none of us had been ill, I stated the other option of it not been as infectious as we were told.
Working with the public gives you a huge source of information, all the information I heard ,saw myself through work, friends and family actually highlighted perspectives and perceptions.
I worked, my hubby didn’t, he bought the whole pandemic concept with being held away from viewing the real world, instead he watch the force fed garbage.
I would actually mock and ridicule how brave they all were, potentially sacrificing their health and lives to keep us updated.
I couldn’t stomach watching their downright lies and manipulation, every single one of them needs prosecuting for the harm they’ve caused.
PINO (Pandemic In Name Only).
It is a "pandemic" of nanotechnology toxicity poisoning:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/thats-what-covid-is
“A recent study of particular objects known as "nanotubes," revered for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity, demonstrated that such objects tend to clump within the lungs, causing suffocation.”
https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1119251 Is Nanotechnology Prohibited by the Biological and Chemical Weapons Conventions
“Take the experience of researchers at DuPont, who are testing microscopic tubes of carbon, known as nanotubes, valued for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity.
When the researchers injected nanotubes into the lungs of rats in the summer of 2002, the animals unexpectedly began gasping for breath. Fifteen percent of them quickly died. ''It was the highest death rate we had ever seen,''
said David B. Warheit, the research leader, who began his career studying asbestos and has been testing the pulmonary effects of various chemicals for DuPont since 1984.
Research shows that nanoparticles deposited in the nose can make their way directly into the brain.
“[in 2015] Günter Oberdörster and co-authors published what is possibly the most comprehensive review of carbon nanotube toxicology studies to date. Focusing on inhalation of nanotubes, they document evidence of transient pulmonary inflammation, and rapid and persistent development of granulomatous lesions and interstitial fibrosis on exposure to single- and multiwalled carbon nanotubes in rodents. They cite data indicating that inhaled long and thin multiwalled carbon nanotubes can move to the lining surrounding the lungs and penetrate it, where they can potentially cause mesothelioma. Furthermore, the authors indicate that carbon nanotubes can act as a cancer promoter — with inhalation increasing the probability of developing lung cancer from exposure to other carcinogens.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706753/ INHALATION EXPOSURE TO CARBON NANOTUBES (CNT) AND CARBON NANOFIBERS (CNF): METHODOLOGY AND DOSIMETRY - PMC (nih.gov)
Li et al. (2007a) compared the pulmonary response of mice exposed to purified MWCNT by IT instillation versus inhalation.
Intratracheal instillation produced inflammation and severe destruction of alveolar structures, while inhalation predominately resulted in moderate pathology consisting of alveolar wall thickening and cell proliferation but general alveolar structure was retained. This study demonstrated significant differences in the type and degree of pulmonary responses to MWCNT in mice between bolus-type IT instillation and inhalation, with higher doses deposited in lung by inhalation resulting in only moderate effects compared to severe lesions induced by instillation of lower doses. (!!!!!) - SO-CALLED "PCR TEST"...
https://chemsec.org/new-chemicals-on-the-sin-list-challenge-the-global-supply-chain/
ChemSec announced the addition of carbon nanotubes to the SIN (‘Substitute It Now’) list1. Carbon nanotubes were added as an entire material class that “should be restricted or banned in the EU.”
The SIN List now includes carbon nanotubes, one of the more well-studied nanomaterials. First engineered in the 1990s, they are used to make durable, lightweight materials, for electrical conductivity, as a super black pigment and for water purification, among other uses.
“Several studies have shown that carbon nanotubes cause lung cancer. The small tubes induce inflammation in a somewhat similar way to asbestos. Reprotoxic properties have also been observed. Up until now, the debate about the safety of nano has focused on the fact that more research is needed. However, here is a perfect example of where there is enough science to say that these materials should not be used”, says Dr. Lennquist.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/can-toxic-substances-be-mandated
https://outraged.substack.com/p/causes-of-injuries-and-deaths-from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577996/ Carbon nanotubes in COVID-19: A critical review and prospects
The utility of Carbon nanotubes in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19.
- carbon nanotubes (CNTs) face mask filters and respirator filters (https://www.graphene-info.com/israeli-researchers-develop-graphene-based-self-sterilizing-air-filter, https://www.embs.org/pulse/articles/versatile-graphene-underlies-new-covid-zapping-air-filter/, https://medium.com/edge-of-innovation/how-safe-are-graphene-based-face-masks-b88740547e8c, https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=38205)
- carbon nanotubes (CNTs) personal protective equipment
- nanomaterial-based biosensors, including PCR tests (https://news.mit.edu/2021/carbon-nanotube-covid-detect-1026, https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5892, https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=37676, https://www.nsmedicaldevices.com/news/graphene-sensor-covid-19-test/,https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5892)
- drugs and "vaccines"
tps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7993985/ Recent advances in carbon nanomaterials for biomedical applications: A review
https://outraged.substack.com/p/mrnas-are-nanoscale-machines-they
“And then here Internet of BioNano Things - this are for the health applications. I did also research on that for the last 15 years; Bio nano scale machines, but these are for the injecting into the body and always monitoring the health problems.
And that is also going really well with these Covid vaccines. It’s going that direction. These mRNAs are nothing than small scale nanoscale machines. They are programed and they are injected.
And then Internet of Nano scale Things.
Those would be a part of 7 G and beyond.”
