64 Comments
Jan 28, 2023·edited Jan 28, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley

I'm sure it's coincidence that they pull the shots from the under 50s which are experiencing high excess deaths at the time all this is coming out in to the public arena.

On the flip side it would appear the 50 and older age group are being culled ,but the figures will be less noticeable in the 50s and up and it will save on state pensions so there are some benefits🇬🇧🍻👍it will help to reduce the overall excess deaths (good pr) so the body plie under the carpet should become less noticeable in time although it may be a bit smelly for a while yet 💉💉💉💉⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️🧚 safe and effective tm👍

Expand full comment
Jan 28, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley

The post vaccination death figures are due to be updated on 21st February, hopefully Joel, Norman and others will interrogate these too. Given the “tricks” used previously by ONS, let’s hope that the next figures aren’t fudged.

Expand full comment

Is it still the case that they count a person dying with 14 days of having the jab as being unvaccinated??!!! I am not a vaccinologist or medically trained person, but to me if that is true that stinks and seems like a deliberate attempt to hide the true data!! Hard to know what is true and not sometimes??!! Keep up the great work Joel!!

Expand full comment
Jan 28, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley

"It’s impossible to have a reasonable discussion with anyone who hasn’t done their research properly, especially if they are simply hell bent on defeating you, rather than seeking to draw out the truth of the situation."

This reality produces almost as much frustration as all the lies we've been told about this disease and how to handle it. I have found it particularly difficult speaking with family members who disagree. I guess those you love you also want the most to reach. It's odd though that their convictions can run so deep and yet be based on so little evidence (or so much false evidence). Not only that, but any suggestion that there actually is another side to the narrative is dismissed as everything from illogical conspiracy to hubris. Your quote is also a great reminder for me to make sure I've done my research properly. The last thing the world needs is another person who is ill-informed.

Expand full comment

MSM is funded by advertising. The most lucrative advertisers are the pharmaceutical companies. You get what you pay for.

Expand full comment

I am beyond horrified. It appears that the only review the MHRA carried out was a "Stakeholder" review [WEF-ism]. 28 organisations were asked 4 questions. Only 10 responded, the 18 who said nothing tell us everything.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/changes-to-human-medicine-regulations-to-support-the-rollout-of-vaccines-one-year-review/regulations-174a-and-247a-one-year-review?fbclid=IwAR1wzkyZGYdyYTxpA2bjyUojw-8q4WfRVZrUgQlp4IVtDQrwnkhxT2jEhhE#stakeholder-review

Expand full comment
Jan 28, 2023·edited Jan 28, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley

In my household of three, all supposedly at higher risk due to age (70 and 68) and our son's significant disability, we didn't believe the propaganda, mainly because it was so blatantly commercially biased from the start: bleeding heart stuff, really. Calculating personal risk either from the novel mRNA vaccine or from the Covid itself was impossible, so we simply applied the precautionary principle and avoided the jab. Probably helps that my background is in Public Health management, so I know all the previous scandals.

We have all had Covid, probably twice, and it was entirely trivial: and that was the other major flaw in the data: this so called killer virus was actually a damp squib for all except the very old and frail, and not a plague at all. We were never, ever, all in it together.

Expand full comment

So is any of our corrupt governments or militaries or prosecutors or constitutionalist sheriffs or We The People, etc... going to hold EVERYONE in the evil Medical cabal accountable???

Expand full comment
Jan 28, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley

I am inclined to believe that this admission comes at a convenient time for them

Expand full comment

The back peddling will only increase for sure.

Expand full comment

Thanks Joel. This just sums up ''COVID-19'' which in my view has been nothing but a statiistical fraud, all of it ! Why ? To install CCP2.0 globally. To 'save the planet' as well. Did you hear back from NRS on the data you requested ?

Expand full comment

I asked these 2 questions of the MHRA in mid-November 2022:

1 - the metric or standard that is used by the MHRA to quantify the term “safe” with regards/reference to a “covid vaccine” authorised for use by the MHRA?

2 - the metric or standard that is used by the MHRA to quantify the term “effective” with regards/reference to a “covid vaccine” authorised for use by the MHRA?

Simple enough questions and there should be a standard that they can reference surely?

You know, things like “xxxx adverse events/serious adverse events/hospitalisations/deaths reported by xxxx injections given” and “stops transmission of xxxx” and/or similar.

But no reply was forthcoming and as they legally have to reply within 20 working days, even if it is to request an extension, and as I had received nothing from them by the 19th Jan 2023 I sent them a polite follow-up saying I had not received an answer from them.

Yesterday they replied with:

Dear Mr Awkward Git

Thank you for your email.

We apologise you have not yet received a response and we hope to respond to your as soon as we can.

Kind Regards

MHRA Customer Service Centre

So what’s the problem with supplying a standard that they are working to to say “safe” and “effective”.

Anyone else get the feeling they cannot supply the standards they used as they never used anything other than “the manufacturer and/or Matt hancock said it’s OK and we were ordered from above to issue the EUA anyway”.

Expand full comment
Jan 28, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley

Our main issue is the infantile trust of the masses in the mainsteam media. The only thing that matters will be how these developments will impact this collective trust in this new global church.

Expand full comment
Jan 28, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley

Yes, indeed, there's no good way to have a rational discussion with those who refuse to research and parrot the output of Blackrock/Vanguard/StateStreet owned media.

Expand full comment

I'll say it again here...the same people who refuse to admit that there's even a possibility of a shot causing problems will heartily admit that people can die from bee stings and peanuts.

Expand full comment

But the reason they are "admitting" the data can't be used to show vaccine effectiveness is because they don't want people to use the data to show vaccine ineffectiveness. Ultimately they want to be able to say this data can't be used to say either way even though they squeezed every drop of utility at the times it would have most effects on promoting high uptake.

Now they can say, "no, no, no, you can't use this data that way!"

How convenient.

Expand full comment