This is old news, but it needs to be hammered again and again. It's from an FDA report about the Pfizer covid vaccine trial. The report was released by court order after a FOIA request.
That's _at least_ 1223 deaths in the 1st three months of the rollout. So many were unresolved which also might have been deaths.
Combine this with no all-cause mortality benefit from the Pfizer covid vaccine and any reasonable person would stop giving the covid vaccines.
The Truth About Safety of mRNA Vaccines Found in The European Medicines Agency's Document Titled "Comirnaty (COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine) Risk Management Plan"
mRNA "Vaccines" Are Gene Therapy. May cause Undesirable Side Effects That Could Delay Or Prevent Their Regulatory Approval According To BioNTech SEC Filing
The Truth About "Safe and Effective" mRNA "Vaccines" Hidden In Plain Sight
Lets not rush and panic. This paper has been circulating for some time. And the biggest problem is that the number of administered doses is censored in this paper. So as much as I hate Pfizer for rigging the trials, this paper is worthless, unless we know how many doses caused these 1223 deaths.
My impression is people are erroneously circulating this number as being deaths that occurred in the trial. But this is just reports from anywhere and everywhere in real world use, right? Just another heap of data to complement VAERS?
Yes this is how I read it. People are misinterpreting this as data from the vaccine trial which it’s not. It’s based on data from the first 2 months of administering to the public. Without knowing the total no. of doses given it is hard to draw conclusions. But to be fair, how many drugs/vaccines/etc would still be used if there were 1200 deaths, by historical standards it would have been pulled…
That has been my impression as well, David. The second linked article in the post says "Out of 42,000 trial participants 1227 died in the first 3 months. At a death rate of 1% per month...". Which is a totally wild misconstruction. While I agree that the released docs are quite damning, the linked article was a poor choice in my opinion due to being so misleading.
It would be helpful to know if there is statistical significance of these deaths beyond background death rates. I assume this is the justification used for continuing rollout?
This reveals fraud committed by Pfizer in the vaccine trial by not disclosing this information. Criminal liability probably attaches to somebody, and the liability protections granted the rogue company can never under any scheme agreed to by any company up to now, ever provide liability insulation for proven fraud. This makes this company vulnerable for elimination in a coming wave of litigation based on the amount of fraud revealed by these documents.
The 'N' in Table 7 of the linked document is not the 'number of trial participants'. It is the number of *adverse event reports*. (You presented this correctly, but the breathless drivel on the linked page got it monumentally wrong).
The type of shoddy misreading of data tables - and histrionic conclusions drawn therefrom - on the linked material, is the sort of thing I would expect from a journalist or a doctor (two groups that are equally innumerate [NB: that's *provable*], and equally full of their own importance).
It's a datacrime as bad as, but in the opposite direction to, legacy-media journalists' displays of innumeracy.
If this 'Nagase' is trying to present this as an exposé, it marks him as a dimwit. It risks being a massive own-goal if people redistribute the link without qualifying it (as you did by correcting what is represented by 'N').
This is old news, but it needs to be hammered again and again. It's from an FDA report about the Pfizer covid vaccine trial. The report was released by court order after a FOIA request.
That's _at least_ 1223 deaths in the 1st three months of the rollout. So many were unresolved which also might have been deaths.
Combine this with no all-cause mortality benefit from the Pfizer covid vaccine and any reasonable person would stop giving the covid vaccines.
Key word: reasonable. Which is ruled out by "conflict of interest".
Just imagine what we will find in the 400k pages they are required to release over the next 8 months.
Lots of redaction, I imagine. But remember to believe in the science!
Safe and effective!
Pfizer is science!
Last I heard, the FDA together with Pfizer were trying to prevent release. Check out Aaron Siri.
Yes, I know but I am holding our faith is Aaron and the judge who ruled initially to decrease the 75 years to 8 months. Clinging to hope!!!
“What the f*ckin’ f*ck?!?!?!” - Matt Taibbi
I'm mid writing a piece on this too. I know it's old but lots probably haven't seen it and there's lots to write about!