PCR "test"... NANO TECHNOLOGY instillation
Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets - ScienceDirect https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386420301879
After 24 h, besides being present in the olfactory bulbs, trace quantities of us-GO translocated to more distant structures, such as the cortex, striatum, hippocampus, midbrain, cerebellum, and the pons and medulla.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/nanotechnology-based-therapeutics
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00012/full - Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells
How to Reach the Brain: G-Based Nanocarriers and the Blood-Brain Barrier
Graphene based PCR test:
https://www.nsmedicaldevices.com/news/graphene-sensor-covid-19-test/
https://www.medgadget.com/2021/06/graphene-sensor-for-rapid-covid-19-detection.html
https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/sona-nanotech-withdraws-rapid-covid-19-antigen-test-application-based-on-feedback
https://phys.org/news/2020-08-graphene-oxide-based-rapid-infections.html
https://www.biospace.com/article/new-graphene-chemo-phononic-test-for-sars-cov-2-may-challenge-pcr-assays/
https://www.grapheneuses.org/graphene-sensor/
https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=37676
https://outraged.substack.com/p/can-toxic-substances-be-mandated
GRAPHENE FAMILY NANOPARTICLES can be delivered into bodies by intratracheal instillation, oral administration, intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection and subcutaneous injection. GFNs can induce acute and chronic injuries in tissues by penetrating through the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier, and blood-placenta barrier etc. and accumulating in the lung, liver, and spleen etc. For example, some graphene nanomaterials aerosols can be inhaled and substantial deposition in the respiratory tract, and they can easily penetrate through the tracheobronchial airways and then transit down to the lower lung airways, resulting in the subsequent formation of granulomas, lung fibrosis and adverse health effects to exposed persons.
In addition, several typical mechanisms underlying GFN toxicity have been revealed, for instance, physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis.
While Martina Vijver, a professor of toxicology at the Leiden University, states that the nanoparticles are the new asbestos, they are actually used as therapeutics!!!
https://www.plastichealthcoalition.org/latest-news/nano-should-be-the-new-asbestos/
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13346-020-00818-0 Nanotechnology-based antiviral therapeutics | SpringerLink Published: 03 August 2020
Nanotechnology has emerged as one of the most promising technologies on account of its ability to deal with viral diseases in an effective manner, addressing the limitations of traditional antiviral medicines.
The initial part of the paper focuses on some important proteins of influenza, Ebola, HIV, herpes, Zika, dengue, and corona virus and those of the host cells important for their entry and replication into the host cells. This is followed by different types of nanomaterials which have served as delivery vehicles for the antiviral drugs. It includes various lipid-based, polymer-based, lipid–polymer hybrid–based, carbon-based, inorganic metal–based, surface-modified, and stimuli-sensitive nanomaterials and their application in antiviral therapeutics. The authors also highlight newer promising treatment approaches like nanotraps, nanorobots, nanobubbles, nanofibers, nanodiamonds, nanovaccines, and mathematical modeling for the future.
In recent times, there have been outbreaks of several viral infections caused by corona virus, Nipah virus, Ebola virus, Zika virus, dengue virus, chikungunya virus and different strains of influenza virus—H5N1 (avian flu) and H1N1 and H3N2 (swine flu).
Application of nanotechnology in antiviral therapeutics
With the advent of nanotechnology, it has been possible to comprehend the cellular mechanisms of the living cells and to develop relevant technologies which facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of various viral infections
Lipid nanoparticles for siRNA delivery
Polymer-based nanoformulations
Polymer drug conjugates
Dendrimers
Antimicrobial peptides with antiviral activities
Carbon-based nanoformulation - Carbon-based nanoformulations are comprise of carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide nanoparticles, and fullerenes.
Carbon nanotubes - Though CNTs are widely explored for delivering chemotherapeutic agents at the target site, their overall application in the biomedical field is limited due to pulmonary toxicity and high hydrophobicity [160]. The proposed mechanisms for toxicity are uptaken by macrophages with subsequent generation of ROS and inflammatory mediators.
CNTs were considered to be good candidates for vaccine delivery [164].
Further, functionalized CNTs were used for the transport of peptides (such as foot-and-mouth virus peptide) for vaccination [165].
Graphene - One of the most promising carbon-based nanomaterials with great potential for antiviral application is graphene.
Graphene (G) is a two-dimensional (2-D) planar sheet of hexagonally arranged sp2-hybridized carbon atoms obtained from its three-dimensional (3-D) material of graphite [166]. It is chemically oxidized to graphene oxide (GO) to acquire oxygen bearing functional groups like hydroxyl, epoxide, and carboxylic acids [167]. Graphene-based nanomaterials (GBNs) have high surface area, high loading capacity, and superior mechanical strength which make them attractive candidates for carrying antiviral agents [168]. The oxygen-containing functional groups allow surface functionalization and conjugation strategies and show biocompatibility, reduced toxicity, and good dispersibility [169].
Recently, Pokhrel et al. studied the interactions between graphene and VP40 (viral matrix protein) of Ebola virus using molecular dynamics simulations and graphene pelleting assay.
They proposed the use of graphene-based nanoparticle solutions as disinfectant to prevent the Ebola epidemic [172].
