Young Americans are Dying at Unprecedented Rates since 2021
The significant increase in deaths is concomitant with the mRNA experiment.
The mRNA experiment will go down as the most heinous crime against humanity ever witnessed. Those that persist in its support or even its promotion would do well to look at the data that unequivocally demonstrates that the novel gene therapy is not Safe or Effectiveâ„¢.
For this brief study, I am working with the Social Security Administration deaths data that Steve Kirsch has also been working on.
Here is their definition of their data:
SSA’s Death InformationWe collect death information to administer our programs. We receive death reports from many sources, including family members, funeral homes, financial institutions, postal authorities, States and other Federal agencies. It is important to note our records are not a comprehensive record of all deaths in the country.We compile files of death information from our Master Files of Social Security Number (SSN) Holders and SSN Applications (Enumeration System) system of records, which contains our records of SSNs assigned to individuals since 1936.  These files of death information include, if available, the deceased individual’s SSN, first name, middle name, surname, date of birth, and date of death.The full file of death information includes state death records.  Pursuant to section 205(r) of the Social Security Act, we only share the full file with certain Federal and State agencies. If you are a representative of a Federal or State agency, please see the information below to learn how to submit a request for the full file of death information.We provide the Department of Commerce’s National Technical Information Service (NTIS) a public file of death information, which excludes state death records. NTIS sells the public file of death information, also known as the public Death Master File (DMF) or Limited Access DMF, to other agencies and private organizations such as banks and credit companies in accordance with the requirements of section 203 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013.Suffice to say then, it is reliable and widely available to all public administrations should they care to analyse it. Ignorance is no defence.
Over 55s
In the over 55s, even the most basic summary statistics clearly show that deaths in the COVID era (Feb ‘20 to present), are higher than expected according to historical trend:
Comparing periods running from August to July each year (since this is the observed seasonal mortality pattern), 2019-20, the year of the COVID epidemic, results in 6% more deaths than expected.
In 2020-21 and 2021-22, the post-mRNA experiment years, deaths are respectively 15% and 12% higher than expected. The unusual spikes in deaths occur coincidentally with the start of the mass mRNA injection campaign1:
18 to 55s
In the 18 to 55s, the basic summary statistics again clearly show that deaths in the COVID era, are higher than expected according to historical trend:
2019-20 results in 9% more deaths than expected. In 2020-21 and 2021-22, deaths are an unprecedented 26% and 34% higher than expected.
Once again, the unusual spikes in deaths occur coincidentally with the start of the mass mRNA injection campaign:
Under 18s
Finally, the pattern repeats for the under 18s:
The recent trend of declining mortality is reversed ever so slightly in 2019-20, with deaths 5% higher than expected. However, deaths are respectively 11% and 21% higher than expected in the subsequent two-year periods.
The correlation between deaths and mRNA adverse event reports are strongest in this age group:
Conclusion
Whilst correlation does not equal causation, it is an indisputable fact that deaths across all ages are substantially higher (in absolute terms and relative to expectation) in the post-mRNA experiment era than they were during the COVID era prior to the start of the experiment.
In terms of overall public health, in the absence of any other plausible explanation (which is not apparent), it is safe to conclude that the mRNA experiment is not associated with lower mortality overall.
In fact, it is quite the contrary, with the severity of the increase in mortality in the post-mRNA experiment era being more heavily felt in the age groups under 55, who were less affected by the natural virus when it first emerged.
N.B. Since there is no reliable, public data on the injection rates by age in the States, I have used the vaccine adverse event reports (VAERS) as a proxy (where there is LOTS of data!).
These data are consistent with mortality data from around the world showing increased mortality following peak COVID vaccine uptake, as you, I and others have been showing. Thank you also for discussing the difficulty of finding this information, now that North American and western European governments have hidden so much of it.
I'm sure everyone has seen it but John Dee is doing the same sort of terrifying analysis on UK data.
How do we get this data out into the mainstream? The public know people are dying but they don't know the real reason why because they are all still telling themselves the lie about safety and efficacy. If your friend dies of a heart attack months after his booster jab nobody is going to accuse the jab of doing it and nobody is going to be looking anyway. The BBC, the Guardian, the New York Times - the big news outlets need to be shouting about this otherwise we are all just talking to each other