Thanks Metatron for your work here again. You are definitely up to something, but I am less convinced by the conclusion here. Note you use a 3week delay here (test reporting to death reporting), but 1week in your previous analysis. Might be plausible, but somewhat ad-hoc. Also, this is time-matched cohort, I have a hard time believing such a high mortality rate difference. Sounds more likely if they were vaccine induce deaths again. How many deaths per vaccination this would be, and how would it compare to the 1/1000 in the previous analysis ?
Sure, I don't claim to be right here. Just offering my interpretation of where I think the data has been corrupted and plausible remedies. I put my caveat in the final part in that respect. Rather than double speculating, if we were granted access to the unfettered data, we could make a better fist of it.
amazing work here - is it possible to get the graphs for other age ranges too?
Thanks Metatron for your work here again. You are definitely up to something, but I am less convinced by the conclusion here. Note you use a 3week delay here (test reporting to death reporting), but 1week in your previous analysis. Might be plausible, but somewhat ad-hoc. Also, this is time-matched cohort, I have a hard time believing such a high mortality rate difference. Sounds more likely if they were vaccine induce deaths again. How many deaths per vaccination this would be, and how would it compare to the 1/1000 in the previous analysis ?
Sure, I don't claim to be right here. Just offering my interpretation of where I think the data has been corrupted and plausible remedies. I put my caveat in the final part in that respect. Rather than double speculating, if we were granted access to the unfettered data, we could make a better fist of it.