In another study, 18 sulfonated magnetic nanoparticles were anchored onto reduced graphene oxide (SMRGO) sheets and used to trap and destroy HSV-1 photothermally, upon their irradiation with near-infrared light. It was found to be effective against 28 viral infections including HSV. It was found that SMRGO has higher entrapment efficiencies in comparison to magnetic nanoparticles due to increased entrapping efficiency, larger surface area, unique sheet-like structure, and outstanding photothermal characteristics shown by graphene [173].
Fullerenes
Fullerenes are among the first discoveries in symmetric carbon nanostructures and have received considerable attention in the case of antiviral research. Fullerenes are comprised fully of carbon atoms forming a nanosized caged hollow sphere. Buckminster fullerene (C60), also known as buckyball, is the most common form of fullerenes with 60 carbon atoms arranged in a spherical structure showing high symmetry [174].
Few studies aimed at screening fullerene derivatives for anti-influenza activity.
Inorganic-based nanoformulations
Quantum dots (QDs) (2–10 nm) are semiconductor nanocrystals having the shape of dots.
They are comprised of a semiconductor core, overcoated by a shell, and a cap leading to improved solubility in aqueous buffers [190]. Fundamental semiconducting character and unique optical and electronic properties are attributed to the presence of the inorganic core consisting of semiconducting materials like silicon, cadmium selenide, cadmium sulfide, or indium arsenide [191]. Quantum dots find interesting applications in biomedical imaging due to its limited light scattering, narrow emission bands, and low tissue penetration. Quantum dots have been widely explored as theranostic platforms for simultaneous sensing, imaging, and therapy [192]. The advantages of quantum dots as a drug carrier system include improved bioavailability and stability of drugs, increased circulation times, active targeting, and localized therapy. In addition to this, QDs can be surface modified with targeting ligands [193, 194].
Metal and metal oxide nanoparticles have been widely explored for their antiviral activity. Among the various metal nanoparticles showing high efficacy are silver and gold, and among the various metal oxides are CuO, SiO2, TiO2, and CeO2. These nanoparticles have shown great efficacy against a broad spectrum of viruses like influenza (H3N2 and H1N1), HBV, HSV, HIV-1, HSV, dengue virus type-2, foot-and-mouth disease virus, and vesicular stomatitis virus [196].
Lipid–polymer hybrid nanoformulations
Nanovaccines
Nanotechnological approaches currently under investigation against SARS-CoV2
The majority of these patents are on diagnostic technology followed by RNAi therapeutics, vaccines, and nanomaterial-based filters [292]. (!!!!!)
ALL THESE "PANDEMICS" ARE NANO TECHNOLOGY TOXICITY PANDEMICS.
PCR INSTILLS THESE NANO PARTICLES VIA OLFACTORY AND CRANIAL NERVE IN THE BRAIN
I made this comment in response to a previous 'stack by someone, maybe even you, Joel, but it bears repeating. There WAS a pandemic. A pandemic is a political designation delivered by the WHO, period. They can declare it whenever they like, assuming some set of guidelines which they also control, and that declaration has repercussions worldwide. What you are stating, and what Denis is stating--and with which I agree wholeheartedly--is that the declaration of "a pandemic" was more about politics and control than about safety and the threat of death due to a "novel" virus. That much is absolute fact. However, and this is something else I said, repeatedly, throughout what I have been calling The Great Covid Dumpster Fire, this was NEVER, EVER, about facts and science. Bureaucrats, many of them the type of evil bastard personified by Dr. Fauci and the CEO of Pfizer, used this opportunity to enrich themselves and increase their power and reach. They took what Bad Cat would call, "the low energy path" and actually reaped benefits from it. CDC made mistake after mistake, and I am sure no one will be called to task for it. People like Hancock in UK are STILL saying they should have been more stringent in their applications of power, e.g., imposing lockdowns. Facts be damned! Unsure if this rant was helpful, but as I so often say, at least it's off my chest.
Yes, but that doesn't mean publishing the facts and revealing the truth is not important. I take solace in the truth even if it is just for me. If others benefit too then that's even better. The "fact" that the majority never will is something that I am resigned to.
Point taken. (And agreed!)
Well said.
Much of the 2020 swindle rested on a foundation laid by the WHO in 2009, when they revised the criteria for evoking the Powerful Magic Words "Phase 6 Pandemic™", which in the case of many (most?) nations, both opens the funding floodgates and raises the indemnity shields, as provided for in pre-loaded contracts between the nations and their pharma partners.
Here's a choice quote from an enlightening 2010 piece in Der Spiegel (article linked below):
"In fact, the vast majority of experts on epidemics automatically associate the term "pandemic" with truly aggressive viruses. On the WHO Web site, the answer to the question "What is a pandemic?" included mention of "an enormous number of deaths and cases of the disease" -- until May 4, 2009. That was when a CNN reporter pointed out the discrepancy between this description and the generally mild course of the swine flu. The language was promptly removed."
https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/reconstruction-of-a-mass-hysteria-the-swine-flu-panic-of-2009-a-682613.html
Abso-effing-lutely! The declaration of "pandemic" leads to conference of other authorities upon the politically connected and their acolytes. Spoiler Alert: organizations like the WHO are largely a scam and pretty much have always been such. They are just getting better and better at monetizing that scam. #GetsBumpyFromHere
And there goes the next collective delusion.
Show me one intensive care clinician who worked with COVID patient and agrees to this.
He is stepping right into the confirmation bias trap.
