"Oh, never mind all the social, economic and public health harms it caused then?". Not to mention the mental health harms. Tho I didn't go along with any of the madness, I didn't want to leave my house. Not because of any"virus ", but because I knew I would see people wearing fear diapers on their faces and people obediently standing 6 feet apart. I knew I would see parents dropping their kids off at school, all wearing the diaper of fear and oppression. I knew I would see willing compliance with some of the most ludicrous policies I've ever seen in my 60 years on this planet. This affected me deeply and I still have a bit of PTSD. I struggle every day with regaining any trust in my fellow man. We often hear about how people lost their trust in the medical establishment, but I never trusted them anyway. It was with the public, my fellow human beings, that I lost trust. I never thought so many people would play along with something so obviously wrong and insane. I don't know if I will ever completely trust the people again. Thanks Fauci. You monster!
It's about time we started to call them what they are: cowards. Many of them fat, old and unfit, most of them authoritarian little Hitlers. What they refer to when they talk about safety for others, is the illusion of safety for themselves. They are little people, frightened and pathetic, yet still puffed up with fat egos full of self-importance and relevance, despite working for a mostly unnecessary state or entirely disposable company department. But underneath it all, they're just cowards.
I cannot believe for the first few weeks I fell for their hokum, but unease began to develop when the extreme draconian measures kicked in and that was when I started to search for more information after recognising that everyone on the media were repeating the exact same stories down to the same words. I felt I had been transported and was reliving the same day without end. Thank goodness for twitter where I found many voices like yourself speaking sense and reason instead of hysteria, they made sense to me. I cannot even bear to watch or hear anything on TV, it is a medium used to bring lies and deceit into our homes and lives.
Did any one expect anything else but lies and deception from these wretched evil individuals? Joe as always huge respect to you for all your hard work and fabulous articles.
Prof Michel Chossudovski wrote a book, Covid19, Global Coup d'Etat, which can be freely downloaded from this website and here's another writer with his analysis. globalresearch.ca/capitalism-friedrich-boris/5785964 Do any recall London 2012 olympics opening ceremony? Dancing nurses, scared kids, grim reaper with syringe? Oh, and Boris caricature, ill in bed? Check out Barcelona ceremony with grotesque human spike balls!
Education can be caught up, high school is 2 years too long, anyway. If Trump can be found just think of the field day it will be with Fauci. Fauci is not indemnified and with the destruction of government property along with his perjury testimonies... it will be less than the four week trial of 45.
From my understanding of immunology/virology there's nothing about a "novel" (or more aptly 'newly identified') coronavirus that would make it any less treatable with standard respiratory treatments than any other respiratory infection (e.g. due to any other coronavirus such as NL 63, OC43 etc). But, hey, you sure could give that appearance of a "novel" pathogen if you denied people that very basic care whilst simultaneously "testing" them for the presence of a non-specific, potentially ubiquitous protein, likely shared by all manner of coronaviruses within the swarm. Then, when people get really sick, you can let them die or suffer without antibiotics (to prevent secondary bacterial infections) or steroids. How easy is it to just let them get so sick at home that by the time they get any help it's either too late or you give them sedatives and end-of-life drugs because it's "covid"?
I don't like the idea of conspiracies but damn, the 'science' they professed sure doesn't line up with any known biology I've been able to find pre 2020.
And, anecdotally, I'll add that while I had a positive covid test with an nasty chest infection (once about 3 years ago) , I know plenty of other unvaxxed people who had neither. So, for a supposedly, novel rapidly spreading virus, it sure didn't seem so "deadly". The whole thing stinks.
The Energy Transition Story Has Become Self-Defeating
There is still a widespread belief that it is possible to transition away from fossil fuels, a myth which is contradicted by an ever growing body of evidence. Not that the previous model — based on coal, oil and gas — was even a slight bit more sustainable: we are talking about finite resources after all. However, the “energy transition” was a far more easier sell, than admitting that we have reached the end of growth, and that a long winding road back to a much simpler life is what awaits. Meanwhile, the real crisis (climate change), has proved to be a far more complex topic than what could be “tackled” by turning a few coal fired power plants off, and wishing for the magic unicorn of the Hydrogen economy to materialize… Where did it all go wrong? What kind of transition is possible then?
Let’s start by making a simple statement first: There has been no energy transition ever taking place in human history. Neither in the 19th century, when coal came into the picture, nor in the 20th with the advent of nuclear, or in the 21st, for that matter, with the widespread adoption of wind and solar. As the term implies, it would’ve required us to abandon a viable energy source in favour of another, ramping down the old one in advantage of the new. That would’ve meant leaving vast reserves of the old energy source out there, untapped. That has never happened, and never will, for a simple reason: the Maximum Power Principle.
The MPP posits that complex systems (like the human economy) tend to evolve in ways that maximize their power intake or energy throughput. Which means, that as long as there is a viable energy source out there, we will not stop using it: It has to run out first, or become otherwise unavailable for us. (And as the history of climate conferences show, that pretty much seems to be the case with fossil fuels.) In a nutshell: no, there is no such thing as an “energy transition” — only addition to the existing mix.
