That is the obvious conclusion. I wish he had said that and of course we will have government campaigns encouraging us to have it for the next flu season.
Well, get used to it. All the supposedly woke folk here are determined to wait for anyone ELSE to do something about all the problems, but will never themselves get involved with saving lives.
They lack the balls to stand up to a single criminally corrupt politician.
Me? Refusing to acknowledge compelled speech for starters. Saying what I mean not what I am meant to say. I'm 70. My parents' generation risked and laid down their lives fighting people who think like this.
My stepdaughter, for example, got woke brainwashed at SOAS (premier UK Uni. Once). She called me a "Cis" male. I told her she was misgendering me, as I am and always have been MALE. (Sex, not gender). She shut up, as I threw her shity straight back at her and she was stymied.
This shit is evil and a manifestation of totalitarianism.
I'm involved in ridiculing these ridiculous theories so we can get on and fight this virus then my children can live without the worry of transmitting or catching covid eventually.Anti vaxers are the reason this pandemic is becoming worse and all they are doing is guessing and hoping that they won't have to have a tiny prick(in the arm)🙂
"Involved in?" That's WAY too loaded a question. It implies YOU only feel safe in crowds so large, you feel you can be invisible within it. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but it's an ESPECIALLY strange question to ask of someone who already stated 1) an unsupported opinion, & 2) that there IS no one standing up to be "involved in."
Everywhere I go, it's the same. Look at Jeremy Pointon's latest reply about generalities of people "standing up" with no indication of to who or what they stood up to, how, if it succeeded, if they stood for anything themselves.
That's my Entire Point: you all only VERBALLY state your opinions, then the English Language calls that "standing up" instead of what it truly is, Expressing An Opinion & absolutely nothing more, & you're all here like 5-year-olds screaming "I DID SO scream ABOUT the problem."
That's not standing up to it. That's whining about your dislikes.
In the meantime, you've all fooled no one but yourselves that this is = to standing up. So much so, that the suggestion that we DO ACTUALLY try to do something to PHYSICALLY END the thing killing children is found offensive.
If I'm wrong, then walk me through it. How is anything written here on this site or anywhere else on social media going to end these mandates?
Come on. Step by step: Daddy-Government hears your pathetic whining, Mommy-Nancy Pelosi & Daddy-Mitch McConnell deliver their apology with hands held & fingers intertwined, you all have your Great Moment where your faith in politicians is restored, then the mandates end?
Yeah, no. Once they TAKE the lobbying $ to FORWARD the mandates, they forward the mandates regardless of how pathetically you all wait for the imaginary Caring Parent to respond otherwise. & they HAVE TAKEN the lobbying $, http://allaregreen.us/.
Repeatedly.
Now: where is this group of others ready to act like adults & HOLD POLITICIANS ACCOUNTABLE that I can get "involved in?" I've created several groups people could have joined myself over the years.
I couldn't PAY you utter cowards to join, & everyone I've explained this to in person has run away in utter terror at the prospect of ACTUALLY standing up to them. In writing, when given the more comfortable distance like here, people only simply do the immature 12-year-old trick & ask what I Personally am doing.
As if I can make congress do anything on my own.
Strange, isn't it? YOU are all waiting for more other people to join you to continue doing nothing because you KNOW THAT you need mass public support.
I point out that we already have WAY MORE of that than we'll ever need & that we can do something now, & then you all ask why I am doing myself.
Yeah I bet you'd prefer to see riots everywhere and all lefties slaughtered rather than think for yourself and admit that you're more probably wrong than right as like 99.9999per cent of the population you don't even know if you're right or wrong but won't take the advise of the few brilliant scientists that do.
Don't know if I'm right or wrong? 1) NO virus is contagious; The contagion theory has been debunked several times. Only a couple of hundred have been included in chapters 7 & 8 of https://betterness.com/wp-content/uploads/TheInvisibleRainbow.pdf then vetted by the publisher who would face libel charges from the powerful vaccine manufacturers if they were incorrect or lying.
"But Covid is different." In what way? What do the studies on it show?
Well, that's what the Alberta Health Minister Deena Hinshaw wanted to know, because she had a court date wherein she wanted to present all the evidence shown in studies proving that masking, social distancing, testing etc. help prevent the spread of it.
So, now you have a problem. How are you going to twist ALL of these real, demonstrable facts back in upon themselves so that they look like your beliefs. That's the same human nature you're accusing many of in your comments, how people's opinions need debunking. But I'm showing you FACTS.
I COULD ADD all the videos of Kary Mullis the inventor of the PCR MACHINES (there are no such thing as PCR "tests," that's a made up term. The machines do not "test for" anything, they make copies of what they're told to if any are found in the samples they're given. They can't even "test" to see if the virus they're making copies OF are dead, already killed by a person's immune system) but you can find talks where he says this all over Odysee video platform.
Youtube of course has scrubbed these as has Facebook.
So, to recap we have 1) HUNDREDS of independent researches showing NO virus spreads through contamination, 2) going back over 100 years now, consistently. No one has EVER infected any living organism or tissue by exposing it to viral infected organisms or tissue.
3) NO tests exist on Covid specifically to show ANY of the measures you want us to get on board with work. None. None at the CDC, none at the W.H.O., or at the N.I.H.
None.
4) Covid itself has yet to be isolated which makes it hard to test, & 5) the "test" they claim can tell if one is infected with it can not DO that.
So ALL we have left is people unable to get compensation for the harms done them https://duckduckgo.com/?q=maddie+de+garay&t=newext&atb=v290-1&ia=web because of illegal protections given by politicians because of lobbying http://www.nvic.org/injury-compensation/origihanlaw.aspx. Is that enough for you? Or will it take more to shake your belief in Mommy & Daddy-Government? Social psychology says you will simply avoid looking at any facts presented here & simply try & find some opinion piece that claims to debunk any of this without having done any debunking.
Lobbying exists, http://allaregreen.us/. So tell me (since you write in another comment how you can't believe "every politician is in on this") HOW do any politicians get away with this if they AREN'T ALL in on it?
As the articles of impeachment against Trump reminded us, taking private $ for personal profit WHILE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IS 100% illegal, despite what they claim Citizens United says. How DOES EVERY politicians forget this simple fact every single day?
They're not in on knowing the jabs are harmful: they just can't take the $ then vote against the people PAYING them it.
D'uh. Which is WHY this IS STILL illegal! D'uh & d'uh again!!
As for the threat of it BEING illegal holding them in check, one cannot PAY Americans to act to protect their own children if it risks angering Mommy or Daddy & that's exactly how Americans view their politicians, as Authority figures whose wrath they are terrified of provoking.
So don't worry... you don't NEED to consider ANY facts. The entire population of the Western world will NEVER ACTUALLY ACT TO do anything to reduce Daddy's power.
You can relax now. No one will ever act to show these truths in anything but a rhetorical way on social media where it has absolutely no effect on His Ability to push us around.
Riiiight... only SOME politicians take lobbying $, as evidenced by http://allaregreen.us/. Or perhaps you think any politicians can take this $, vote against those paying it & survive?
Seriously... you're telling us you've NEVER heard of lobbying? No one needs to be IN on any conspiracy. The cowardly American public would GLADLY sacrifice their own children to show how Blind their Faith in Authority Figures is. As evidenced by the fact that when I point to the fact that lobbying is illegal as well as MANDATING untested or proven harmful products, everyone HERE gets horribly upset with me.
Indeed. There has been a bit more investigation into this and indeed many other vaccines too. The suspicion is that none of them works particularly well but it's not possible to determine because, just like the EUA mRNA jabs, there is no reliable evidence provided by the manufacturers or independent analysts demonstrating it.
Get the DVD from Andrew Wakefield called Vaxxed. He linked autism to the MMR vaccine and the British Medical System Destroyed his livelihood. He realized there were no Studies on vaccine effectiveness or mortality. None. Because it would expose the truth about how ineffective vaccines really are.
Read Doctoring Data by Dr Malcolm Kendrick - he outlines the lack of relevant endpoints to many drug trials/studies - how many people would know that, according to his research up to the time his book was written for example , no trial into the use of Statins had ever demonstrated improved life expectancy or reduced morbidity - none. But they did show that Statins reduced cholesterol - "So that's all right then".
Which begs the question, to this avowed non scientist, why a very large, multi billion dollar Pharmaceutical company with a recent history of multi billion dollar liability judgements against their business "practices", inject the placebo group of the initial - now revealed to be ethically, morally bankrupt and devoid of scientific worth - trial weeks into the trial thus destroying ANY possibility of trawling the long term safety/adverse effects data for posterity. A stone cold criminal act of a 100% criminally actuated business - how do the ESG wallahs factor that corporate action into their metrics?
But the fact that they make $ from lying to us ISN'T something we should look into? Just the end results of making selling us death for $?
It's amazing how everyone here 100% KNOWS that their politicians are 100% complicit in this & yet studiously avoids mentioning it. The jab MANUFACTURERS do NOT MANDATE the jabs.
The jabs do not mandate themselves.
You all know that your politicians have ALL the info you have & possibly more & yet intentionally mandate them anyway for... some reason http://allaregreen.us/.
& everyone here just dives deeper into their beliefs that "Mommy and Daddy-Government would NEVER DO that to us."
No discussion of stopping the jabs. Only discussion of telling Daddy what Daddy already knows, then irrationally hoping that yet somehow, "Daddy" will Turn Moral tomorrow afternoon just for the sake of it.
Who of these do you think will suggest first that they all reject millions of extra $? Ted Cruz? Or that REALLY righteous guy who blocked the Heroic First Responders from getting needed medical aid for years, Mitch McConnell? Which of THESE PEOPLE http://allaregreen.us/ who KNOWINGLY mandated the jabs do you think is going to risk their own hide to rescue you?
The vast majority of politicians, media and medical "professionals" are nothing more than whores for the pharma cartel. You can apply the above "Pro or Ho" question to other groups not just doctors. It's such an easy softball and almost none of them will answer "No".
You are correct. Nobody is coming to save us. Anyone who says that is just trying to delay a response from the public holding them responsible.
We're on our own folks. Time to fight by any means necessary to stop this.
Whereas all citizens are bravely fighting in the trenches against this? Listen, I can't find the original comment you're replying to, but I'm Highly Critical of people waiting for others to rescue them. & here you are complaining how others aren't leading the way.
Where would doctors go to defy this? Dr. Sam Bailey had to give up her license to practice in order to continue making posts about this. Should we ask Dr. Andrew Wakefield why waiting for others doesn't work?
It doesn't work because people who wait for others to lead the fight are utter cowards who then sit back and wait to see how the fight goes WITHOUT GIVING A SINGLE SHRED OF REAL SUPPORT!
You all act like 4-year-olds terrified of Divine Retribution from some Authority FIGURE!!
