I'm waiting for Jeremy Vine to do his BBC radio 2 show on "Covid - did you get misled into taking the toxic jab?" "Masks - were you bullied into wearing one?" "Lockdowns - did your business fold due to illegal lockdowns depriving you of an income?"
When this happens we will know that the bell is tolling somewhere for all these crooks, charlatans, thieves, liars, narcissists.
I think it already is but with the clapper muffled - "they" cannot keep this rubbish going - the very thing being used to control people - "fire from/via media/internet" - is being turned back into their faces, they cannot dodge it, and "their" answers are, to me as a non scientist, increasingly desperate, easily highlighted as mendacious, and being proved wrong in great detail. "KCACO"..
If Jeremy Vine even thinks about doing that on his Radio 2 show, I promise I will hunt him down and slap him repeatedly for being an illiterate, incompetent and generally just not very intelligent excuse as a 'presenter'. And aside from that, I'd slap him because that would be a complete 180 degree turn that he'd have made. I remember screaming at the radio one day, whilst driving, because of his shockingly biased and incorrect propoganda he spewed on his show, on this very topic.
I would positively encourage him to just as you propose; he would then become eligible to be fully paid up member of the Harry Wales-Windsor Self Absorbed And Completely Absent From Humanity Society - with just the one other member to keep him company.
Then you can slap him with an appropriately barbed implement...
When we have put a fork in the COVID19 fakery, can we all agree to move on and finish the job on Net Zero Carbon nonsense, then move onto government CBDCs? Piece by piece we can take back our democracies from these international mobsters and use actual science and common sense to cure our planet and have good lives.
1) COVID is as fake as the 2009 H1N1/Pandremix conspiracy.
2) Climate change is much more complicated and the other strongly related but more serious problem is peak oil which was probably in 2018. No diesel and we all die, because shipping farming and HGVs run on diesel.
It's unhelpful to combine the two in people's mind.
Shovel? OK then: a fair trial ... followed by noose/firing squad/electric chair, etc. ... then the gravediggers use the shovels -- not just for Killy Billy but for the whole lot of them --- and then we all do a happy dance for humanity.
Propaganda only works if everyone believes it. Fingers-crossed... the public have woken up to reality. Next climate change/Net Zero/Green Deal please. Newspapers have to follow their readership or else file for bankruptcy.
I’m in the US and young people here don’t watch the television news, be it National or local. I don’t either, my local news station just repeated the CDC talking points. Many people are awake.
Most of the elderly population is on their 5th or 6th shot and will continue taking them until their demise. It's very sad. These poor folks watch CBS Nightly News and believe they're actually getting the news.
I've had the same thought as Joel all along. The mainstream press faces a conundrum - if they keep covering up the facts (and refusing to even investigate serious claims), they will lose all credibility. In fact, they've already lost most of their credibility as witnessed by plunging subscription numbers and terrible advertising (except for Big Pharma). But if they belatedly start doing their job, this would be an admission that they were covering up the facts for years, that they were active participants in a conspiracy to spread and protect a false narrative.
I actually think executives at Fox News might recognize this. This network has recently begun to challenge the narrative on vaccines and all the other Covid lies (especially Tucker Carlson). My speculation is that they know the truth will come out and they want to be on "the right side of history" when it does. That is, at least they can say they challenged some parts of the false narrative well before their "journalism" peers. This might enhance their credibility and benefit their business in the future. This separates or distinguishes their "news coverage" from that of their competitors.
This is an important nugget you found, Joel. Common sense tells us some reporters or editors must be taking note of the fact the "public" is way ahead of the "fact-finding journalists" on all elements of the Covid story. A great (untold) story would be to show all the efforts that MUST be taking place in newsrooms to conceal the truth.
And... the education has come to the public via the great blogs on Substack and elsewhere not via the main media channels. The Internet has destroyed the monopoly Governments and vested interests once had, which is why Big Tech and Governments are so desperate to control it with their ‘misinformation’ nonsense and attempts at censorship.