Dr. Michael Yeadon: THIS MUST STOP! Pfizer Documents Show FDA Knew of Death Risk
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-michael-yeadon-this-must-stop
The Truth About Safety of mRNA Vaccines Found in The European Medicines Agency's Document Titled "Comirnaty (COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine) Risk Management Plan"
Welcome to the Medical Inquisition
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-truth-about-safety-of-mrna-vaccines
mRNA "Vaccines" Are Gene Therapy. May cause Undesirable Side Effects That Could Delay Or Prevent Their Regulatory Approval According To BioNTech SEC Filing
The Truth About "Safe and Effective" mRNA "Vaccines" Hidden In Plain Sight
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-are-gene-therapy-may
You can find the rumble clip https://rumble.com/vtpz8e-freedom-of-information-request-pfizer.-absolutely-shocking.html
And the document... pretty phenomenal, that all authorities had this info from pfizer in APRIL: and continued the program https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
"Dr. Nagase was fired after treating three Covid patients with Ivermectin at the Rimbey Hospital and Care Centre." --- The saddest sentence.
Lets not rush and panic. This paper has been circulating for some time. And the biggest problem is that the number of administered doses is censored in this paper. So as much as I hate Pfizer for rigging the trials, this paper is worthless, unless we know how many doses caused these 1223 deaths.
My impression is people are erroneously circulating this number as being deaths that occurred in the trial. But this is just reports from anywhere and everywhere in real world use, right? Just another heap of data to complement VAERS?
Yes this is how I read it. People are misinterpreting this as data from the vaccine trial which it’s not. It’s based on data from the first 2 months of administering to the public. Without knowing the total no. of doses given it is hard to draw conclusions. But to be fair, how many drugs/vaccines/etc would still be used if there were 1200 deaths, by historical standards it would have been pulled…
That has been my impression as well, David. The second linked article in the post says "Out of 42,000 trial participants 1227 died in the first 3 months. At a death rate of 1% per month...". Which is a totally wild misconstruction. While I agree that the released docs are quite damning, the linked article was a poor choice in my opinion due to being so misleading.
Is it known how many people were vaccinated during this same time period to get a lower bound on adverse effects and/or deaths per person?
I don't think it's exactly known how many Pfizer shots had been given and it's also not known what the reporting rate might be.
You may want to check out Mathew Crawford's estimates from this doc release; he arrived at 430 deaths/million:
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/leaked-pfizer-post-marketing-safety
thank you
It would be helpful to know if there is statistical significance of these deaths beyond background death rates. I assume this is the justification used for continuing rollout?
This reveals fraud committed by Pfizer in the vaccine trial by not disclosing this information. Criminal liability probably attaches to somebody, and the liability protections granted the rogue company can never under any scheme agreed to by any company up to now, ever provide liability insulation for proven fraud. This makes this company vulnerable for elimination in a coming wave of litigation based on the amount of fraud revealed by these documents.
In case you didn’t see it yet . https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature-Review-and-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Effects-of-Lockdowns-on-COVID-19-Mortality.pdf
Oh but the vaccine is so safe and effective, Joel.
The 'N' in Table 7 of the linked document is not the 'number of trial participants'. It is the number of *adverse event reports*. (You presented this correctly, but the breathless drivel on the linked page got it monumentally wrong).
The type of shoddy misreading of data tables - and histrionic conclusions drawn therefrom - on the linked material, is the sort of thing I would expect from a journalist or a doctor (two groups that are equally innumerate [NB: that's *provable*], and equally full of their own importance).
It's a datacrime as bad as, but in the opposite direction to, legacy-media journalists' displays of innumeracy.
If this 'Nagase' is trying to present this as an exposé, it marks him as a dimwit. It risks being a massive own-goal if people redistribute the link without qualifying it (as you did by correcting what is represented by 'N').
Wonder how many subjects were in the trial that generated this number of injuries/deaths
Canadian Immunization Research Network, Which Evaluates Vaccines, Is Funded By Big Pharma
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/canadian-immunization-research-network