There are already laws on the books making lobbying as well as mandating untested or proven harmful products illegal. It takes mass public pressure to enforce this.
NOT ONE PERSON HERE WOULD JOIN ANY EFFORT TO hold a single one of their cherished Daddy-Figures in politics accountable, NO MATTER HOW many doctors joined. Cowardice is cowardice ALL the time, not "except when others are courageous." You need others to be courageous FOR you, never with you.
I've been leading this charge for decades. Every time it's the same lame excuses. Some version of "We need to wait for Daddy-Government's permission to act."
A nice, built-in excuse to do nothing. "We have to wait." For more others, for "someone" to "do something."
Please do not misunderstand me - I have very personal experience of the corrupt elements of the medical profession, would have lost 'ooo's if I had take the "advice " of my MP ( "Congressman") - and I have direct first hand knowledge through experience of the criminal behaviour of Big Business hell bent on destroying Joe Soap for dollars. I am as sceptical and distrusting of so called professionals as it gets - I have conducted a campaign of pressurising my MP with incontrovertible scientific papers and studies to try to shift his one eyed support for "the narrative". I "ginger", I put "the case" and suffer the ridicule of the ignorant - I am the "person on the bus" no one sits near. So not sure why you think I am on the back foot ( or in your vernacular, WS 3 games all, bottom of the ninth, Mariano Rivera sitting on a 0 -2 count, bases loaded, I am batter number 9, batting average barely positive and I need a walk off homer with 7 Cy Young Gold Glove fielders in front of me, and I have an injured leg into the bargain) - a 7.62 FMJ is needed for these criminals, or should I say WEF graduates?
ALL harmful corporate agendas have to go through http://allaregreen.us/. Corporations do not have the Public's Trust. Only politicians do to that extent.
Politicians are exempt from precisely NO laws in any Western nation. So obviously, what's stopping us is this fear of abandoning faith in politicians as extensions of 'Government, He Who Protects Us.'
The majority of people would never consciously get on board with anything that appears to reduce the powers of Mommy and Daddy-Government. They ALSO would join anything that Doesn't APPEAR TO directly do so.
Like :March Against Monsanto." Politicians allow that corporation whatever they want due to lobbying. So affecting Monsanto = affecting lobbying, = reducing the power of politicians. So the trick is to start what appears to be an attack of the power & influence of the hated corporations, that later swings to include that of politicians - after one has amassed sufficient public support.
People won't abandon their subconscious (a-HA!) faith in their Perceived Protectors without something else to latch onto emotionally. These desires conflict & confuse in the early goings. Like everyone SAID they wanted the Canadian trucking convoy to succeed.
... but at what? No one will SAY "end the mandates" in that context because what if they HAD succeeded?
Federal governments would seem smaller & weaker than previously assumed, & then there would have been REAL panic.
So my ideas have always been to introduce a campaign that appeals to the masses, targets the hated corporations, gathers mass grass roots support, then adds more things that indirectly affects the power of lobbying, subtly adding more things that would make it impossible. Once the public subconsciously wants it to succeed, add on how it's illegal for politicians to ACCEPT lobbying $ as it is to offer it.
Yeah right lol so everyone who holds power in the whole world and all the countries in it is in on a big deception which has brought mayhem to their economies and now inflation on an unprecedented scale .....on a scale of 1 to 100 how likely is that.Just man up and get vaccinated.After all this time you can't even use the excuse that it's experimental anymore so you drag up rogue scientists who want to make some money unscrupulously
"just man up" - ROTFLMAO. Yale University did a study in the summer of 2020 and "bravery" was one of their manipulation techniques. Congrats on being so easily manipulated.
It is STILL EXPERIMENTAL. You don't seem to be following the information exposed by the Corminaty lawsuit. 108 days to approve and 75 years to release was what the FDA wanted but the judge was having none of it.
"Man up"? ROTFLMAO. Which one of the Yale talking points was that?
"Get vaccinated"? For something that hasn't been in circulation for over year and half? LOL.
"Not experimental"? Wow you sure haven't kept up. The review & approval in 108 DAYS by the FDA who wanted 75 YEARS to release it shows FRAUD in epic fashion. https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
Jul 11, 2022·edited Jul 11, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
You say “the truth will eventually come out”
Its already out. Half the country knows/believes these vaccines are poison.
The other half only believe what they hear from mainstream media and they will never concede that they were wrong. This is as “out” as the truth will ever be. With all this awful data we have they just started giving this stuff to toddlers. The vaccines are an unstoppable force. All we can do is protect ourselves and our family—big pharma gonna big pharma to the end of time.
It's only about 20% max I'm the UK.....I haven't been able to stop immediate family getting these useless poisons. Even when my 84 year old mum (as healthy an 84 year old you could find btw) was rushed into intensive care within a day of her 2nd shot, my 2 sisters STILL went ahead and had a 3rd shot and a booster!! Even when you fully explain the fraudulent PCR test or the utter garbage Lateral flow it doesn't work. They are still of the opinion that our governments, and others worldwide are on their side (laughable). Even when I point them to the World wars as examples of the elite not giving a toss about It's people, it doesn't work!! ....one MAJOR victory for me though has been my daughter deciding NOT to give these clotshots to my granddaughters , which was such a relief
It's how the vaccine is administered that is causing these incidents.Check out aspiration.Basically the nurse should make sure that they don't inject into a vain and that's tricky if you've only done it a few times.
As a UK GP has pointed out, an injection into tissue should be pulled back to reveal or not if a vessel/vein has been breached - I am jabbed and this was not done 3 times - and I only found this out afterwards. And if you truly believe that it is the method of administering these drugs that causes these "incidents" , sincerely you have my sympathies. Please check out Dr Richard Fleming's video showing how these drugs - all those with EUA - act when injected directly into the blood stream. If after viewing you then still believe the skill of the injector is the issue, then truly I pity you but more so your children.
the uptake is low in kids and toddlers. I think most people got Omicron and are consequently less fearful. However, if mandates continue, more parents will comply. I am very curious if state and national level data on the % of Americans who are vax vs unvaxxed are accurate, or more coercive propaganda.
Emeritus Professor of Medical Microbiology and Immunology Professor Sucharit Bhakdi said exactly the same at around the same time in this 40-minute interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IBv3A8-ShI&t=3s
Even if the intramuscular injection of mRNA vaccine could somehow magically stimulate durable mucosal antibody production and B-T memory cell immunity without suppressing innate immunity (it cannot but this is a thought experiment) through hijacking a few cells' peptide factories into producing foreign spike protein antigens and subsequent durable antigen-matching neutralizing antibodies to them - those vaccinal antibodies are made for neutralizing spike protein that no longer exists in circulation, but that can still bind ineffectually to new variant viral spike proteins with different receptor binding domains, making antibody-antigen complexes that result in a chain of events culminating in a far more drastic, severe and possibly even fatally ineffectual immune response to what should have been a mild self-limiting upper respiratory infection. It boggles my mind that a retired store clerk like me with no academic degree can get this, and PhD public health officials don't.
Jul 11, 2022·edited Jul 11, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
"It boggles my mind that a retired store clerk like me with no academic degree can get this, and PhD public health officials don't."
This part. I'm a nobody. Just a curious human with life experience. I lost two kittens a decade ago to FIP, an ADE version of coronavirus that sometimes happens to vaccinated kittens that get subsequent natural infections. At the time, there was no cure. Coronaviruses are normally just colds for kittens. RIP kitty friends. I sincerely hope that this human experiment doesn't end like that.
What are you, 8 years old? Because everyone has HEARD OF lobbying. But only a child would think that "Daddy-Government is So Pure that this $ he's accepting wouldn't affect his decision-making."
THIS is why it all continue; All of you keep thinking of 'Government' as if you have to go to 'it' for protection.
Well wakey-wakey: these people here http://allaregreen.us/ ARE the only government you HAVE! They CAN'T refuse the $, the can't refuse to go along with the corporate agendas after taking it, & you are all still waiting for them to do exactly that.
"Campaigning?" You mean searching for support for a thing by communicating with others?
What is this right here then? If commenting, discussing things on social media isn't campaigning, then why do YOU continually do nothing but?
Maybe you should define the difference between what that word means in all other contexts, & the way you wish it to apply addressing me here?
Better yet, tell me what's step #2 after "campaigning?" Do we then gather together & beg the decision-makers in power more loudly to... to what? Pardon what seems like a stupid question, but once you've "campaigned" against the mandates, what then?
Do the pharma companies decide to stop making trillions because you campaigned? That's it? You only have to whine as a group & they decide they don't like wealth any more? Or do you expect the politicians to voluntarily reject it?
You DO KNOW what lobbying is, right?
So tell me what are you talking about by "campaigning," & how it has anything to do with ending the mandates?
What is the connection from campaigning to your Intended End Goal pray tell?
Will the vaccines themselves get upset, grab their syringes & go home? WHY does everyone insist that ranting ABOUT the problems SOLVES them without us ever having to take action to stop the people BEHIND the problems?
Mandating untested OR harmful products is illegal in every Western nation. Accepting private, corporate $ is an illegal conflict of interest in them too.
Politicians are exempt from precisely NO laws in any Western nation. If we got all the public support needed for ending the mandates, but not one of you had the courage to hold the people enforcing the mandates accountable, then how can you stop them continuing the mandates?
This is an infantile wish-fulfillment fantasy, that "Daddy-Government" will respond favorably, because his Caring Children whined.
I have BEEN "campaigning" for people to grow tf up & realize that it's Our Job to FORCE those in decision-making power to comply to the law, or we have tyranny. It's Our Job. You're begging them to police THEMSELVES?
WHO is coming to rescue you & end the mandates if we won't? Gandalf's swallows from Middle-Venus? The Congolese Air Force? When all your campaigning for more people to beg those in power to VOLUNTARILY reject their wealth & power are gathered, what will YOU all actually do when they refuse yet again?
Potent material indeed. Come ON, you hypocrite! What does begging MORE people to beg again & again what begging has already failed to elicit do to end the mandates? Walk me through it!
Really? Here's something I wrote; Mandating untested OR harmful products is illegal in every Western nation. Accepting private, corporate $ is an illegal conflict of interest in them too.
Politicians are exempt from precisely NO laws in any Western nation. If we got all the public support needed for ending the mandates, but not one of you had the courage to hold the people enforcing the mandates accountable, then how can you stop them continuing the mandates?
I HANDED YOU The Way to end the mandates, legally & non-violently with fewer people than have sites like this up. If all the people you knew wrote up a legal challenge then SIGNED ON to it, then introduced it across all these forums with dozens of signatures, then this public you've "been campaigning" would also sign on.
After that, you could pressure other groups to join. After that, giants like James Corbett of The Corbett Report.
You get HIS listeners on board, THEN you have enough public support to flip this into a genuine legal challenge. What can the government do? Arrest MILLIONS? If it was THAT hopeless, then what use is all your campaigning?
