I've sort of run out of shocked/distressed/amazed/saddened comments.
Or funny/witty/sarcastic ones.
Or angry/indignant ones.
What is there left to say? The jabbed are jabbed. It can't be undone. They presumably don't want to know what they've done to themselves. The authorities don't want them to know. The conversation has been changed to save the sanity of the gullible.
Sadly, I know what’s been done to me. I woke up a year ago after receiving two shots in the spring of 2021 Thankfully no AES (yet). Now it is my sole mission for the rest of my life to wake the sheep.
Great analysis as always. It's Bill's Law of Opposite Effects. The "vaccines" supposed to protect everyone and largely end cases and spread, did the opposite. This could have been predicted (and was by a few of us - the people who were censored, cancelled and ridiculed).
Months ago I wrote a post about "opposite day". Remember those days? We can just about judge anything these kleptocrats say and do by assuming the opposite.
It works. Whatever they say is the truth, you know the opposite must be the truth. The corollary to this is: Whatever they say is a lie, we must assume is actually the truth.
On the plus side, you can actually use their statements to find the truth ... or else get your starting point for some investigation. What are they trying to cover up? They tell you with their lies.
Total deaths Norway, first 42 weeks of the year (all mortality.org has logged so far for 2022)
2018 -32,907
2019 - 32,496
2020 - 32,358
2021 - 32,373
2022 - 35,922 +11%!
An 11% increase year over year, prior to Covid, is extreme for any country (usually see 2% variance). Which of course you know Joel. Just had the data on hand as I was doing my weekly check on South Korea and thought I'd check on Norway while I was at it.
Devil's Advocate - if this 11% increase was from the vaccine, why did it take a year to increase mortality? Why did Norway have a harsher response than Sweden and Denmark, at -.08% and +3.9%, respectively (Finland though seems to mirror Norway, at 40 weeks data they are near +10% year over year). Lot's of variables to tease out and possible confounders, don't have the time, but if anyone wants to chime in with theories please do.
You know, the powers that be find themselves in a quite tricky position: if they'd admit to anything like it, their heads would roll; if they don't (their current MO), they will stumble from one absurd 'explanation' to the next one while losing what remains of their credibility.
I see the carnage of these jabs on a daily basis on site in Norway.
A lot of colleagues have been injured as well.
Recently there were a campaign for the ‘influenza-vaccine’, unfortunately quite many took this shit but the clinic I work in have the 3d lowest uptake, hurrah! Finally some is getting it.
The PR marketing tools has been ripped down through the hospital and are now completely gone. People are not happy with those paid off glossy signs.
Same here. No-one talks about it, though, it's as if that would kinda make the problems go away. I'm having quite a field day explaining to my kids that wishful thinking is no substitute for objective reality.
if only politicians and public health bureaucrats would be as receptive to these lessons as my kids…
Some actually do and less private now as all know my stance.
Many are regretting their choice to be jabbed and some are expressing that they felt coerced to do so as there were kind of ‘threats’ to lose your job if you didn’t accept the hospitals kind offer to take the ‘miracle cure’.
My work is contract based and there has never been an issue of my non jabbed status.
Said no to work for a long period when they decided masking was a necessity for being at work after non masking for months on time. It was never an option for me to obey.
Was asked several times to come but firmly used the word NO. Was welcomed back as nothing ever took place when that insanity ‘rule’ was suddenly gone just the way it was put in.
I know that their goal was to ‘vaccinate’ 75% of the workforce, which they have not reached.
The lowest clinic is in psychiatric, around 26%.
They sell it by
* most effective way to prevent influenza
*cannot give the ‘sickness’ influenza
* it is safe
Administered by colleague ‘vaccinators’ - which you can opt in to be, have no idea if they are getting paid for doing that or being on their glossy posters.
The hospitals all over Norway follows the FHI (as the CDC) where they recommend all health personell to take the ‘influenza shot’ yearly as it is a good thing and it is FREE.