Has anyone ever considered that the vaccines actually did cause epidemics? Because that's what I see in the data.
The dying began right after the modRNA drugs were produced (March 2020).
THIS is why there is a 14 day delay until someone is considered vaccinated. The drugs turned people into infectious disease spreaders.
We are moving farther and farther from the truth.
Tragic.
They did not have any covid in Australia until after jabbing the gullible with a bioweapon.
What else changed?
Did they open borders?
I'd really like to look into that
Denis Rancourt's essay includes plenty on Australia.
I'd get primary data. The papers I've seen from Rancourt didn't convince me.
Did they open borders?
Hi Fabian, I am in Australia. Our borders were closed to non residents/citizens in March 2020 and there was a staged reopening in November 2021. This staged re-opening occurred after we reached the target of vaccinating 95% of the population with 2 doses.
The vaccine rollout first began with health workers in March 2021. The rollout for the public began July 2021. There was a mad push with mandates to reach the 95% target prior to re-opening international and interstate borders.
NSW went into lockdown in August 2021 due to an outbreak. Lockdown ended for the vaccinated 11 October 2021 - "freedom day"! Of course cases then began to soar as the "protected vaccinated" people began mingling. Bless them, they were all in shock when they caught Covid after going to "safe" venues that only allowed the fully vaccinated in with their vax passports to ensure they didn't mingle with the dirty unvaccinated sewer rats.
The unvaccinated were finally allowed out of lockdown a few days before Christmas 2021. By lockdown I mean that we were unable to travel more than 10kms from our home and we were only allowed to go to an essential service such as a grocery store.
Thank you for this excellent summary.
It's just heart wrenching what happened to your society. Even worse to what happened in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. But at least you've got a resistance movement now that isn't all "doom and gloom". We don't.
You'd need the data. Maybe that Aussie politician could assist, Malcom Roberts is his name? Whether he is truly for the people I really couldn't say anymore as I've only recently learned about how the world really works and new vocab like shill, controlled op, false flag, limited hang out etc!
Okay, I checked.
There were a number of sequenced samples that were positive for COVID-19 in Australia starting in March 2020.
OWID also lists "cases" during the same periods.
So this is simply not true.
I don't mean there were no "cases" based on fraudulent PCR tests, but there were few deaths from covid in Australia before the jabs.
Never mind whatr I said in those deleted posts. Damn OWID charts x axis labels are so awful, I misread that chart. :D
Would be very interesting to compare sequenced samples and cases for Australia, I will definitely put that on my list.
It just takes forever to download these sequences though. They are throttling accounts.
Western Australia had closed borders including the one with E. Aus. They had just a handful of cases till after they started vaxxing. Likewise New Zealand where I seem to recall 20 deaths.
In case you didn't take the time to understand all that, here is the essence of it:
The number of sequenced patient samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 per population count was almost exactly the same between the USA and Australia throughout 2020.
Boom!
This comes as an absolute shock to me btw. I have to digest this. It changes everything I thought I knew.
Not just a handful.
There were 18,524 sequenced patient samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 in 2020.
In the USA there were 235,687 sequenced samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 in 2020.
If you multiply that by the population ratio you get...
18,243
So the rate of sequenced samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 per population is actually slightly lower in the USA! (98.5% compared to Australia)
In the USA the pre-vaccine ratio between sequenced samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 and cases was around 85:1. (slightly over 20mio cases in 2020 per 235,687 SC2-positive sequenced samples)
Yet Australia only registered 28,425 cases throughout 2020, resulting in a ratio of 1.5:1.
My family members that died months before any vaccine was in development. Another was a 17 yo high school athlete contracted SARS/Cov2, and died of heart failure within a week of diagnosis. He didn't have pneumonia, so no ventilator was used in his treatment plan. Since at the time of these deaths no vaccine was in development, your assertion is they died from from mass hysteria or time traveling vaccinations.
Human trials on SARS/Cov2 vaccines did not start until July 2020 and ended in Jan 2021. That was Pfizer and BioNTech. Mass vaccination programs Started in Jan 2021, not in March 2020 as you stated. The millions of deaths from COVID symptoms before Jan 2021 can only be attributed to the SARS/Cov2 virus.
These are the facts: there is a genetic disposition to symptom severity from the SARS/Cov2 virus. If the disposition becomes is active or becomes active due to epigenetic influences, there was and still is nothing anyone can do to save that life. The vaccine and other mitigations only delayed the enviable deaths. Yes, a political response, to keep 3% of the population from dying in a few months and having millions of bodies; parents, children, in-laws, cousins, aunts and uncles burned en masse in pyres at city parks, town squares, vacant lots, farms and garbage incinerators.
Ignorance, sheer stupidity and listening to empty headed morons that think they know how to interpret VAERS data, move a small population of easily swayed people with an inane fear of lost control over their destiny. These are the morons that exploit other's fears and move them farther and farther from the truth.
That 1918 H1N1 virus was killing people well into the late 1930s as people aged, much like how the elderly are susceptible to new strains and variants of other viruses and influenzas. That 1918 virus is still in the population. We are the survivors, the ones that have an immunity to that strain. Normal healthy people don't often die from bacterial infections unless their immune system is compromised. Anyone with a basic understanding of infectious disease and epidemiology knows this fact. 1918 H1N1 decimated peoples' immune systems and left them susceptible to secondary infection, much like how influenzas killed our aged populations today.