Agreed. Journalists love to present themselves as fearless seekers of the truth, slaying powerful institutions and individuals as they do so. Well they fawned over Harvey Weinstein, covering up for him for years, and they have been nothing but a mouthpiece for Pfizer. They have lost all credibility. The hard work on Weinstein was done by Ronan Farrow and the truth on Covid has been revealed by independent researchers and a few brave doctors who have been persecuted for their troubles.
'Journalists love to present themselves as fearless seekers of the truth'.......That type of journalist disappeared ages ago.........99% of the modern day ones are useless cretins with IQs of Rocking Horses!!
I was really impressed with the quality of the information given in the comments section. Many people clearly are better informed than the news reporters. Also very encouraged by the comments indicating that many readers do not want the celebrity gossip and other dross they are fed.
The difficulty will be if "folks" who think SARS COV2 is a charade of massive and very harmful proportions, they will not have the resolve mentally to "keep going". There is no hiding place for MSM, Elon Musk has set that ball rolling and we have a Mexican standoff to some extent. Neil Oliver and others have to continue their principled opposition. Can we hope for a MSM corporate "Mea culpa" - I really hope "yes" - even if it is forced , in some way yet to be revealed, by financial necessity if not wholly from conviction?
If ONE prominent news organization did its job and reported at least one scandal or element of "truth," this would open the floodgates IMO. This would give permission for everyone else to belatedly do their investigating and reporting jobs. But it will take that first news organization to do this. Pretty much everyone agrees that the NY Times is the "leader of the pack" of our "pack" journalist cabal, so I guess it would have to be this newspaper doing this ... which will not happen. But, yes, there are plenty of salaried journalists who actually know how to do real investigative journalism ... if they are "allowed" to do so. Once you get one news organization following a story and getting some big scoop, everyone else follows and tries to get in on the action. Or, at least, this is the way things used to happen.
It's bizarre. We've got the Scandal of our Ages. Any journalists that broke the real story would go down in the history books and would be set for life (with book deals, movie deals, future speaking engagements, etc) ... and there's not ONE mainstream journalist who is interested in this happening to him. They'd also be saving countless lives. This right there tells us how deep the "conspiracy" goes ... or the power of "groupthink."
Talking about Fox, have been talking with some friends and someone said
how cool would it be if Rupert Murdoch, not a spring rooster, suddenly realised and used his power for the good of humanity, hastening inevitable change. What has he got lose? One divine intervention to change one old man old ways would be great but what are the chances of that happening?
I won’t ever trust Fox (except Tucker) because I believe I read that they were getting paid - along w/ many other media outlets, to be sure - to inflate “Covid deaths”, flog the shots & the rest of the idiocy of locking down, wiping groceries, wearing masks, etc. Esp those stupid doctors - Segal, Safire & the one I really can’t stand but can never remember her name.
I agree. Fox News was going along with the "narrative" for much of the last three years. That's why it strikes me as noteworthy that they suddenly seem to be saying it's okay to question the narratives after all. Tucker especially is calling out Big Pharma at least once a week. I can only assume he wouldn't pen and then air these scathing monologues without the permission of his bosses. So something changed. I don't know what it was or why (unless my theory above is right), but at least one network has (partially) departed from "the pack." And the sky didn't fall. In fact, this is helping Fox News and Tucker's ratings. It seems like other news organizations would pick up on that FACT.
Agree. We have one journalist here in the Netherlands who attacked John Campbell on Twitter. Claiming that Dr. John made huge amounts of money on his youtube broadcasts. Quite a disguting piece of proze. The best thing about it is the Twitter comments, exactly as you mention above. Its quite obvious that most people are done with the narrative. Is the dam breaking?
This is the quandary of the COVID era: how do you admit you were wrong, when you were so sure you were right? So far the only person I've seen do it is Tim Robbins, in his interview with Russell Brand.
Tucker Carlson did a public mea culpa on the wars in the Mideast. He once supported them and is now among the biggest critics of the "Neo-cons." This proves it's possible to admit you were wrong ... and you can actually become even more popular than ever after doing so. It's NOT a career-ender.