The second thing which needs to be stated here, is that energy efficiency is not a solution for two reasons. First, it too violates the Maximum Power Principle — and thus puts the entity reducing its overall energy intake into a major disadvantage; effectively allowing other entities to outcompete it. Since we are living in a competitive environment, where the weak gets eaten/occupied/robbed/colonized/etc. this cannot allowed to happen. As a result energy saved by efficiency measures will always be used up in other ways (usually by increasing economic output). And while we could debate how this is a bad thing from a moral standpoint, this is the world we live in. Just take a look at the chart below:
The other reason, why energy efficiency cannot possibly save the day (not even in a benign, cooperative environment) is the Jevons-paradox, put forward by an English economist William Stanley Jevons in 1865. The phenomenon named after him occurs when technological progress increases the efficiency with which a resource (like coal) is used, but the falling cost of use induces increases in demand. Likewise, if you were to give up coal use in favour of “renewables” all it would achieve is to make coal much cheaper elsewhere, and thereby drive up its use. The same goes for gasoline (vs electric cars) or any other form of energy saving. Unless an energy source gets physically banned worldwide, or becomes less available due to depletion, its consumption cannot be expected to fall — no matter how detrimental its use proves to be on the long run.
Now, with these two factors in mind take a look at the first chart above. Have you noticed the plateauing (or the taper off) of fossil fuels: first coal, then oil, and as of late: natural gas?
Was there any ban on their use globally? No?
THE PUNCHLINE!!!!
Then why did they stopped growing? Due to the energy transition — which never was — or perhaps because of energy efficiency measures [sic]? Or maybe, because we have arrived at hard limits to their extraction? Take a minute to ponder on that.
"Oh, never mind all the social, economic and public health harms it caused then?". Not to mention the mental health harms. Tho I didn't go along with any of the madness, I didn't want to leave my house. Not because of any"virus ", but because I knew I would see people wearing fear diapers on their faces and people obediently standing 6 feet apart. I knew I would see parents dropping their kids off at school, all wearing the diaper of fear and oppression. I knew I would see willing compliance with some of the most ludicrous policies I've ever seen in my 60 years on this planet. This affected me deeply and I still have a bit of PTSD. I struggle every day with regaining any trust in my fellow man. We often hear about how people lost their trust in the medical establishment, but I never trusted them anyway. It was with the public, my fellow human beings, that I lost trust. I never thought so many people would play along with something so obviously wrong and insane. I don't know if I will ever completely trust the people again. Thanks Fauci. You monster!
100% my sentiments too.
Thanks Joel. I always wondered if they got '6 feet apart' because you bury bodies '6 feet under.' Just seems like something these weirdos would do.
Can you identify the third 6 so we have a complete 666?
It's about time we started to call them what they are: cowards. Many of them fat, old and unfit, most of them authoritarian little Hitlers. What they refer to when they talk about safety for others, is the illusion of safety for themselves. They are little people, frightened and pathetic, yet still puffed up with fat egos full of self-importance and relevance, despite working for a mostly unnecessary state or entirely disposable company department. But underneath it all, they're just cowards.
I cannot believe for the first few weeks I fell for their hokum, but unease began to develop when the extreme draconian measures kicked in and that was when I started to search for more information after recognising that everyone on the media were repeating the exact same stories down to the same words. I felt I had been transported and was reliving the same day without end. Thank goodness for twitter where I found many voices like yourself speaking sense and reason instead of hysteria, they made sense to me. I cannot even bear to watch or hear anything on TV, it is a medium used to bring lies and deceit into our homes and lives.
“Acted in lockstep..” and using the exact same scripted language. That’s what made it so suspicious. Thanks joel
Can’t stand Piers, now. Among others….Keep it up Joel. Thank you!
Did any one expect anything else but lies and deception from these wretched evil individuals? Joe as always huge respect to you for all your hard work and fabulous articles.
Thank you for all of your hard work, Joel. Now we need to find judges who are not compromised.
Imagine if they’d known it was aerosol spread rather than droplet spread. Instead of 6ft apart it would have been 1 person at a time In Sainsbury’s.
Which still wouldn't have made any difference given how long an aerosol could linger!
TheyLied. Join the campaign to Take Action and Raise Public Awareness at
www.TheyLied.ca
.
Video
https://theylied.substack.com/p/theylied-time-for-action-and-raising
.
Raise Public Awareness
https://theylied.ca/SpreadTheWord.shtml
.
Take Action
https://theylied.ca/TakeAction.shtml
.
Prof Michel Chossudovski wrote a book, Covid19, Global Coup d'Etat, which can be freely downloaded from this website and here's another writer with his analysis. globalresearch.ca/capitalism-friedrich-boris/5785964 Do any recall London 2012 olympics opening ceremony? Dancing nurses, scared kids, grim reaper with syringe? Oh, and Boris caricature, ill in bed? Check out Barcelona ceremony with grotesque human spike balls!
And the Breggins..global 0redators and we are the prey.
