I've sort of run out of shocked/distressed/amazed/saddened comments.
Or funny/witty/sarcastic ones.
Or angry/indignant ones.
What is there left to say? The jabbed are jabbed. It can't be undone. They presumably don't want to know what they've done to themselves. The authorities don't want them to know. The conversation has been changed to save the sanity of the gullible.
Great analysis as always. It's Bill's Law of Opposite Effects. The "vaccines" supposed to protect everyone and largely end cases and spread, did the opposite. This could have been predicted (and was by a few of us - the people who were censored, cancelled and ridiculed).
Total deaths Norway, first 42 weeks of the year (all mortality.org has logged so far for 2022)
2018 -32,907
2019 - 32,496
2020 - 32,358
2021 - 32,373
2022 - 35,922 +11%!
An 11% increase year over year, prior to Covid, is extreme for any country (usually see 2% variance). Which of course you know Joel. Just had the data on hand as I was doing my weekly check on South Korea and thought I'd check on Norway while I was at it.
Devil's Advocate - if this 11% increase was from the vaccine, why did it take a year to increase mortality? Why did Norway have a harsher response than Sweden and Denmark, at -.08% and +3.9%, respectively (Finland though seems to mirror Norway, at 40 weeks data they are near +10% year over year). Lot's of variables to tease out and possible confounders, don't have the time, but if anyone wants to chime in with theories please do.
Nov 16, 2022·edited Nov 16, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
I see the carnage of these jabs on a daily basis on site in Norway.
A lot of colleagues have been injured as well.
Recently there were a campaign for the ‘influenza-vaccine’, unfortunately quite many took this shit but the clinic I work in have the 3d lowest uptake, hurrah! Finally some is getting it.
The PR marketing tools has been ripped down through the hospital and are now completely gone. People are not happy with those paid off glossy signs.
The virulence got weaker but it's the same for the control group lol, but vaxies' are many more times more prone to constant infection....likely against other bugs too, what an amazing drug
This study analyzing UK govt's data, on page 54 showed over 50s at over NEGATIVE 1900% super spreading LOL
You are doing us all a great service by collecting and analyzing this data. Especially considering the unnatural lack of curiosity exhibited by public health authorities. Thanks!However, there is a major confounder here. In the later seasons other variants were prevalent that were more infectious but less lethal. There are suggestions that these variants were favored by the widespread vaccination campaign because they were able to escape the immune response generated by the vaccine. Others suggest that these variants are just natural mutation of the virus. Perhaps the truth is that both suggestions are correct. What would be interesting is to compare vaccinated against unvaccinated in the same wave. During a particular wave certain variants predominate, typically one of the newer variants. Earlier variants die out. So looking at the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated in a particular wave would give us a better handle on the vaccine effectiveness in that wave. My suspicion is that the data will show limited to no advantage to being vaccinated. In a discussion with another commenter on another substack I combined the results of several studies to get to the following tentative conclusion. We appeared to be getting a 2/1000 reduction in death by vaccination (from 3/1000 in the unvaccinated to 1/1000 in the vaccinated). But at the cost of ~3/1000 severe adverse events in the first 28 days and about 3/1000 premature/excess deaths over the following 12 months due to vaccination. (I used your data/analysis to estimate the rate of premature/excess death due to vaccination. Again, thanks.) So, in summary, vaccination saves two lives in the near term, but causes three SAEs in the near term and three deaths over the next 12 months. When you consider that it is likely that early use of existing antivirals like HCQ & IVM could reduce the ~3/1000 deaths to ~2/1000 without the adverse effects, that course of action seems to be more appropriate than vaccination.
Are the criteria of deaths due to covid consistent across the time frames?
Is it possible playing the devil's advocate here that that's in the early period were real covid deaths whereas deaths more recently are deaths with covid?
Several substackers (Metatron, Igor Chudov, the Ethical Skeptic, Die Frackel, etc.) have been observing significant excess deaths in US/UK/EU. Metatron, & others, have shown a strong correlation between vaccination rates and excess deaths (deaths over expectation) that would imply a 40% increase in deaths among the vaccinated. This correlation and rate were also found when comparing vaccination and excess death rates by socio-economic quintile in the UK. The average annual death rate in US in 2019 was 750/100K (CDC). 40% of that number gives 3/1000. It is only an estimate. But in the absence of honest, competent and transparent reporting by public health authorities it is at least an attempt at an estimate. The similar estimate of 3/1000 SAEs was produced by looking at several papers reporting SAEs and directly calculating. Primary source was a paper reporting results for vaccinated vs unvaccinated from insurance databases. Estimates for SAEs vary widely with some being as low as 1/10K (Prasad) or even 1/30K. However, SAEs are clearly being underreported In official sources. On the other hand, insurance claims have to be reviewed and paid. And, deaths are harder to hide. The estimate of lives save by vaccination came from a favorable paper using hospital data that claimed a death rate of 3/1000 in the unvaccinated and 1/1000 in the vaccinated.
I've sort of run out of shocked/distressed/amazed/saddened comments.
Or funny/witty/sarcastic ones.
Or angry/indignant ones.
What is there left to say? The jabbed are jabbed. It can't be undone. They presumably don't want to know what they've done to themselves. The authorities don't want them to know. The conversation has been changed to save the sanity of the gullible.
Great analysis as always. It's Bill's Law of Opposite Effects. The "vaccines" supposed to protect everyone and largely end cases and spread, did the opposite. This could have been predicted (and was by a few of us - the people who were censored, cancelled and ridiculed).