Dan Bongino had a pretty good mea culpa about having been duped into “vaccinating”. He was practically in tears. I’m not sure if he just did his own thing in taking it or if he advocated publicly that others do so. For me, the thing always was that I don’t give a 💩 what some “celeb”, doctor, politician or anyone else says or does, ESP as it pertained to everything done to or that happened to us the past 3 years
One of the single best things about social media is it affords little old nobodies like myself the capability to assess public thinking & produce basic data-sets using their responses to posts by mainstream media, government etc.
I got into this by assessing the popularity of the McCanns, parents who staged an abduction in Portugal to cover-up the death/murder of their daughter Madeleine. When this fine couple first appeared in the media in 2007 they were almost universally liked & pitied. At first everyone fell for it t. Around 95% of the public supported them. But that did not last long. Over the following years, using the publics responses on social media as a measure, their popularity has plummeted to the point where half a percent of social media commenters still support the couple. It took less than fifteen years for the McCann's to go from 95% public support to 0.5% public support, if that!
95% of the public were expressing support for all sorts of pandemic measures not so long ago. Whether support for the vaccines ever got that high, I have no idea, but some countries boast vaccination levels of 95% or even more. So support for the vaccines was in some cases very high. That time is also gone. Now, judging by responses to a post by the UK gov about the two years anniversary since the rollout, the public are, again, around 0.5% supportive. The only difference between the McCanns bs narrative & the Covid/vaccine bs narrative is that the McCann's narrative took over a decade to collapse while the Covid/vaccine narrative has collapsed within two years.
and indeed, the comments section of the DM post shows EXACTLY what I am talking about here.
If only we could enlighten the proleteriate as effectively re false flag & entirely hoaxed terrorism. Now that would be a fine day. We've been brainwashed for decades already. Lots of programming to undo.
That's very interesting. I am one of those who went from immense sympathy for the McCanns to hoping they will finally be put on trial.
The difference here though is that people are directly invested. Madeleine was a child we had empathy with but zero direct involvement so pivoting on opinion carried no emotional cost, whereas for people who have been jabbed, especially multiply, there is strong emotional investment in continuing with the initial mindset.
Excellent comment & observation. No argument from moi. Perhaps this explains how rapidly the narrative around covid & vaccine has collapsed. folks now have a personal, vested interest in the truth. In fact, it's life & death.
As a teen growing up in newly independent Zimbabwe, I witnessed two terrorist bombings. Not one, two. I guess I'm lucky like that! The first went off right down the road in front of me, I saw it explode. Fortunately the bomb had been mis-timed, blowing an empty cafe into the street on a quiet Sunday morning. My dad & I were the only folks around, no-one hurt.
The second was massive, perfectly timed for lunchtime shoppers on a Firday. Although the blast blew the roof off the political building which had been evacuated thanks to a warning, the roof landed on a busy bakery next door. Six were killed, hundreds wounded. I was about a km away when the bomb went off, I saw the boiling black cloud rising from the scene, which I was on in three minutes.
I won't describe the horrors I saw as a 13 year old that day but my experience fostered a life-long interest in terrorism, war, insurgency etc etc. And it is that personal experience & personal investment in terrorism that puts me in a unique position to observe the mainstream media claims about Islamist terrorism to pick apart genuine acts from false flags & complete hoaxes.
If you have any doubt that terrorist attacks can be faked, watch the "victims" running onto the scene of this car-bombing in Baghdad. The street was empty until after the blast! - https://www.bitchute.com/video/7gGFmxHZL1ao/
Re: "Reader Comments" ... There's a reason the Establishment fears these sections. The sites that do allow them (especially unmoderated/uncensored Comment Sections) provide a great public service and at least one way to get around the "gatekeepers of the news." I've actually found several blockbuster news items ... in the Reader Comments.
