Trying to inform politicians and bureaucrats who have a different agenda is very difficult, to ask these same people to admit to a policy failure with real deaths? I would say is even less likely. The inability to admit failure seems to be a political survival trait.
All politicians are hardwired to lie in order to protect their rotten careers. But this is even more fundamental than that. They know that if they admit their coercive mass vaccination campaigns have caused thousands of deaths, in all likelihood many more deaths than lives saved, then they are not just opening themselves up to the loss of a very cushy job and a generous pension, they are leaving themselves wide open to criminal prosecutions for crimes as serious as conspiracy to commit democide plus population-scale violation of human rights relating to informed consent to an experimental medical procedure. They know they are going to be facing the realistic prospect of being tried in a court of law and the government of which they are part is going to be facing unprecedented numbers of claims from victims of state malfeasance. They will do anything to avoid that happening, including starting WW3. Thus, they will have to be dragged, kicking and screaming, to the confession box.
Thank you for your passion to do this. I have different passions, many of them - like I have a passion to know this. I drink in the information, like I drink in the information in 2000 Mules. I have a passion for truth and human rights. Those passions have served me well in the plandemic. The "kool-aid" - all artificial colors and flavorings, quite deadly - was never tempting.
Will there be a sequel called 2000 Tools, which describes Brandon, Kamala, Dr. Jill, their cabinet, Fauci, and other highly placed bureaucrats and political appointees?
"However, what is undeniable is that there are almost 800k excess deaths since mass vaccination started in the States and natural COVID cannot possibly account for any substantial part of them. Even if it does, that’s a massive failure of public health anyway. Remind me again, how many contrite public “servants” have admitted this complete and utter abject failure?"
Equal parts amazement and heartbreak that the incontrovertible truth is still denied.
Hi Joel, Impressive data as always but a huge problem with the basic premise! I've put some of the evidence we've been given on the virus so far here https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/spikes-and-knobs?s=w- there was not 'enough' virus to form a density gradient and take EM pictures- so how do they know it's there? No detection through indirect methods not also seen in uninfected cultures. No purification of the sample that was first sequenced, how do they know where all the RNA fragments came from in the first place?
Oh, for sure. I have never ruled out that all COVID deaths are simply iatrogenic. Too many analyses I've done show excess mortality and pathology since autumn 2019 that would be consistent with "something" like COVID circulating before spring when the "epidemic" actually started.
so they could be covering up something with all this nonsense- like in the 80's when they covered up the effects of allowing crack cocaine to flood into deprived areas of the US and explained the occupation deaths and diseases of black workers in death trap dust filled diamond mines in Africa by blaming AIDS symptoms on a non existent HIV!
Hiya, thank you for this. Montagnier also admitted on camera in 1997 that he hadn't purified. A sucrose density gradient band of purified virus and confirmatory EM pictures are essential to show purification and that a virus is there! I can't just believe him, I need to SEE!. Montagnier NEVER produced any pictures. When pictures were later produced of a gradient band they showed only cell debris.
What Montagnier meant by 'isolation' was a) detection of reverse transcriptase actively (known to be present in all cells), b)presence of 'virus' like type C particles when cultured with umbilical cord cells (known to produce type C particles), and c)the presence of antibodies to proteins in the cell culture by adding back the original (BRU) patient's serum (all this says is that there are antibodies, it says nothing about the origin of the proteins), these antibody reactions also occur in healthy people, TB patients and with pregnancy. The core HIV proteins (p24)cannot therefore be for a unique virus. Montagnier did no controls for his experiments. None of them are valid- which i've tried to show here https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/the-importance-of-intellectual-freedom?s=w T
The Perth Group have written extensively on the 'spike' proteins; 'experts agree there are spikes/knobs on the surface of the viral particle whose presence is an absolute requirement for infectivity. The knobs are said to consist of two proteins, gp120 and gp41 (gp = glycoprotein). Hans Gelderblom from the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin is the leading expert on HIV electron microscopy. In 1987 he and his colleagues published a model of the “ideal” HIV particle, claiming that “On the ‘ideal’, intact HIV particle 72 knobs can be determined”. However, in their most detailed electron microscopic studies Gelderblom’s group reported that “cell-released, ‘mature’ HIV particles represent by far the majority of virus structures...The loss of surface knobs apparently correlates morphologically with virus maturation. Immature and/or budding HIV particles are “spiked”, but they are rarely observed” and are seen only “on metabolically impaired cells”. Immature particles have knobs but by definition are not infectious. Since the knobs are crucial for infectivity but are lost during maturation, the mature particles cannot be infectious either.