Re brightsAngel's comment below, it's not an entirely identical copy of CDC recommendations, as there are no injections used in Norway that include mercury as an adjuviant.
Oh, well, there's no societal advantage for critical thinking, esp. in such highly 'conformist' societies, you know, like in Scandinavia.
I've only lived here for slightly more than two years (after 10 years in Switzerland), but the Nordics are certainly way less interested in individual liberties, esp. compared to the Swiss.
Any colleague that is taking it should fill in a registration form and answer the following
*do you feel sick or do you have fever?
*do you have any known allergy to egg (ovalbumin, chicken proteins), formaldehyde or oktoksinol-9?
*have you had serious AEs towards former ‘vaccines’?
*do you use any medication with elevated risk of bleeding, like Warfarine, Marevan, Eliquis) or do you have any illness that can cause elevated risk for bleeding?
And lastly it states on the form;
Pregnant and breastfeeding women can take the ‘vaccine’
Could not find any form of something that looks like anywhere close to an informed consent. This is in a hospital!!!!!!!
The virulence got weaker but it's the same for the control group lol, but vaxies' are many more times more prone to constant infection....likely against other bugs too, what an amazing drug
This study analyzing UK govt's data, on page 54 showed over 50s at over NEGATIVE 1900% super spreading LOL
Hi gentlemen, I'm very honoured you took the time out of your busy life. Thank you, Joel, in particular, for doing this!
Now, contrary to what you wrote to Norman Fenton and me via email ('doesn't tell us anything we didn't know'), I do think we learned at least one thing: while I remain quite wary about the official numbers in general, this information will be incredibly hard to refute--and I'd bet my farm if these trends couldn't be reproduced with (clean) data from other mRNA-subjected countries.
You are doing us all a great service by collecting and analyzing this data. Especially considering the unnatural lack of curiosity exhibited by public health authorities. Thanks!However, there is a major confounder here. In the later seasons other variants were prevalent that were more infectious but less lethal. There are suggestions that these variants were favored by the widespread vaccination campaign because they were able to escape the immune response generated by the vaccine. Others suggest that these variants are just natural mutation of the virus. Perhaps the truth is that both suggestions are correct. What would be interesting is to compare vaccinated against unvaccinated in the same wave. During a particular wave certain variants predominate, typically one of the newer variants. Earlier variants die out. So looking at the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated in a particular wave would give us a better handle on the vaccine effectiveness in that wave. My suspicion is that the data will show limited to no advantage to being vaccinated. In a discussion with another commenter on another substack I combined the results of several studies to get to the following tentative conclusion. We appeared to be getting a 2/1000 reduction in death by vaccination (from 3/1000 in the unvaccinated to 1/1000 in the vaccinated). But at the cost of ~3/1000 severe adverse events in the first 28 days and about 3/1000 premature/excess deaths over the following 12 months due to vaccination. (I used your data/analysis to estimate the rate of premature/excess death due to vaccination. Again, thanks.) So, in summary, vaccination saves two lives in the near term, but causes three SAEs in the near term and three deaths over the next 12 months. When you consider that it is likely that early use of existing antivirals like HCQ & IVM could reduce the ~3/1000 deaths to ~2/1000 without the adverse effects, that course of action seems to be more appropriate than vaccination.
I totally agree and covered it in the article? We expect the virus to "attenuate". In other words, more transmissible, less virulent strains come to dominate. This on its own could easily explain lower hospital and death rates. BUT, as you also suggest, what if these variants are due to the unnatural immune pressure from the "vaccine". Not a novel premise at all. It's been the case since Marek and his chickens! If only there was just one honest country that would release the raw data stratified (properly) by vax status, we could indeed clear this debate up once and for all.
