Trying to inform politicians and bureaucrats who have a different agenda is very difficult, to ask these same people to admit to a policy failure with real deaths? I would say is even less likely. The inability to admit failure seems to be a political survival trait.
Thank you for your passion to do this. I have different passions, many of them - like I have a passion to know this. I drink in the information, like I drink in the information in 2000 Mules. I have a passion for truth and human rights. Those passions have served me well in the plandemic. The "kool-aid" - all artificial colors and flavorings, quite deadly - was never tempting.
"However, what is undeniable is that there are almost 800k excess deaths since mass vaccination started in the States and natural COVID cannot possibly account for any substantial part of them. Even if it does, that’s a massive failure of public health anyway. Remind me again, how many contrite public “servants” have admitted this complete and utter abject failure?"
Equal parts amazement and heartbreak that the incontrovertible truth is still denied.
May 14, 2022·edited May 14, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
Hi Joel, Impressive data as always but a huge problem with the basic premise! I've put some of the evidence we've been given on the virus so far here https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/spikes-and-knobs?s=w- there was not 'enough' virus to form a density gradient and take EM pictures- so how do they know it's there? No detection through indirect methods not also seen in uninfected cultures. No purification of the sample that was first sequenced, how do they know where all the RNA fragments came from in the first place?
I'm glad Steve K calls on you and others when he goes venturing in numbers. His latest made me chuckle because I wondered if you'd have figures on folks who died within 14 days before getting vaxxed! LOL!
Your plots here are devastating enough, and coupled with Dowd's insurance guys' plots, there's no doubt. We're in a new normal of barbarism. I guess 20th Century democide was just a dry run.
One variable in the mix is the appearance of Delta, which if I recall correctly, was both more transmissible and virulent. That does not challenge the contention that "vaccines were far less effective than advertised", but it might challenge the contention that "vaccines make the vaccinated more susceptible to Covid".
I still don't understand why the mRNA vaccines were so focused on generating ONLY spikes rather than two or more parts of SARS-2. If they had, it's possible the vaccines would have been more effective against Delta and Omicron. Of course it's also possible that the vaccines would have caused far more frequent and severe side-effects.
Thank you for your passion to do this. I have different passions, many of them - like I have a passion to know this. I drink in the information, like I drink in the information in 2000 Mules. I have a passion for truth and human rights. Those passions have served me well in the plandemic. The "kool-aid" - all artificial colors and flavorings, quite deadly - was never tempting.
One caveat: That which you label "Covid deaths" should be listed as "deaths attributed to Covid" or some such qualifier.
What constitutes a "Covid death" is up for an audit as all of the Covid mortality data is fraught with false attribution, statistical manipulation and outright fraud.
I so appreciate your work on this. I sent you an email (I hope it makes it to you) with my notes on looking at the data from another perspective. Please let me know if you received the email and your thoughts. I am not a major data guru - just a little old pharmacist who reviewed meds in a past managed care clinical position. Not a fan of the vax - skeptical of new drugs - especially new categories - even more skeptical of products with EUA when there are potential existing products that may be beneficial, if you get me drift.
I doubt that many policy makers and public servants are smart enough to understand the arguments you make linking the excess deaths to the vaccines. It's confusing enough for them to be able to just say to themselves 'It must be Covid - the vaccines help'. If they really understood they'd change their message. They hear an argument like yours, recognize that you're arguing that the vaccines caused more deaths but without a real grasp of your argument they don't find it compelling. Then they hear some other 'expert' arguing that the vaccines saved lives, without really understanding their arguments either and why they are weak, and they go with the one that they'd prefer to believe, which is 'vaccines good'.
My plan is to compare aircraft accidents and incidents in 2021 against 2019. The percentage of heart attacks and ‘pilot medical emergencies.’ My theory is that they’ve increased.
Your paragraph "Given that there are -studies showing the complete ineffectiveness of Covid intervention...". I have been following <c19early.com> and their metanalyses and forest plots demonstrate considerable treatment efficacy for various interventions, particularly early treatment.
It is very difficult to inform true believers of the excess mortality of vaxxes and interventions, even, or especially, physicians. Excess ACM is always attributed to Covid and no effort is spared to ignore the recent injections.
So... with those percentage vaccinated versus excess deaths plots... they're missing a time dimension, it's kinda implicit in that the rollout took time.
But If it's directly the vaccine causing say strokes and heart atttacks... Then you'd expect a straighter line, no? This pattern lends itself more to leaky vaccines, increased susceptibility from misdirected immune systems, ADE/OAS mechanisms, right?
I wonder if other nations can clarify this picture? UK/Italy who had bad first waves for example?
Trying to inform politicians and bureaucrats who have a different agenda is very difficult, to ask these same people to admit to a policy failure with real deaths? I would say is even less likely. The inability to admit failure seems to be a political survival trait.
