22 Comments

In 40 years of observing diseases and pests attacking crops and pastures it is nearly always seasonal conditions that drive infection and damage, as they affect crop growth.. this can be a week or two of cold weather, or hot wet weather... but it sets up conditions for either slower growth of the crops, making it more susceptible or conditions that promote rapid growth of the pest.... what is most significant though is when two or three stresses coincide at one point in time- where one stress causes 10% loss on its own, bring two into play at the same time, you get 50% loss but add another all at the same time then you get 90% loss wipeouts... the seasonal nature of covid fits this perfectly as do the co morbidity effects....if the vaccines were to be effective they would need to be protective in those seasonal conditions, blanket vaccination outside those periods of season stress is fruitless when so called immunity wanes so quickly ... however what’s more important is 80% of the population does not get sick in any one year so vaccinating over the 20% of susceptible people cannot have any real impact... that’s just simple maths... mandates are manipulating people for fruitless damaging effect... they know that, we know that...

Expand full comment
Jan 4, 2022·edited Jan 4, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Sounds like a positive feedback cycle similar to what is found in the body and disease .

And like with crops early intervention or anticipatory mitigation make a big difference in outcomes

Expand full comment

Precisely...in rice when weeds are removed early post emergent, ie within a week of sowing when the weeds are less than 2 mm high, the crop response ie final yield at harvest can be 25-30% higher, compared to removing them 3-4 weeks later, despite the final harvest being 150 days from sowing... this story is repeated over and over... early intervention always wins......that’s what first showed me the official narrative against HCQ or other early interventions was clearly false..

what also interesting is that some herbicides are more damaging to certain varieties than others so the cost benefit is lower, and we see resistance to herbicide/pesticides develop where one herbicide is used as a blanket application over several years... ie there are massive dangers in trying to achieve 90% vaccination with very narrow spectrum antibody response...

Expand full comment
author

Fascinating stuff. Imagine if the govt sought council from really independent, cross-discipline experts like this, how much better they might have dealt with the situation?

Expand full comment
Jan 5, 2022·edited Jan 5, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Thanks for your work I have posted To a few people .. data like this is so helpful..

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

They do not want to know; they have set their stall out and mean to keep it that way. Facts would only curtail their reason for all of this hogwash; control.

They want total control of people and their money/personal data.

Expand full comment

Yes truth doesn’t matter for them...

Expand full comment
Jan 4, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Long may nature last.

A brilliant collection of data Joel which I have sent straight to my sister, In the USA, who obtains most of her covid info and data from CNN. When speaking to her on FaceTime, she often shakes her head and says “I don’t know where you get your Information”. To which I usually reply, “well it isn’t from CNN or MSM outlets. I gave up on those nearly 18 months ago”. Now at every opportunity I send her and the other sheeple I know data and articles such as yours, in the hope they will wake up.💕💕

Expand full comment
author

Good luck, Mary! Nice to see you here off Twitter! You will know that I've pretty much given up trying to debate Branch Covidians. There is no point presenting facts to someone who has gorged on dogma.

Expand full comment

Another intriguing aspect of Tegnell's theory of the evolution of the epidemic -

While Sweden's vaccination drive did predictably coincide with (restart) the Alpha wave in January shortly after the Pre-vaccination "Natural" epidemic (wild type natural variants) wave during January in Sweden, it was far less deadly than in the UK, where Alpha tore through the vaccine mediated immune responses (often while recovering from vaccine injuries) of the population.

Perhaps many different things may have contributed to additional fatalities in the UK including the brain dead expectation that introducing the vaccination when the natural wave started declining would provide their friends at Financial Times another opportunity to produce misleading graphs showing the "crushing" effectiveness of the vaccine drive.

I can tell from the study designs from that time that the investigators fully expected the vaccines to work in line with whatever the "experts" were announcing in the tabloids. "1 dose and 1 week you are practically immune!"

A scientifically important question that I hope the "experts" find time to investigate: England and Sweden both did not take any huge infection prevention measures at the level of the state. Then England did. Assuming the vaccine trials didn't have anything major to do with seeding Alpha all over the British Isles, why would the Swedish "Herd" be better protected from the deadlier variant when they were totally naive to it?

Expand full comment

Thank you once again for your careful analysis. I understand that most were not appreciating the seasonal aspect of illness and I agree that it's a season thing. Since most people don't believe it yet (or appreciate it fully), I have no doubt the subtitle "No impact of vaccination" is correct.

On the other hand, I'd like to know what the impact of vaccination is in sustaining or exacerbating seasonal peaks of susceptibility. I know someone who has a biophysical hypothesis about how all viral infections and disease have a ambient air temperature and humidity component- https://twitter.com/mahmudme01/status/1458637692019916800?s=20

Is it plausible that vaccination maybe safer or less safe in season or out of season? We are so severely behind the curve in the scientific community that we aren't really asking the obviously pertinent questions. Hopefully this piece and others can move the conversation forward to understanding what the impact of massive immune modulation of the population can mean for disease prevalence at different times of the year. Does it have an impact in places with constant season? (Singapore, Kerala).

Expand full comment
author

Thanks but I don't think I'm just being humble in saying I don't think it will make any difference! Those in public office and those that serve them as "expert advisers" don't care for the truth even as it stares them in the face making a mockery of what they do and say. Unless/until the whole legacy structure is torn down, I don't think any real lessons will be learnt from this. I just do this to support those who need reassurance that they are doing the right thing for themselves and society by not complying.

Expand full comment
Jan 4, 2022·edited Jan 4, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

I fear you are right, and I wish to believe that someone somewhere who is a good person honestly duped might find the courage to tell their colleagues that what they are doing is suicidal and it will harm people and we won't even be able to detect it. You are not wrong in your expectation, but we have to hope someone is going to read this in the future and know that not everyone was sleeping.

Expand full comment

Related: https://www.pnas.org/content/112/3/827.short

Temperature-dependent innate defense against the common cold virus limits viral replication at warm temperature in mouse airway cells

If this is remotely related to Prof. Geert Vanden Bossche's theory of eroded innate immunity driving producing infections, then one simple method to alleviate or attenuate (regardless of "variant") would be to rely on the old Hot Toddy and tea to reduce viral replication.

Expand full comment

Any idea how the flu disappeared all over the world in April 2020?

According to WHO influenza tracking app when COVID-19 mass testing was introduced, influenzas "vanished"...

World:

https://apps.who.int/flumart/Default?ReportNo=10

By Country:

https://apps.who.int/flumart/Default?ReportNo=7

Expand full comment
author

Yeah, strangely enough, isn't the reason why the FDA removed the EUA on the PCR test because it couldn't distinguish between the flu and COVID?

Expand full comment

Influenza was bound to be resurrected ever since Moderna entered the clinical trials of mRNA vaccines for both influenzas and SARS CoV2in September 2021.

Up until now, co-infections with influenzas, corona viruses and other were counted as COVID-19

Expand full comment
Jan 4, 2022·edited Jan 4, 2022

"...(and so does science)". What is this "science"?

I will brief my Health Minister.

Expand full comment

There's gotta be an association between how religious one is about the virus/shots n where one gets information. Nothing I present to several of my closest family persuades them. They all watch CNN/Univision. 🙄

Expand full comment
author

I'm not so sure. Utah was held as a more hesitant and reserved state because of the Mormans but it hasn't fared any better since the vaccine was rolled out.

Expand full comment
Jan 4, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Good point. Thank u

Expand full comment