Fauci and all the other experts have STILL never had to actually sit in front of a hostile audience and answer questions. Half a dozen people I know could rip the entire covid debacle apart if they were given the chance...........and that's why we're not allowed anywhere near the lying bastards.
This clown, Dr Punk, is likely a school teacher without the tools to argue with you or to even understand your arguments, so he just tosses chaffe around like Rip Torn, then disappears. But he does have the cutesy software to make his little AR self and smartboard, just like the elementary school teachers do. 🤡
The hilarious thing about the screenshot you from his YouTube channel, Joel is that he features Dr. John Campbell.
Dr. Campbell was until fairly recently an advocate of the programme/narrative until he (to his credit) had an epiphany having viewed the first Pfizer release. No doubt he'll be debunking Professor Shmuel Shakira next.
Fear is why they say nothing. The Deep State are actually the minions of the Real Power. These are very serious - very deadly men and nobody messes with them.
Keep in mind POTUS... is nothing more than an appointed flunky. Democracy is a sham --- the main purpose of it is to deflect from the people who really run the show --- if things go sideways (Bush > Iraq) -- release the steam with a new catch phrase (Hope and Change) ... rinse repeat rinse repeat.
Notice how even though Bush Cheney Rummy committed a war crime faking the WMD... Obama immediately announced 'we need to put that behind us and look forward to a better future' And then he proceeded to implement even more NSA intrusions into everybody's life - and he kicked off a few more wars...
It's all a massive scam... and the people behind this would rip the throat out of any gang or any organized crime family. They are feared - and for good reason.
When they say follow the money - that is correct - but follow it to the font.... The Federal Reserve.
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. …We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.” – Edward Bernays – Propaganda
“Once a nation parts with the control of its currency and credit, it matters not who makes the nation’s laws. … Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most sacred responsibility, all talk of the sovereignty of parliament and of democracy is idle and futile.” — Mackenzie King, Canadian Prime Minister 1935-1948.
"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." - Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence
“Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” ― Woodrow Wilson
Thank you for your incisive post, I would love to do a follow up post and name names but don't in respect to Joel. That being said, until we do such this will continue .
I'm with Joel. If you have names to name, please do. That is what it will take to end this. Individuals will have to be identified, isolated, and debunked -- probably one-by-one because they all have different audiences.
I've had the misfortune of interacting with this insufferable person online and can confirm it's a waste of time.
His arrogance, intellectual dishonesty, unquestioning acceptance of any and all mainstream public health narratives+studies+data, and shameless self promotion are second to none.
There is zero chance of him participating in a healthy debate with you or anyone else.
I agree. Total waste of time. A saying from HR: "Not everyone is coachable" Just writing your impressions, opinions, beliefs does not mean you are critically thinking about...anything really. I respect Joel Smalley being always respectful and replying with the well articulated argument, and I wish I could do more to protect him from dickheads like "Dr Debunk".
Could this Funk character be a gov't or pharma employee whose job it is to attack information providers in order to discredit them and create confusion? He/She isn't concerned with whether they are providing anything truthful themselves. It's all about generating enough confusion to keep the fearful from straying from the herd.
It wouldn't surprise me. They certainly have plenty of time on their hands to churn out "debunking" "content". Can't rule out they're simply addicted to the attention and feeling of righteous moral superiority. Many such cases.
I suffered this for many years, decades even, campaigning against “climate change”, i.e. alleged man-made global warming. Proponents never, ever engaged in debate. No matter what strong arguments you put up, all they ever did was to fall back on the official narrative, e.g. “the science is settled”, “the consensus is overwhelming”, “climate change is an existential threat”, etc.
1. 'Debate me Bro' has become a meme online. Atheists vs Christians, Marxists vs Free Market advocates, Bloodsports and clout chases challenging bigger youtubers purely to grow their audience. Debate has become disingenuous and a bit of a joke to the online community.
2. ClusterB personality types: Assertion of Control by Withdrawal. If ignore you, I retain control. Look at our leaders and bureaucrats, and tell me they don't present as clusterB personality disordered.
