The public health officials claim to be acting on facts and evidence but forgot to bring any with them to the hearing. "Squirm" is a wonderfully descriptive term of their reaction to his questions.
I have been following Senator Rennick for a while and when I saw this Substack I was immediately drawn in. I can honestly say that, I have never been so immersed in reading the comments for any Substack as I have been here. Thankyou to everyone who contributes an opinion. It gives me faith that we have a band of citizens that know what is happening and are fighting for everyone of us. My own story is rather long and full of pain with what I was subjected to because of the policies. I was caught out in the Philippines and unable to get home because of localised lockdowns. My eldest son died and being unable to attend your own child's funeral is devastating. After many months when restrictions eased I made it home through the help of DFAT. Only to be forced into detention for 15 days in a hotel room with no facilities. I couldn't wash my clothes or anything. There wasn't even a towel rail in the bathroom. As for the food, I won't go there. Things were that bad, I had a medical episode and was taken by ambulance under police escort to hospital where I was treated like I had the plague. You watch these scenarios in a good drama movie. You never expect to be the main character.
This blokes a hero. I’ve been following his you tube for a while now. His subscriber numbers stopped going up. Shadow banned to the nines. Please subscribe to his YouTube guys and girls.
Senator Rennick has been one of the few shining lights in our national parliament. Together with Antic and now retired George Christiansen and ex liberal member Craig Kelly, they were the only members of the liberal party (a Conservative party in Australia) who had the spine to see and tell the truth. Add to them Roberts and Hanson from the One Nation Party. They were the only people who asked real questions and the only ones who introduced and voted for legislation to protect Australian citizens. History is told by the victors and I will fight to ensure history will remember these men and Ms Hanson as hero’s.
Listen to the vague and meandering way the "experts" respond to the questions. Just that alone should cause suspect. If they HAD reports and data, this is where they would cite it to actual study and specific outcomes. But it is the senator who is citing study and data to challenge this word salad from the "experts"; what does that tell you? The grift is so extreme on this topic. We should all be deeply concerned.
The truth is that the “vaccines” are useless, worse - they are dangerous. Everyone was lied to about everything. Now we have to watch these parasites verbally slalom their way out of the crime. Watch in awe as no one gets justice and all those responsible get a bonus.
Brendan Murphy lied to the Australian public in February 2021 when he said the Pfizer and AstraZeneca jabs have "gone through the normal, full range of regulatory approvals for our vaccines...we have been able to do the full, safe, regulatory approval...we have not cut any corners" and "...we decided that to get the confidence of the people in Australia, because we had no community transmission, we were not going to do anything other than our full normal registration process".
This was a lie, because both the Pfizer and AstraZeneca jabs had only been given 'provisional' approval by the TGA - this was NOT made clear to the Australian public.
'Provisional' approval means the TGA will be relying on manufacturer supplied data to judge the longer term efficacy and safety from ongoing clinical trials and post-market assessment. 'Post-market assessment' indicates people being vaccinated in the community are now part of the clinical trials assessing these vaccine products - have people been informed they are part of a vaccine clinical trial?
Have these people given their consent to being involved in a vaccine clinical trial with these provisionally approved vaccine products?
See my email to Brendan Murphy, challenging him about misleading the Australian public, dated 24 February 2021 - I haven't received a response: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/covid-19-vaccines-are-not-fully-approved-by-the-tga.pdf
Brilliant job highlighting the ridiculousness of Australia's ongoing pandemic-response policy over your last few articles, Joel! Over a year ago, when I wrote to the CMO, the TGA, and ATAGI (among many others) I was labouring under the misapprehension that the people leading these organisations were competent and principled people who, when presented with valid, evidence-based concerns, would alter course. After years of work as a critical care nurse, I have to say I think it would have been hard for me to be more disappointed. These people are either the most wildly incompetent career bureaucrats in existence, or they are motivated entirely by self interest and have spent the last three years making decisions they thought would provide maximum personal advancement (Brendan Murphy has already received a substantial promotion), at the devastatingly serious expense of the Australian public. With every passing day I become more convinced it is the latter; surely nobody could simply be THAT stupid. The fact that they remain arrogantly (and inexplicably) committed to their mistakes suggests they are incapable of acknowledging they were/are wrong, nor are they capable of even a shred of empathy. Oh the bitter irony of 'public health' being administered by profoundly sick people.
Further to my previous comment, and on the subject of lying...
The former Morrison government in Australia lied to health practitioners when it told them they would have specific medical indemnity re administering the Covid jabs.
It's now been clarified by the Albanese government that health practitioners DO NOT have specific Covid medical indemnity under a government scheme. It's also been confirmed that "Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations".
This could get interesting as I very much suspect health practitioners have NOT been getting 'valid informed consent' before each jab, because people aren't being properly informed. For instance, why are so many people (including children) being called to have the defective jabs in the first place, when most people aren't at serious risk of Covid-19?
And then there's the jab mandates...so many people have been bullied to submit to the jabs under mandates...this means they're not giving 'voluntary' informed consent, i.e. without pressure, coercion or manipulation, as stipulated in The Australian Immunisation Handbook.
The health practitioners inserting the needle need to be warned about this, because they probably think they're covered, but they're NOT covered by a specific government Covid medical indemnity scheme...and they really need to think about the informed consent issue...because they're the person wielding the needle.
For more detail, please see my response to Australian Health Minister Mark Butler: Are health practitioners covered for indemnity insurance re the Covid jabs? 21 November 2021: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/11/response-re_-are-health-practitioners-covered-for-indemnity-insurance-re-the-covid-jabs-.pdf
Over Here, Vallance and Whitty are nowhere to be seen, such as telling us about the excess deaths...So much for accredited Chief Scientific Advisor and Chief Medical Officer. Sinecures in the truest meaning of the word!