Education can be caught up, high school is 2 years too long, anyway. If Trump can be found just think of the field day it will be with Fauci. Fauci is not indemnified and with the destruction of government property along with his perjury testimonies... it will be less than the four week trial of 45.
Fauci remembers only to things.
The fifth amendment.
His paycheck.
Everything else is out of reach.
He is only an old mentally ill man .
Everyone knows that.
It was just a joke.
He deserve a punishment that would make vomit a Chinese torturer
these people are NOT to be trusted give them an inch and they become a ruler
From my understanding of immunology/virology there's nothing about a "novel" (or more aptly 'newly identified') coronavirus that would make it any less treatable with standard respiratory treatments than any other respiratory infection (e.g. due to any other coronavirus such as NL 63, OC43 etc). But, hey, you sure could give that appearance of a "novel" pathogen if you denied people that very basic care whilst simultaneously "testing" them for the presence of a non-specific, potentially ubiquitous protein, likely shared by all manner of coronaviruses within the swarm. Then, when people get really sick, you can let them die or suffer without antibiotics (to prevent secondary bacterial infections) or steroids. How easy is it to just let them get so sick at home that by the time they get any help it's either too late or you give them sedatives and end-of-life drugs because it's "covid"?
I don't like the idea of conspiracies but damn, the 'science' they professed sure doesn't line up with any known biology I've been able to find pre 2020.
And, anecdotally, I'll add that while I had a positive covid test with an nasty chest infection (once about 3 years ago) , I know plenty of other unvaxxed people who had neither. So, for a supposedly, novel rapidly spreading virus, it sure didn't seem so "deadly". The whole thing stinks.
This is why we are being exterminated:
The Energy Transition Story Has Become Self-Defeating
There is still a widespread belief that it is possible to transition away from fossil fuels, a myth which is contradicted by an ever growing body of evidence. Not that the previous model — based on coal, oil and gas — was even a slight bit more sustainable: we are talking about finite resources after all. However, the “energy transition” was a far more easier sell, than admitting that we have reached the end of growth, and that a long winding road back to a much simpler life is what awaits. Meanwhile, the real crisis (climate change), has proved to be a far more complex topic than what could be “tackled” by turning a few coal fired power plants off, and wishing for the magic unicorn of the Hydrogen economy to materialize… Where did it all go wrong? What kind of transition is possible then?
Let’s start by making a simple statement first: There has been no energy transition ever taking place in human history. Neither in the 19th century, when coal came into the picture, nor in the 20th with the advent of nuclear, or in the 21st, for that matter, with the widespread adoption of wind and solar. As the term implies, it would’ve required us to abandon a viable energy source in favour of another, ramping down the old one in advantage of the new. That would’ve meant leaving vast reserves of the old energy source out there, untapped. That has never happened, and never will, for a simple reason: the Maximum Power Principle.
The MPP posits that complex systems (like the human economy) tend to evolve in ways that maximize their power intake or energy throughput. Which means, that as long as there is a viable energy source out there, we will not stop using it: It has to run out first, or become otherwise unavailable for us. (And as the history of climate conferences show, that pretty much seems to be the case with fossil fuels.) In a nutshell: no, there is no such thing as an “energy transition” — only addition to the existing mix.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4e0fd934-8772-472d-9206-607d609fc960_1000x685.png
The second thing which needs to be stated here, is that energy efficiency is not a solution for two reasons. First, it too violates the Maximum Power Principle — and thus puts the entity reducing its overall energy intake into a major disadvantage; effectively allowing other entities to outcompete it. Since we are living in a competitive environment, where the weak gets eaten/occupied/robbed/colonized/etc. this cannot allowed to happen. As a result energy saved by efficiency measures will always be used up in other ways (usually by increasing economic output). And while we could debate how this is a bad thing from a moral standpoint, this is the world we live in. Just take a look at the chart below:
The other reason, why energy efficiency cannot possibly save the day (not even in a benign, cooperative environment) is the Jevons-paradox, put forward by an English economist William Stanley Jevons in 1865. The phenomenon named after him occurs when technological progress increases the efficiency with which a resource (like coal) is used, but the falling cost of use induces increases in demand. Likewise, if you were to give up coal use in favour of “renewables” all it would achieve is to make coal much cheaper elsewhere, and thereby drive up its use. The same goes for gasoline (vs electric cars) or any other form of energy saving. Unless an energy source gets physically banned worldwide, or becomes less available due to depletion, its consumption cannot be expected to fall — no matter how detrimental its use proves to be on the long run.
Now, with these two factors in mind take a look at the first chart above. Have you noticed the plateauing (or the taper off) of fossil fuels: first coal, then oil, and as of late: natural gas?
Was there any ban on their use globally? No?
THE PUNCHLINE!!!!
Then why did they stopped growing? Due to the energy transition — which never was — or perhaps because of energy efficiency measures [sic]? Or maybe, because we have arrived at hard limits to their extraction? Take a minute to ponder on that.
More https://thehonestsorcerer.substack.com/p/the-energy-transition-story-has-become