3. If I platform you | Engage with you, I am giving you validity. As a GenX, it was always the proper thing to engage with all ideas. Nowadays where we indoctrinate - not educate, we keep children away from dangerous ideas for fear they may be seduced by them. It is indicative to me, they have so little confidence in their ideas they do not believe anyone would freely choose them - if given the choice.
This is psychop. Excess deaths are normalising in “sufficiently” jabbed countries, meaning children and young adults have now become vulnerable after these deadly jabs. This psychop is yet another effort to do just that.
Our World in Data is supported by grants from the Quadrature Climate Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and a grant from the German entrepreneur, businesswoman and philanthropist Susanne Klatten.
In the past we have also received grants from the World Health Organization, the Department of Health and Social Care in the United Kingdom, the Centre for Effective Altruism – Effective Altruism Meta Fund, and the Nuffield Foundation.
Following the deaths of her parents, Klatten obtained a 50.1% stake in pharmaceuticals and chemicals company Altana and a 19.2% stake in BMW. She increased her stake in Altana over the years and is now the sole owner of the Wesel-headquartered company, which has over €2 billion in annual sales.
The one thing that I have found gob-smacking throughout is that, for a deadly plague it really was crap at killing people. I had to keep checking that the numbers of dead people were that low - surely such a deadly plague should have killed millions in the UK alone? Then the age of the deceased was mostly over the average age of death. Then the health of the deceased meant they mostly were already dying of something. Yet people like Dr Wilson talk as though young, fit athletes were dying of covid in their millions. He clearly hasn't noticed all the young, fit athletes who didn't die of covid but have been dying in droves since the vaccines appeared. Death is an emotional subject and people appear incapable of talking rationally about it but most of the people who died of covid were old/ill. People dying post vaccination are of all ages but people don't want to talk about it. (Is he a *real* doctor? bit worrying if he is!)
I guess he has a 60k+ debt and a newly minted PhD that he needs to use to earn an income.
19K subscribers on youtube doesn't sound like enough to make a living from (someone I know has about 40k and he doesn't make a living from it). So I guess debunkthefunk is, as
Shlomo says below, a psyop. One who gets paid by someone.
"Then the health of the deceased meant they mostly were already dying of something."
Having a comorbidity doesn't mean that that person is "immediately dying." People can live for decades with comorbidities like hypertension and diabetes.
The biggest comorbidity unrecognized by any "accredited" public health agency is vitamin D deficiency.
I meant that, having a comorbidity meant you're more likely to die from something like covid that wouldn't have killed you without the comorbidity. People can live for decades with things like diabetes (my father did) but it is killing them slowly and makes them less able to withstand other attacks. Covid doesn't seem to kill the fit elderly - my 92 year old mother in law recently caught it and brushed it off easily (although she and her carers thought it was a likely death sentence due to months of propaganda).
If you mean killing people immediately -- 5mos to a year-- yes you are correct. Wait-- papers I read are already linking acute increases in severe and rare chronic diseases in younger people with no underlying morbidities or history of chronic disease. There are many ways to kill people.
This Doctor is a total moron. Nothing he said makes sense. If you look at current trends, not cumulative data, as here in New Zealand, nearly 100% of serious hospitalisations and ICU visits are the boosted and 97% of dsaths are boosted. Today there were 47 Covid deaths and only ONE, SOMEONE in THEIR 80'S WAS THE ONLY PERSON TO DIE WHO WASNT FULLY VACCINATED. Its been like that for days. In fact. So the vax is ineffective. Since July 16th, only 3 undervaccinated people under 60 have died with Covid, compared to 35 fully vvaccinated, 7% and only 5 undervaccinated in that time went into ICU and yet they represent 15% of the population. Hardly a burden on the health system and they are under represented by 50% in the Covid death gigures. And remember, half of these died with Covid, not from Covid.
Add to the failure of the vaccine, exvess mortality caused by vaccination. It has climbed 11% since the vax roll out and it's excellerating post booster. We have broken record after record with deaths this year and we haven't hit our worst month yet, August. The NZ government is too gutless to tell us the vaccine status of those dying from All Causes.