Here are two potentially “narrative-changing” blockbuster pieces of “news” I found in Reader Comments sections:
The first startling piece of news was recorded by a New York Times subscriber (“Shane from Marin County, California”) who claims that he had Covid in the “fall” of 2019 “far earlier than anyone else” or any other Covid case he’d heard of.
Shane, in the moderated Times’ Reader Comments (following another Covid story from May 2020), says he had all the classic symptoms, which he describes in an erudite and persuasive manner. Adding much greater weight to his claim, “Shane” lists the two labs where he later received TWO positive antibody test results.
If Shane is telling the truth, he would be the first known Covid case in the world … by months.
This, I argue, is not only news, but huge news. Certainly, it’s a “reader tip” that would be worth Times’ reporters following up on. Which the newspaper could have easily done since it has Shane’s subscriber info (certainly his email address, full name, probably his street address, etc.).
I also note that only paid subscribers can comment in the Times’ Reader Comment section, which is also “moderated” - which means some employee of the newspaper picks the posts that get published.
Many thousands of people must have read this article and the popular Reader Comments. This would include at least some NY Times staffers and journalists who probably read the Reader Comments. The people who read NY Times Covid stories (and Reader Comments) would also likely include at least some public health employees at, say, the CDC, NIH, NIAID, etc.
Clearly no one at the NY Times or in the U.S. public health bureaucracies thought Shane’s claim was worth looking into.
In case nobody at The Times reads its own Reader Comments, I sent at least three emails to the newspapers “news tip” email address, pointing out Shane’s claim and suggesting that someone at the paper investigate. Cricket City at the Old Gray Lady.
This, I maintain, is important information as it would seem to confirm that the NY Times is not interested in investigating “case zero” in the world. Which prompts this question: why is this or how could this even be possible?
I also recently found the possible “case zero” in the UK from reading the Reader Comments of the UK’s Daily Mail, where a reader says she was hospitalized in November 2019, and three weeks before making her post (on May 16, 2020) says she tested positive for Covid antibodies.
This paper could have also quickly found this poster in my opinion.
Thanks. The vaping deaths and illnesses keep coming up in some places; they haven't gotten any kind of serious attention or no real investigation has looked into this possibility.
covid was all over Lombardy in 2019 according to tests done on stored blood samples, so "Shanes " claims are quite plausible, if this testing may be trusted.
I'm waiting for Jeremy Vine to do his BBC radio 2 show on "Covid - did you get misled into taking the toxic jab?" "Masks - were you bullied into wearing one?" "Lockdowns - did your business fold due to illegal lockdowns depriving you of an income?"
When this happens we will know that the bell is tolling somewhere for all these crooks, charlatans, thieves, liars, narcissists.
I think it already is but with the clapper muffled - "they" cannot keep this rubbish going - the very thing being used to control people - "fire from/via media/internet" - is being turned back into their faces, they cannot dodge it, and "their" answers are, to me as a non scientist, increasingly desperate, easily highlighted as mendacious, and being proved wrong in great detail. "KCACO"..
When I looked up the defintion of "Dunning-Krueger Effect" it read "example : Jeremy Vine"
If Jeremy Vine even thinks about doing that on his Radio 2 show, I promise I will hunt him down and slap him repeatedly for being an illiterate, incompetent and generally just not very intelligent excuse as a 'presenter'. And aside from that, I'd slap him because that would be a complete 180 degree turn that he'd have made. I remember screaming at the radio one day, whilst driving, because of his shockingly biased and incorrect propoganda he spewed on his show, on this very topic.
Just keep listening! He will turn!
There were no Nazis in Germany after 1945 - absolutely nobody had ever been a Nazi.
You scream at the radio too?!
All the time it would appear. Maybe I need to change stations..
I would positively encourage him to just as you propose; he would then become eligible to be fully paid up member of the Harry Wales-Windsor Self Absorbed And Completely Absent From Humanity Society - with just the one other member to keep him company.
Then you can slap him with an appropriately barbed implement...
If he ever did do that it would mean that the dam had well and truly broken. I don’t think he dare given his model, pro-narrative stance.
