Is it a penny dropping? Is it the tide turning? Two years too late but are The Experts™ finally, unapologetically admitting failure just as the experts predicted all along?
Bollocks. This guy, whose committee voted 16-2 AGAINST boosters for people less than 50 in the U.S. well over 2 years ago, already knows the answer. The vaccines were never worth a large, shiny, softened-by-the-sun, turd. I don't know much about epitopes and such, but I know BS when I smell it.
With all of these high profile 180 switcharoos, look for one or more of the tells:
- they mostly blame MRNA jabs, adenovirus jabs never mentioned despite comparable harms
- they mostly blame Pfizer (chosen sacrificial pfall guy?), Moderna is rarely mentioned (Astra Zeneca and J&J are adenovirus/DNA so are ignored despite comparable harms)
- “traditional” vaccines still a safe and effective intervention generally
- “viruses and variants as pathogens” and germ theory orthodoxy is alive and well
- adverse reactions mostly rare
- COVID-19 illness also causes the outcomes purported to be jab-related
Why did North London BBC, this morning, allow Dr Aseem Malhotra to discuss his concerns that the covid injections are causing cardiac adverse events. He was also allowed to disparage Chris whitty, by disagreeing with whitty on the use of statins. Was this intentional on behalf of the bbc or have they now lost one too many employees post vaxx and have turned a corner?
Dr Offit has been saying boosters are not necessary for everyone for the past year, this is not news. His point is that once you have either been vaccinated or have had COVID, it is no longer necessary for healthy people to get a booster because the incremental benefit is tiny.
Furthermore, he points out that the bivalent booster was only tested in eight mice and so there is no actual data to show they are effective in humans. He voted against the bivalent booster for this reason.
So no, his interview this week is not him changing his view.
Joel, I have an issue with the first paragraph from Dr. Offit. I think it could be read as meaning to cease inoculation, OR to continue inoculating...! Or is it me being thick...?
When I first started warning folks that a vaccine for a rapidly shifting antigen like a coronavirus was a risky idea because in the time it takes to produce the vaccine a new variant will appear which might render the vaccines useless, friends tried to tell me I "didn't understand the science".
Right. Then when it became apparent that cases, hospitalisations & even fatalities were rising despite the widespread rollout & I contended that vaccine-related harm was being obfuscated as covid-related, the same people tried to tell me that this was not because the vaccines were dangerous but because the new variants were bypassing them.
Which is exactly as I warned before the vaccines even came out. But I don't think my friends saw much of their own hypocrisy.
He went on z dog quite a while ago against the first booster for college-age kids. The university he works for gets a lot of money from vaccine research. Could he only stomach harming people with two shots but not three?
Bollocks. This guy, whose committee voted 16-2 AGAINST boosters for people less than 50 in the U.S. well over 2 years ago, already knows the answer. The vaccines were never worth a large, shiny, softened-by-the-sun, turd. I don't know much about epitopes and such, but I know BS when I smell it.
I’ve said it before. Offit is a malignant menace. This is pure theater and CYA in anticipation of what’s coming.
With all of these high profile 180 switcharoos, look for one or more of the tells:
- they mostly blame MRNA jabs, adenovirus jabs never mentioned despite comparable harms
- they mostly blame Pfizer (chosen sacrificial pfall guy?), Moderna is rarely mentioned (Astra Zeneca and J&J are adenovirus/DNA so are ignored despite comparable harms)
- “traditional” vaccines still a safe and effective intervention generally
- “viruses and variants as pathogens” and germ theory orthodoxy is alive and well
- adverse reactions mostly rare
- COVID-19 illness also causes the outcomes purported to be jab-related
It’s really impossible for me to believe this is anything other than a pivot to the next step in their overall plan to make us all slaves.
Show me his vax status.
Just a Clown falling off the ‘ancestral perch’ in the proverbial research gold mine.
Why did North London BBC, this morning, allow Dr Aseem Malhotra to discuss his concerns that the covid injections are causing cardiac adverse events. He was also allowed to disparage Chris whitty, by disagreeing with whitty on the use of statins. Was this intentional on behalf of the bbc or have they now lost one too many employees post vaxx and have turned a corner?
Dr Offit has been saying boosters are not necessary for everyone for the past year, this is not news. His point is that once you have either been vaccinated or have had COVID, it is no longer necessary for healthy people to get a booster because the incremental benefit is tiny.
Furthermore, he points out that the bivalent booster was only tested in eight mice and so there is no actual data to show they are effective in humans. He voted against the bivalent booster for this reason.
So no, his interview this week is not him changing his view.
Joel, I have an issue with the first paragraph from Dr. Offit. I think it could be read as meaning to cease inoculation, OR to continue inoculating...! Or is it me being thick...?
Ya think?
When I first started warning folks that a vaccine for a rapidly shifting antigen like a coronavirus was a risky idea because in the time it takes to produce the vaccine a new variant will appear which might render the vaccines useless, friends tried to tell me I "didn't understand the science".
Right. Then when it became apparent that cases, hospitalisations & even fatalities were rising despite the widespread rollout & I contended that vaccine-related harm was being obfuscated as covid-related, the same people tried to tell me that this was not because the vaccines were dangerous but because the new variants were bypassing them.
Which is exactly as I warned before the vaccines even came out. But I don't think my friends saw much of their own hypocrisy.
He went on z dog quite a while ago against the first booster for college-age kids. The university he works for gets a lot of money from vaccine research. Could he only stomach harming people with two shots but not three?
Hogwash.
Thank you for that clarification. It's on the right side, thank goodness!
Wow
Well then...