The most successful countries in ths world, as far as deaths per million from Covid, are the Weat African countries, then Bangladesh and Pakistan. The first two have something in common,: low vaccination rates. Im not sure about Pakistan.
Even a kindergarten student would know Omicron is less deadly than all previous variants. What's killing people is that the elderly, many who were shielded from the first waves are now vaccinated and are facing Covid for the first time. The vax is useless and if it wasnt for antivirals, thsy would be dying in their droves. Any variant is dangerous to someone over 80.
"HART is not "well-respected" among the scientific community, I challenge you to show me any favorable recognition of the group's work by any accredited scientific or medical society if you disagree."
There is a logical fallacy here. Who are in "the scientific community?" "The accredited scientific or medical societies?" There is dispute about whether the accredited societies are following science. There is question of their adequacy of expertise. There is also a question about whether accreditation means anything. So there is a logical fallacy on both sides.
If he is real and "defends" his theses by hollow arguments he uses on Twitter and his email to Mr Joel Smalley, his thesis is not worh the paper it is written on. I am just annoyed that he attracts attention of someone so honorable in his research and arguments as Joel Smalley.
This guy has 15k subscribers. He's nothing and not worth your time! From my point of view, alot of unnecessary energy is spent debating with nothing folks like this.
Fauci and all the other experts have STILL never had to actually sit in front of a hostile audience and answer questions. Half a dozen people I know could rip the entire covid debacle apart if they were given the chance...........and that's why we're not allowed anywhere near the lying bastards.
I'll see your half a dozen and raise you 200!
This clown, Dr Punk, is likely a school teacher without the tools to argue with you or to even understand your arguments, so he just tosses chaffe around like Rip Torn, then disappears. But he does have the cutesy software to make his little AR self and smartboard, just like the elementary school teachers do. 🤡
He's a woke postdoc with an enormous fro
Ditto, and the reverse about the people who stayed to do the 'interview'.
To those who don't want to know, no amount of evidence will suffice.
The hilarious thing about the screenshot you from his YouTube channel, Joel is that he features Dr. John Campbell.
Dr. Campbell was until fairly recently an advocate of the programme/narrative until he (to his credit) had an epiphany having viewed the first Pfizer release. No doubt he'll be debunking Professor Shmuel Shakira next.
Yes, I noticed that too!!
Fear is why they say nothing. The Deep State are actually the minions of the Real Power. These are very serious - very deadly men and nobody messes with them.
If any leader were to try to they'd be taken aside and shown this https://youtu.be/oi_8rwlXrJI
Keep in mind POTUS... is nothing more than an appointed flunky. Democracy is a sham --- the main purpose of it is to deflect from the people who really run the show --- if things go sideways (Bush > Iraq) -- release the steam with a new catch phrase (Hope and Change) ... rinse repeat rinse repeat.
Notice how even though Bush Cheney Rummy committed a war crime faking the WMD... Obama immediately announced 'we need to put that behind us and look forward to a better future' And then he proceeded to implement even more NSA intrusions into everybody's life - and he kicked off a few more wars...
It's all a massive scam... and the people behind this would rip the throat out of any gang or any organized crime family. They are feared - and for good reason.
When they say follow the money - that is correct - but follow it to the font.... The Federal Reserve.
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. …We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.” – Edward Bernays – Propaganda
“Once a nation parts with the control of its currency and credit, it matters not who makes the nation’s laws. … Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most sacred responsibility, all talk of the sovereignty of parliament and of democracy is idle and futile.” — Mackenzie King, Canadian Prime Minister 1935-1948.
"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." - Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence
“Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” ― Woodrow Wilson
Thank you for your incisive post, I would love to do a follow up post and name names but don't in respect to Joel. That being said, until we do such this will continue .
Don't worry about me, Tim. If you have something useful to share, please do!
I'm with Joel. If you have names to name, please do. That is what it will take to end this. Individuals will have to be identified, isolated, and debunked -- probably one-by-one because they all have different audiences.
Hasn't David Martin done some of that?
I've had the misfortune of interacting with this insufferable person online and can confirm it's a waste of time.
His arrogance, intellectual dishonesty, unquestioning acceptance of any and all mainstream public health narratives+studies+data, and shameless self promotion are second to none.