The so called spike protein gp120 (later shown to be a polymer of p41 which is the cellular protein actin) can be present when spikes are not observed-ie false positives and the group concluded 'The clusters of gp120 do not form spikes on the surface of HIV as is commonly described in the literature" and they "found no evidence that the gp120 monomers form threefold symmetric trimers...We suggest that the spikes observed by negative-staining electron microscopy may be an artifact of the penetration of heavy metal stain between envelope proteins.'
Incidentally the spikes would have fallen off any 'virus' by the time blood from 'infected' people is transfused into haemophiliacs, so cannot possibly be infectious.
If this wasn't enough AIDS is not sexually transmitted- as is only correlated with frequency of receptive anal sex. Kaposi Sarcoma and PCP, the original AIDS indicated are caused by popper inhalation.
The is no evidence that AIDS associated symptoms are cause by a virus and no evidence that the virus that doesn't cause AIDS is 'HIV!
Hiya, yes, I was referring to the original HIV/AIDs in the specific population in the US in specific areas. The testing all over the world is different. In Africa you can be claimed to be an AIDS patient in the absence of testing- with indicator symptoms such as TB and weight loss. So a lot of malnourished people added to HIV numbers, no spreading of virus required.
HIV is also interesting as they can't use PCR to 'test' for it. There are so many 'variants' in the SAME person at one time- depending on the lab and the primer they use your 'viral load' could differ from zero to a million copies for the same sample. There is up to 40 % genetic variability-so it's amazing that they all code for the same entity and the 'core' (non-specific) protein still used in the antibody (presence of which in other diseases means you're immune) test.
I'm glad Steve K calls on you and others when he goes venturing in numbers. His latest made me chuckle because I wondered if you'd have figures on folks who died within 14 days before getting vaxxed! LOL!
Your plots here are devastating enough, and coupled with Dowd's insurance guys' plots, there's no doubt. We're in a new normal of barbarism. I guess 20th Century democide was just a dry run.
One variable in the mix is the appearance of Delta, which if I recall correctly, was both more transmissible and virulent. That does not challenge the contention that "vaccines were far less effective than advertised", but it might challenge the contention that "vaccines make the vaccinated more susceptible to Covid".
I still don't understand why the mRNA vaccines were so focused on generating ONLY spikes rather than two or more parts of SARS-2. If they had, it's possible the vaccines would have been more effective against Delta and Omicron. Of course it's also possible that the vaccines would have caused far more frequent and severe side-effects.
Unless Delta was a vaccine immune-escape variant all along?! Zoinks! And they might have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for those meddling truth seekers!"
And why did the spikes the mRNAs generated have to have all the HIV genes in them? Looking at DMED we see visits for HIV took off - up 490% from years before (Before the DOD "fixed" the previous 5 year "glitch" in statistics). And why did the spikes have all the other bad news sequences such as the prion-like/amyloid generating, mouse malaria, strep, etc., etc., sequences? Why the spike at all? Oh wait, that's right Astra Zenica and Moderna and the rest already had the operative SARS2 sequences patented in Europe and the U.S. in 2003, 2005 and subsequent years.
Thank you for your passion to do this. I have different passions, many of them - like I have a passion to know this. I drink in the information, like I drink in the information in 2000 Mules. I have a passion for truth and human rights. Those passions have served me well in the plandemic. The "kool-aid" - all artificial colors and flavorings, quite deadly - was never tempting.
One caveat: That which you label "Covid deaths" should be listed as "deaths attributed to Covid" or some such qualifier.
What constitutes a "Covid death" is up for an audit as all of the Covid mortality data is fraught with false attribution, statistical manipulation and outright fraud.
I so appreciate your work on this. I sent you an email (I hope it makes it to you) with my notes on looking at the data from another perspective. Please let me know if you received the email and your thoughts. I am not a major data guru - just a little old pharmacist who reviewed meds in a past managed care clinical position. Not a fan of the vax - skeptical of new drugs - especially new categories - even more skeptical of products with EUA when there are potential existing products that may be beneficial, if you get me drift.
I doubt that many policy makers and public servants are smart enough to understand the arguments you make linking the excess deaths to the vaccines. It's confusing enough for them to be able to just say to themselves 'It must be Covid - the vaccines help'. If they really understood they'd change their message. They hear an argument like yours, recognize that you're arguing that the vaccines caused more deaths but without a real grasp of your argument they don't find it compelling. Then they hear some other 'expert' arguing that the vaccines saved lives, without really understanding their arguments either and why they are weak, and they go with the one that they'd prefer to believe, which is 'vaccines good'.