I just nod my head at the nothing-new bullshit and lies coming from these leftist puppets. Whatever these turds say, you can most likely bet on the opposite being true. We live in la la land.
Unvaccinated are likely to suffer - because Dr.Kelly will make sure they will!
Re my recent email to Australian Health Minister Mark Butler re medical indemnity re Covid jabs for health practitioners, and informed consent, I've also forwarded this email to Kamran Abbasi, Editor in chief of The BMJ, noting this is a very serious situation at the heart of medical ethics and that it should be a priority topic on The BMJ, see: Health practitioners, Covid jabs and 'valid informed consent' - a medical ethics disaster, 21 November 2022: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/11/health-practitioners-covid-jabs-and-valid-informed-consent-a-medical-ethics-disaster.pdf
My email to Kamran Abbasi has also been copied to a number of key people, including Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St Georges, University of London.
Angus Dalgleish has responded to the email - please see his response below, he has given his permission for this to be shared:
Dear Kamran Abbasi,
I write in total support of Elizabeth Hart.
COVID no longer needs a vaccine programme given the average age of death of COVID in the UK is 82 and from all other causes 81 and falling.
The link with clots , myocarditis, heart attacks and strokes is now well accepted as is the link with myelitis and neuropathy.
( We predicted these side effects in our QRBD article Sorensen et all, 2020, as the blast analysis revealed 79% homologies to human epitopes, especially PF4 and myelin)
However, there is now another reason to halt all vaccine programmes.
As a practicing Oncologist I am seeing people with stable disease rapidly progress after being forced to have a booster, usually so they can travel.
Even my own family and colleagues are developing B cell based disease after the boosters, they describe being distinctly unwell a few days to weeks after the booster
With my brother in law developing leukaemia, my pharmacist NHL, a former PhD student NHL, and now an old school friend who has felt like he has had
Long COVID since receiving his booster who after getting severe bone pain has been diagnosed as having multiple mets from myeloma.
I am experienced enough to know that these are not the coincidental anecdotes that many suggest, especially as the same pattern is
Being seen in Germany, Australia and the USA.
The reports of innate immune suppression after mRNA for several weeks would fit as all these patients to date have melanoma or B cell based cancers
Which are very susceptible to immune control and that is before the reports of suppressor gene suppression by mRNA reports.
This must be aired and debated immediately.
Angus Dalgleish MD FRACP FRCP FRCPath FMedSci
In my previous comment I questioned why are so many people (including children) being called to have the defective jabs in the first place, when most people aren't at serious risk of Covid-19?
In this regard, I sent an email to Nigel Crawford, the Chair of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), asking why ATAGI recommend COVID-19 mRNA injections for children, as ATAGI acknowledges children are at low risk of Covid.
That's another email to which I did not receive a response...
I've now forwarded the email to Australian Health Minister Mark Butler, asking him to provide a response to my queries, see: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/11/why-does-atagi-recommend-covid-19-mrna-injections-for-children.pdf
Lots more emails about the Australian situation on my website: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/vax-australia/
One of the only venues I've seen globally (in English) with a lawmaker asking pointed questions directly to a national health authority. Senator Rennick has a finance background, but he's asking questions such as spike longevity juiced with pseudouridine, all cause mortality, etc. Hopeful these meetings will continue with more in depth questions, possibly some experts the Senator brings in to ask the TGA and their minions questions where they can't disregard him for his lack of 'expertise'.
"One thing I wanted to know from this data was how many total extra deaths there have been so far this year, so I just found the sum of each of the columns using Excel. Australia, for example, has almost 19,000 extra deaths this year alone! And that’s only up until the end of July! Canada is similar at 21,000 excess deaths. UK 27,000. The US 349,000, remembering though, that the US has a much larger population at around 332 million which is around 12 or 13 times the population of Australia, but even so, that’s a lot of extra deaths! But the standout, I suppose, is Sweden with only 158 extra deaths in total, a fraction of the other countries, noting that Sweden has a population of around ten-and-a-half million people. So why would that be? Why would Sweden have so few excess deaths?
Here’s a comparison of the raw data between Sweden and Australia, noting that Australia has about two-and-a-half times the population. But even so, there’s a huge disparity in excess deaths between the two countries. The excess deaths in Sweden, shown in orange, are relatively stable, in that sometimes they’re positive, sometimes they’re negative, but overall, they’re hovering around the x-axis – the zero mark. Whereas Australia in blue has clearly stayed well above historical averages. Depending on the week, there’s been between 400 and 1000 extra deaths every week this year. I mean, that would be like a jumbo jet falling out of the sky every single week.
If we compare the percentage change of excess deaths between Sweden and Australia, which basically takes out the population difference, we can still see that Australia is well above Sweden in terms of excess deaths. They kind of follow the same pattern, but a lot less extra people are dying in Sweden. Let’s add Canada in yellow. It pretty follows the same percentage of extra deaths as Australia, except that by about Week 20, it drops off quite rapidly. Australia though, continues to have significant excess deaths. Let’s add the UK to the mix in green. At the start of the year, it was faring fairly well, but then numbers went a bit crazy in the middle, coming back to some sense of normalcy in the latest reporting period, but who knows how long that will last? And finally, the United States in brown. It seems to be following a similar trend to Australia, although started out with more excess deaths early on in the year, but then dipped below Australia, but seems to have risen in more recent months. Either way, percentage wise, it certainly has more excess deaths than Sweden.
www.doctorsagainstmandates.com funded an expert review of the NSW data which supports Senator Rennicks view. It can be found here: https://www.doctorsagainstmandates.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Expert-Witness-Report-Madry-15-Aug-2022-B.pdf