There is zero chance of him participating in a healthy debate with you or anyone else.
Let's hope we spare a few more the ordeal if they see this first!
Indeed!
Sadly I'm sure he's making a killing off those youtube videos. Narrative boosting pays.
But we're the grifters apparently...
I agree. Total waste of time. A saying from HR: "Not everyone is coachable" Just writing your impressions, opinions, beliefs does not mean you are critically thinking about...anything really. I respect Joel Smalley being always respectful and replying with the well articulated argument, and I wish I could do more to protect him from dickheads like "Dr Debunk".
Could this Funk character be a gov't or pharma employee whose job it is to attack information providers in order to discredit them and create confusion? He/She isn't concerned with whether they are providing anything truthful themselves. It's all about generating enough confusion to keep the fearful from straying from the herd.
Chaffe and countermeasures.
Yes. Well said . And he might be part of 77 brigade.
It wouldn't surprise me. They certainly have plenty of time on their hands to churn out "debunking" "content". Can't rule out they're simply addicted to the attention and feeling of righteous moral superiority. Many such cases.
The clown doesn't know anything, y'all are wasting your time and energy.
I suffered this for many years, decades even, campaigning against “climate change”, i.e. alleged man-made global warming. Proponents never, ever engaged in debate. No matter what strong arguments you put up, all they ever did was to fall back on the official narrative, e.g. “the science is settled”, “the consensus is overwhelming”, “climate change is an existential threat”, etc.
Covid was the new "climate change," the two were interchangeable from the start.
3 Reasons;
1. 'Debate me Bro' has become a meme online. Atheists vs Christians, Marxists vs Free Market advocates, Bloodsports and clout chases challenging bigger youtubers purely to grow their audience. Debate has become disingenuous and a bit of a joke to the online community.
2. ClusterB personality types: Assertion of Control by Withdrawal. If ignore you, I retain control. Look at our leaders and bureaucrats, and tell me they don't present as clusterB personality disordered.
3. If I platform you | Engage with you, I am giving you validity. As a GenX, it was always the proper thing to engage with all ideas. Nowadays where we indoctrinate - not educate, we keep children away from dangerous ideas for fear they may be seduced by them. It is indicative to me, they have so little confidence in their ideas they do not believe anyone would freely choose them - if given the choice.
They're correct. It's why they lie, cheat and steal elections. They rely on coersion.
This is psychop. Excess deaths are normalising in “sufficiently” jabbed countries, meaning children and young adults have now become vulnerable after these deadly jabs. This psychop is yet another effort to do just that.
Find it hard to believe "Dr Debunk " is a real person. Not worth your time. Totally Irrelevant entity "Dr Funk". What a dickhead.
He's real. But only 1 year out of defending his thesis by the looks of it.
Probably bought off by one of the vaccine companies. Like many.
He also includes in his missive to Joel, 2 links from this site - https://ourworldindata.org/funding
Grants
Our World in Data is supported by grants from the Quadrature Climate Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and a grant from the German entrepreneur, businesswoman and philanthropist Susanne Klatten.
In the past we have also received grants from the World Health Organization, the Department of Health and Social Care in the United Kingdom, the Centre for Effective Altruism – Effective Altruism Meta Fund, and the Nuffield Foundation.
--
https://www.leadersleague.com/fr/news/fortunes-2021-susanna-klatten-deputy-chairwoman-altana
Following the deaths of her parents, Klatten obtained a 50.1% stake in pharmaceuticals and chemicals company Altana and a 19.2% stake in BMW. She increased her stake in Altana over the years and is now the sole owner of the Wesel-headquartered company, which has over €2 billion in annual sales.
Our world in data is often referred to. Almost a semi-official site for the indoctrinated and the indoctrinating.