My plan is to compare aircraft accidents and incidents in 2021 against 2019. The percentage of heart attacks and ‘pilot medical emergencies.’ My theory is that they’ve increased.
Your paragraph "Given that there are -studies showing the complete ineffectiveness of Covid intervention...". I have been following <c19early.com> and their metanalyses and forest plots demonstrate considerable treatment efficacy for various interventions, particularly early treatment.
It is very difficult to inform true believers of the excess mortality of vaxxes and interventions, even, or especially, physicians. Excess ACM is always attributed to Covid and no effort is spared to ignore the recent injections.
So... with those percentage vaccinated versus excess deaths plots... they're missing a time dimension, it's kinda implicit in that the rollout took time.
But If it's directly the vaccine causing say strokes and heart atttacks... Then you'd expect a straighter line, no? This pattern lends itself more to leaky vaccines, increased susceptibility from misdirected immune systems, ADE/OAS mechanisms, right?
I wonder if other nations can clarify this picture? UK/Italy who had bad first waves for example?
No, time is deliberately omitted in these plots so you can see the consistent relationship between vaccine and excess death, REGARDLESS of time. If there is insight from this, it would seem that a threshold of around 50% is the population trigger. This is consistent with my multinational study showing low vax countries have lower covid mortality and also consistent with Malone and Vanden Bossche etc. Who say MASS vaccination is the problem, as much as the vaccine itself.
Trying to inform politicians and bureaucrats who have a different agenda is very difficult, to ask these same people to admit to a policy failure with real deaths? I would say is even less likely. The inability to admit failure seems to be a political survival trait.
All politicians are hardwired to lie in order to protect their rotten careers. But this is even more fundamental than that. They know that if they admit their coercive mass vaccination campaigns have caused thousands of deaths, in all likelihood many more deaths than lives saved, then they are not just opening themselves up to the loss of a very cushy job and a generous pension, they are leaving themselves wide open to criminal prosecutions for crimes as serious as conspiracy to commit democide plus population-scale violation of human rights relating to informed consent to an experimental medical procedure. They know they are going to be facing the realistic prospect of being tried in a court of law and the government of which they are part is going to be facing unprecedented numbers of claims from victims of state malfeasance. They will do anything to avoid that happening, including starting WW3. Thus, they will have to be dragged, kicking and screaming, to the confession box.
Thank you for your passion to do this. I have different passions, many of them - like I have a passion to know this. I drink in the information, like I drink in the information in 2000 Mules. I have a passion for truth and human rights. Those passions have served me well in the plandemic. The "kool-aid" - all artificial colors and flavorings, quite deadly - was never tempting.
Will there be a sequel called 2000 Tools, which describes Brandon, Kamala, Dr. Jill, their cabinet, Fauci, and other highly placed bureaucrats and political appointees?
"However, what is undeniable is that there are almost 800k excess deaths since mass vaccination started in the States and natural COVID cannot possibly account for any substantial part of them. Even if it does, that’s a massive failure of public health anyway. Remind me again, how many contrite public “servants” have admitted this complete and utter abject failure?"
Equal parts amazement and heartbreak that the incontrovertible truth is still denied.
Hi Joel, Impressive data as always but a huge problem with the basic premise! I've put some of the evidence we've been given on the virus so far here https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/spikes-and-knobs?s=w- there was not 'enough' virus to form a density gradient and take EM pictures- so how do they know it's there? No detection through indirect methods not also seen in uninfected cultures. No purification of the sample that was first sequenced, how do they know where all the RNA fragments came from in the first place?
And what is cvd anyway- we don't need a virus in a world of pollution, toxins, pesticides, poverty and obesity- causing all sorts of symptoms they like to lump together. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/were-so-far-down-the-rabbit-hole?s=w
If we don't get this sorted out in ours heads - there will be viruses and vaccines ad infinitum for ever
Oh, for sure. I have never ruled out that all COVID deaths are simply iatrogenic. Too many analyses I've done show excess mortality and pathology since autumn 2019 that would be consistent with "something" like COVID circulating before spring when the "epidemic" actually started.
so they could be covering up something with all this nonsense- like in the 80's when they covered up the effects of allowing crack cocaine to flood into deprived areas of the US and explained the occupation deaths and diseases of black workers in death trap dust filled diamond mines in Africa by blaming AIDS symptoms on a non existent HIV!