When we have put a fork in the COVID19 fakery, can we all agree to move on and finish the job on Net Zero Carbon nonsense, then move onto government CBDCs? Piece by piece we can take back our democracies from these international mobsters and use actual science and common sense to cure our planet and have good lives.
1) COVID is as fake as the 2009 H1N1/Pandremix conspiracy.
2) Climate change is much more complicated and the other strongly related but more serious problem is peak oil which was probably in 2018. No diesel and we all die, because shipping farming and HGVs run on diesel.
It's unhelpful to combine the two in people's mind.
Let It Rain.. On them!!!!
Better yet, piss on their heads & tell ‘‘em it’s raining!
https://www.rtvutrecht.nl/nieuws/1647767/man-op-oudegracht-plast-etende-mensen-onder
Run this through google translate:-)
If only Schwab & Gates had been there
Gates, pie in face (44sec)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK6SS8CXYZo
That’s great! Let’s update that to a shovel
Shovel? OK then: a fair trial ... followed by noose/firing squad/electric chair, etc. ... then the gravediggers use the shovels -- not just for Killy Billy but for the whole lot of them --- and then we all do a happy dance for humanity.
Propaganda only works if everyone believes it. Fingers-crossed... the public have woken up to reality. Next climate change/Net Zero/Green Deal please. Newspapers have to follow their readership or else file for bankruptcy.
I’m in the US and young people here don’t watch the television news, be it National or local. I don’t either, my local news station just repeated the CDC talking points. Many people are awake.
Many are awake, but there are still too many young and old buying the narrative. Most of my family are part of that problem.
me2 and i'm the only one w a medical license and decades of experience!
I was shocked to see the number of booster ads still playing.
Most of the elderly population is on their 5th or 6th shot and will continue taking them until their demise. It's very sad. These poor folks watch CBS Nightly News and believe they're actually getting the news.
I've had the same thought as Joel all along. The mainstream press faces a conundrum - if they keep covering up the facts (and refusing to even investigate serious claims), they will lose all credibility. In fact, they've already lost most of their credibility as witnessed by plunging subscription numbers and terrible advertising (except for Big Pharma). But if they belatedly start doing their job, this would be an admission that they were covering up the facts for years, that they were active participants in a conspiracy to spread and protect a false narrative.
I actually think executives at Fox News might recognize this. This network has recently begun to challenge the narrative on vaccines and all the other Covid lies (especially Tucker Carlson). My speculation is that they know the truth will come out and they want to be on "the right side of history" when it does. That is, at least they can say they challenged some parts of the false narrative well before their "journalism" peers. This might enhance their credibility and benefit their business in the future. This separates or distinguishes their "news coverage" from that of their competitors.
This is an important nugget you found, Joel. Common sense tells us some reporters or editors must be taking note of the fact the "public" is way ahead of the "fact-finding journalists" on all elements of the Covid story. A great (untold) story would be to show all the efforts that MUST be taking place in newsrooms to conceal the truth.
And... the education has come to the public via the great blogs on Substack and elsewhere not via the main media channels. The Internet has destroyed the monopoly Governments and vested interests once had, which is why Big Tech and Governments are so desperate to control it with their ‘misinformation’ nonsense and attempts at censorship.
They’ve been leading them, with a government subsidy, so far.
Agreed. Journalists love to present themselves as fearless seekers of the truth, slaying powerful institutions and individuals as they do so. Well they fawned over Harvey Weinstein, covering up for him for years, and they have been nothing but a mouthpiece for Pfizer. They have lost all credibility. The hard work on Weinstein was done by Ronan Farrow and the truth on Covid has been revealed by independent researchers and a few brave doctors who have been persecuted for their troubles.
'Journalists love to present themselves as fearless seekers of the truth'.......That type of journalist disappeared ages ago.........99% of the modern day ones are useless cretins with IQs of Rocking Horses!!
Ain't this the truth?!!