I can't get your support for a feasible, legal non-violent solution & you won't back one yourselves. Seems that neither the government, the jab-manufacturers (who cannot mandate anything themselves, they HAVE TO go through government) nor I am the problem. You all pretend you don't see solutions even when one is written out before your eyes.
You ONLY SAW insults? Or you only CHOSE to see insults?
A bit stern, but you are right. Now what? The vote won't do it, the judiciary won't (reliably) do it. A civil war scenario is just what they want to get rid of the real resisters as quickly as possible. So, now what?
Mandating untested or proven harmful products is illegal. Politicians are exempt from precisely no laws in any Western nation.
The whole point of that is that if the politicians are in collusion, so IS the judiciary. So it's up to us to coerce either the politicians or the judiciary to play with us, or we DO SOMETHING about it like remove or reduce their power.
The real problem is the cowardice of the majority, so how to get around this? Easier than one might think.
The majority of people would never consciously get on board with anything that appears to reduce the powers of Mommy and Daddy-Government. They ALSO would join anything that Doesn't APPEAR TO directly do so.
Like :March Against Monsanto." Politicians allow that corporation whatever they want due to lobbying. So affecting Monsanto = affecting lobbying, = reducing the power of politicians. So the trick is to start what appears to be an attack of the power & influence of the hated corporations, that later swings to include that of politicians - after one has amassed sufficient public support.
People won't abandon their subconscious (a-HA!) faith in their Perceived Protectors without something else to latch onto emotionally. These desires conflict & confuse in the early goings. Like everyone SAID they wanted the Canadian trucking convoy to succeed.
... but at what? No one will SAY "end the mandates" in that context because what if they HAD succeeded?
Federal governments would seem smaller & weaker than previously assumed, & then there would have been REAL panic.
So my ideas have always been to introduce a campaign that appeals to the masses, targets the hated corporations, gathers mass grass roots support, then adds more things that indirectly affects the power of lobbying, subtly adding more things that would make it impossible. Once the public subconsciously wants it to succeed, add on how it's illegal for politicians to ACCEPT lobbying $ as it is to offer it.
I don't disagree with the indirect approach, but it requires organization and cooperation. Once it is seen to be a threat, some slap-down will occur. In the trucker case, JT overplayed his hand and scared a lot of folks when he attacked supporter's bank accounts. Which was helpful to wake up some more folks. Perhaps mass-awakening is possible, if slow and painful.
And because the people in charge can still be brought to justice is why they aren't conspiring like the anti vaxers are suggesting in their fairy tales
Nice start. Don't know what you mean by the finish. Are you giving up before even discussing what can be done? JT over-played his hand... so? Members of the trucker convoy accused him of murder & treason TO his FACE!!
Then she dropped the mic, wept, & left him in power to continue both.
& you're still in that mentality too apparently; That we can't deal with mere mortal corrupt politicians as human beings, but have to leave them with all decision-making power over our lives. Why? Because 'Government' = "Daddy!!"
Yeah, he overplayed & people got scared. And they STILL ALLOWED him to do whatever tf he wants! So why point to that as progress?
Jul 11, 2022·edited Jul 11, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
On another related issue, a UK GP has recently published a mea culpa; the GP has admitted the 180 deg about turn from the previous position of being 100% convinced of all things SARS COV2 . Very brave of this GP, who potentially may be censured and be the subject of a GMC kangaroo court. One of the things that stuck in my mind was the observation that the recently "trained" jabbers may not have withdrawn the needle after first insertion into the arm muscle to test if they had struck a vein - I am jabbed ( never ever again) and that did NOT happen with me; implication being that the jab may have been directly injected into jabbed veins, rendering the implausibility of mucosal antibody reactions a fact and sending the jab into the blood stream, straight to the ACE2 receptor and then into the cells - bingo. Scope Dr Richard Fleming for the effects - frightening. Requested a D Dimer test with my GP to determine the extent, if any, of microclotting - flat out refusal after a lengthy very stilted conversation during which the Practice's stance of supporting the jab campaign was stated again and again ( nothing to do with the money, surely?). There is no way in this Universe that UK CMO Whitty, UK CSO Vallance and Dame Raine of >80% funded by Pharma UK MHRA , did not know what the Aussie scientist, Yeadon and others have pointed out - which makes their behaviour and actions beyond any professional protection - and that makes me very very angry.
Yeadon has been discredited now as he has a conflict of interests and it technically not fully qualified in this particular field .Google his name and don't ignore what you don't want to hear.
Dear Joel, I LOVE your substack posts after following you for years on Twitter. Regarding Prof Steele's comments, whatever he says about the site of the injection being critical also is relevant for any other vaccine. I learned this decades ago when my child was born (she is now 27) and did not vaccinate her at all. NO VACCINE CAN WORK if it enters the body in a different way to the genuine disease, except for the tetanus jab. I don't believe a coronavirus vaccine can ever work because I doubt human to human transmission. Are you familiar with Dr Samantha Bailey's work n Odyssey. She is a physician but has completely woken up to vaccines, the myth of germ theory (I think it's terrain that counts) & her stuff on vaccines is unmissable. Perhaps Prof Steele believes the mRNA jab is better if it enters your nose, but honestly, I have my doubts. Dr McCullough points out Swedish study that claims the spike protein moves to cells and enters our DNA. That is a huge problem. Anyways, just thought you might be interested in this information though there are no gaps in your knowledge & your brave endeavours to get the truth out there in order to protect us people who have no voice. Thank you.
I'm recalling at the initial rollout of these shots, the pseudo-scientific explanation with simplified, attractive infographics "showing how the spike protein works" and how everyone just lapped this up, while I looked on in horror, knowing this is mad scientist territory, with unknown effects -- and wondering why on earth everyone I knew was willing to be a guinea pig. None of my loved ones were suicidal, so why would they be willing to play Russian roulette with their one and only body? It escapes me....
Jul 11, 2022·edited Jul 12, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
Because their policies have killed so many and continue to kill, they believe they have no choice but to sustain their narrative. Consequently they will kill an increasing number of people, convincing them to boost, boost and boost some more. They are more likely to put unvaccinated in camps than retreat on mRNA jabs.
The vaccinated are the super spreaders. The vaccinated still get the disease, still transmit it to others and have identical viral loads to the unvaccinated. That has been known for over a year and even Fauci & Walensky admitted it on TV.
So where is the benefit of putting the unvaccinated in camps?
In the book "principles of mucosal immunity" by Smith, MacDonald, Blumenberg; 2013; it shows on p.124 a distribution of antibody producing cells of different types, and under the label "Mucosal", they show 80% IgA, 6% IgG. So I guess there'd be _some_ from the jab, but horribly inefficient, if I get that right? So one can imagine what strong kind of response they need to create systemically to produce an effect where it's needed w.r.t. infection.
If the jab doesn't mean a lot vs. the respiratory disease, one would have to revise ideas about the products pressing for new variants? (e.g. Vanden Bossche)
Well, I guess people who do get deeper infections _will_ contribute to that, but the density of those isn't very high? Except in special places, like old people's homes.
my impression is that GVB has lots of things in his head, but sometimes has a hard time conveying them simply. I arrived at this impression because it was sometimes hard to follow his concerns, but they were greatly clarified when he was being interviewed by others, that could simplify and clarify his meaning.
So this is just a crude and oversimplified attempt at what I think he may be up to... Let's think of someone with two arms, fighting COVID. One arm is "Humoral Immunity" and the other is "Cell Mediated, Mucosal, etc". I think GVB is not ignoring one whole arm, he is saying, oh man, you are tying a whole arm behind your back, and if you keep fighting, you might get tired of punching and have no functional defense left. He is also saying that people with natural immunity still have two arms to fight with, which just gives them better odds, long term.
Just a guess. I don't think he's ignoring, he's just focusing on describing how the shots turn your immune system into a one trick pony that will supersede a normal, multi-layered immune response
Bhakdi says the mucosal (with digestive) system work almost independently from the vascular system. I read the mucosa makes a/b's from white blood cells (through a chemical process they reach the mucosa with b/tells).
So if you get a blood test for a/bs after natural infection why is it that it's a blood test, not a swab (like PCR).
You can't cheat the universe? Maybe not. But the gamble that's been taken is that they can cheat us out of our lives. And why shouldn't they believe that? They've gotten away with so much for decades and decades. No more, is what more and more of us are saying.
2 things cause illness.. toxins and deficiencies. It’s that simple.
Vaccines put toxins into the body, weakening your immune defenses. Get the toxins out, chelation/MMS, healthy diet etc. you won’t get sick. Put toxins in, you get lots of symptoms of ‘dis-ease’ which is your body ridding itself of the poisons.
Viruses are not the cause, they are the effect. They are there to save you and detox the poisoned cell.
Believe me when I tell you, they know this. They have been experimenting for over 100 years on the best ways to make people sick and sneezing on someone is NOT how you get sick.
Hundreds of experiments have been done where sick people sneeze and cough on healthy people.. it doesn’t work. Professors of biology swollowing cholera cultures in front of a class to their horror.. but never getting sick.
If you can’t sneeze on someone and get them sick how do you get them sick??? Inject it.
Not sure why you felt the need to lash out at me instead of just scrolling on by, but I am happy to have a civil conversation with anyone willing to be respectful.
And this nut pile was vax injured in 2011 by the flu shot. Lost a baby and use of my left hand for 8 years.
After losing 8 years of my life to some mystery disease that no doctor could help with and desperately searching for relief and answers, I have learned more than I could possibly put into words (esp. to some random troll on the internet) about what makes us sick and how to heal.
But what I can tell you is I have been pain and inflammation free since October when no one thought it possible.
You might want to broaden your horizons because I have the names, literature and hundreds of studies to back up everything I said.
Name calling is a red flag. Nut pile did give me a chuckle though. I loved it when the media started calling Julian Assange names too. It means there are not clear and compelling counter arguments. But hey I'm just some guy on the internet to go at it Easy.
Im a doc in NJ USA. I have a bio chem background. thank you for posting this. me and so many others have been saying these things for 2 years. ANyone with even a basic understanding and their critical thinking skills intact would know these things.
Apart from Steele, Bhakdi and Yeadon remember Bridle said the same thing-he added that there is a possibility of the virus finally reaching the vascular system via alveoli (but I guess by then your lungs will have been damaged and you'll be in ICU), so early treatment should always have been the way.
I think the WHY question of the vax not stopping infect/transmission should be hammered home. I've had a number of arguments online and when I put the WHY question forward the answer is 'they always said you could still catch/pass on the virus'. I always reply (firstly they didn't, they claimed 100% efficacy) and you haven't answered WHY. The WHY part is VERY important because the whole vax narrative collapses-once people realise their own immune systems are doing the work it might break the spell of hypnosis (or denial or whatever people are blind against).
