Is the COVID vaccine killing more than COVID?
Analysis of Age-Standardised Mortality Rates reveals an alarming outcome for middle-aged Austrian men.
I’ll keep this brief because I’m putting it out before I complete my analysis.
Courtesy of https://substack.com/profile/17811035-there-is-no-spoon I’ve found a good source of global age-standardised mortality rates (ASMRs) - the Human Mortality Database by Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany) and University of California, Berkeley (USA).1
ASMRs are the gold standard for mortality analyses because they control for changing population sizes over time.
The numbers of deaths per 100 000 population are influenced by the age distribution of the population. Two populations with the same age-specific mortality rates for a particular cause of death will have different overall death rates if the age distributions of their populations are different. Age-standardized mortality rates adjust for differences in the age distribution of the population by applying the observed age-specific mortality rates for each population to a standard population.2
I started with 15-64 year olds in Austria, simply because it was near the start of the alphabet and an exemplar of the neo-fascism sweeping across Europe.
The preliminary results are potentially a damning indictment of the harm caused by the vaccine and by extension the de facto democide enacted by the government by mandating its use.
At the very least, the public health authorities should be monitoring this and coming up with a damned good counterargument.
Figure 1 shows the ASMR for women aged between 15 and 64 years old in Austria. As you can see, there is very little to remark upon in terms of excess mortality events.
In 2020, despite the hysteria about the risk of COVID, there is a brief excess over the expected range (2 standard deviations from the mean) in April and then again in December.
In statistical terms, for the calendar year up to week 49 in each case, both the most recent years are very close to average.
Figure 2 shows the ASMR for men aged between 15 and 64 years old in Austria. Once again 2020 is unremarkable except for a couple of spikes outside the range in late November and mid-December.
Conversely, 2021 is punctuated by numerous spikes outside the range throughout the year and remains well outside the range since October.
In statistical terms, 2021 sits 1.4 standard deviations from the mean. Although this is not typically consider statistically significant in general, in my opinion, the fact that it is somewhat higher than the prior year (+0.8) when the virus was supposedly the issue, is a clear signal that requires investigation.
How can it be that the death rate for men is so much higher in 2021 than 2020?
How can it be that the death rate for men in 2021 is higher than for women?
How does this fit with the scientific evidence that young men are more susceptible to serious cardiovascular vaccine adverse events?
Why are the public health authorities and investigative journalists not all over this?
Moving on, is there evidence that the vaccine made a different in outcomes for the older age groups?
According to Figure 3 and Table 3, things are marginally worse so far in 2021 than 2020 for the 65 to 74 year olds. Not exactly what you might expect in the midst of a deadly pandemic before and after a treatment that is 90%+ effective in reducing mortality?
According to Figures and Tables 4 and 5, things appear to have improved in 2021 during COVID season for the 75 to 84 and 85+ year olds respectively and overall too year-to-date.
We should not be quick to assume that the vaccine is responsible for the reduction in mortality. The vulnerable population will be smaller in 2021 and the virus ought to be less virulent for the COVID-naive.
So, it looks to me like those young men have died somewhat in vain and they didn’t even give properly informed consent to the experiment.
How does it look to you?