2 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Thank you Dr. Yeadon for all your work exposing vaccine safety problems.

Since you worked on asthma, thought this may be of interest:

Aeroallergen contaminated injected vaccines cause the development of asthma. New CHO cell protein contaminated biologic treatment for asthma - tezepelumab, will cause de novo autoimmune disorders.

https://vinuarumugham.substack.com/p/aeroallergen-contaminated-injected?s=w

And the general case:

Vaccines and Biologics injury table based on mechanistic evidence – Feb 2020 Covering over 125 conditions

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2582634

Expand full comment

That’s a big issue. It’s not surprising that introduction of foreign protein into the airway can result in allergic type responses to subsequent exposure. While that’s certainly a form of immunity, it’s not the kind that’s desirable! We can observe a Type I (acute) & sometimes a Type IV (Cell mediated) allergic reaction.

I’ve often wondered how they ensure this doesn’t happen with nasal vaccines (there I go, presuming intent is to avoid harms!). Nasal flu vaccine is routinely given to English kids at school. I don’t think it’s justified. It’s extraordinarily unusual for a previously healthy child to die of flu. Does this warrant vaccination of almost 100% of kids annually in the hope of saving one life? Again, I doubt it. The reason is how low must the rate be of serious adverse effects for that trade off to make ethical sense? Probably far fewer than 1 in 1 million.

Statistical “powering” to detect such low rates of SAEs is problematic. I doubt it’s possible to test for safety in enough kids even to stand up the intended claim. I’m a risk / benefit person & ideally the same individual gets both. I don’t like most kids bearijg risk in order to benefit one person, it’s unethical.

Expand full comment