Thank you for your passion to do this. I have different passions, many of them - like I have a passion to know this. I drink in the information, like I drink in the information in 2000 Mules. I have a passion for truth and human rights. Those passions have served me well in the plandemic. The "kool-aid" - all artificial colors and flavorings, quite deadly - was never tempting.
"However, what is undeniable is that there are almost 800k excess deaths since mass vaccination started in the States and natural COVID cannot possibly account for any substantial part of them. Even if it does, that’s a massive failure of public health anyway. Remind me again, how many contrite public “servants” have admitted this complete and utter abject failure?"
Equal parts amazement and heartbreak that the incontrovertible truth is still denied.
Hi Joel, Impressive data as always but a huge problem with the basic premise! I've put some of the evidence we've been given on the virus so far here https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/spikes-and-knobs?s=w- there was not 'enough' virus to form a density gradient and take EM pictures- so how do they know it's there? No detection through indirect methods not also seen in uninfected cultures. No purification of the sample that was first sequenced, how do they know where all the RNA fragments came from in the first place?
And what is cvd anyway- we don't need a virus in a world of pollution, toxins, pesticides, poverty and obesity- causing all sorts of symptoms they like to lump together. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/were-so-far-down-the-rabbit-hole?s=w
If we don't get this sorted out in ours heads - there will be viruses and vaccines ad infinitum for ever
Impressive Data presentation/ explanation! Thanks!
I'm glad Steve K calls on you and others when he goes venturing in numbers. His latest made me chuckle because I wondered if you'd have figures on folks who died within 14 days before getting vaxxed! LOL!
Your plots here are devastating enough, and coupled with Dowd's insurance guys' plots, there's no doubt. We're in a new normal of barbarism. I guess 20th Century democide was just a dry run.
One variable in the mix is the appearance of Delta, which if I recall correctly, was both more transmissible and virulent. That does not challenge the contention that "vaccines were far less effective than advertised", but it might challenge the contention that "vaccines make the vaccinated more susceptible to Covid".
I still don't understand why the mRNA vaccines were so focused on generating ONLY spikes rather than two or more parts of SARS-2. If they had, it's possible the vaccines would have been more effective against Delta and Omicron. Of course it's also possible that the vaccines would have caused far more frequent and severe side-effects.
Thank you for your passion to do this. I have different passions, many of them - like I have a passion to know this. I drink in the information, like I drink in the information in 2000 Mules. I have a passion for truth and human rights. Those passions have served me well in the plandemic. The "kool-aid" - all artificial colors and flavorings, quite deadly - was never tempting.
Excellent work.
One caveat: That which you label "Covid deaths" should be listed as "deaths attributed to Covid" or some such qualifier.
What constitutes a "Covid death" is up for an audit as all of the Covid mortality data is fraught with false attribution, statistical manipulation and outright fraud.
I love these analyzes you've been doing and these recent posts. 👍🏼
I so appreciate your work on this. I sent you an email (I hope it makes it to you) with my notes on looking at the data from another perspective. Please let me know if you received the email and your thoughts. I am not a major data guru - just a little old pharmacist who reviewed meds in a past managed care clinical position. Not a fan of the vax - skeptical of new drugs - especially new categories - even more skeptical of products with EUA when there are potential existing products that may be beneficial, if you get me drift.
I doubt that many policy makers and public servants are smart enough to understand the arguments you make linking the excess deaths to the vaccines. It's confusing enough for them to be able to just say to themselves 'It must be Covid - the vaccines help'. If they really understood they'd change their message. They hear an argument like yours, recognize that you're arguing that the vaccines caused more deaths but without a real grasp of your argument they don't find it compelling. Then they hear some other 'expert' arguing that the vaccines saved lives, without really understanding their arguments either and why they are weak, and they go with the one that they'd prefer to believe, which is 'vaccines good'.
My plan is to compare aircraft accidents and incidents in 2021 against 2019. The percentage of heart attacks and ‘pilot medical emergencies.’ My theory is that they’ve increased.
Your paragraph "Given that there are -studies showing the complete ineffectiveness of Covid intervention...". I have been following <c19early.com> and their metanalyses and forest plots demonstrate considerable treatment efficacy for various interventions, particularly early treatment.
It is very difficult to inform true believers of the excess mortality of vaxxes and interventions, even, or especially, physicians. Excess ACM is always attributed to Covid and no effort is spared to ignore the recent injections.
What is the definition of "excess deaths"? Compared to historic averages of most recent years?
So... with those percentage vaccinated versus excess deaths plots... they're missing a time dimension, it's kinda implicit in that the rollout took time.
But If it's directly the vaccine causing say strokes and heart atttacks... Then you'd expect a straighter line, no? This pattern lends itself more to leaky vaccines, increased susceptibility from misdirected immune systems, ADE/OAS mechanisms, right?
I wonder if other nations can clarify this picture? UK/Italy who had bad first waves for example?