You are wrong about mRNA vaccines, and wrong about vaccinated people spreading disease. The people that died from the SARS/Cov2 virus and side effects from vaccines were already dead. They are dead because we cannot save them, we didn't know how.
People with a genetic disposition towards symptom severity, ones that will die in the future from SARS/Cov2 virus and vaccine side effects are ,again, already dead because we don't know how to save them. They, and you, just don't know they will be dead from COVID symptoms.
The question "allow the 10s of millions to die quickly or is it more cruel to delay the inevitable and allow the susceptible to spend time with their families, make a living for a short while, contribute to society by allowing them to die over time ?"
Look at the anti-vaccers that died from SARS/Cov2 virus. They weren't jabbed, and they are all still just as dead as the jabbed who were susceptible to severe symptoms.
You should feel lucky and grateful that little genetic switch in you hasn't been flipped on, yet. If it does turn on in the near future, you will suffer the same fate as my family members and unfortunately today there is nothing anyone can do to save you.
Yes you are right on most of what you say. I just had doubts for a while there, due to glitches in the data, which I now all chalk up to typos. The entire cover-up around early delta and omicron sightings is a cover-up of the agencies' sloppiness nothing else.
Invalidating my suspicions was quite a relief, because virology makes perfect sense again now.
However:
- Human trials of BNT162b1 started on April 23rd 2020 in Germany.
- Freshly vaccinated people did spread the disease and I will provide strong evidence for this. Transmission was INCREASED in case of an early post-vaccination infection or an infection at the time of vaccination. I have been busy with the US data for 6 months now. Just wait. There is not a doubt in my mind about this anymore at this point. If you want to catch a glimpse look at my latest notes.
Regarding the dangerousness of the virus: I am not denying that and I am very tired of people downplaying it. So you are kinda barking up the wrong tree there, but I can see how my post might've given off the impression of this being adequate.
VAERS is grossly misinterpreted. I have a proper VAERS analysis up on my website https://pervaers.com btw. This to me is the gold standard of creating safety profiles from post-approval data (spontaneous reports).
The worst part about sloppy VAERS analysis is that people never discriminate between breakthrough reports and regular AE reports. Deaths that occur in specific batches in large numbers are breakthrough reports. Batches were distributed during different times of the pandemic and hence have a very different proportion of breakthrough reports. Especially those administered during Delta have a very large number of breakthrough reports with outcome death registered.
Thank you for the reply. I really like your VAERS tracking website !! It led me to your substack :)
Admittedly, I'm a bit tired and highly sensitive to downplayed narratives about CoV2 impotence. I just barely made it through Feb 2020 and never fully recovered. Other family members weren't so lucky. So yeah, I'm knowingly and unapologetically a bit sensitive.
I'll share a bit... When defining the policies and procedures surrounding COVID clinical data collection, we found substantial, alternate interpretation of instructions and classifications. Not all cultures, political policies, or individuals interpret terms and actions the same way. Which, leads to unpredicted variation in analytic outcomes and interpretation. VAERS data is no exception.
One interesting artifact of covid reporting was the large increase in cases each Monday. That issue was caused by the data processing and reporting process. Data from end of business Friday and over the weekend were batched until Monday. We can all agree batch reports require careful scrutiny.
VAERS is only an indicator, think of it as an adverse symptom with an underlying cause. It's not good enough to say certain manufactures and batches are more deadly than others and allowing readers to draw invalid conclusions, although strong emotional responses from readers are good for recurring site visits and participation..
What bothers me about VAERS detail is misinterpretation. In some cases, adverse events 'could' simply be a cluster phenomenon. Areas may have similar DNA profiles caused by familiar and/or common, environmental epigenetic influencing factors creating unrecognized/unaccounted immunotypes. And, then again it could be some minor variation in the manufacturing process, i.e. ingredients chirality (physical shape of the molecules). Funding research studying underlying cause of events will become increasing important as mRNA vaccines become more common.
Agreed, infection rates of certain SARS/CoV2 variants did increase after vaccination programs were initiated. Conversely, transmission of other variants decreased. This is relationship is merely a correlation, not an indication of causality. Variant success had little if nothing to do with vaccines. The vaccine not the issue pertaining to containing SARS/CoV2 spread, it is the human immune system. The virus reproduced at a rate that greatly exceeded the tempo of immune response. Response delay allows pathogens to reproduced unchecked, significantly increasing viral loads in a short period of time.
Virus success is based on 1) virus kinetics (number reproduced per infected cell and shorter incubation period) and, 2) efficacy penetrating host cells. Virus shedding is directly proportion to the host's viral load. Some variants displaced others though improved success. The faster reproducing variants displaced the slower reproducing variants. The original variant started shedding after 4.6-6.7 days. Delta between 3.7-4 days and BA.1 between 3-3.4 days. Even apparently small changes in shedding profiles seemed to significantly effect success. (arbitrary interpretation of the term small)
I'm not sure where the narrative started that vaccines halt virus proliferation, but it's an incorrect premise. Vaccines are not indented to halt virus proliferation. Vaccines are only intended to hasten a person's immune response to minimize deadly symptoms. Quickened immune response slows infection rates by minimizing viral loads, and subsequent amounts and time window of virus shed. Reduced infection rates are side-effect of faster immune response.