Could it be 5G???
when Luc Montagnier said he isolated the HIV virus, I believe him. There is a documentary about the start of HIV which we should all be interested in, since sequences from HIV are in the spike: https://rumble.com/v14a4rh-the-surprising-origins-of-the-aids-pandemic-documentary-2004.html
Hiya, thank you for this. Montagnier also admitted on camera in 1997 that he hadn't purified. A sucrose density gradient band of purified virus and confirmatory EM pictures are essential to show purification and that a virus is there! I can't just believe him, I need to SEE!. Montagnier NEVER produced any pictures. When pictures were later produced of a gradient band they showed only cell debris.
What Montagnier meant by 'isolation' was a) detection of reverse transcriptase actively (known to be present in all cells), b)presence of 'virus' like type C particles when cultured with umbilical cord cells (known to produce type C particles), and c)the presence of antibodies to proteins in the cell culture by adding back the original (BRU) patient's serum (all this says is that there are antibodies, it says nothing about the origin of the proteins), these antibody reactions also occur in healthy people, TB patients and with pregnancy. The core HIV proteins (p24)cannot therefore be for a unique virus. Montagnier did no controls for his experiments. None of them are valid- which i've tried to show here https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/the-importance-of-intellectual-freedom?s=w T
The Perth Group have written extensively on the 'spike' proteins; 'experts agree there are spikes/knobs on the surface of the viral particle whose presence is an absolute requirement for infectivity. The knobs are said to consist of two proteins, gp120 and gp41 (gp = glycoprotein). Hans Gelderblom from the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin is the leading expert on HIV electron microscopy. In 1987 he and his colleagues published a model of the “ideal” HIV particle, claiming that “On the ‘ideal’, intact HIV particle 72 knobs can be determined”. However, in their most detailed electron microscopic studies Gelderblom’s group reported that “cell-released, ‘mature’ HIV particles represent by far the majority of virus structures...The loss of surface knobs apparently correlates morphologically with virus maturation. Immature and/or budding HIV particles are “spiked”, but they are rarely observed” and are seen only “on metabolically impaired cells”. Immature particles have knobs but by definition are not infectious. Since the knobs are crucial for infectivity but are lost during maturation, the mature particles cannot be infectious either.
The so called spike protein gp120 (later shown to be a polymer of p41 which is the cellular protein actin) can be present when spikes are not observed-ie false positives and the group concluded 'The clusters of gp120 do not form spikes on the surface of HIV as is commonly described in the literature" and they "found no evidence that the gp120 monomers form threefold symmetric trimers...We suggest that the spikes observed by negative-staining electron microscopy may be an artifact of the penetration of heavy metal stain between envelope proteins.'
Incidentally the spikes would have fallen off any 'virus' by the time blood from 'infected' people is transfused into haemophiliacs, so cannot possibly be infectious.
This interview with the Perth Group and EM experts explains better than me https://youtu.be/PQFxratWh7E
If this wasn't enough AIDS is not sexually transmitted- as is only correlated with frequency of receptive anal sex. Kaposi Sarcoma and PCP, the original AIDS indicated are caused by popper inhalation.
The is no evidence that AIDS associated symptoms are cause by a virus and no evidence that the virus that doesn't cause AIDS is 'HIV!
I've written about spikes in relation to SARS, there being similar problems with the experiments. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/spikes-and-knobs?s=w
thanks again for your reply
Jo
How does this correlate with the spread of HIV in Africa? I assume very different social practices, but amyl nitrate poppers?
I missed a diagnosis of HIV in 1989 in a woman whom I subsequently learned had had a blood transfusion after childbirth in 1981.
Hiya, yes, I was referring to the original HIV/AIDs in the specific population in the US in specific areas. The testing all over the world is different. In Africa you can be claimed to be an AIDS patient in the absence of testing- with indicator symptoms such as TB and weight loss. So a lot of malnourished people added to HIV numbers, no spreading of virus required.
House of numbers is really worth watching on this
https://youtu.be/BsT4GrimfLQ
Jo
HIV is also interesting as they can't use PCR to 'test' for it. There are so many 'variants' in the SAME person at one time- depending on the lab and the primer they use your 'viral load' could differ from zero to a million copies for the same sample. There is up to 40 % genetic variability-so it's amazing that they all code for the same entity and the 'core' (non-specific) protein still used in the antibody (presence of which in other diseases means you're immune) test.
Impressive Data presentation/ explanation! Thanks!
I'm glad Steve K calls on you and others when he goes venturing in numbers. His latest made me chuckle because I wondered if you'd have figures on folks who died within 14 days before getting vaxxed! LOL!
Your plots here are devastating enough, and coupled with Dowd's insurance guys' plots, there's no doubt. We're in a new normal of barbarism. I guess 20th Century democide was just a dry run.
