That is actually chilling. I would try to find out who logged you as having taken those jabs and see what legal redress you have, if any. It's certainly defamatory as it implies that you are lying. I'm tempted to check my own record by I refuswe to set up an NHS account. Weirdly, they did stop texting me some time ago, though; it wouldn't surprise me if this was widespread.
Wow!! I did not suspect this one. I knew of the intense pressure to get people to have shots - no jab, no job. But this, to record people as injected when they're not!
Blimey, I've never even downloaded the NHS app never mind looked for any records of 'vaccines' I've not received. It does make you wonder just how many more of these there are 🤔
Between this and Pierre Kory's writing about personally seeing the way they manipulated vax records in the US (listed as unvaxx'd anyone who didn't receive their vax in the same healthcare system, so the "unvax'd" were hospitalized and dying. Even though they were vax'd, just not within the same system as they were later hospitalized), we can be pretty damn confident that the population level data is the key, and the "deaths/hospitalizations by vax status" that they always try to use to rebut the population level data, is manipulated BS. Whether it's manipulated for reasons of incompetence, malfeasance, or some of both (my guess) - regardless, it's manipulated. The population level data speaks for itself.
Well, what a turn of events. Makes one wonder what other mistakes our nhs is making, daily? But yes, it would be difficult to make any sense out of the current incorrect data. The old saying “Garbage in, garbage out” comes to mind.💕💕
1. Illegal alien used your name to get the shot, I'm sure it happens in the US for healthcare.
2. Someone really wanted another shot, so they used an known antivaxxer name.
3. You are a CIA plant, playing the long game
4. You lost your mind and capitulated to The Man in a fugue state, so you have no memory of the event.--this is similar to what happened at my wedding!
5. This is really an effort by the government to impungn your antivaxx credibility, a potential smear campaign.
Up until 2020, I would have laughed at 5, but now...
I'm just sitting here in Canada wondering how this could even be possible in a supposedly 1st world 1st rate nation (England). Naturally I can't test this hypothesis out on any electronic systems we have here, I haven't been vaxxed and even if I was I wouldn't log into any internet record-keeping. But this is some crazy stuff.
I'll pick number 3 reason: "to try and hide the onslaught of negative efficacy data that would be too apparent if they used the correct number for the vaccinated population." The NHS must be using the same computer software systems that the US is using for elections. I really don't believe that many people got the jab, and definitely Brandon did not win!
I vaguely recall a similar issue with vaccinated numbers in Pennsylvania. My guess was they were all given a task to get to 80% vaxx rate by their party leaders (whoever they are), and likely were incentivized accordingly based on this metric, thus the incentive to cook the books.
That is actually chilling. I would try to find out who logged you as having taken those jabs and see what legal redress you have, if any. It's certainly defamatory as it implies that you are lying. I'm tempted to check my own record by I refuswe to set up an NHS account. Weirdly, they did stop texting me some time ago, though; it wouldn't surprise me if this was widespread.
Wow!! I did not suspect this one. I knew of the intense pressure to get people to have shots - no jab, no job. But this, to record people as injected when they're not!
The powers that be will try anything to justify their lies in a house of falling cards
In the Headlines: British government curtails access to NHS records after domestic terrorist views sensitive information.
Should we be surprised? No. Furious, yes.
Blimey, I've never even downloaded the NHS app never mind looked for any records of 'vaccines' I've not received. It does make you wonder just how many more of these there are 🤔
judas! next we'll find out that dr. vernon coleman just got his third booster!
Between this and Pierre Kory's writing about personally seeing the way they manipulated vax records in the US (listed as unvaxx'd anyone who didn't receive their vax in the same healthcare system, so the "unvax'd" were hospitalized and dying. Even though they were vax'd, just not within the same system as they were later hospitalized), we can be pretty damn confident that the population level data is the key, and the "deaths/hospitalizations by vax status" that they always try to use to rebut the population level data, is manipulated BS. Whether it's manipulated for reasons of incompetence, malfeasance, or some of both (my guess) - regardless, it's manipulated. The population level data speaks for itself.
Well, what a turn of events. Makes one wonder what other mistakes our nhs is making, daily? But yes, it would be difficult to make any sense out of the current incorrect data. The old saying “Garbage in, garbage out” comes to mind.💕💕
Could be a couple of other things, too.
1. Illegal alien used your name to get the shot, I'm sure it happens in the US for healthcare.
2. Someone really wanted another shot, so they used an known antivaxxer name.
3. You are a CIA plant, playing the long game
4. You lost your mind and capitulated to The Man in a fugue state, so you have no memory of the event.--this is similar to what happened at my wedding!
5. This is really an effort by the government to impungn your antivaxx credibility, a potential smear campaign.
Up until 2020, I would have laughed at 5, but now...
I'm just sitting here in Canada wondering how this could even be possible in a supposedly 1st world 1st rate nation (England). Naturally I can't test this hypothesis out on any electronic systems we have here, I haven't been vaxxed and even if I was I wouldn't log into any internet record-keeping. But this is some crazy stuff.
Now wait
In all fairness, you likely weren't actually considered to be vexed until two weeks after the shots you didn't receive, so they
only fudge the books after two weeks from the fictitious inject.
So taint necessarily not so.
Fascinating
I'll pick number 3 reason: "to try and hide the onslaught of negative efficacy data that would be too apparent if they used the correct number for the vaccinated population." The NHS must be using the same computer software systems that the US is using for elections. I really don't believe that many people got the jab, and definitely Brandon did not win!
Quite the find. Several people I am connected to have said often that the numbers are definitely likely inflated. Guess this is a perfect example.
I vaguely recall a similar issue with vaccinated numbers in Pennsylvania. My guess was they were all given a task to get to 80% vaxx rate by their party leaders (whoever they are), and likely were incentivized accordingly based on this metric, thus the incentive to cook the books.