I am so tired of the narcissistic mutterings of “experts.” What they do is not mysterious and exclusive. Most intelligent people can arrive at their own valid conclusions if they have access to the data in useable form. Thank you for providing this! Merry Christmas!
First off, Thanks so much for your effort and taking the time out to do this quickly. Merry Christmas to you and your family.
Second. These charts are really harrowing. I'm praying there is an error somewhere because I'm afraid now to ask for data from December 7 to Now. I just know what we will see there and it's just unthinkable what's happened and is happening right now. That September spike?!
The "Waning" of vaccine effectiveness was real-and the booster did reverse it, by restoring the high death rate of the susceptible before they could catch Covid. If this is true, it's really astounding that people were sitting on this data and never explained that the denominator changing was the illusion of vaccine efficacy.
Great analysis, thanks! It would be great if you could provide a more extended explanation of different lines in your graphs, esp. what 1st and 2nd vaccinated mean? 2+21 for 2nd? What about 1st? And give your take why sometimes the unvaccinated fared worse than vaccinated on your graphs (Jan-Apr)? To be complete and so ppl's eyes don't glaze over. Also, when did vaxx started in England, what "vaccines" at what times to what age groups?
Metatron I am confused about the "Total" line in your graphs. Since we are looking at rates here, not absolute numbers, shouldn't the Total be sort of an average of the other category rates?
Thanks Metatron. But I don't think you can add up rates in this way. E.g. if you have 50/100k rates for vaccinated 1dose and 2dose, the combined rate (1+2dose) is still 50/100k, as you have to add numerators and denominators. Or perhaps I am missing something ?
I am so tired of the narcissistic mutterings of “experts.” What they do is not mysterious and exclusive. Most intelligent people can arrive at their own valid conclusions if they have access to the data in useable form. Thank you for providing this! Merry Christmas!
First off, Thanks so much for your effort and taking the time out to do this quickly. Merry Christmas to you and your family.
Second. These charts are really harrowing. I'm praying there is an error somewhere because I'm afraid now to ask for data from December 7 to Now. I just know what we will see there and it's just unthinkable what's happened and is happening right now. That September spike?!
The "Waning" of vaccine effectiveness was real-and the booster did reverse it, by restoring the high death rate of the susceptible before they could catch Covid. If this is true, it's really astounding that people were sitting on this data and never explained that the denominator changing was the illusion of vaccine efficacy.
Great work thank you
Have you seen the AIER email release? Or , read the smoking Fauci gun piece in Brownstone? Or my substack...
Mandatory information...
Re response to GBD...
Great analysis, thanks! It would be great if you could provide a more extended explanation of different lines in your graphs, esp. what 1st and 2nd vaccinated mean? 2+21 for 2nd? What about 1st? And give your take why sometimes the unvaccinated fared worse than vaccinated on your graphs (Jan-Apr)? To be complete and so ppl's eyes don't glaze over. Also, when did vaxx started in England, what "vaccines" at what times to what age groups?
What are "Person-Years"?
Metatron I am confused about the "Total" line in your graphs. Since we are looking at rates here, not absolute numbers, shouldn't the Total be sort of an average of the other category rates?
Can't reproduce the results except for 18-39 age group
Hi Joel, I just discovered your substack. Excellent work !
In an earlier study Mathew Crawford, showed that there was virtually no difference in all cause mortality between vaccinated and non vaccinated. Do you have an explanation for the difference ? https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/uk-data-shows-no-all-cause-mortality
Interesting analysis, as usual by you. Thank you for the extensive job you are providing on this.
A question.
I guess you calculated for each month x, the mortality / 100k Persons Years as it follows:
mortality / 100k Persons Years (x) = ( deaths_age_group (x) / population_age_group (x) ) * 100000
Is it correct?
In positive case, where did you get the data for population for the age group, for each month?
Or did you assume population_age_group(x)=population_age_group(January), that is, you set it constant for the year?
Thank you in advance.
Personally I find charts are racist and bigoted. I prefer numbers in a table.
Thanks Metatron. But I don't think you can add up rates in this way. E.g. if you have 50/100k rates for vaccinated 1dose and 2dose, the combined rate (1+2dose) is still 50/100k, as you have to add numerators and denominators. Or perhaps I am missing something ?
Acus Mortis