Total deaths Norway, first 42 weeks of the year (all mortality.org has logged so far for 2022)
2018 -32,907
2019 - 32,496
2020 - 32,358
2021 - 32,373
2022 - 35,922 +11%!
An 11% increase year over year, prior to Covid, is extreme for any country (usually see 2% variance). Which of course you know Joel. Just had the data on hand as I was doing my weekly check on South Korea and thought I'd check on Norway while I was at it.
Devil's Advocate - if this 11% increase was from the vaccine, why did it take a year to increase mortality? Why did Norway have a harsher response than Sweden and Denmark, at -.08% and +3.9%, respectively (Finland though seems to mirror Norway, at 40 weeks data they are near +10% year over year). Lot's of variables to tease out and possible confounders, don't have the time, but if anyone wants to chime in with theories please do.
I see the carnage of these jabs on a daily basis on site in Norway.
A lot of colleagues have been injured as well.
Recently there were a campaign for the ‘influenza-vaccine’, unfortunately quite many took this shit but the clinic I work in have the 3d lowest uptake, hurrah! Finally some is getting it.
The PR marketing tools has been ripped down through the hospital and are now completely gone. People are not happy with those paid off glossy signs.
I am so grateful to you and others tirelessly doing the work of DOCUMENTING all of this.
Why isn’t anyone doing research to see if baking soda reduces heart inflammation caused by the mRNA injections?
Baking Soda, Baking Soda, Baking Soda - The Aging Viking
https://theagingviking.substack.com/p/baking-soda-baking-soda-baking-soda
Stark example. It really looks like the ‘cure’ is causing the disease (amongst other things).
The virulence got weaker but it's the same for the control group lol, but vaxies' are many more times more prone to constant infection....likely against other bugs too, what an amazing drug
This study analyzing UK govt's data, on page 54 showed over 50s at over NEGATIVE 1900% super spreading LOL
Pre-print
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.06.28.22276926v4.full.pdf
Published here -
https://www.walshmedicalmedia.com/abstract/increasing-sarscov2-cases-hospitalizations-and-deaths-among-the-vaccinated-populations-during-the-omicron-b11529-variant-114464.html
Stephan Sander-Faes (https://fackel.substack.com/) has been reporting about Covid in Norway (and Austria) all the time.
You are doing us all a great service by collecting and analyzing this data. Especially considering the unnatural lack of curiosity exhibited by public health authorities. Thanks!However, there is a major confounder here. In the later seasons other variants were prevalent that were more infectious but less lethal. There are suggestions that these variants were favored by the widespread vaccination campaign because they were able to escape the immune response generated by the vaccine. Others suggest that these variants are just natural mutation of the virus. Perhaps the truth is that both suggestions are correct. What would be interesting is to compare vaccinated against unvaccinated in the same wave. During a particular wave certain variants predominate, typically one of the newer variants. Earlier variants die out. So looking at the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated in a particular wave would give us a better handle on the vaccine effectiveness in that wave. My suspicion is that the data will show limited to no advantage to being vaccinated. In a discussion with another commenter on another substack I combined the results of several studies to get to the following tentative conclusion. We appeared to be getting a 2/1000 reduction in death by vaccination (from 3/1000 in the unvaccinated to 1/1000 in the vaccinated). But at the cost of ~3/1000 severe adverse events in the first 28 days and about 3/1000 premature/excess deaths over the following 12 months due to vaccination. (I used your data/analysis to estimate the rate of premature/excess death due to vaccination. Again, thanks.) So, in summary, vaccination saves two lives in the near term, but causes three SAEs in the near term and three deaths over the next 12 months. When you consider that it is likely that early use of existing antivirals like HCQ & IVM could reduce the ~3/1000 deaths to ~2/1000 without the adverse effects, that course of action seems to be more appropriate than vaccination.
The 'disease' is class war, although the 'health crisis', the 'science' and the 'statistics' are doing a great job of concealing it.
A class war requires a class war response.
Shame we don't have any good long term RCTs...
Funny that....
Are the criteria of deaths due to covid consistent across the time frames?
Is it possible playing the devil's advocate here that that's in the early period were real covid deaths whereas deaths more recently are deaths with covid?
Antibody Dependant Enhancement.
The phenomenon that a so-called vaccine makes you more susceptible for a virus is what has happened here.
We were warned in advance for this, but officials did not listen.
They should be prosecuted for their bad behavior in the covid PLANDAMIC, killing so many.
Thank you so much for cross posting my recent post :)
Several substackers (Metatron, Igor Chudov, the Ethical Skeptic, Die Frackel, etc.) have been observing significant excess deaths in US/UK/EU. Metatron, & others, have shown a strong correlation between vaccination rates and excess deaths (deaths over expectation) that would imply a 40% increase in deaths among the vaccinated. This correlation and rate were also found when comparing vaccination and excess death rates by socio-economic quintile in the UK. The average annual death rate in US in 2019 was 750/100K (CDC). 40% of that number gives 3/1000. It is only an estimate. But in the absence of honest, competent and transparent reporting by public health authorities it is at least an attempt at an estimate. The similar estimate of 3/1000 SAEs was produced by looking at several papers reporting SAEs and directly calculating. Primary source was a paper reporting results for vaccinated vs unvaccinated from insurance databases. Estimates for SAEs vary widely with some being as low as 1/10K (Prasad) or even 1/30K. However, SAEs are clearly being underreported In official sources. On the other hand, insurance claims have to be reviewed and paid. And, deaths are harder to hide. The estimate of lives save by vaccination came from a favorable paper using hospital data that claimed a death rate of 3/1000 in the unvaccinated and 1/1000 in the vaccinated.
excellent
do you have any age related stats on this?