The one thing that I have found gob-smacking throughout is that, for a deadly plague it really was crap at killing people. I had to keep checking that the numbers of dead people were that low - surely such a deadly plague should have killed millions in the UK alone? Then the age of the deceased was mostly over the average age of death. Then the health of the deceased meant they mostly were already dying of something. Yet people like Dr Wilson talk as though young, fit athletes were dying of covid in their millions. He clearly hasn't noticed all the young, fit athletes who didn't die of covid but have been dying in droves since the vaccines appeared. Death is an emotional subject and people appear incapable of talking rationally about it but most of the people who died of covid were old/ill. People dying post vaccination are of all ages but people don't want to talk about it. (Is he a *real* doctor? bit worrying if he is!)
I guess he has a 60k+ debt and a newly minted PhD that he needs to use to earn an income.
19K subscribers on youtube doesn't sound like enough to make a living from (someone I know has about 40k and he doesn't make a living from it). So I guess debunkthefunk is, as
Shlomo says below, a psyop. One who gets paid by someone.
Only 60k in debt?!
"Then the health of the deceased meant they mostly were already dying of something."
Having a comorbidity doesn't mean that that person is "immediately dying." People can live for decades with comorbidities like hypertension and diabetes.
The biggest comorbidity unrecognized by any "accredited" public health agency is vitamin D deficiency.
I meant that, having a comorbidity meant you're more likely to die from something like covid that wouldn't have killed you without the comorbidity. People can live for decades with things like diabetes (my father did) but it is killing them slowly and makes them less able to withstand other attacks. Covid doesn't seem to kill the fit elderly - my 92 year old mother in law recently caught it and brushed it off easily (although she and her carers thought it was a likely death sentence due to months of propaganda).
If you mean killing people immediately -- 5mos to a year-- yes you are correct. Wait-- papers I read are already linking acute increases in severe and rare chronic diseases in younger people with no underlying morbidities or history of chronic disease. There are many ways to kill people.
This Doctor is a total moron. Nothing he said makes sense. If you look at current trends, not cumulative data, as here in New Zealand, nearly 100% of serious hospitalisations and ICU visits are the boosted and 97% of dsaths are boosted. Today there were 47 Covid deaths and only ONE, SOMEONE in THEIR 80'S WAS THE ONLY PERSON TO DIE WHO WASNT FULLY VACCINATED. Its been like that for days. In fact. So the vax is ineffective. Since July 16th, only 3 undervaccinated people under 60 have died with Covid, compared to 35 fully vvaccinated, 7% and only 5 undervaccinated in that time went into ICU and yet they represent 15% of the population. Hardly a burden on the health system and they are under represented by 50% in the Covid death gigures. And remember, half of these died with Covid, not from Covid.
Add to the failure of the vaccine, exvess mortality caused by vaccination. It has climbed 11% since the vax roll out and it's excellerating post booster. We have broken record after record with deaths this year and we haven't hit our worst month yet, August. The NZ government is too gutless to tell us the vaccine status of those dying from All Causes.
The most successful countries in ths world, as far as deaths per million from Covid, are the Weat African countries, then Bangladesh and Pakistan. The first two have something in common,: low vaccination rates. Im not sure about Pakistan.
Even a kindergarten student would know Omicron is less deadly than all previous variants. What's killing people is that the elderly, many who were shielded from the first waves are now vaccinated and are facing Covid for the first time. The vax is useless and if it wasnt for antivirals, thsy would be dying in their droves. Any variant is dangerous to someone over 80.
"HART is not "well-respected" among the scientific community, I challenge you to show me any favorable recognition of the group's work by any accredited scientific or medical society if you disagree."
There is a logical fallacy here. Who are in "the scientific community?" "The accredited scientific or medical societies?" There is dispute about whether the accredited societies are following science. There is question of their adequacy of expertise. There is also a question about whether accreditation means anything. So there is a logical fallacy on both sides.
If he is real and "defends" his theses by hollow arguments he uses on Twitter and his email to Mr Joel Smalley, his thesis is not worh the paper it is written on. I am just annoyed that he attracts attention of someone so honorable in his research and arguments as Joel Smalley.
He had a go at Steve Kirsch. One whole video.
Why? It isn't in their interest to do so. They would lose the debates. So why engage?
He isn't interested in engaging in a debate. He is "right" because he's following the herd.
This guy has 15k subscribers. He's nothing and not worth your time! From my point of view, alot of unnecessary energy is spent debating with nothing folks like this.