In the Melbourne lockdown at that time last year, I remember coming across this... I showed this to my GF at the time and she lost her mind. Massive argument ensued, claiming I was into all these "conspiracy theories". Mind blowing insanity. She got both the jabs, I got none. Were no longer together. That eternal question of Why... Why can some of us see what is going on and others cannot.
In Australia, we were confronted with all forms of the media announcing 24/7, cases, cases, etc. I kept telling friends, cases are not deaths, but fear was so strong, they complied with every mandate. Now the controllers know how simple it is to manipulate the majority.
I mean it's Mass Formation psychosis but yeah, why some succumb and some don't. I've ordered Desmet's book on the subject and can't wait for it to arrive as this question is a big deal for me.
Exactly Mass Formation, the question still remains though... Why them, why not us? Yes, got that book in the post also! hopefully will shed some light on this very question!
The vaccine is supposed to train the second line of defence, he is talking about the first line of defence. Hence the argument that vulnerable people should take it - because their first line won't cope. But it does not stop transmission (and they knew that) and so the argument that everyone should take it to protect the vulnerable was moot from the start and instead they used propaganda and coercion to force it onto people, some of who succumbed to the short term side effects and the rest are now dealing with the long term effects.
the big question here really is...does the vaccine increase your chances of survival and therefore prevent you from taking up a very valuable hospital bed which could be used for someone in a critical ,not self induced ,condition?If the people who are against vaccination could prove that the vaccine doesn't improve your chances of staying out of hospital then they would have a PROPER case.......But they can't
First, this is not true. There are plenty of data showing that the vaccine has some positive effect but only for a limited time and sadly after that the effect becomes negative because the immune system in weakened. Second, those promoting the vaccine has clearly been shown fraudulent in their claims about effectiveness. Third we are observing over-mortality in every country that cannot be explained by covid deaths .. the more data are coming in the more it looks like the vaccine is killing people but of course the cause is not proved in part because the medical industries have always avoided population studies comparing the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated. That speaks volumes in itself.
Joel, this is from 9 months ago. I made posts and videos about this 19 months ago in December of 2020, before the vaccines even came out on 12/14/20. Then I proved I was right a month later, on January 16, 2021.I made a video about it on January 24. I can't attach screen shots here. We don't care who was first because this isn't a race but it is important. Fauci and Walensky and Biden were saying the vaccine would block transmission well into July of '21. If people had listened to me all the people who have died from the vaccine would have been spared. This has been so frustrating for me, having my videos and posts taken down and people coming behind me 1.5 - 2 years and explaining this stuff after much of the damage has been done. My book will come out in a month or so and they can't take that down. The book is called "HEROES AND VILLAINS: The COVID-19 Book of Lists". I hope you will encourage your readers to get it.
I think I recall you saying exactly this. You & Sucharit Bhakdi. Maybe close together in time? That would possibly explain why it stuck. Repetition. Oddly enough, I’d forgotten it. But as soon as I heard it, I knew you were correct. No mucosal immunity, no protection.
Now, things have moved on for me. I no longer believe there’s any such thing as SARS-CoV-2, beyond possibly a sequence in a lab.
It’s not the cause of disease imo.
1. There’s no evidence of a pandemic. Several detailed papers show this.
2. The science of viruses is between very weak & outright fraud. I do believe microbiology of bacteria, fungi & Protozoa remains intact. As does immunology. People become ill, and very commonly, develop respiratory symptoms. We’ve called it viruses. Rarely, people die without developing so called secondary bacterial infection, pneumonias, for sure.
3. Some other evidence that the perpetrators who’re behind this deception knew there was no hazard. Boris Johnson’s No 10 team holding a sizeable party right in the middle of “the second wave”. No one got ill or died, of course. No masks ever worn in No 10. The mother of a friend of one of my daughters does hairdressing. The Queen, in her 90s, attended a G20 dinner with dozens of people freshly into uk & not quarantined. Her team would not have exposed her to such a risk.
Yes, as I said in my commentary, I knew and reported this over a year ago too (not as early as you, Reid!). Indeed, there are plenty of hypotheses floating in independent scientific circles right now around the government reactions possibly being responsible for all the excess deaths.
Joel, did you ever read a paper by Denis Rancourt of Canada? His analyses of all cause mortality in USA led him to conclude no pandemic, excess deaths due to the institutional response ie lockdown & worse in hospitals.
Is this a game in which whoever gives the least believable answer wins?If so you are near the top of the leader board.Why don't you actually show some proof that the vaccine doesn't reduce your chances of hospitalization?
Yes, Mike. As you will recall, Israel started administration later than the US by six days but was much more efficient at getting jabs into arms. The US only had 2% of the population done at the turn of the new year when Israel had almost of the12% of their population. (of only 9 million)., so I used Israel's data. One advantage I had on figuring this out so quickly was that I had just proved we reached herd immunity to the wild type on January 11, 2021 without a single person fully-vaccinated plus 3 weeks. (another massive issue that destroys THE NARRATIVE and would reduce vaccine enrollment markedly.. This video was up less than an hour before YouTube took it down. The graphs and logic are all in the book, though for everyone to see for all time.
In order to explain the confirmation by data that the vaccines were not blocking transmission properly, you have to include a term I coined, "Immunity-in-Place " for people who have cross protection from exposure to other corona viruses and you had to know what fraction of the population had immunity-in-place. People told me I was wrong. They were not including those 33% or so who, if they were vaccinated, would have been erroneously designated as having had a vaccine that blocked transmission, but it was really due to their immunity-in-place. The data was too noisy until about January 15, when it became clear that the vaccines weren't blocking transmission. The spread was too fast for a country that had about 1/3 of its population (conservatively) IIP non-spreaders at the outset.
There is no question in my mind that the whole thing was planned and there was collusion. In my book , I list the several reasons why it must have been planned, for example those things that were below the threshold of stupidity. We already knew the clonal memory of T cells specific for the N-protein (that stabilizes the RNA) of SARS-1 not only still protected SARS patients from getting SARS-1 17 years later but also that all the participants in the trial (they found 23 patients who had had SARS-1 nd were still living 17 years later), that all of those 23 were protected against SARS-2 without having been exposed to it.. The vaccine manufacturers knew this and chose the spike protein instead of a protein that was not toxic and didn't change in 17 years. That's beyond the stupidity threshold when all 4 of the biggest vaccine producers all did it. It has to be collusion among them. When I was giving a primer video on how the vaccines worked and I learned it was the spike protein, I said "I wonder why they used a vaccine that changed so often and was toxic to vascular endothelium. I said out loud on the video, "Maybe they want to sell more vaccines..."
There are many other reasons. China was definitely in on it. They sent pictures all 0ver the world of their city-wide fountain parties they sponsored only a month after they lifted their lockdowns. to tell the world how well lockdowns worked, knowing they couldn't work. I wrote letters to FOX, CNN and the White house warning them of the damage and death the lockdowns would cause but no one heeded my advice. I prove how they can't work in the book too. absurd. Did you see the pictures of the fountain parties in Wuhan.?
When you look at the rate of spread mathematically including those 120 million Americans who have this before the virus even arrives on our shores (or on Israel's, it would be 3 million), you could see the vaccines weren't blocking transmission
I don't understand your point, Ian. The number of deaths, in my opinion , was grossly exaggerated. I would say, instead of when around a million deaths were claimed in the US, there were about 150,000. I could be off but my number is closer than the 1 million number
Thank you for sharing this, it's really interesting, even if it hails from last year. I find it very telling that the overwhelming propaganda which aims to ridicule anyone who questions "vaccines" of whatever form, as stupid, irrational and anti-science is one of the biggest problems here. Presenting people with facts does not work if someone is the type of person who wishes to appear "knowledgeable" and "sensible." It really is a problem, and I'm not sure how to tackle it.
It's where the facts come from and the integrity of the person purporting to give us the truth that present the doubt in the vaccinated persons mind.This is a highly specialised field and very very few people are clever enough or qualified enough to give a realistic opinion.Nevertheless It seems that anyone with letters after their name can persuade vaccine hesitant people to refuse it.
Vaccine "hesitant" is a contested term. As is "vaccine" in this context. I'm not hesitating...."Qualified" can mean different things as well. Experience can be a great qualification. I take note of who is currently ill, and who is not. As a cohort, it is now those who took the mRNA injections that are getting ill in what is currently described as a "heatwave" where I live. That's if they didn't get damaged after taking it in the first place.
I take note of vested interests and then see who is shut down in the public sphere to get an idea of who is truthful and sincere. The predictions made by those speaking out have, sadly, come to pass. And it is a crime against humanity in my view.
What that tells us is the Flu Vaccine is Useless for the Same reason.
That is the obvious conclusion. I wish he had said that and of course we will have government campaigns encouraging us to have it for the next flu season.
A completely UNTESTED version from here on out. There will be ZERO safety and efficacy testing on future covid shots. ZERO.
Mom always got a flu shot (1980's-1990's) then she got shingles, mid 1990's, then she got lung cancer. Then she died. At least I see it now.
Well, get used to it. All the supposedly woke folk here are determined to wait for anyone ELSE to do something about all the problems, but will never themselves get involved with saving lives.
They lack the balls to stand up to a single criminally corrupt politician.
Uh? The woke people see no problem. They love this shit. Get real eh?
Please tell us what you are involved in to do something about the problems?
Me? Refusing to acknowledge compelled speech for starters. Saying what I mean not what I am meant to say. I'm 70. My parents' generation risked and laid down their lives fighting people who think like this.
My stepdaughter, for example, got woke brainwashed at SOAS (premier UK Uni. Once). She called me a "Cis" male. I told her she was misgendering me, as I am and always have been MALE. (Sex, not gender). She shut up, as I threw her shity straight back at her and she was stymied.
This shit is evil and a manifestation of totalitarianism.
I'm involved in ridiculing these ridiculous theories so we can get on and fight this virus then my children can live without the worry of transmitting or catching covid eventually.Anti vaxers are the reason this pandemic is becoming worse and all they are doing is guessing and hoping that they won't have to have a tiny prick(in the arm)🙂
you've just ridiculed yourself moron
"Involved in?" That's WAY too loaded a question. It implies YOU only feel safe in crowds so large, you feel you can be invisible within it. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but it's an ESPECIALLY strange question to ask of someone who already stated 1) an unsupported opinion, & 2) that there IS no one standing up to be "involved in."
Everywhere I go, it's the same. Look at Jeremy Pointon's latest reply about generalities of people "standing up" with no indication of to who or what they stood up to, how, if it succeeded, if they stood for anything themselves.
That's my Entire Point: you all only VERBALLY state your opinions, then the English Language calls that "standing up" instead of what it truly is, Expressing An Opinion & absolutely nothing more, & you're all here like 5-year-olds screaming "I DID SO scream ABOUT the problem."