Sorry. Missed your meaning in that line. I fully agree about the data. One of the most discouraging things about this pandemic has been the suppression of data in general, the suppression of cheap antivirals and the heavy marketing of expensive new drugs and shots. I foolishly thought that a national crisis would engender a nonpartisan, altruistic and public- spirited response across the community — including the public health authorities, the medical establishment and Pharma. I have been very disappointed in the public health authorities, the mainline medical community and Pharma.
Could you plz explain (if possible with one or two key sources) how you became convinced of the quite high vaccination fatality rate of 3/1000 over 12 months?
Are the criteria of deaths due to covid consistent across the time frames?
Is it possible playing the devil's advocate here that that's in the early period were real covid deaths whereas deaths more recently are deaths with covid?
Several substackers (Metatron, Igor Chudov, the Ethical Skeptic, Die Frackel, etc.) have been observing significant excess deaths in US/UK/EU. Metatron, & others, have shown a strong correlation between vaccination rates and excess deaths (deaths over expectation) that would imply a 40% increase in deaths among the vaccinated. This correlation and rate were also found when comparing vaccination and excess death rates by socio-economic quintile in the UK. The average annual death rate in US in 2019 was 750/100K (CDC). 40% of that number gives 3/1000. It is only an estimate. But in the absence of honest, competent and transparent reporting by public health authorities it is at least an attempt at an estimate. The similar estimate of 3/1000 SAEs was produced by looking at several papers reporting SAEs and directly calculating. Primary source was a paper reporting results for vaccinated vs unvaccinated from insurance databases. Estimates for SAEs vary widely with some being as low as 1/10K (Prasad) or even 1/30K. However, SAEs are clearly being underreported In official sources. On the other hand, insurance claims have to be reviewed and paid. And, deaths are harder to hide. The estimate of lives save by vaccination came from a favorable paper using hospital data that claimed a death rate of 3/1000 in the unvaccinated and 1/1000 in the vaccinated.
The age-stratified data was presented as a daily summary with one data file per day! So, no, I wasn't going to stitch all 1,000 of those together to get a time-series!!
yikes-----I am out of my depth re the data---I am trying to put a collation of adverse effects on children together from the research.
I currently have a 4 part collation rebutting all 9 government strategies awaiting publication ,I hope, so I am trying a similar compilation re adverse effects. Btw I am due to speak to Pandata in a fortnight re children.
I've sort of run out of shocked/distressed/amazed/saddened comments.
Or funny/witty/sarcastic ones.
Or angry/indignant ones.
What is there left to say? The jabbed are jabbed. It can't be undone. They presumably don't want to know what they've done to themselves. The authorities don't want them to know. The conversation has been changed to save the sanity of the gullible.
Sadly, I know what’s been done to me. I woke up a year ago after receiving two shots in the spring of 2021 Thankfully no AES (yet). Now it is my sole mission for the rest of my life to wake the sheep.
Here’s a start. http://banners4freedom.com/
I’m trying to work with the founders to see if they can collaborate with Steve Kirsch.
Great analysis as always. It's Bill's Law of Opposite Effects. The "vaccines" supposed to protect everyone and largely end cases and spread, did the opposite. This could have been predicted (and was by a few of us - the people who were censored, cancelled and ridiculed).
Months ago I wrote a post about "opposite day". Remember those days? We can just about judge anything these kleptocrats say and do by assuming the opposite.
It works. Whatever they say is the truth, you know the opposite must be the truth. The corollary to this is: Whatever they say is a lie, we must assume is actually the truth.
Yes - the upside down, backwards and game of opposites we have all played in this matrix for years now.
On the plus side, you can actually use their statements to find the truth ... or else get your starting point for some investigation. What are they trying to cover up? They tell you with their lies.
Precisely.
Billy Big Tits Gates is very happy and delighted.
Total deaths Norway, first 42 weeks of the year (all mortality.org has logged so far for 2022)
2018 -32,907
2019 - 32,496
2020 - 32,358
2021 - 32,373
2022 - 35,922 +11%!