Hehe I am sure you will find the article I am writing very interesting. Something extraordinary happened during the delta wave.
Indeed, the jabs were not released to the public until December 2020 or even later, depending on the brand and country, but they were first created many months earlier, so by March 2020 was probably when the clinical trials began in earnest. If enough participants turned into superspreaders of whatever it was, that would have been enough to seed an outbreak even before the general public was jabbed.
Note that every single new scariant originated in a country where significant clinical trials of jabs were taking place, with the possible lone exception of Gamma in Manaus, Brazil (IF that's where it really originated).
All articles claim Delta came from India in October 2020. They are all wrong or even lying.
It's one of the biggest cover-ups in history.
Here is what I know:
Participants of Biontech's phase 1 clinical trials received the drug between April 23rd and April 29th 2020.
18 sequenced patient samples were positive for delta - the most pathogenic variant - in Germany on May 11th 2020.
All samples were sequenced by the same laboratory in a neighbouring federal land of where the trials were held (MVZ Krone Labor).
The Robert-Koch-Institut uploaded the samples to GISAID, but excluded them from their public dataset.
Weekly nextstrain reports for the time between May 15th 2020 and early August 2020 are missing.
Nextstrain had all cached versions of their website before August 2020 deleted.
Alas narratives like "there was no pandemic" will make it very hard to get this story to the public. We are deep inside the Matrix.
Interesting indeed. And even Omicron was supposedly much older than they claim as well. Like Delta, it was taken from the reject pile, albeit a different reject pile shortly afterward.
No. B.1.529 (Omicron) and it's decendents are the only variants that did not exist before they hit us.
It's all lies. All of it.
I suspect Omicron could be an actual leak, possibly a white hat leak. Paul Cottrell proposed this in November 2021. Smart man btw.
That makes sense.
I have completely lost my trust in the medical community. I was seeing a doctor here in Calgary for an upcoming hernia operation. (March 2021.) He was angry at me for not being vaccinated and told me that his daughter was a nurse at one of the local hospitals and that the "body bags were piling up". His nurse then proceeded to grill me as well, and when I told her about Drs. Malone and Vanden Bossche's theories about mass vaccination during a pandemic, she told me that she was no longer interested in talking to me and to wear an N-95 mask.
I had a hernia 4 years ago and have still not had surgery. My doc said I could wait on surgery until it starts to hurt.
So open minded. Hope you have a new doc. Better yet, hope you don’t need a doc!
Exactly my conclusions having looked at the Scottish data since 2020. No pandemic. All funeral data from the 32 councils shows only 950 more funerals than average in 2020 yet they were reporting 6,000 COVID deaths. All cause mortality increases post jab 2021-2022 and into 2023 excess deaths are now DOUBLE 2021 and TREBLE 2022 rates.
Crimes against humanity !
https://twitter.com/upholdreality/status/1673462874696568833
I remain convinced that in late 2019/early 2020 there was a circulating virus, at least somewhat novel, that was relatively lethal to those who were in very poor metabolic health (i.e. had months to live, whether they knew it or not).
There most certainly was a PANdemIC, caused by governments' reactions to the virus, abandoning best practices and advocating known ineffective or inappropriate measures.
There most certainly was a PLANdemic, though I am not sure how much of the plan was well-laid pre-2020 and how much was an opportunistic capitalization on the the circulating virus.
Listen to Malaysian leader in this video interview. Around 13:00 he talks of depopulation which was agreed way back in 70's. www.globalresearch.ca/video-new-world-order-addressed-2015-former-malaysian-prime-minister-dr-mahathir-mohamad/5790769
Thank-you for sharing and to all of those who reposted it appreciated. My wish is that more people realized that things are not what they seem. That as a person, you have choices. The National Citizens Inquiry is doing a great job to get the word out. Something that was truly under wraps in Canada, like in many other countries. I appreciate all the empirical (real) data and all the personal stories shared. May the truth be told.
We need to consider the possibility that these countermeasures/bioweapons are being given to people by the disguise of common flu shots. The authorities have been discovered to be enormous liars about so much that I wouldn't put it past them.
This today from Eugippius is interesting: https://www.eugyppius.com/p/covid-suppressed-influenza-during
yes why wouldn't they? no to all vaccines!
Simple and concise, well done. Just shared on LinkedIn, where C Level execs will excoriate me for my "conspiracist pureblooded psychosis" as their brain fog and myocarditis wipes them out 20 years early.
Hail Victory! And, schadenfreude! I honestly smile, at each quad jabbed obituary!
I think I am still persona non grata on LinkedIn! Just sharing my name will land you in trouble!!
Aye, aren't we all Joel? What use is it to be accepted, in such a profoundly denatured society? :-)
I pulled down my LinkedIn profile and deleted my account after Robert Malone was censored. Amazingly, despite doing that years ago, I still continue to get job inquiries from LinkedIn related connections, leading me to believe they have NOT deleted my info as requested. I wonder if that can be the basis of a lawsuit? (It was used against the Ashley Madison web site, following their embarrassing breach a few years back.)
What country are you in? A legal claim may be feasible in the UK. I'm not a lawyer but I've done several since 2014, against various companies.
Last time I looked, US data privacy laws were weak compared to Europe.
I am in the US, and yes, they are weak. Just the way the data brokers want it.
