67 Comments
author

Does someone want to tell Dr Funk?

Expand full comment
Aug 4, 2022·edited Aug 4, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Yes. No worries. Consider it done.

Expand full comment
Aug 5, 2022·edited Aug 5, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Joel,

Funnily enough, I was up til 3am yesterday, reading that manuscript.

Importantly, the authors find no evidence of what was considered the characteristic fingerprint of respiratory viral deaths, which are always exponentially related to age.

That’s missing from the 100 week all causes mortality analysis. It’s really stark. It doesn’t fit the narrative of a respiratory virus as cause of massed illness & death.

They do present an alternative explanation (disruption, stress, immune suppression, susceptibility to bacterial pneumonias, under-prescribing antibiotics).

Bluntly, the data do not beg the presence of a respiratory virus.

Expand full comment
author

I'm hearing/seeing this hypothesis lots and lots more. And the evidence that Sars-Cov-2 was circulating way before March 2020 when deaths explode. You've seen the recent Ontario stuff? 90% of the population with cross-reactive abs in spring 2020 - abs to many epitopes that were not included in the standard antigen tests. Was that another deliberate omission??

Expand full comment

It’s very strange. I don’t have the pieces assembled at all well (yet!)

What exactly are they measuring with “cross reacting antibodies”, I wonder?

Expand full comment

Please if you find out, tell us. This is very interesting - and we would love to know if they were doing it with the orignal SARS for cross reactive? or for what?

Expand full comment

Will do. They’re lying, that much I’m sure.

Expand full comment

Am I the only one in the world who remembers that Moderna shifted to 'vaccines' because repeated doses of mRNA were bad for living things?

Expand full comment

I’ve tried to point this out to some of the believers here in Australia, but the psychosis/hypnosis seems to prevent them taking in any rational information.

Expand full comment

Scientists are especially cautious because of their experience with vaccines aimed at animal relatives of the SARS virus. SARS is a coronavirus, the same virus family that causes serious diseases in pigs and other animals. While shots work well against some of these, they occasionally go disastrously bad. A vaccine for the feline coronavirus actually results in worse disease, not less, when cats catch the virus.

Vaccines work by giving the body a glimpse of its target, typically a dead virus, a weakened live one or bits of viral proteins. When all goes well, the immune system remembers these and goes on full attack when it later encounters the real thing.

But as happened with the cat vaccine, they sometimes trigger an off-kilter immune reaction, so when attacked by the actual virus, the system responds with a weak or misguided defense.

----------

Gee, we wouldn't want that to happen! We better be SUPER SURE any 'vaccines' we distribute don't train your body poorly!

Expand full comment

Could we try more science? Cause maybe we aren't trusting it enough.

Expand full comment

The great thing about real science is that you don't have to trust it at all - it happens no matter your feelings.

The Science, however, is not about science at all.

Expand full comment

Interesting point you make, Commander. "The" Science isn't about science.

A possibly useful corollary: The Science isn't about truth (replicable, verifiable, knowable) but about "truths" in a post-postmodern sense—that is, the parsing of "a" truth that is expedient to achieving an political/economic objective that supersedes any otherwise governing "self-evident" truths. That much is evidenced by the current administration's stated emphasis on strategic messaging via legacy and social media rather than actual strategy in the national security sense.

In an ironic twist, we've devolved from the best of the Enlightenment back to a neo-Medieval, tyrannical orthodoxy under which the adventurism of discovery, debate and intellectual honesty is burned at the stake under the dark lords of the Corporatist/State Church.

Expand full comment

Yes, the political science was always a better indicator of what the 'experts' would do than actual real-life science was.

Expand full comment

Nope. Like I told the sane part of my family. We decided it was time to destroy the world.

Expand full comment

Science is like a kitchen knife. When used positively it makes life a whole lot better, but, in the wrong hands, it can be murderous.

Expand full comment

The fact that vaccine induced enhancement occurs for some diseases, such as Dengue Fever, or feline SARS has no bearing per se on the safety of mRNA injection.

Expand full comment
author

Yes, it does. The mode of action of mRNA technology (getting the body to produce an unknown quantity of the antigen rather than injecting a known quantity of the attenuated pathogen) must have serious implications for a something as complex as the immune system. It certainly should negate any argument for experimenting with it at worldwide scale without even properly informed consent, for a virus that is not a serious threat for the majority of those taking it. From this position, make your argument...

Expand full comment

NIH Award Funded Informed Consent Study on ADE Risks of mRNA Vaccine Spike including Criticism of Limited Clinical Trials, a lack of Surveillance for ADE from exposure to Circulating Variants

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijcp.13795

Expand full comment

My comment was, "The fact that vaccine induced enhancement occurs for some diseases, such as Dengue Fever, or feline SARS has no bearing per se on the safety of mRNA injection."

Since it is well established that the spike protein as well as other SARS-CoV-2 proteins elicit immune responses that do not enhance Covid-19 infection, the question of vaccine induced enhancement is not germane. Also, the issue of "unknown quantity" is of no moment because the immune response elicited by known quantities of mRNA are well known and have been thoroughly studied. Dose-response curves can be made by mRNA vs immune response or by antigen delivered vs immune response. The "unknown quantity" issue is irrelevant.

Expand full comment

My reference to "mRNA" or "antigen delivered" refers to mRNA vaccines vs inactivated virus vaccines. You can measure dose-response with mRNA vaccines as sell as inactivated virus vaccines.

Expand full comment

Yet the threat is exactly the same, and everybody seemed to understand this before 2020.

