Injustice prevails - you find it easier to understand the death of one than the death of a million
Lucy Letby suffers a gross miscarriage of justice whilst the real murderers still walk freely among us.
Ever since I failed to apprehend a pickpocket in London about 30 odd years ago, I have felt very much aggrieved whenever I witness injustice.
So it is, with the Lucy Letby prosecution (here, here, here, here and here), that I felt compelled to write about the COVID murders in New York City that I had otherwise postponed indefinitely.
Those cheering Lucy’s demise1 are the same who are too blind and insincere to recognise the real evidence of medical malfeasance, resulting in the untimely deaths of millions of people around the world, including children.
The Tale of New York City
I am still of the opinion that COVID is real. However, I am more confident that it is not deadly. And even more confident that the so-called “vaccine” caused more deaths (COVID and non-COVID) than lives saved.
The data speaks for itself.
Between 21-Mar-2020 and 30-May-2020, there was a marked increase in influenza-like illness (ILI) and/or pneumonia visits and admissions to NYC emergency departments.
There are some in my various science groups who believe the acuteness and severity of the first wave indicate some sort of biological attack, even with an agent like anthrax, for example.
I am not convinced. I think the policy responses can explain why a respiratory pathogen can buck all prior scientific knowledge and logic and be deadly for some but asymptomatic for others, as I will explain in a short moment.
There are three further distinct waves of ILI / pneumonia events bringing New Yorkers to the ED: 31-Oct-2020 to 05-Jun-21, which I have split at 16-Jan-21, for reasons I will also shortly explain; 27-Nov-21 to 12-Mar-22 and thereafter, seemingly without definition or end.
As much as people claim that COVID only exists as a computer sequence and the result of faulty testing, evidently there is something causing people to be symptomatic of respiratory disease.
If we look at reported COVID deaths alongside ILI admissions, it certainly does seem like COVID is that something.
The correlations are obvious and the deaths are about 2 to 3 weeks after the admissions, consistent with much other research and usually evidence of causation.
But here’s the first problem.
In the initial period, the ratio of COVID deaths offset 2 weeks to ILI admissions is an incredible 69%. A fatality rate of 69%?!?? #$%@!!! That’s incredible. Quite literally, ‘unbelievable’2.
A contagious pathogen that virulent simply cannot spread to that many people and cannot be simultaneously so benign for others that they don’t even show symptoms.
So, if these “COVID” deaths weren’t due to a virus, what were they? We know from excess mortality studies that an extraordinary number of people did die unexpectedly during that period3. What did they die from?
Well, just like the UK data, there is a clue in the non-COVID data.
In 2019, on average, every week, there were around 58,000 non ILI / pneumonia visits to the ED4. However, as a deliberate, direct response to the alleged novel coronavirus epidemic, visits dropped dramatically from around 68,000 a week at the beginning of March 2020 to just 24,000 by mid-April.
For the period 04-Apr-2020 to 13-Jun-20, there were 228,000 fewer visits than expected, using the 2019 weekly average as baseline. Not everyone going to hospital is in a life-threatening condition but you have to accept that this dramatic denial of primary health care alone could be responsible for a significant number of deaths?
And, if you only tested for one thing, that was circulating at the time, you could easily blame those deaths on that “something” and fool people into believing it was more deadly than it really was. In fact, you could argue that the majority of New Yorkers who died unexpectedly at that time were also wearing hospital gowns. QED.
Well, that might explain why the fatality rate in the spring 2020 wave was so incredibly high but there is also other evidence of iatrogenesis.
Again, consistent with the UK evidence5, there were dramatic changes in the provision of standard care. Unfortunately, NYC does not publish data on prescription meds like antibiotics, corticosteroids, sedatives, etc. but the overall narrative was consistent across the world - not to treat this virus early in the normal way but for people to wait until they were literally blue in the lips then ram a tube down their throat and pump them full of end-of-life drugs. That ought to do it.
By the time “COVID” comes around for its second wave at the end of Oct 2020, hospital visits seem to be almost back to usual levels.
There is another quite severe rise in ILI admissions, albeit nowhere near as bad as the first wave. The “COVID” fatality rate has now dropped to 25% for the period between 31-Oct-2020 and 16-Jan-21.
I picked this last date because that is 2 weeks after NYC started their second round of the COVID “vaccine”, when it is alleged to become “effective”.
Again, naively, you might be fooled into thinking that it was responsible for being a “dead-end” for the virus since it coincided with the peak of ILI ED visits.
If you are still of this opinion (in spite of the enormous number of so-called “breakthrough” cases and the explicit admission by the manufacturers themselves that their product does not stop transmission) then there is this excellent explanation by my friend Norman:
And if you still believe the “vaccine” saved millions of lives6 after that, I have a rather famous piece of New York bridge real estate you might be interested in.
But, what about the claims about reducing severe illness and death? Well, although there is insufficient evidence to properly assess the reduction in disease severity, we can compare the fatality rate before and after the intervention.
In the period 31-Oct-20 to 16-Jan-21 (pre-vax), the fatality rate is 25%. In the period 21-Jan-21 to 05-Jun-21 (post-vax), it is 24%. Meh.