I was really impressed with the quality of the information given in the comments section. Many people clearly are better informed than the news reporters. Also very encouraged by the comments indicating that many readers do not want the celebrity gossip and other dross they are fed.
BRjnr, I consider you to be 100000% correct.
The difficulty will be if "folks" who think SARS COV2 is a charade of massive and very harmful proportions, they will not have the resolve mentally to "keep going". There is no hiding place for MSM, Elon Musk has set that ball rolling and we have a Mexican standoff to some extent. Neil Oliver and others have to continue their principled opposition. Can we hope for a MSM corporate "Mea culpa" - I really hope "yes" - even if it is forced , in some way yet to be revealed, by financial necessity if not wholly from conviction?
If ONE prominent news organization did its job and reported at least one scandal or element of "truth," this would open the floodgates IMO. This would give permission for everyone else to belatedly do their investigating and reporting jobs. But it will take that first news organization to do this. Pretty much everyone agrees that the NY Times is the "leader of the pack" of our "pack" journalist cabal, so I guess it would have to be this newspaper doing this ... which will not happen. But, yes, there are plenty of salaried journalists who actually know how to do real investigative journalism ... if they are "allowed" to do so. Once you get one news organization following a story and getting some big scoop, everyone else follows and tries to get in on the action. Or, at least, this is the way things used to happen.
Where are Bernstein and Woodward when you need them?
It's bizarre. We've got the Scandal of our Ages. Any journalists that broke the real story would go down in the history books and would be set for life (with book deals, movie deals, future speaking engagements, etc) ... and there's not ONE mainstream journalist who is interested in this happening to him. They'd also be saving countless lives. This right there tells us how deep the "conspiracy" goes ... or the power of "groupthink."
Your post read to my latest article! Thanks for the story idea!
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/wheres-the-woodward-and-bernstein
What's "allowed"? They either are real journos or not? It was not easy/easier in the past, was it? The difference is that they're all
captured and corrupted to the core, happy in their bubble.
So much corruption, moral and, otherwise.
Talking about Fox, have been talking with some friends and someone said
how cool would it be if Rupert Murdoch, not a spring rooster, suddenly realised and used his power for the good of humanity, hastening inevitable change. What has he got lose? One divine intervention to change one old man old ways would be great but what are the chances of that happening?
Miracles do happen!!
I won’t ever trust Fox (except Tucker) because I believe I read that they were getting paid - along w/ many other media outlets, to be sure - to inflate “Covid deaths”, flog the shots & the rest of the idiocy of locking down, wiping groceries, wearing masks, etc. Esp those stupid doctors - Segal, Safire & the one I really can’t stand but can never remember her name.
And FOX still runs ad for the gene jab
Really! I only see about an hour early in morning b4 I go to work & then the only show I watch after I’m home is Tucker. Sheesh
I agree. Fox News was going along with the "narrative" for much of the last three years. That's why it strikes me as noteworthy that they suddenly seem to be saying it's okay to question the narratives after all. Tucker especially is calling out Big Pharma at least once a week. I can only assume he wouldn't pen and then air these scathing monologues without the permission of his bosses. So something changed. I don't know what it was or why (unless my theory above is right), but at least one network has (partially) departed from "the pack." And the sky didn't fall. In fact, this is helping Fox News and Tucker's ratings. It seems like other news organizations would pick up on that FACT.
Agree. We have one journalist here in the Netherlands who attacked John Campbell on Twitter. Claiming that Dr. John made huge amounts of money on his youtube broadcasts. Quite a disguting piece of proze. The best thing about it is the Twitter comments, exactly as you mention above. Its quite obvious that most people are done with the narrative. Is the dam breaking?
The good doctor was demonetized by YouTube long ago. Meanwhile, here’s giving away his textbook
Ja zeker
“Squeaky bum”. Thanks Joel for starting my day off with a laugh. And with hope.
This is the quandary of the COVID era: how do you admit you were wrong, when you were so sure you were right? So far the only person I've seen do it is Tim Robbins, in his interview with Russell Brand.