That's not standing up to it. That's whining about your dislikes.
In the meantime, you've all fooled no one but yourselves that this is = to standing up. So much so, that the suggestion that we DO ACTUALLY try to do something to PHYSICALLY END the thing killing children is found offensive.
If I'm wrong, then walk me through it. How is anything written here on this site or anywhere else on social media going to end these mandates?
Come on. Step by step: Daddy-Government hears your pathetic whining, Mommy-Nancy Pelosi & Daddy-Mitch McConnell deliver their apology with hands held & fingers intertwined, you all have your Great Moment where your faith in politicians is restored, then the mandates end?
Yeah, no. Once they TAKE the lobbying $ to FORWARD the mandates, they forward the mandates regardless of how pathetically you all wait for the imaginary Caring Parent to respond otherwise. & they HAVE TAKEN the lobbying $, http://allaregreen.us/.
Repeatedly.
Now: where is this group of others ready to act like adults & HOLD POLITICIANS ACCOUNTABLE that I can get "involved in?" I've created several groups people could have joined myself over the years.
I couldn't PAY you utter cowards to join, & everyone I've explained this to in person has run away in utter terror at the prospect of ACTUALLY standing up to them. In writing, when given the more comfortable distance like here, people only simply do the immature 12-year-old trick & ask what I Personally am doing.
As if I can make congress do anything on my own.
Strange, isn't it? YOU are all waiting for more other people to join you to continue doing nothing because you KNOW THAT you need mass public support.
I point out that we already have WAY MORE of that than we'll ever need & that we can do something now, & then you all ask why I am doing myself.
Avoiding a single thing I said.
Yeah I bet you'd prefer to see riots everywhere and all lefties slaughtered rather than think for yourself and admit that you're more probably wrong than right as like 99.9999per cent of the population you don't even know if you're right or wrong but won't take the advise of the few brilliant scientists that do.
Don't know if I'm right or wrong? 1) NO virus is contagious; The contagion theory has been debunked several times. Only a couple of hundred have been included in chapters 7 & 8 of https://betterness.com/wp-content/uploads/TheInvisibleRainbow.pdf then vetted by the publisher who would face libel charges from the powerful vaccine manufacturers if they were incorrect or lying.
"But Covid is different." In what way? What do the studies on it show?
Well, that's what the Alberta Health Minister Deena Hinshaw wanted to know, because she had a court date wherein she wanted to present all the evidence shown in studies proving that masking, social distancing, testing etc. help prevent the spread of it.
Know what she found?
Nothing.
Not "no studies showing lock-down measures worked." No studies on covid in existence anywhere. Not at the N.I.H., the CDC or W.H.O. Not one study on this virus exists at any health institute anywhere on planet Earth, https://rumble.com/vkorz0-freedom-fighter-court-victory-ends-masking-shots-quarantine-in-alberta.html which she ADMITTED in COURT!!!
Which makes sense. It's consistent with the fact that this virus hasn't even BEEN ISOLATED yet https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-truth-about-virus-isolation-%F0%9F%A4%AB:f.
So, now you have a problem. How are you going to twist ALL of these real, demonstrable facts back in upon themselves so that they look like your beliefs. That's the same human nature you're accusing many of in your comments, how people's opinions need debunking. But I'm showing you FACTS.
I COULD ADD all the videos of Kary Mullis the inventor of the PCR MACHINES (there are no such thing as PCR "tests," that's a made up term. The machines do not "test for" anything, they make copies of what they're told to if any are found in the samples they're given. They can't even "test" to see if the virus they're making copies OF are dead, already killed by a person's immune system) but you can find talks where he says this all over Odysee video platform.
Youtube of course has scrubbed these as has Facebook.
So, to recap we have 1) HUNDREDS of independent researches showing NO virus spreads through contamination, 2) going back over 100 years now, consistently. No one has EVER infected any living organism or tissue by exposing it to viral infected organisms or tissue.
3) NO tests exist on Covid specifically to show ANY of the measures you want us to get on board with work. None. None at the CDC, none at the W.H.O., or at the N.I.H.
None.
4) Covid itself has yet to be isolated which makes it hard to test, & 5) the "test" they claim can tell if one is infected with it can not DO that.
So ALL we have left is people unable to get compensation for the harms done them https://duckduckgo.com/?q=maddie+de+garay&t=newext&atb=v290-1&ia=web because of illegal protections given by politicians because of lobbying http://www.nvic.org/injury-compensation/origihanlaw.aspx. Is that enough for you? Or will it take more to shake your belief in Mommy & Daddy-Government? Social psychology says you will simply avoid looking at any facts presented here & simply try & find some opinion piece that claims to debunk any of this without having done any debunking.
Lobbying exists, http://allaregreen.us/. So tell me (since you write in another comment how you can't believe "every politician is in on this") HOW do any politicians get away with this if they AREN'T ALL in on it?
As the articles of impeachment against Trump reminded us, taking private $ for personal profit WHILE IN PUBLIC OFFICE IS 100% illegal, despite what they claim Citizens United says. How DOES EVERY politicians forget this simple fact every single day?
They're not in on knowing the jabs are harmful: they just can't take the $ then vote against the people PAYING them it.
D'uh. Which is WHY this IS STILL illegal! D'uh & d'uh again!!
As for the threat of it BEING illegal holding them in check, one cannot PAY Americans to act to protect their own children if it risks angering Mommy or Daddy & that's exactly how Americans view their politicians, as Authority figures whose wrath they are terrified of provoking.
So don't worry... you don't NEED to consider ANY facts. The entire population of the Western world will NEVER ACTUALLY ACT TO do anything to reduce Daddy's power.
You can relax now. No one will ever act to show these truths in anything but a rhetorical way on social media where it has absolutely no effect on His Ability to push us around.
Poynton actually
Thanks Michael. I am quite used to my Mom being dead.
Wow. So you think allowing OTHERS to die from the shots is okay?
You. Are. An. Idiot.
Why are you here? PMS and need to fight?
But you're really saying that every politician in the world who is in power is in on this. .It's just too ridiculous to even begin to believe.
Riiiight... only SOME politicians take lobbying $, as evidenced by http://allaregreen.us/. Or perhaps you think any politicians can take this $, vote against those paying it & survive?
Seriously... you're telling us you've NEVER heard of lobbying? No one needs to be IN on any conspiracy. The cowardly American public would GLADLY sacrifice their own children to show how Blind their Faith in Authority Figures is. As evidenced by the fact that when I point to the fact that lobbying is illegal as well as MANDATING untested or proven harmful products, everyone HERE gets horribly upset with me.
Still....
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/so-many-people-are-now-dying-suddenly?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web
They may not be "on it" - but those silent are still silent on government figures on the carnage al over the world.
A sin is a sin, whether it be by omission or commission. We don't pay our politicians to stick their heads in the sand do we?
No you definitely don't
AND they've been getting away with it for decades.
Indeed. There has been a bit more investigation into this and indeed many other vaccines too. The suspicion is that none of them works particularly well but it's not possible to determine because, just like the EUA mRNA jabs, there is no reliable evidence provided by the manufacturers or independent analysts demonstrating it.
Get the DVD from Andrew Wakefield called Vaxxed. He linked autism to the MMR vaccine and the British Medical System Destroyed his livelihood. He realized there were no Studies on vaccine effectiveness or mortality. None. Because it would expose the truth about how ineffective vaccines really are.
Read Doctoring Data by Dr Malcolm Kendrick - he outlines the lack of relevant endpoints to many drug trials/studies - how many people would know that, according to his research up to the time his book was written for example , no trial into the use of Statins had ever demonstrated improved life expectancy or reduced morbidity - none. But they did show that Statins reduced cholesterol - "So that's all right then".
Right. You've had YEARS of evidence that the jabs harm, kill & give children brain damage.
& here you all are still awaiting for "someone" to "do something" about... well, just to remove all adult responsibility from yourselves, really.
Wait harder.
So really you're just guessing
Dissolving Illusions is a great book for challenging the vaccine narrative.
Yeah now it's all about jumping on the bandwagon to make money out of the supposed uncertainty of vaccine efficasy. Shameful
Which begs the question, to this avowed non scientist, why a very large, multi billion dollar Pharmaceutical company with a recent history of multi billion dollar liability judgements against their business "practices", inject the placebo group of the initial - now revealed to be ethically, morally bankrupt and devoid of scientific worth - trial weeks into the trial thus destroying ANY possibility of trawling the long term safety/adverse effects data for posterity. A stone cold criminal act of a 100% criminally actuated business - how do the ESG wallahs factor that corporate action into their metrics?
But the fact that they make $ from lying to us ISN'T something we should look into? Just the end results of making selling us death for $?
It's amazing how everyone here 100% KNOWS that their politicians are 100% complicit in this & yet studiously avoids mentioning it. The jab MANUFACTURERS do NOT MANDATE the jabs.
The jabs do not mandate themselves.
You all know that your politicians have ALL the info you have & possibly more & yet intentionally mandate them anyway for... some reason http://allaregreen.us/.
& everyone here just dives deeper into their beliefs that "Mommy and Daddy-Government would NEVER DO that to us."
No discussion of stopping the jabs. Only discussion of telling Daddy what Daddy already knows, then irrationally hoping that yet somehow, "Daddy" will Turn Moral tomorrow afternoon just for the sake of it.
Who of these do you think will suggest first that they all reject millions of extra $? Ted Cruz? Or that REALLY righteous guy who blocked the Heroic First Responders from getting needed medical aid for years, Mitch McConnell? Which of THESE PEOPLE http://allaregreen.us/ who KNOWINGLY mandated the jabs do you think is going to risk their own hide to rescue you?
The vast majority of politicians, media and medical "professionals" are nothing more than whores for the pharma cartel. You can apply the above "Pro or Ho" question to other groups not just doctors. It's such an easy softball and almost none of them will answer "No".
You are correct. Nobody is coming to save us. Anyone who says that is just trying to delay a response from the public holding them responsible.
We're on our own folks. Time to fight by any means necessary to stop this.
Whereas all citizens are bravely fighting in the trenches against this? Listen, I can't find the original comment you're replying to, but I'm Highly Critical of people waiting for others to rescue them. & here you are complaining how others aren't leading the way.
Where would doctors go to defy this? Dr. Sam Bailey had to give up her license to practice in order to continue making posts about this. Should we ask Dr. Andrew Wakefield why waiting for others doesn't work?
It doesn't work because people who wait for others to lead the fight are utter cowards who then sit back and wait to see how the fight goes WITHOUT GIVING A SINGLE SHRED OF REAL SUPPORT!
You all act like 4-year-olds terrified of Divine Retribution from some Authority FIGURE!!
There are already laws on the books making lobbying as well as mandating untested or proven harmful products illegal. It takes mass public pressure to enforce this.