Unfortunately, as bad as it is, that’s as good as it gets.
When ILI / pneumonia / “COVID” returns with a bang at the end of Nov 2021, the fatality rates rises to 28%.
As I’ve said many times before, there are so many natural reasons why the fatality rate should actually be lower in later periods (the weakest are already dead, the less virulent virus should be selected, herd immunity should be providing better protection, etc.). So, the most likely reason the fatality rate can be higher is because the host has been compromised, i.e. a new pool of susceptible population has emerged for some reason.
But what reason?
Do you think I wouldn’t investigate?!
Not one to ignore the pachyderm in the vestibule, I thought I’d also take a look at the roll out of the COVID “vaccine” in NYC alongside the ILI admissions.
Hmmm… not exactly a picture of effectiveness, is it?
In fact, it’s almost like that third wave is caused by the booster program, not mitigated by it. Silly me.
And, 2023 looks like it was shaping up to be another bad one - for both ILI and non-ILI visits. And then they stopped reporting the data7. Funny how that happens…
Anyway, I’ll leave you with the table of fatality rates. You can make your own minds up about the effectiveness of the mRNA injectable, fraudulently described as a “vaccine”8.
And with the question:
Who is going to properly investigate and hold the real criminal medical and public health authorities accountable for the iatrogenic deaths they have caused?
To be clear, like the references I gave, I am not making a claim on her innocence or guilt, just that the evidence presented was not properly adduced or determined.
It is not a surprise. COVID has shown us that 70% of the population lack the intellect and inclination to properly assess evidence and are more easily swayed and persuaded by circumstantial “evidence” and expert opinion, or their own prior assumptions and “gut feeling”, which are inevitably ill-informed.
In other words, most of the jury probably lacked the capacity to make the correct judgement, IMO.
You see, I personally know several honest, and very capable, experienced medical, scientific and legal professionals (in addition to the references cited above) with serious doubts about the evidence presented.
How on earth can a jury of ordinary people, therefore, be convinced of her guilt “beyond reasonable doubt” based on that same evidence?
To put this onto context, here is a reader comment regarding the Diamond Princess, which of course I know about, but had overlooked for context (N.B. infection fatality rate - IFR - will always be lower than case fatality rate - CFR - but not by an order of almost 40X!).
In fact, I just remembered, I also studied the NYC antibody data. Being as conservative as possible, it indicates that around 280,000 New Yorkers might have been infected by 06-Jun-20, putting the IFR at around 7.8%, more than 4 times higher than the Diamond Princess, possibly meaning almost 17,000 of the 22,000 that died “of” COVID in spring 2020 probably didn’t…
”Data of Diamond Princess at Yokohama Port, Japan in February 2020 (of cause no vax year)
｜712 infections｜13 deaths｜3711 total on board
= 19% infection rate, 1.8% infection fatality rate (some treated), 0.35% overall infection mortality rate.
0.35% infection mortality rate for the Wuhan strain, a large number of retirees, and an approximately closed population.
So it's probably a much larger rate than the population of a country or region, but that's about it.”
Detailed Assessment of the Impact of the COVID "Vaccine" on Mortality in New York City.
In my last post, I extolled the utility of the cumulative excess deaths function in analysing mortality in England. However, my modified Gompertz function is just as useful in getting to the bottom of whether exogenous factors (external events) are exerting an influence on a mortality distribution.
These are the idiots you might be unfortunate enough to be sitting on your jury.
Response from my MP Regarding the Evidence against the Safety and Effectiveness of the COVID "Vaccine"
For the record, and entirely as expected, here is my MP, Julie Marson’s response to my detailed analysis of the recent JVCI advice on COVID “vaccination”: Never forget these people. She failed to answer any of the legitimate questions I raised. She fails to represent her constituency. This is what you vote for.
A pathogen so lethal it killed you in hospital but so benign you could be oblivious to even having it.
A pathogen that had no medication to alleviate it's symptoms until you were in intensive care yet needing no medication when you didn't know you had it.
A pathogen that knew to avoid you if you were seated and eating. That only came out of your mouth and got stopped by your mask but could get out of an unmasked mouth and through your mouth to contaminate you.
A pathogen which could defy the PCR and LF tests and fool you into thinking you were/were not ill, regardless of whether you had symptoms.
A pathogen which made it necessary for hospitals to deny you antibiotics (even though most people who die "of an ILI" generally get popped off by pneumonia which can be treated with antibiotics) as well as deny you visits by family even though you already had the disease and your nurse was getting the bus home every day.
Nobody wants to know now about the not-very-dangerous-to-anyone pathogen or the very-dangerous-to-everyone "vaccines". Nobody wants to know about the excess deaths, unexplained deaths, sudden illnesses, inability to conceive or any of the other stuff.
But a nurse who killed babies is a person with a face everyone can see and hate and insist on punishment (and she should be punished but so should all the people who knew but did nothing - like all the people who knew the truth about covid and did nothing)
Perhaps the lesson is if committing murder, go big. If you murder one person you go to jail for a long time. If you commit genocide you get a promotion, a government contract and will never by held responsible.