Expand full comment

There is no evidence of vaccine enhanced SARS-CoV-2 in humans, so this has nothing to do with mRNA vaccines in particular and is not germane to SARS-CoV-2 in humans.

Expand full comment

Instead, there are a number of other mechanisms of toxicity, most of which were predicted before the first EUA.

Those we missed in early Dec 2020, we were busy writing open letters to EMA about in early spring 2021.

Expand full comment

Except the actual data that shows vaccinated people are more likely to get the variants....because the variants get around the vax.

Expand full comment
Aug 4, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Greeeeeeat work Joel Smalley ❤❤❤ Thank you !

Expand full comment
author

Not me. Rancourt et al. I just pulled a few pertinent bits out. Nevertheless, the exact same conclusions I have been drawing about health and wealth factors but more robust and detailed analysis.

Expand full comment

There is no benefit to these experimental gene editing therapies. It did not happen in the trials despite the obvious fraud and conclusion bias and literally NO benefit has emerged in the live fire real world human animal studies. The mRNA injected are worse off and this is before the true costs of fertility and H3 dysregulation truly manifests in the explosions of cancer that the bioweapon injected world will be subject to. This is not the crime of the century, it is the greatest crime of all human timeline.

Expand full comment

"We found that in the USA the state-wise integrated excess ACM of all main age groups

in the summer seasons (2020 and 2021) especially was largest (on a per capita basis)

in the southern states, and was correlated to state-specific obesity and poverty rates, "

In the South, it is hot and humid and people don't get much sun in the summer. Hence, vitamin D deficiency is prevalent there in the summer, especially when correlated with skin pigmentation. This is similar to what is seen in other subtropical areas. It can take someone who is dark-complected three hours to produce as much vitamin D as someone who is light-complected can produce in 10 minutes. When the temperature is 100F and humidity is 80-100%, dark-complected people don't produce much vitamin D in their skin. With vitamin D deficiency, there is increased risk from ILIs, of course.

The correlation with poverty is incidental.

Expand full comment

Why did Africa have such a "mild" covid experience?

Expand full comment

Ivermectin and hydroxychloriquine is used extensively for malaria and parasites.

Expand full comment
Aug 5, 2022·edited Aug 5, 2022

Excepting South Africa...

1. Africa is younger than southern US

2. Africa treats with HCQ

"Most studies that reported low 25(OH)D concentrations were from northern African countries and South Africa"

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X19304577

Expand full comment

Men were less likely to have low D concentrations than women, likely because of their occupations farming and herding. Miners would be expected to have low D concentrations.

Expand full comment

I looked at the entire paper and didn’t see an an analysis of excess mortality per state relative to vaccination rate. Did I miss it?

Expand full comment

Joel, can I check I have understood this (because I don't have a science brain or a graph reading brain).

This says that before the vaccinations extra old people were dying (possibly of things other than a bad cold) but after the vaccinations younger people started dying (also of things other than a cold). That the jabs didn't stop excess deaths but just changed the demographic of the dead. Is that right?

Expand full comment

Remember the COVID death numbers were highly suspicious and we already have many cases of fraud. 1213+ cases of fraud here: http://wordsalad.info/tag-coronavirusfraud.html

This includes people who died of cancer had their death certificate changed to show died of COVID even though they had no COVID symptoms. At least one lab double counted COVID cases. One guy in a motorcycle accident was counted as having COVID but he had no symptoms at all, and he himself reported this! A fruit and goat tested positive for COVID, which sounds implausible to me. More people signed up to get a COVID test and never showed up, yet they were still counted as positive for COVID. The list goes on and on.

Perhaps that link will help you with more stories Joel, as it has a few studies in it also. Look for the string #study. I don't know who does that site but it's interesting.

Expand full comment

Excellent Joel.

Who are the authors?

Can I suggest an idiot's guide to the second part ---rather in the same way as you bullet pointed the first part----just to be clear on what the data is saying.

Expand full comment

so I have a question: is this why our borders were opened up? They knew all the low socioeconomic folks were gonna die, so we need to replace them with aliens to keep society running?

Expand full comment
author

Or to create a new army.

Expand full comment

Not really, the illegal immigrants are supposed to riot when food shortages start, simply to add to the chaos and distractions, and to suck up resources like food and water.

Expand full comment

Seems like the vaccine equity efforts are more like vaccine iniquity efforts.

Expand full comment

All, the red text above the second graphic is the link to the study.

Expand full comment

"No deaths, within the resolution of all-cause mortality, can be said to have been averted due to vaccination in the USA."

Deaths prevented by vaccine are not calculated by looking at gross all-cause mortality statistics alone. That's like trying to do dental work with a carpenter's drill. In other words, the statement that No deaths, within the resolution of all-cause mortality, can be said to have been averted due to vaccination is a straw man.

"We write vd (x ) for the expected lives saved per vaccination of a

person aged x . Each death averted at age x prevents the loss of

e (x ) years of potential life. The product ve (x ) = vd (x )e (x ) gives

the expected years of life saved per vaccination." Goldstein et al, PNAS 2021 Vol. 118 No. 11

e2026322118

You have to determine vd(x) before you can make an estimate of how many lives are saved by vaccine.

Expand full comment

Why should there a Life Save with this Gene therapies?

Expand full comment

CDC "Science" told me: I have to feed my cock a rat once a week or it'll die from mal nutrition.

Expand full comment

Better use some duct tape on that poor rat. :D

Expand full comment