Two years ago (before I was deplatformed by LinkedIn), I was sharing what I thought was insightful and helpful information from world-renown epidemiologists like Johan Giesecke who were criticizing the rest-of-the-world response to the COVID plandemic and inevitably supporting the much more reasonable Swedish approach.

Of course, this was met with harsh criticism from those self-important leftie media pawns like Nick Cohen of The Guardian accusing Sweden of “deadly folly”.

Sweden’s chief pandemic epidemiologist cautioned that it would be two years before anyone could really know what responses worked and which ones didn’t.

Dead Man Talking

Sweden, Damn Sweden!

2020 - The Year of COVID-19 and Conspiracy Theories from Tin-Foil Hat Wearers Like Me Our main conspiracy theories in 2020 (made as early as March) were: COVID-19 is amenable to risk-stratification, i.e. protect the elderly and those with co-morbidities and the rest should just get on with life…

a year ago · 184 likes · 40 comments · Joel Smalley

Personally, I thought it was conclusive after four weeks. But, hey, what do I know? I’m not an epidemiologist!!

But just for the record, on the two-year anniversary of the deadly plague, let’s see if there is any substance to Tegnell’s claim and any evidence of Sweden’s “deadly folly”.

No deadly folly that I can see. Can you?

In fact, apart from their admitted failure in not protecting the care homes, in the words of a rather less respected epidemiologist, you would have to concede that Sweden got it “mostly right”?

No, Neil, you were completely wrong. Proven wrong in July 20201 and even more wrong now.

1

The False Premise Of COVID-19, Published on July 21, 2020, Joel Smalley MBA

Dead Man Talking

We really do need to talk about Sweden