This is my first dedicated foray on Substack into the risks for pregnant and breastfeeding women posed by the COVID-19 mRNA injectable product.
It isn’t my very first report on the matter though. I earned my first permanent ban from Twitter (my 50k account) for sharing a video from Mike Yeadon, Elisabeth Lee Vliet, Dr Ray Stricker and Roger Hodkinson, warning of the potential risks on reproduction for women of child-bearing age, well over a year ago1.
Regrettably (albeit predictably), the video has aged extremely well in spite of my censorship and more importantly, the vilification of the experts. Just look at the plethora of recent reports of dramatic drops in livebirth rates across the heavily vaccinated countries. QED.
Recently, there has been much controversy about updates on various UK government websites about quietly changing advice they had previously given for women, pregnancy and breastfeeding.
Rather than offer my own attempt at investigating and reporting on this current topic, I hand the mic over to recently red-pilled, “pro-vaxxer”, Dr John Campbell. Who better?!
Hot on the heels of his first taste of censorship for daring to challenge the narrative in spite of the evidence that contradicts it, he has produced a careful but candid explanation of the differences between guidance offered by the UK HSA Green Book2, the JVCI3 and the MHRA4.
It doesn’t need further commentary from me. Just watch his video, uploaded here just in case the YouTube Ministry of Truth decide to take further action against him!
Then decide for yourself, would you really inject this complete “unknown” into your body if you were hoping to get pregnant, already were, or were breastfeeding your newborn?
What would you think of those who encouraged you to do so? Most likely, the same people that tell you not to drink heavily, smoke or soft, mould-ripened cheeses, such is the level we are currently at in terms of cognitive dissonance in Camp Delusion.
What concerns might you have that the public health authorities can’t even get their story straight?
I can’t not mention the casual thalidomide truth bomb he drops in at 3 mins when talking about teratogenicity. It’s exactly that, just 100 times worse.
Source video:
Addendum
Be careful of those who attack objective observation such as that presented by JC, people like Dr Susan Oliver:
See how readily she turns on this prior bastion of the pro-vax narrative as soon as his reason seems to be getting the better of his dogma?
Ad hominems, strawmen, etc… don’t work on us - we have had 2 1/2 years of batting them off. Thankfully, the courageous Norman Fenton jumped in to defend JC:
Again, decide for yourself who the dangerous ones are and act accordingly. But before you do, you can read in more detail about Norman’s considered position on his blog.
Share this post