73 Comments

I’ll bet there are certain people who wince each time a new analysis appears from Joel Smalley.

You see, it’s not possible to hide what they’ve done or been complicit in lying about.

Unless the authorities are lying about the number of dead people, the evidence of multiple crimes is in the data.

Some people point to certain datasets & exclaim “look, entirely consistent with the official narrative”, as if that dismisses any & all objections.

Sorry, it doesn’t.

ALL the data needs to be consistent with the narrative, with plausible, non-overwrought explanations for deviations.

And they just don’t fit.

Exactly what the truth is / was will be debated for ever.

But we can be absolutely certain that all the deaths are not consistent with a viral pandemic plus some unfortunate consequences of policy.

Many people were murdered. Medical protocols designed to kill. Things you’d never do we’re done to tens of thousands of innocent people in each country.

Some people were all but frightened to death then treated inappropriately or not at all.

What’s worse is that a large number of medical staff know full well what I’ve said is true, yet are still drawing their taxpayer funded salaries.

Where it comes to the “vaccines”, there’s no question that this was an irrational policy response. Even if they’d done a good job of design (they didn’t, it couldn’t have been worse); of non-clinical toxiciology (they simply missed out numerous packages); of clinical development (they committed trials fraud); of manufacturing (ha ha), they still couldn’t have saved lives.

Early multi drug treatment would have been the correct response, assuming there really was a novel virus (I don’t think there was).

So the “vaccines” are superfluous, ineffective & toxic.

Other than that, anyone who wishes to believe the official lies - about how people died & the role of the injections - is welcome to knock thrmselves out.

Expand full comment
Nov 10, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Canadian MSM reports that COVID-19 related deaths this year have surpassed all of 2021 yet doctors still say; “Fortunately the vaccine has protected many from severe outcomes".

How are more deaths not more severe outcomes?:):)

Expand full comment
Nov 10, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Joel, You are a diamond, you are good as gold, you are the silver lining, the player who wont fold.

Expand full comment
Nov 10, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Magnificent analysis. The tightness of the correlations and the XS death mean reversion to zero in the charts pre Feb 2020 is so clear and justifies your country groupings.

Just one question: Is the "GDP" per capita (I would have thought that's a better measure of wealth than raw GDP which is largely affected by population size)?

And one speculation: I wonder if lockdown-driven (excess) alcohol consumption has some of the explanatory power here as well. No idea if any data exists on that.

Expand full comment

Oh my god!! What amazing sets of stats. Thank you.

Expand full comment

I got an email in which you mentioned you think the vaccines make people more susceptible to disease.

I think you are right. The vaccines are disease enhancers. I've been spamming this all over the internet for months. Created the website, just so people could see, but it seems few are inclined to do so.

Differences in proportion of myocarditis for males 12-17 in VAERS reports:

+0.370% (1 Injection, no infection: https://pervaers.com/?v=C10&q=_myocarditis_)

+6.321% (1 Injection + infection: https://pervaers.com/?v=C11&q=_myocarditis_)

+11.718% (2 Injections, no infection: https://pervaers.com/?v=C20&q=_myocarditis_)

+15.476% (2 Injections + infection: https://pervaers.com/?v=C21&q=_myocarditis_)

Expand full comment
Nov 10, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

The vaccinated think the deaths and side effects are from the virus not the vaccine. If the rate is still climbing this fall then Dr. Zelenko's prediction has come true.

Expand full comment
Nov 11, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Number 3 seems the most likely of your hypotheses.

What are the age profiles of these countries and does that correlate to excess deaths and vaccinations?

Were countries given different doses in their vaccines or different lots based on their GDP (i.e. getting rid of useless eaters if you believe in the depopulation theory)?

Why longitude and not latitude groupins/comparisons?

Expand full comment

Joel Thank you for the massive amount of hard work you're constantly putting out here.

Expand full comment

You’re absolutely brilliant!

Expand full comment
Nov 10, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

the effect of GDP correlates with Mathew Crawford's findings; he calls it the wealth and health effect, related to zip codes

Expand full comment
Nov 12, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

I have at least 2 neighbour (older women) who died after they took "inoculum"" called vaccine in Romania, but they are not count as older people who was inoculated and died. Romania haven't such a great intake of vaccine in population but have a low rate of associate the mortality with vaccine.

Expand full comment
founding
Nov 12, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Joel painting yet more Picasso’s with the Data... Thank You Joel. Great stuff. As Dr Mike Yeadon says above here, there will be no hiding from and of the Truth in the Data!

Expand full comment

Yes, I understand not thinking clearly. Lyme brain.

Expand full comment

Yes, I can only agree with Jacquelyn below !

Expand full comment

Got it! thanks. Michael

Expand full comment