Dr Daniel Nagase of Alberta reviewed the document on Dec 13th last year.
This is old news, but it needs to be hammered again and again. It's from an FDA report about the Pfizer covid vaccine trial. The report was released by court order after a FOIA request.
That's _at least_ 1223 deaths in the 1st three months of the rollout. So many were unresolved which also might have been deaths.
Combine this with no all-cause mortality benefit from the Pfizer covid vaccine and any reasonable person would stop giving the covid vaccines.
Just imagine what we will find in the 400k pages they are required to release over the next 8 months.
“What the f*ckin’ f*ck?!?!?!” - Matt Taibbi
I'm mid writing a piece on this too. I know it's old but lots probably haven't seen it and there's lots to write about!
Dr. Michael Yeadon: THIS MUST STOP! Pfizer Documents Show FDA Knew of Death Risk
The Truth About Safety of mRNA Vaccines Found in The European Medicines Agency's Document Titled "Comirnaty (COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine) Risk Management Plan"
Welcome to the Medical Inquisition
mRNA "Vaccines" Are Gene Therapy. May cause Undesirable Side Effects That Could Delay Or Prevent Their Regulatory Approval According To BioNTech SEC Filing
The Truth About "Safe and Effective" mRNA "Vaccines" Hidden In Plain Sight
You can find the rumble clip https://rumble.com/vtpz8e-freedom-of-information-request-pfizer.-absolutely-shocking.html
And the document... pretty phenomenal, that all authorities had this info from pfizer in APRIL: and continued the program https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
"Dr. Nagase was fired after treating three Covid patients with Ivermectin at the Rimbey Hospital and Care Centre." --- The saddest sentence.
Lets not rush and panic. This paper has been circulating for some time. And the biggest problem is that the number of administered doses is censored in this paper. So as much as I hate Pfizer for rigging the trials, this paper is worthless, unless we know how many doses caused these 1223 deaths.
Is it known how many people were vaccinated during this same time period to get a lower bound on adverse effects and/or deaths per person?
It would be helpful to know if there is statistical significance of these deaths beyond background death rates. I assume this is the justification used for continuing rollout?
This reveals fraud committed by Pfizer in the vaccine trial by not disclosing this information. Criminal liability probably attaches to somebody, and the liability protections granted the rogue company can never under any scheme agreed to by any company up to now, ever provide liability insulation for proven fraud. This makes this company vulnerable for elimination in a coming wave of litigation based on the amount of fraud revealed by these documents.
In case you didn’t see it yet . https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature-Review-and-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Effects-of-Lockdowns-on-COVID-19-Mortality.pdf
Oh but the vaccine is so safe and effective, Joel.
The 'N' in Table 7 of the linked document is not the 'number of trial participants'. It is the number of *adverse event reports*. (You presented this correctly, but the breathless drivel on the linked page got it monumentally wrong).
The type of shoddy misreading of data tables - and histrionic conclusions drawn therefrom - on the linked material, is the sort of thing I would expect from a journalist or a doctor (two groups that are equally innumerate [NB: that's *provable*], and equally full of their own importance).
It's a datacrime as bad as, but in the opposite direction to, legacy-media journalists' displays of innumeracy.
If this 'Nagase' is trying to present this as an exposé, it marks him as a dimwit. It risks being a massive own-goal if people redistribute the link without qualifying it (as you did by correcting what is represented by 'N').
Wonder how many subjects were in the trial that generated this number of injuries/deaths
Canadian Immunization Research Network, Which Evaluates Vaccines, Is Funded By Big Pharma