NOT ONE PERSON HERE WOULD JOIN ANY EFFORT TO hold a single one of their cherished Daddy-Figures in politics accountable, NO MATTER HOW many doctors joined. Cowardice is cowardice ALL the time, not "except when others are courageous." You need others to be courageous FOR you, never with you.
I've been leading this charge for decades. Every time it's the same lame excuses. Some version of "We need to wait for Daddy-Government's permission to act."
A nice, built-in excuse to do nothing. "We have to wait." For more others, for "someone" to "do something."
After which you'll all just watch.
Please do not misunderstand me - I have very personal experience of the corrupt elements of the medical profession, would have lost 'ooo's if I had take the "advice " of my MP ( "Congressman") - and I have direct first hand knowledge through experience of the criminal behaviour of Big Business hell bent on destroying Joe Soap for dollars. I am as sceptical and distrusting of so called professionals as it gets - I have conducted a campaign of pressurising my MP with incontrovertible scientific papers and studies to try to shift his one eyed support for "the narrative". I "ginger", I put "the case" and suffer the ridicule of the ignorant - I am the "person on the bus" no one sits near. So not sure why you think I am on the back foot ( or in your vernacular, WS 3 games all, bottom of the ninth, Mariano Rivera sitting on a 0 -2 count, bases loaded, I am batter number 9, batting average barely positive and I need a walk off homer with 7 Cy Young Gold Glove fielders in front of me, and I have an injured leg into the bargain) - a 7.62 FMJ is needed for these criminals, or should I say WEF graduates?
ALL harmful corporate agendas have to go through http://allaregreen.us/. Corporations do not have the Public's Trust. Only politicians do to that extent.
Politicians are exempt from precisely NO laws in any Western nation. So obviously, what's stopping us is this fear of abandoning faith in politicians as extensions of 'Government, He Who Protects Us.'
The majority of people would never consciously get on board with anything that appears to reduce the powers of Mommy and Daddy-Government. They ALSO would join anything that Doesn't APPEAR TO directly do so.
Like :March Against Monsanto." Politicians allow that corporation whatever they want due to lobbying. So affecting Monsanto = affecting lobbying, = reducing the power of politicians. So the trick is to start what appears to be an attack of the power & influence of the hated corporations, that later swings to include that of politicians - after one has amassed sufficient public support.
People won't abandon their subconscious (a-HA!) faith in their Perceived Protectors without something else to latch onto emotionally. These desires conflict & confuse in the early goings. Like everyone SAID they wanted the Canadian trucking convoy to succeed.
... but at what? No one will SAY "end the mandates" in that context because what if they HAD succeeded?
Federal governments would seem smaller & weaker than previously assumed, & then there would have been REAL panic.
So my ideas have always been to introduce a campaign that appeals to the masses, targets the hated corporations, gathers mass grass roots support, then adds more things that indirectly affects the power of lobbying, subtly adding more things that would make it impossible. Once the public subconsciously wants it to succeed, add on how it's illegal for politicians to ACCEPT lobbying $ as it is to offer it.
Interested?
Yeah right lol so everyone who holds power in the whole world and all the countries in it is in on a big deception which has brought mayhem to their economies and now inflation on an unprecedented scale .....on a scale of 1 to 100 how likely is that.Just man up and get vaccinated.After all this time you can't even use the excuse that it's experimental anymore so you drag up rogue scientists who want to make some money unscrupulously
you're a fuck8ng moron.. you're future is , another fool bites the dust'vax statistic
"just man up" - ROTFLMAO. Yale University did a study in the summer of 2020 and "bravery" was one of their manipulation techniques. Congrats on being so easily manipulated.
It is STILL EXPERIMENTAL. You don't seem to be following the information exposed by the Corminaty lawsuit. 108 days to approve and 75 years to release was what the FDA wanted but the judge was having none of it.
What scientists are making $ unscrupulously" from what? Show your proof? Who is PAYING THEM to lie if/when their lies can be exposed?
Are the Rockefellers deliberately not suing for libel people they can prove are lying? Are all the governments of the world doing so as well?
"Man up"? ROTFLMAO. Which one of the Yale talking points was that?
"Get vaccinated"? For something that hasn't been in circulation for over year and half? LOL.
"Not experimental"? Wow you sure haven't kept up. The review & approval in 108 DAYS by the FDA who wanted 75 YEARS to release it shows FRAUD in epic fashion. https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
That’s correct, they don’t save the elderly & vulnerable. Total fraud.
worse than useless, it disrupts natural immunity and may be the cause of the spike in respiratory illness in the winters of 2019 and 2020.
Only because it is a Russian roulette/pin the tail on the donkey - but at least they are inert and non spike protein inducing.
No. It’s not rMNA
That doesn't change the problem at all
You say “the truth will eventually come out”
Its already out. Half the country knows/believes these vaccines are poison.
The other half only believe what they hear from mainstream media and they will never concede that they were wrong. This is as “out” as the truth will ever be. With all this awful data we have they just started giving this stuff to toddlers. The vaccines are an unstoppable force. All we can do is protect ourselves and our family—big pharma gonna big pharma to the end of time.
Unfortunately, I don't think it's half yet, not that would actually do something about it at any rate.
It's only about 20% max I'm the UK.....I haven't been able to stop immediate family getting these useless poisons. Even when my 84 year old mum (as healthy an 84 year old you could find btw) was rushed into intensive care within a day of her 2nd shot, my 2 sisters STILL went ahead and had a 3rd shot and a booster!! Even when you fully explain the fraudulent PCR test or the utter garbage Lateral flow it doesn't work. They are still of the opinion that our governments, and others worldwide are on their side (laughable). Even when I point them to the World wars as examples of the elite not giving a toss about It's people, it doesn't work!! ....one MAJOR victory for me though has been my daughter deciding NOT to give these clotshots to my granddaughters , which was such a relief
It's how the vaccine is administered that is causing these incidents.Check out aspiration.Basically the nurse should make sure that they don't inject into a vain and that's tricky if you've only done it a few times.
As a UK GP has pointed out, an injection into tissue should be pulled back to reveal or not if a vessel/vein has been breached - I am jabbed and this was not done 3 times - and I only found this out afterwards. And if you truly believe that it is the method of administering these drugs that causes these "incidents" , sincerely you have my sympathies. Please check out Dr Richard Fleming's video showing how these drugs - all those with EUA - act when injected directly into the blood stream. If after viewing you then still believe the skill of the injector is the issue, then truly I pity you but more so your children.
the uptake is low in kids and toddlers. I think most people got Omicron and are consequently less fearful. However, if mandates continue, more parents will comply. I am very curious if state and national level data on the % of Americans who are vax vs unvaxxed are accurate, or more coercive propaganda.
Emeritus Professor of Medical Microbiology and Immunology Professor Sucharit Bhakdi said exactly the same at around the same time in this 40-minute interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IBv3A8-ShI&t=3s
Even if the intramuscular injection of mRNA vaccine could somehow magically stimulate durable mucosal antibody production and B-T memory cell immunity without suppressing innate immunity (it cannot but this is a thought experiment) through hijacking a few cells' peptide factories into producing foreign spike protein antigens and subsequent durable antigen-matching neutralizing antibodies to them - those vaccinal antibodies are made for neutralizing spike protein that no longer exists in circulation, but that can still bind ineffectually to new variant viral spike proteins with different receptor binding domains, making antibody-antigen complexes that result in a chain of events culminating in a far more drastic, severe and possibly even fatally ineffectual immune response to what should have been a mild self-limiting upper respiratory infection. It boggles my mind that a retired store clerk like me with no academic degree can get this, and PhD public health officials don't.
"It boggles my mind that a retired store clerk like me with no academic degree can get this, and PhD public health officials don't."
This part. I'm a nobody. Just a curious human with life experience. I lost two kittens a decade ago to FIP, an ADE version of coronavirus that sometimes happens to vaccinated kittens that get subsequent natural infections. At the time, there was no cure. Coronaviruses are normally just colds for kittens. RIP kitty friends. I sincerely hope that this human experiment doesn't end like that.
You think that they 'don't GET' it?
What are you, 8 years old? Because everyone has HEARD OF lobbying. But only a child would think that "Daddy-Government is So Pure that this $ he's accepting wouldn't affect his decision-making."
THIS is why it all continue; All of you keep thinking of 'Government' as if you have to go to 'it' for protection.
Well wakey-wakey: these people here http://allaregreen.us/ ARE the only government you HAVE! They CAN'T refuse the $, the can't refuse to go along with the corporate agendas after taking it, & you are all still waiting for them to do exactly that.
Forever.
May I see links to public campaigning you’ve done?
It should be potent material!
"Campaigning?" You mean searching for support for a thing by communicating with others?
What is this right here then? If commenting, discussing things on social media isn't campaigning, then why do YOU continually do nothing but?
Maybe you should define the difference between what that word means in all other contexts, & the way you wish it to apply addressing me here?
Better yet, tell me what's step #2 after "campaigning?" Do we then gather together & beg the decision-makers in power more loudly to... to what? Pardon what seems like a stupid question, but once you've "campaigned" against the mandates, what then?
Do the pharma companies decide to stop making trillions because you campaigned? That's it? You only have to whine as a group & they decide they don't like wealth any more? Or do you expect the politicians to voluntarily reject it?
You DO KNOW what lobbying is, right?
So tell me what are you talking about by "campaigning," & how it has anything to do with ending the mandates?
What is the connection from campaigning to your Intended End Goal pray tell?
Will the vaccines themselves get upset, grab their syringes & go home? WHY does everyone insist that ranting ABOUT the problems SOLVES them without us ever having to take action to stop the people BEHIND the problems?
Mandating untested OR harmful products is illegal in every Western nation. Accepting private, corporate $ is an illegal conflict of interest in them too.
Politicians are exempt from precisely NO laws in any Western nation. If we got all the public support needed for ending the mandates, but not one of you had the courage to hold the people enforcing the mandates accountable, then how can you stop them continuing the mandates?
This is an infantile wish-fulfillment fantasy, that "Daddy-Government" will respond favorably, because his Caring Children whined.
I have BEEN "campaigning" for people to grow tf up & realize that it's Our Job to FORCE those in decision-making power to comply to the law, or we have tyranny. It's Our Job. You're begging them to police THEMSELVES?
WHO is coming to rescue you & end the mandates if we won't? Gandalf's swallows from Middle-Venus? The Congolese Air Force? When all your campaigning for more people to beg those in power to VOLUNTARILY reject their wealth & power are gathered, what will YOU all actually do when they refuse yet again?
Potent material indeed. Come ON, you hypocrite! What does begging MORE people to beg again & again what begging has already failed to elicit do to end the mandates? Walk me through it!
You beg, and... what then happens?
I don’t understand what good you think you’re doing.
All your posts criticise others.
Have a lovely day.