An 11% increase year over year, prior to Covid, is extreme for any country (usually see 2% variance). Which of course you know Joel. Just had the data on hand as I was doing my weekly check on South Korea and thought I'd check on Norway while I was at it.
Devil's Advocate - if this 11% increase was from the vaccine, why did it take a year to increase mortality? Why did Norway have a harsher response than Sweden and Denmark, at -.08% and +3.9%, respectively (Finland though seems to mirror Norway, at 40 weeks data they are near +10% year over year). Lot's of variables to tease out and possible confounders, don't have the time, but if anyone wants to chime in with theories please do.
Indeed. I've covered excess deaths here - https://metatron.substack.com/p/did-hungarys-preference-for-sinopharm
Apologies for the shameless shilling here--but they injections have been officially absolved from having had anything to do with it:
https://fackel.substack.com/p/covidor-whateverin-norway-experts-21f
You know, the powers that be find themselves in a quite tricky position: if they'd admit to anything like it, their heads would roll; if they don't (their current MO), they will stumble from one absurd 'explanation' to the next one while losing what remains of their credibility.
Shill away! That’s why I’m here drowning in subscriptions!
I see the carnage of these jabs on a daily basis on site in Norway.
A lot of colleagues have been injured as well.
Recently there were a campaign for the ‘influenza-vaccine’, unfortunately quite many took this shit but the clinic I work in have the 3d lowest uptake, hurrah! Finally some is getting it.
The PR marketing tools has been ripped down through the hospital and are now completely gone. People are not happy with those paid off glossy signs.
Same here. No-one talks about it, though, it's as if that would kinda make the problems go away. I'm having quite a field day explaining to my kids that wishful thinking is no substitute for objective reality.
if only politicians and public health bureaucrats would be as receptive to these lessons as my kids…
Some actually do and less private now as all know my stance.
Many are regretting their choice to be jabbed and some are expressing that they felt coerced to do so as there were kind of ‘threats’ to lose your job if you didn’t accept the hospitals kind offer to take the ‘miracle cure’.
My work is contract based and there has never been an issue of my non jabbed status.
Said no to work for a long period when they decided masking was a necessity for being at work after non masking for months on time. It was never an option for me to obey.
Was asked several times to come but firmly used the word NO. Was welcomed back as nothing ever took place when that insanity ‘rule’ was suddenly gone just the way it was put in.
Do you know the specifics on which and what type of 'flu vaccine' is being used in the clinic where you work?
No. Will try to find out.
I know that their goal was to ‘vaccinate’ 75% of the workforce, which they have not reached.
The lowest clinic is in psychiatric, around 26%.
They sell it by
* most effective way to prevent influenza
*cannot give the ‘sickness’ influenza
* it is safe
Administered by colleague ‘vaccinators’ - which you can opt in to be, have no idea if they are getting paid for doing that or being on their glossy posters.
The hospitals all over Norway follows the FHI (as the CDC) where they recommend all health personell to take the ‘influenza shot’ yearly as it is a good thing and it is FREE.
All paid for by your taxed NOK
Find out here: https://fackel.substack.com/p/covid-nay-influenza-in-norway-requiem
Re brightsAngel's comment below, it's not an entirely identical copy of CDC recommendations, as there are no injections used in Norway that include mercury as an adjuviant.
Call it 'progress', if you like.
I know it is not an entirely copy of CDC but CDC and FDA have set the ‘standards’ for many countries in the world.
And health personnel unfortunately bow their heads to that organisation, ie FHI and its recommendations.
Oh, well, there's no societal advantage for critical thinking, esp. in such highly 'conformist' societies, you know, like in Scandinavia.
I've only lived here for slightly more than two years (after 10 years in Switzerland), but the Nordics are certainly way less interested in individual liberties, esp. compared to the Swiss.
Vaxigrip Tetra,
a quadrivalent influenza ‘vaccine’.