One variable in the mix is the appearance of Delta, which if I recall correctly, was both more transmissible and virulent. That does not challenge the contention that "vaccines were far less effective than advertised", but it might challenge the contention that "vaccines make the vaccinated more susceptible to Covid".
I still don't understand why the mRNA vaccines were so focused on generating ONLY spikes rather than two or more parts of SARS-2. If they had, it's possible the vaccines would have been more effective against Delta and Omicron. Of course it's also possible that the vaccines would have caused far more frequent and severe side-effects.
Unless Delta was a vaccine immune-escape variant all along?! Zoinks! And they might have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for those meddling truth seekers!"
because the spike is the weapon
And why did the spikes the mRNAs generated have to have all the HIV genes in them? Looking at DMED we see visits for HIV took off - up 490% from years before (Before the DOD "fixed" the previous 5 year "glitch" in statistics). And why did the spikes have all the other bad news sequences such as the prion-like/amyloid generating, mouse malaria, strep, etc., etc., sequences? Why the spike at all? Oh wait, that's right Astra Zenica and Moderna and the rest already had the operative SARS2 sequences patented in Europe and the U.S. in 2003, 2005 and subsequent years.
Thank you for your passion to do this. I have different passions, many of them - like I have a passion to know this. I drink in the information, like I drink in the information in 2000 Mules. I have a passion for truth and human rights. Those passions have served me well in the plandemic. The "kool-aid" - all artificial colors and flavorings, quite deadly - was never tempting.
Excellent work.
One caveat: That which you label "Covid deaths" should be listed as "deaths attributed to Covid" or some such qualifier.
What constitutes a "Covid death" is up for an audit as all of the Covid mortality data is fraught with false attribution, statistical manipulation and outright fraud.
I love these analyzes you've been doing and these recent posts. 👍🏼
I so appreciate your work on this. I sent you an email (I hope it makes it to you) with my notes on looking at the data from another perspective. Please let me know if you received the email and your thoughts. I am not a major data guru - just a little old pharmacist who reviewed meds in a past managed care clinical position. Not a fan of the vax - skeptical of new drugs - especially new categories - even more skeptical of products with EUA when there are potential existing products that may be beneficial, if you get me drift.
I doubt that many policy makers and public servants are smart enough to understand the arguments you make linking the excess deaths to the vaccines. It's confusing enough for them to be able to just say to themselves 'It must be Covid - the vaccines help'. If they really understood they'd change their message. They hear an argument like yours, recognize that you're arguing that the vaccines caused more deaths but without a real grasp of your argument they don't find it compelling. Then they hear some other 'expert' arguing that the vaccines saved lives, without really understanding their arguments either and why they are weak, and they go with the one that they'd prefer to believe, which is 'vaccines good'.
My plan is to compare aircraft accidents and incidents in 2021 against 2019. The percentage of heart attacks and ‘pilot medical emergencies.’ My theory is that they’ve increased.
Your paragraph "Given that there are -studies showing the complete ineffectiveness of Covid intervention...". I have been following <c19early.com> and their metanalyses and forest plots demonstrate considerable treatment efficacy for various interventions, particularly early treatment.
It is very difficult to inform true believers of the excess mortality of vaxxes and interventions, even, or especially, physicians. Excess ACM is always attributed to Covid and no effort is spared to ignore the recent injections.
What is the definition of "excess deaths"? Compared to historic averages of most recent years?
In this case, I took simple weekly average 2014-2019 as baseline.
So... with those percentage vaccinated versus excess deaths plots... they're missing a time dimension, it's kinda implicit in that the rollout took time.
But If it's directly the vaccine causing say strokes and heart atttacks... Then you'd expect a straighter line, no? This pattern lends itself more to leaky vaccines, increased susceptibility from misdirected immune systems, ADE/OAS mechanisms, right?
I wonder if other nations can clarify this picture? UK/Italy who had bad first waves for example?
No, time is deliberately omitted in these plots so you can see the consistent relationship between vaccine and excess death, REGARDLESS of time. If there is insight from this, it would seem that a threshold of around 50% is the population trigger. This is consistent with my multinational study showing low vax countries have lower covid mortality and also consistent with Malone and Vanden Bossche etc. Who say MASS vaccination is the problem, as much as the vaccine itself.
That 50% jabbed then, is the threshold at which the morbidity and mortality correlation from jabs can't be disguised as background any longer? Hmm.
UK, Italy, Israel, and Sweden are good countries to compare, though primarily to see correlations.