Really? Here's something I wrote; Mandating untested OR harmful products is illegal in every Western nation. Accepting private, corporate $ is an illegal conflict of interest in them too.
Politicians are exempt from precisely NO laws in any Western nation. If we got all the public support needed for ending the mandates, but not one of you had the courage to hold the people enforcing the mandates accountable, then how can you stop them continuing the mandates?
I HANDED YOU The Way to end the mandates, legally & non-violently with fewer people than have sites like this up. If all the people you knew wrote up a legal challenge then SIGNED ON to it, then introduced it across all these forums with dozens of signatures, then this public you've "been campaigning" would also sign on.
After that, you could pressure other groups to join. After that, giants like James Corbett of The Corbett Report.
You get HIS listeners on board, THEN you have enough public support to flip this into a genuine legal challenge. What can the government do? Arrest MILLIONS? If it was THAT hopeless, then what use is all your campaigning?
I can't get your support for a feasible, legal non-violent solution & you won't back one yourselves. Seems that neither the government, the jab-manufacturers (who cannot mandate anything themselves, they HAVE TO go through government) nor I am the problem. You all pretend you don't see solutions even when one is written out before your eyes.
You ONLY SAW insults? Or you only CHOSE to see insults?
what does dr steele think about immune escape and the possibility of the vaxes potentiating more virulent strains?
A bit stern, but you are right. Now what? The vote won't do it, the judiciary won't (reliably) do it. A civil war scenario is just what they want to get rid of the real resisters as quickly as possible. So, now what?
Mandating untested or proven harmful products is illegal. Politicians are exempt from precisely no laws in any Western nation.
The whole point of that is that if the politicians are in collusion, so IS the judiciary. So it's up to us to coerce either the politicians or the judiciary to play with us, or we DO SOMETHING about it like remove or reduce their power.
The real problem is the cowardice of the majority, so how to get around this? Easier than one might think.
The majority of people would never consciously get on board with anything that appears to reduce the powers of Mommy and Daddy-Government. They ALSO would join anything that Doesn't APPEAR TO directly do so.
Like :March Against Monsanto." Politicians allow that corporation whatever they want due to lobbying. So affecting Monsanto = affecting lobbying, = reducing the power of politicians. So the trick is to start what appears to be an attack of the power & influence of the hated corporations, that later swings to include that of politicians - after one has amassed sufficient public support.
People won't abandon their subconscious (a-HA!) faith in their Perceived Protectors without something else to latch onto emotionally. These desires conflict & confuse in the early goings. Like everyone SAID they wanted the Canadian trucking convoy to succeed.
... but at what? No one will SAY "end the mandates" in that context because what if they HAD succeeded?
Federal governments would seem smaller & weaker than previously assumed, & then there would have been REAL panic.
So my ideas have always been to introduce a campaign that appeals to the masses, targets the hated corporations, gathers mass grass roots support, then adds more things that indirectly affects the power of lobbying, subtly adding more things that would make it impossible. Once the public subconsciously wants it to succeed, add on how it's illegal for politicians to ACCEPT lobbying $ as it is to offer it.
Interested?
I don't disagree with the indirect approach, but it requires organization and cooperation. Once it is seen to be a threat, some slap-down will occur. In the trucker case, JT overplayed his hand and scared a lot of folks when he attacked supporter's bank accounts. Which was helpful to wake up some more folks. Perhaps mass-awakening is possible, if slow and painful.
And because the people in charge can still be brought to justice is why they aren't conspiring like the anti vaxers are suggesting in their fairy tales
Nice start. Don't know what you mean by the finish. Are you giving up before even discussing what can be done? JT over-played his hand... so? Members of the trucker convoy accused him of murder & treason TO his FACE!!
Then she dropped the mic, wept, & left him in power to continue both.
& you're still in that mentality too apparently; That we can't deal with mere mortal corrupt politicians as human beings, but have to leave them with all decision-making power over our lives. Why? Because 'Government' = "Daddy!!"
Yeah, he overplayed & people got scared. And they STILL ALLOWED him to do whatever tf he wants! So why point to that as progress?
On another related issue, a UK GP has recently published a mea culpa; the GP has admitted the 180 deg about turn from the previous position of being 100% convinced of all things SARS COV2 . Very brave of this GP, who potentially may be censured and be the subject of a GMC kangaroo court. One of the things that stuck in my mind was the observation that the recently "trained" jabbers may not have withdrawn the needle after first insertion into the arm muscle to test if they had struck a vein - I am jabbed ( never ever again) and that did NOT happen with me; implication being that the jab may have been directly injected into jabbed veins, rendering the implausibility of mucosal antibody reactions a fact and sending the jab into the blood stream, straight to the ACE2 receptor and then into the cells - bingo. Scope Dr Richard Fleming for the effects - frightening. Requested a D Dimer test with my GP to determine the extent, if any, of microclotting - flat out refusal after a lengthy very stilted conversation during which the Practice's stance of supporting the jab campaign was stated again and again ( nothing to do with the money, surely?). There is no way in this Universe that UK CMO Whitty, UK CSO Vallance and Dame Raine of >80% funded by Pharma UK MHRA , did not know what the Aussie scientist, Yeadon and others have pointed out - which makes their behaviour and actions beyond any professional protection - and that makes me very very angry.
Yeadon has been discredited now as he has a conflict of interests and it technically not fully qualified in this particular field .Google his name and don't ignore what you don't want to hear.
You are not being paid--either through a research grant or a job to look the other way.
that's because you don't get it .You get the bit you want to get and ignore anything that contradicts it.
Dear Joel, I LOVE your substack posts after following you for years on Twitter. Regarding Prof Steele's comments, whatever he says about the site of the injection being critical also is relevant for any other vaccine. I learned this decades ago when my child was born (she is now 27) and did not vaccinate her at all. NO VACCINE CAN WORK if it enters the body in a different way to the genuine disease, except for the tetanus jab. I don't believe a coronavirus vaccine can ever work because I doubt human to human transmission. Are you familiar with Dr Samantha Bailey's work n Odyssey. She is a physician but has completely woken up to vaccines, the myth of germ theory (I think it's terrain that counts) & her stuff on vaccines is unmissable. Perhaps Prof Steele believes the mRNA jab is better if it enters your nose, but honestly, I have my doubts. Dr McCullough points out Swedish study that claims the spike protein moves to cells and enters our DNA. That is a huge problem. Anyways, just thought you might be interested in this information though there are no gaps in your knowledge & your brave endeavours to get the truth out there in order to protect us people who have no voice. Thank you.
I'm recalling at the initial rollout of these shots, the pseudo-scientific explanation with simplified, attractive infographics "showing how the spike protein works" and how everyone just lapped this up, while I looked on in horror, knowing this is mad scientist territory, with unknown effects -- and wondering why on earth everyone I knew was willing to be a guinea pig. None of my loved ones were suicidal, so why would they be willing to play Russian roulette with their one and only body? It escapes me....
maybe to save their one and only body??????eh
I think they were traumatized by the coordinated world-wide fear campaign. Then the shots came along as a protection racket.
Because their policies have killed so many and continue to kill, they believe they have no choice but to sustain their narrative. Consequently they will kill an increasing number of people, convincing them to boost, boost and boost some more. They are more likely to put unvaccinated in camps than retreat on mRNA jabs.
camps for the unvaccinated now there's a good idea
The vaccinated are the super spreaders. The vaccinated still get the disease, still transmit it to others and have identical viral loads to the unvaccinated. That has been known for over a year and even Fauci & Walensky admitted it on TV.
So where is the benefit of putting the unvaccinated in camps?
But they won't put the vaccinated in camps. Too many. They'll be all too happy to put all the unvaccinated in camps.
oops, yeah I meant to say unvaccinated...
In the book "principles of mucosal immunity" by Smith, MacDonald, Blumenberg; 2013; it shows on p.124 a distribution of antibody producing cells of different types, and under the label "Mucosal", they show 80% IgA, 6% IgG. So I guess there'd be _some_ from the jab, but horribly inefficient, if I get that right? So one can imagine what strong kind of response they need to create systemically to produce an effect where it's needed w.r.t. infection.
If the jab doesn't mean a lot vs. the respiratory disease, one would have to revise ideas about the products pressing for new variants? (e.g. Vanden Bossche)
Well, I guess people who do get deeper infections _will_ contribute to that, but the density of those isn't very high? Except in special places, like old people's homes.
That’s why I’ve been criticism of GVDB, he focuses only on antibodies. That’s just poor immunology. Partial. Misleading.
my impression is that GVB has lots of things in his head, but sometimes has a hard time conveying them simply. I arrived at this impression because it was sometimes hard to follow his concerns, but they were greatly clarified when he was being interviewed by others, that could simplify and clarify his meaning.
So this is just a crude and oversimplified attempt at what I think he may be up to... Let's think of someone with two arms, fighting COVID. One arm is "Humoral Immunity" and the other is "Cell Mediated, Mucosal, etc". I think GVB is not ignoring one whole arm, he is saying, oh man, you are tying a whole arm behind your back, and if you keep fighting, you might get tired of punching and have no functional defense left. He is also saying that people with natural immunity still have two arms to fight with, which just gives them better odds, long term.
Just a guess. I don't think he's ignoring, he's just focusing on describing how the shots turn your immune system into a one trick pony that will supersede a normal, multi-layered immune response
Bhakdi says the mucosal (with digestive) system work almost independently from the vascular system. I read the mucosa makes a/b's from white blood cells (through a chemical process they reach the mucosa with b/tells).
So if you get a blood test for a/bs after natural infection why is it that it's a blood test, not a swab (like PCR).
You can't cheat the universe? Maybe not. But the gamble that's been taken is that they can cheat us out of our lives. And why shouldn't they believe that? They've gotten away with so much for decades and decades. No more, is what more and more of us are saying.
Vaccines poison the blood. Period.
2 things cause illness.. toxins and deficiencies. It’s that simple.
Vaccines put toxins into the body, weakening your immune defenses. Get the toxins out, chelation/MMS, healthy diet etc. you won’t get sick. Put toxins in, you get lots of symptoms of ‘dis-ease’ which is your body ridding itself of the poisons.
Viruses are not the cause, they are the effect. They are there to save you and detox the poisoned cell.
Believe me when I tell you, they know this. They have been experimenting for over 100 years on the best ways to make people sick and sneezing on someone is NOT how you get sick.
Hundreds of experiments have been done where sick people sneeze and cough on healthy people.. it doesn’t work. Professors of biology swollowing cholera cultures in front of a class to their horror.. but never getting sick.
If you can’t sneeze on someone and get them sick how do you get them sick??? Inject it.
wow that's the wackiest theory yet. Bravo you are temporarily at the top of the nut pile
Not sure why you felt the need to lash out at me instead of just scrolling on by, but I am happy to have a civil conversation with anyone willing to be respectful.