Any colleague that is taking it should fill in a registration form and answer the following
*do you feel sick or do you have fever?
*do you have any known allergy to egg (ovalbumin, chicken proteins), formaldehyde or oktoksinol-9?
*have you had serious AEs towards former ‘vaccines’?
*do you use any medication with elevated risk of bleeding, like Warfarine, Marevan, Eliquis) or do you have any illness that can cause elevated risk for bleeding?
And lastly it states on the form;
Pregnant and breastfeeding women can take the ‘vaccine’
Could not find any form of something that looks like anywhere close to an informed consent. This is in a hospital!!!!!!!
The link from FDA about the ‘vaccine’
https://www.fda.moph.go.th/sites/drug/Shared%20Documents/Vaccine/U1DR2C1072611500311C-SPC.pdf
I am so grateful to you and others tirelessly doing the work of DOCUMENTING all of this.
Why isn’t anyone doing research to see if baking soda reduces heart inflammation caused by the mRNA injections?
Baking Soda, Baking Soda, Baking Soda - The Aging Viking
https://theagingviking.substack.com/p/baking-soda-baking-soda-baking-soda
Stark example. It really looks like the ‘cure’ is causing the disease (amongst other things).
The virulence got weaker but it's the same for the control group lol, but vaxies' are many more times more prone to constant infection....likely against other bugs too, what an amazing drug
This study analyzing UK govt's data, on page 54 showed over 50s at over NEGATIVE 1900% super spreading LOL
Pre-print
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.06.28.22276926v4.full.pdf
Published here -
https://www.walshmedicalmedia.com/abstract/increasing-sarscov2-cases-hospitalizations-and-deaths-among-the-vaccinated-populations-during-the-omicron-b11529-variant-114464.html
Stephan Sander-Faes (https://fackel.substack.com/) has been reporting about Covid in Norway (and Austria) all the time.
He very kindly pointed me to this dataset and asked me for my take on it. It's his fault I didn't get any work done today!!
Hi gentlemen, I'm very honoured you took the time out of your busy life. Thank you, Joel, in particular, for doing this!
Now, contrary to what you wrote to Norman Fenton and me via email ('doesn't tell us anything we didn't know'), I do think we learned at least one thing: while I remain quite wary about the official numbers in general, this information will be incredibly hard to refute--and I'd bet my farm if these trends couldn't be reproduced with (clean) data from other mRNA-subjected countries.
I'd suspect the ball is in their court now.
You are doing us all a great service by collecting and analyzing this data. Especially considering the unnatural lack of curiosity exhibited by public health authorities. Thanks!However, there is a major confounder here. In the later seasons other variants were prevalent that were more infectious but less lethal. There are suggestions that these variants were favored by the widespread vaccination campaign because they were able to escape the immune response generated by the vaccine. Others suggest that these variants are just natural mutation of the virus. Perhaps the truth is that both suggestions are correct. What would be interesting is to compare vaccinated against unvaccinated in the same wave. During a particular wave certain variants predominate, typically one of the newer variants. Earlier variants die out. So looking at the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated in a particular wave would give us a better handle on the vaccine effectiveness in that wave. My suspicion is that the data will show limited to no advantage to being vaccinated. In a discussion with another commenter on another substack I combined the results of several studies to get to the following tentative conclusion. We appeared to be getting a 2/1000 reduction in death by vaccination (from 3/1000 in the unvaccinated to 1/1000 in the vaccinated). But at the cost of ~3/1000 severe adverse events in the first 28 days and about 3/1000 premature/excess deaths over the following 12 months due to vaccination. (I used your data/analysis to estimate the rate of premature/excess death due to vaccination. Again, thanks.) So, in summary, vaccination saves two lives in the near term, but causes three SAEs in the near term and three deaths over the next 12 months. When you consider that it is likely that early use of existing antivirals like HCQ & IVM could reduce the ~3/1000 deaths to ~2/1000 without the adverse effects, that course of action seems to be more appropriate than vaccination.