Tucker Carlson did a public mea culpa on the wars in the Mideast. He once supported them and is now among the biggest critics of the "Neo-cons." This proves it's possible to admit you were wrong ... and you can actually become even more popular than ever after doing so. It's NOT a career-ender.
Dan Bongino had a pretty good mea culpa about having been duped into “vaccinating”. He was practically in tears. I’m not sure if he just did his own thing in taking it or if he advocated publicly that others do so. For me, the thing always was that I don’t give a 💩 what some “celeb”, doctor, politician or anyone else says or does, ESP as it pertained to everything done to or that happened to us the past 3 years
One of the single best things about social media is it affords little old nobodies like myself the capability to assess public thinking & produce basic data-sets using their responses to posts by mainstream media, government etc.
I got into this by assessing the popularity of the McCanns, parents who staged an abduction in Portugal to cover-up the death/murder of their daughter Madeleine. When this fine couple first appeared in the media in 2007 they were almost universally liked & pitied. At first everyone fell for it t. Around 95% of the public supported them. But that did not last long. Over the following years, using the publics responses on social media as a measure, their popularity has plummeted to the point where half a percent of social media commenters still support the couple. It took less than fifteen years for the McCann's to go from 95% public support to 0.5% public support, if that!
95% of the public were expressing support for all sorts of pandemic measures not so long ago. Whether support for the vaccines ever got that high, I have no idea, but some countries boast vaccination levels of 95% or even more. So support for the vaccines was in some cases very high. That time is also gone. Now, judging by responses to a post by the UK gov about the two years anniversary since the rollout, the public are, again, around 0.5% supportive. The only difference between the McCanns bs narrative & the Covid/vaccine bs narrative is that the McCann's narrative took over a decade to collapse while the Covid/vaccine narrative has collapsed within two years.
and indeed, the comments section of the DM post shows EXACTLY what I am talking about here.
If only we could enlighten the proleteriate as effectively re false flag & entirely hoaxed terrorism. Now that would be a fine day. We've been brainwashed for decades already. Lots of programming to undo.
Love it!
Why bless ya, thanks. I could always use a Subscriber, new to Subs. Watch out for subversive content though, it's my thing! ;)
All the best. Thanks tons for your work!
That's very interesting. I am one of those who went from immense sympathy for the McCanns to hoping they will finally be put on trial.
The difference here though is that people are directly invested. Madeleine was a child we had empathy with but zero direct involvement so pivoting on opinion carried no emotional cost, whereas for people who have been jabbed, especially multiply, there is strong emotional investment in continuing with the initial mindset.
Excellent comment & observation. No argument from moi. Perhaps this explains how rapidly the narrative around covid & vaccine has collapsed. folks now have a personal, vested interest in the truth. In fact, it's life & death.
As a teen growing up in newly independent Zimbabwe, I witnessed two terrorist bombings. Not one, two. I guess I'm lucky like that! The first went off right down the road in front of me, I saw it explode. Fortunately the bomb had been mis-timed, blowing an empty cafe into the street on a quiet Sunday morning. My dad & I were the only folks around, no-one hurt.
The second was massive, perfectly timed for lunchtime shoppers on a Firday. Although the blast blew the roof off the political building which had been evacuated thanks to a warning, the roof landed on a busy bakery next door. Six were killed, hundreds wounded. I was about a km away when the bomb went off, I saw the boiling black cloud rising from the scene, which I was on in three minutes.
I won't describe the horrors I saw as a 13 year old that day but my experience fostered a life-long interest in terrorism, war, insurgency etc etc. And it is that personal experience & personal investment in terrorism that puts me in a unique position to observe the mainstream media claims about Islamist terrorism to pick apart genuine acts from false flags & complete hoaxes.