And this nut pile was vax injured in 2011 by the flu shot. Lost a baby and use of my left hand for 8 years.
After losing 8 years of my life to some mystery disease that no doctor could help with and desperately searching for relief and answers, I have learned more than I could possibly put into words (esp. to some random troll on the internet) about what makes us sick and how to heal.
But what I can tell you is I have been pain and inflammation free since October when no one thought it possible.
You might want to broaden your horizons because I have the names, literature and hundreds of studies to back up everything I said.
Name calling is a red flag. Nut pile did give me a chuckle though. I loved it when the media started calling Julian Assange names too. It means there are not clear and compelling counter arguments. But hey I'm just some guy on the internet to go at it Easy.
Im a doc in NJ USA. I have a bio chem background. thank you for posting this. me and so many others have been saying these things for 2 years. ANyone with even a basic understanding and their critical thinking skills intact would know these things.
And anyone who is not REALLY qualified in virology should not give what is really a ballpark judgement that he can't really be sure of
Apart from Steele, Bhakdi and Yeadon remember Bridle said the same thing-he added that there is a possibility of the virus finally reaching the vascular system via alveoli (but I guess by then your lungs will have been damaged and you'll be in ICU), so early treatment should always have been the way.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7XXmStI8VINb/?list=notifications&randomize=false
I think the WHY question of the vax not stopping infect/transmission should be hammered home. I've had a number of arguments online and when I put the WHY question forward the answer is 'they always said you could still catch/pass on the virus'. I always reply (firstly they didn't, they claimed 100% efficacy) and you haven't answered WHY. The WHY part is VERY important because the whole vax narrative collapses-once people realise their own immune systems are doing the work it might break the spell of hypnosis (or denial or whatever people are blind against).
In the Melbourne lockdown at that time last year, I remember coming across this... I showed this to my GF at the time and she lost her mind. Massive argument ensued, claiming I was into all these "conspiracy theories". Mind blowing insanity. She got both the jabs, I got none. Were no longer together. That eternal question of Why... Why can some of us see what is going on and others cannot.
maybe you are the one that cannot but just follow the anti vax rhetoric like a sheep
In Australia, we were confronted with all forms of the media announcing 24/7, cases, cases, etc. I kept telling friends, cases are not deaths, but fear was so strong, they complied with every mandate. Now the controllers know how simple it is to manipulate the majority.
I mean it's Mass Formation psychosis but yeah, why some succumb and some don't. I've ordered Desmet's book on the subject and can't wait for it to arrive as this question is a big deal for me.
Exactly Mass Formation, the question still remains though... Why them, why not us? Yes, got that book in the post also! hopefully will shed some light on this very question!
The vaccine is supposed to train the second line of defence, he is talking about the first line of defence. Hence the argument that vulnerable people should take it - because their first line won't cope. But it does not stop transmission (and they knew that) and so the argument that everyone should take it to protect the vulnerable was moot from the start and instead they used propaganda and coercion to force it onto people, some of who succumbed to the short term side effects and the rest are now dealing with the long term effects.
the big question here really is...does the vaccine increase your chances of survival and therefore prevent you from taking up a very valuable hospital bed which could be used for someone in a critical ,not self induced ,condition?If the people who are against vaccination could prove that the vaccine doesn't improve your chances of staying out of hospital then they would have a PROPER case.......But they can't
First, this is not true. There are plenty of data showing that the vaccine has some positive effect but only for a limited time and sadly after that the effect becomes negative because the immune system in weakened. Second, those promoting the vaccine has clearly been shown fraudulent in their claims about effectiveness. Third we are observing over-mortality in every country that cannot be explained by covid deaths .. the more data are coming in the more it looks like the vaccine is killing people but of course the cause is not proved in part because the medical industries have always avoided population studies comparing the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated. That speaks volumes in itself.
Joel, this is from 9 months ago. I made posts and videos about this 19 months ago in December of 2020, before the vaccines even came out on 12/14/20. Then I proved I was right a month later, on January 16, 2021.I made a video about it on January 24. I can't attach screen shots here. We don't care who was first because this isn't a race but it is important. Fauci and Walensky and Biden were saying the vaccine would block transmission well into July of '21. If people had listened to me all the people who have died from the vaccine would have been spared. This has been so frustrating for me, having my videos and posts taken down and people coming behind me 1.5 - 2 years and explaining this stuff after much of the damage has been done. My book will come out in a month or so and they can't take that down. The book is called "HEROES AND VILLAINS: The COVID-19 Book of Lists". I hope you will encourage your readers to get it.
I think I recall you saying exactly this. You & Sucharit Bhakdi. Maybe close together in time? That would possibly explain why it stuck. Repetition. Oddly enough, I’d forgotten it. But as soon as I heard it, I knew you were correct. No mucosal immunity, no protection.
Now, things have moved on for me. I no longer believe there’s any such thing as SARS-CoV-2, beyond possibly a sequence in a lab.
It’s not the cause of disease imo.
1. There’s no evidence of a pandemic. Several detailed papers show this.
2. The science of viruses is between very weak & outright fraud. I do believe microbiology of bacteria, fungi & Protozoa remains intact. As does immunology. People become ill, and very commonly, develop respiratory symptoms. We’ve called it viruses. Rarely, people die without developing so called secondary bacterial infection, pneumonias, for sure.
3. Some other evidence that the perpetrators who’re behind this deception knew there was no hazard. Boris Johnson’s No 10 team holding a sizeable party right in the middle of “the second wave”. No one got ill or died, of course. No masks ever worn in No 10. The mother of a friend of one of my daughters does hairdressing. The Queen, in her 90s, attended a G20 dinner with dozens of people freshly into uk & not quarantined. Her team would not have exposed her to such a risk.
Yes, as I said in my commentary, I knew and reported this over a year ago too (not as early as you, Reid!). Indeed, there are plenty of hypotheses floating in independent scientific circles right now around the government reactions possibly being responsible for all the excess deaths.
Joel, did you ever read a paper by Denis Rancourt of Canada? His analyses of all cause mortality in USA led him to conclude no pandemic, excess deaths due to the institutional response ie lockdown & worse in hospitals.
I don’t have a link to the paper immediately to hand, but here’s an interview with Jerm Warfare. https://rumble.com/v11b31c-the-denis-rancourt-report.html
Is this a game in which whoever gives the least believable answer wins?If so you are near the top of the leader board.Why don't you actually show some proof that the vaccine doesn't reduce your chances of hospitalization?
All the papers can be found directly on his website: https://denisrancourt.ca/categories.php?id=1&name=covid
Thank you, most helpful.
Yes, Mike. As you will recall, Israel started administration later than the US by six days but was much more efficient at getting jabs into arms. The US only had 2% of the population done at the turn of the new year when Israel had almost of the12% of their population. (of only 9 million)., so I used Israel's data. One advantage I had on figuring this out so quickly was that I had just proved we reached herd immunity to the wild type on January 11, 2021 without a single person fully-vaccinated plus 3 weeks. (another massive issue that destroys THE NARRATIVE and would reduce vaccine enrollment markedly.. This video was up less than an hour before YouTube took it down. The graphs and logic are all in the book, though for everyone to see for all time.
In order to explain the confirmation by data that the vaccines were not blocking transmission properly, you have to include a term I coined, "Immunity-in-Place " for people who have cross protection from exposure to other corona viruses and you had to know what fraction of the population had immunity-in-place. People told me I was wrong. They were not including those 33% or so who, if they were vaccinated, would have been erroneously designated as having had a vaccine that blocked transmission, but it was really due to their immunity-in-place. The data was too noisy until about January 15, when it became clear that the vaccines weren't blocking transmission. The spread was too fast for a country that had about 1/3 of its population (conservatively) IIP non-spreaders at the outset.
There is no question in my mind that the whole thing was planned and there was collusion. In my book , I list the several reasons why it must have been planned, for example those things that were below the threshold of stupidity. We already knew the clonal memory of T cells specific for the N-protein (that stabilizes the RNA) of SARS-1 not only still protected SARS patients from getting SARS-1 17 years later but also that all the participants in the trial (they found 23 patients who had had SARS-1 nd were still living 17 years later), that all of those 23 were protected against SARS-2 without having been exposed to it.. The vaccine manufacturers knew this and chose the spike protein instead of a protein that was not toxic and didn't change in 17 years. That's beyond the stupidity threshold when all 4 of the biggest vaccine producers all did it. It has to be collusion among them. When I was giving a primer video on how the vaccines worked and I learned it was the spike protein, I said "I wonder why they used a vaccine that changed so often and was toxic to vascular endothelium. I said out loud on the video, "Maybe they want to sell more vaccines..."
There are many other reasons. China was definitely in on it. They sent pictures all 0ver the world of their city-wide fountain parties they sponsored only a month after they lifted their lockdowns. to tell the world how well lockdowns worked, knowing they couldn't work. I wrote letters to FOX, CNN and the White house warning them of the damage and death the lockdowns would cause but no one heeded my advice. I prove how they can't work in the book too. absurd. Did you see the pictures of the fountain parties in Wuhan.?
When you look at the rate of spread mathematically including those 120 million Americans who have this before the virus even arrives on our shores (or on Israel's, it would be 3 million), you could see the vaccines weren't blocking transmission
Thank you for this comprehensive summary! Best wishes
Mike
You're still only guessing though aren't you?Yeah there's no covid and millions haven't died of it .What planet do you live on?
I don't understand your point, Ian. The number of deaths, in my opinion , was grossly exaggerated. I would say, instead of when around a million deaths were claimed in the US, there were about 150,000. I could be off but my number is closer than the 1 million number
Thank you for sharing this, it's really interesting, even if it hails from last year. I find it very telling that the overwhelming propaganda which aims to ridicule anyone who questions "vaccines" of whatever form, as stupid, irrational and anti-science is one of the biggest problems here. Presenting people with facts does not work if someone is the type of person who wishes to appear "knowledgeable" and "sensible." It really is a problem, and I'm not sure how to tackle it.
It's where the facts come from and the integrity of the person purporting to give us the truth that present the doubt in the vaccinated persons mind.This is a highly specialised field and very very few people are clever enough or qualified enough to give a realistic opinion.Nevertheless It seems that anyone with letters after their name can persuade vaccine hesitant people to refuse it.
Vaccine "hesitant" is a contested term. As is "vaccine" in this context. I'm not hesitating...."Qualified" can mean different things as well. Experience can be a great qualification. I take note of who is currently ill, and who is not. As a cohort, it is now those who took the mRNA injections that are getting ill in what is currently described as a "heatwave" where I live. That's if they didn't get damaged after taking it in the first place.
I take note of vested interests and then see who is shut down in the public sphere to get an idea of who is truthful and sincere. The predictions made by those speaking out have, sadly, come to pass. And it is a crime against humanity in my view.