I changed the settings in LinkedIn to zero notifications, twice! I am still getting job notices. Would there be the possibility of a class-action lawsuit here?
hmmm... maybe... I thought when I was deleting everything, I was going to disappear. I can't wait for a $5.76 payout!!!
Lots of corruption available here. Not in order, but among that corruption is major media control, faulty testing practices, data obfuscation and perhaps worst is Government incentivized treatment protocols designed to sell more toxins and to kill the patients. As stated by Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, faith is the currency of the medical system. Currently that system is broke.
Such a brilliant essay. This needs to be shared far and wide! Please share, everyone.
Yes!!!! Brilliant accurate list! I have been particular ranting about number 4 on your list since the beginning and have only found one person before this who agreed.. Now I know two people who agree.
Hi Joel,
I've been telling you this for three years at least. I'm not the only one.
Next time you'll listen? LOL
Love ya' brother.
PS: All bioweapon talk is BS including Lyme.
On Edit PSS: No such thing as pandemics full stop. All you think you know about Ebola is also pure bullshit.
Thank you, Allen! But, if you come to this conclusion, after years of diligent investigation, exploring all possible hypotheses, it carries more weight?!
You are very welcome. I've been doing exactly that for much longer and in much greater detail than Mr. Rancourt in fact.
The problem comes with the veil of "expertise" and of course it certainly is time-consuming to sort through the flotsam and jetsam.
I cut my teeth on the massive amount of corruption and profiteering and Pharma con jobs back in 2005 with the Avian Flu hoax. They tried the same con, with mostly the same cast of characters, in 2009/10 with the Swine Flu hoax.
I spent a lot of time in both instances trying to alert people throughout the community to the realities of these frauds. Each time there was tremendous push back followed by acknowledgement that these were indeed scams. However it seems that there is a bizarre psychotic thirst for this hysteria in our present culture as after each fraud was proven it only needed a few years passing for these very same folks to become ready to accept a new fraud.
Once you have explored the details of these frauds it is easy to identify the scam as it is happening.
The playbook is pretty much the same, they simply refine the techniques. Not so easy to convince others of the scam as they are bombarded with fear porn 24/7.
I have to say that the "messaging" was far more comprehensive, insidious and sophisticated with Operation Covidius than all others before by quantum leaps.
That and they produced the cadavers this time through an array of medical democides (remdesivir, neglect, midazolam, ventilators, etc.) which solidified the fear mechanisms in the masses.
What happened in 2020 was simply that the flu was re-branded and repurposed- the term "Covid-19" was invented to turn the seasonal virus into the equivalent of the mythical “Al-Qaeda” to terrorize the population with yet another media constructed boogeyman.
The Virus™ is superfluous, just like the Swine Flu scamdemic of 2009. All they needed to do was create the perception of a pandemic/mass panic with staged Hollywood productions, doomsday models, and the fraudulent PCR test to manufacture the cases/falsely attributed as “Covid deaths.”
From there use the newly minted "nudge units" and "insight teams" and the swarming social media beehives to catapult the fear across the globe in nanoseconds.
Voila! Global Pandemonium.
Same play book for well over 100 years in fact!
So, Allen, I too have been going down multiple rabbit holes daily for the last 3+ years. I agree with you on many elements above, I've read Virus Mania, Turtles, Illusions, The Real Fauci, State of Fear etc + substacks, videos, podcasts, films etc - It has become my life. I remain unvaxxed!!
BUT I am still stuck on one point: if viruses don't exist (I don't know...) WHAT was the US spending $$ millions on in Wuhan (and elsewhere, like Ukraine)? Fauci certainly believes he is responsible because he tried to cover his ass. What was making people initially sick? Medics said it wasn't normal flu.
Perhaps what they really were doing in the Wuhan lab was making the bioweapon vaccine.
The globalist's most important thing is maintaining the control of the narrative. They maintain control of the narrative through presenting two false ideas (lab leak and natural virus). And the simple people think one or the other must be true. But in realty neither are true. It's used to distract our attention from what's really going on.
What happened in Lombardia - I'm an American living in northern Italy. What happened in Italy is that not all of Italy was hit by the "virus", and not even the whole of northern Italy, where 3/4 of all deaths occurred. The epicentre of the covid virus was in Lombardia which accounts for 2/3 of all the victims. Why there? Well, in January, 2020, Lombardy implemented a major vaccination campaign against meningococcus, following a mini epidemic of bacterial meningitis that affected just 6 people (with 2 deaths). The regional authorities decided on a massive and free-of-charge vaccination of the whole population. Within a few weeks, more than 33,000 people were vaccinated in Lombardy.
Within two months, Lombardy was experiencing the majority of "covid" deaths and was the first area of a Western country that was locked-down.
Could it be that the meningitis vaccine in Lombardy (and even the 2019 flu vaccine given in Western countries) caused these "covid" deaths? Or made those injected more vulnerable to getting "covid"? The Lombardy epicentre of "covid" deaths and the timing of the meningitis vaccine seems to show correlation. Another point is that the 2019 flu vaccine, which the majority of people over 65 take, was the largest group dying from "covid" in 2020.
Cathleen, That is very interesting; thank you for taking the trouble.
All I've read about northern Italy is that it has an older, sicker population and lots of Chinese come over to work there, so they could have spread 'it' (whatever 'it' is).