If you have any doubt that terrorist attacks can be faked, watch the "victims" running onto the scene of this car-bombing in Baghdad. The street was empty until after the blast! - https://www.bitchute.com/video/7gGFmxHZL1ao/
And if you'd like to see a little of what I saw as a teenager, watch this - https://www.bitchute.com/video/k2NnbbCtc9CE/
All the Daily Mail comments on the recent covid stories have been absolutely cracking.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11600095/World-Health-Organisation-warns-XBB-1-5-transmissible-Covid-variant-yet.html#comments
The Kraken? Cracking indeed. Whatever happened to monkey pox?
🤣🤡
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34916207/
From BMJ itself
Re: "Reader Comments" ... There's a reason the Establishment fears these sections. The sites that do allow them (especially unmoderated/uncensored Comment Sections) provide a great public service and at least one way to get around the "gatekeepers of the news." I've actually found several blockbuster news items ... in the Reader Comments.
I recently wrote a piece on this topic.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/in-praise-of-reader-comments
Here are two potentially “narrative-changing” blockbuster pieces of “news” I found in Reader Comments sections:
The first startling piece of news was recorded by a New York Times subscriber (“Shane from Marin County, California”) who claims that he had Covid in the “fall” of 2019 “far earlier than anyone else” or any other Covid case he’d heard of.
Shane, in the moderated Times’ Reader Comments (following another Covid story from May 2020), says he had all the classic symptoms, which he describes in an erudite and persuasive manner. Adding much greater weight to his claim, “Shane” lists the two labs where he later received TWO positive antibody test results.
If Shane is telling the truth, he would be the first known Covid case in the world … by months.
This, I argue, is not only news, but huge news. Certainly, it’s a “reader tip” that would be worth Times’ reporters following up on. Which the newspaper could have easily done since it has Shane’s subscriber info (certainly his email address, full name, probably his street address, etc.).
I also note that only paid subscribers can comment in the Times’ Reader Comment section, which is also “moderated” - which means some employee of the newspaper picks the posts that get published.
Many thousands of people must have read this article and the popular Reader Comments. This would include at least some NY Times staffers and journalists who probably read the Reader Comments. The people who read NY Times Covid stories (and Reader Comments) would also likely include at least some public health employees at, say, the CDC, NIH, NIAID, etc.
Clearly no one at the NY Times or in the U.S. public health bureaucracies thought Shane’s claim was worth looking into.
In case nobody at The Times reads its own Reader Comments, I sent at least three emails to the newspapers “news tip” email address, pointing out Shane’s claim and suggesting that someone at the paper investigate. Cricket City at the Old Gray Lady.
This, I maintain, is important information as it would seem to confirm that the NY Times is not interested in investigating “case zero” in the world. Which prompts this question: why is this or how could this even be possible?
Link for more details:
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/covid-was-spreading-across-us-in
I also recently found the possible “case zero” in the UK from reading the Reader Comments of the UK’s Daily Mail, where a reader says she was hospitalized in November 2019, and three weeks before making her post (on May 16, 2020) says she tested positive for Covid antibodies.
This paper could have also quickly found this poster in my opinion.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/well-i-just-found-the-first-covid
Look at the lung damage in the vaping deaths in 2019 and the lung damage in true "covid" patients on 2020.
Eerily similar.
I think the "vaping deaths" was "covid 19' being released into the general population.
Thanks. The vaping deaths and illnesses keep coming up in some places; they haven't gotten any kind of serious attention or no real investigation has looked into this possibility.
Those vaping deaths were definetly a bit odd and so was the official response - ban certain vaping products but no real investigation.
As they started around Maryland, if I recall correctly, is another bit of the puzzle considering where Fort Detrick is.
covid was all over Lombardy in 2019 according to tests done on stored blood samples, so "Shanes " claims are quite plausible, if this testing may be trusted.
What a hopeful post -- loving this!!!
monday night football (nfl) we saw a 24 year old super athlete go into cardiac arrest after a routine tackle!!1
every vaxxed youth is at risk like Damar!
the standard for a human use should be "proven safe", not "you must prove it harmful"!
The best Daily Mail Comment is from someone in Dorchester: "The Truth Is Out There, But You Are Not." Well put, that commenteer!