I totally agree and covered it in the article? We expect the virus to "attenuate". In other words, more transmissible, less virulent strains come to dominate. This on its own could easily explain lower hospital and death rates. BUT, as you also suggest, what if these variants are due to the unnatural immune pressure from the "vaccine". Not a novel premise at all. It's been the case since Marek and his chickens! If only there was just one honest country that would release the raw data stratified (properly) by vax status, we could indeed clear this debate up once and for all.
Sorry. Missed your meaning in that line. I fully agree about the data. One of the most discouraging things about this pandemic has been the suppression of data in general, the suppression of cheap antivirals and the heavy marketing of expensive new drugs and shots. I foolishly thought that a national crisis would engender a nonpartisan, altruistic and public- spirited response across the community — including the public health authorities, the medical establishment and Pharma. I have been very disappointed in the public health authorities, the mainline medical community and Pharma.
Could you plz explain (if possible with one or two key sources) how you became convinced of the quite high vaccination fatality rate of 3/1000 over 12 months?
Shame we don't have any good long term RCTs...
Funny that....
Are the criteria of deaths due to covid consistent across the time frames?
Is it possible playing the devil's advocate here that that's in the early period were real covid deaths whereas deaths more recently are deaths with covid?
I don't think so. Recent deaths are associated with excess death - https://metatron.substack.com/p/did-hungarys-preference-for-sinopharm. They are getting their COVID now that they didn't get two years ago. Now, that's novel!
confusing to me: so many moving parts
1) is the virus less deadly? sure seems to be but culling also happened to some extent.
2) can a less deadly virus still kill more people if it is more highly contagious?
3) might OAS etc be changing the landscape here?
4) are the effects of systemic dysfunction (caused by lockdowns etc) able to overwhelm all other considerations?
Brilliant logic.
Antibody Dependant Enhancement.
The phenomenon that a so-called vaccine makes you more susceptible for a virus is what has happened here.
We were warned in advance for this, but officials did not listen.
They should be prosecuted for their bad behavior in the covid PLANDAMIC, killing so many.
Thank you so much for cross posting my recent post :)
Several substackers (Metatron, Igor Chudov, the Ethical Skeptic, Die Frackel, etc.) have been observing significant excess deaths in US/UK/EU. Metatron, & others, have shown a strong correlation between vaccination rates and excess deaths (deaths over expectation) that would imply a 40% increase in deaths among the vaccinated. This correlation and rate were also found when comparing vaccination and excess death rates by socio-economic quintile in the UK. The average annual death rate in US in 2019 was 750/100K (CDC). 40% of that number gives 3/1000. It is only an estimate. But in the absence of honest, competent and transparent reporting by public health authorities it is at least an attempt at an estimate. The similar estimate of 3/1000 SAEs was produced by looking at several papers reporting SAEs and directly calculating. Primary source was a paper reporting results for vaccinated vs unvaccinated from insurance databases. Estimates for SAEs vary widely with some being as low as 1/10K (Prasad) or even 1/30K. However, SAEs are clearly being underreported In official sources. On the other hand, insurance claims have to be reviewed and paid. And, deaths are harder to hide. The estimate of lives save by vaccination came from a favorable paper using hospital data that claimed a death rate of 3/1000 in the unvaccinated and 1/1000 in the vaccinated.
excellent
do you have any age related stats on this?
The age-stratified data was presented as a daily summary with one data file per day! So, no, I wasn't going to stitch all 1,000 of those together to get a time-series!!
yikes-----I am out of my depth re the data---I am trying to put a collation of adverse effects on children together from the research.
I currently have a 4 part collation rebutting all 9 government strategies awaiting publication ,I hope, so I am trying a similar compilation re adverse effects. Btw I am due to speak to Pandata in a fortnight re children.