The patents for the vaccines were allegedly filed in US way before the start of the scamdemic, so who knows. And the flu all but disappeared for two + years too. And apparently victims in Italy were literally just left to die. Few were tested or confirmed.
I'm reading a Dr Mark Bailey (from NZ) essay on Goodbye To Virology: he doesn't believe there was any virus; it's all down to false testing and murderous protocols.
And so my quest for truth goes on... Best wishes
actually, the majority of elderly Italians are pretty healthy - (it's the wine and food :-) Those sick in hospitals and nursing homew with other aliments weren't treated for their aliments they had (cancer, high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes) and were left alone to die (then counted as a covid19 death). The National Health Institute in Italy recalculated the Covid death toll since February 2020. It was 130,468. Now it thinks only 3,783 were directly due to COVID-19 ~3% of the total.
Yes, Dr. David Martin and Karen Kingston has talked about the patents filed.
I also thought it was the Chinese workers in the garment industry in Milan, but there is also a large garment industry with Chinese workers in Tuscany (leather goods) and no virus outbreak there. So....?
Dr. Mark Bailey is great!
Best to you on your journey for truth, Marc :-)
Many things make people sick. Illness is built not "caught."
Not one individual has provided a shred of credible evidence for some "novel" disease.
The biolabs are primarily money laundering mechansisms.
"I've been doing exactly that for much longer and in much greater detail than Mr. Rancourt in fact."
This sounds fascinating. Have you posted an article or report anywhere?
I'm no authority on these things, but this matches well with what I was able to cobble together from a variety of sources during the first couple of months or so of the declared "pandemic" in 2020. I knew enough about the immune system to find the "novel virus" claim unbelievable from the start and I began to investigate. I remember coming across a research report that described experiments involving PCR and cycle thresholds (CTs). I already knew about PCR, but not about PCR "tests" and CTs, and oh what a discovery once I understood how PCR was being used.
Once I understood that, I began following the local PCR-based "case" statistics and noticing that there was no epidemic in my county in California, at any time. Just media-inspired hysteria, and all the harm caused by the "lockdown" and school closures.
It took considerably longer to piece together what was happening in the hospitals and care homes, perhaps because it was almost beyond belief. Warning anyone about any of this was nearly impossible, between online censorship and people's gullibility, and my worldview changed for good. I did get through in time to a couple of people close to me.
I realize that most people wouldn't have had the background in biology that I have (high-level only, but enough to see what was happening), and unless they were (left) unemployed, they wouldn't have had the time. I also avoid commercial news media like the plague, and have for years, relying upon alternative sources and not expecting it all to be "free", and I usually recognize gaslighting when I see it. The media gaslighting was over the top and easy to identify, but I had to learn about the full extent of medical gaslighting, another major discovery.
I am semi-retired, working part time still as a consultant, and I paused my work for four months in 2020 to just do research and study relevant topics in biology and other fields. It was apparent that the perpetrators understood the limitations that the general public would have, and leveraged them to full advantage.
It is beyond belief that so many medics worldwide would knowingly do the wrong thing. It's monstrous.
I said much the same thing. My most read post.
https://williamhunterduncan.substack.com/p/there-was-no-covid-19-pandemic
But you didn't reference any of my work in it?!!
No slight intended. I have recommended your work though many times.
I was only kidding. I've linked yours.
As a humble normal working in person I can only report on what I’ve seen and experienced.
I work in a chippy, here in the U.K. I was classed as an essential worker when lockdown was announced, have to say I was slightly baffled to how takeaway places were classed as essential in the midst of the plague we were about to endure.
Have to say working was better than sitting at home as it gave me an eye view of what was really going on and it didn’t tally with anything being pumped out of the tv 24/7.
I have to say I was honestly sceptical from the word go and within a couple of weeks my suspicions were confirmed by a neighbour who worked on the covid ward at the local hospital.
Being the typical nosey Yorkshire twat I am I wondered out on seal night to see who was stupid enough to fall for the manipulation tactics.I spotted my neighbour and made a beeline for her asking how she was going working with so many seriously ill people.
That night she stood there and confirmed my suspicions in one short sentence.
The daily updates had informed us that even if you had this deadly disease, there was no immunity and you could catch it again, thus sending the public into a panic.
What my neighbour told me contradicted everything they were pumping out to the public. She said they got to see people at their worst and their best when, wait for it… they came back out of icu onto the covid ward to recover before being discharged home.
So there you have it the disease that was promoted as the most deadly infectious disease to man, had hospitals bring the most vulnerable back from icu to either finish them off, or they’d created immunity to it that was told to be none existent.
As someone who was working in a cash only business at the time, serving hundreds of people a week, just like my other eight co workers not one of us caught the lurgy until August of 2021
How could this be?
I’d already said to some of my colleagues pre lockdown, that if it really was that infectious it would have swept through all of us without knowing having so much contact with the public. This would have happened well before they even announced anything, as none of us had been ill, I stated the other option of it not been as infectious as we were told.
Working with the public gives you a huge source of information, all the information I heard ,saw myself through work, friends and family actually highlighted perspectives and perceptions.
I worked, my hubby didn’t, he bought the whole pandemic concept with being held away from viewing the real world, instead he watch the force fed garbage.
I would actually mock and ridicule how brave they all were, potentially sacrificing their health and lives to keep us updated.
I couldn’t stomach watching their downright lies and manipulation, every single one of them needs prosecuting for the harm they’ve caused.