8 Comments
User's avatar
AlmostWrong's avatar

Thank you, excellent point!

Expand full comment
Manuel's avatar

This is a very important info, thanks for digging it out. Considering a typical under-reporting rate, one gets close again to of order of 1 death/1000 jabs, as in one of your previous analyses.

Expand full comment
Ely's avatar

Sure it’s higher than previous vaccines and just about everyone knows someone who has had an adverse reaction, aling with our patients. But one death per 1000 jabs? No way.

Expand full comment
Manuel's avatar

This depends on the under-reporting rates of adverse events. According to several studies in the US at least only few percent of the adverse events are reported (it's a passive system).

https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_0490c898f7514df4b6fbc5935da07322.pdf

This would convert the 1/50000 figure in this article, into ~1/1000.

Expand full comment
Morgan Morgan's avatar

Do you think that a vaccine fatality rate of roughly 1 in 60,000 means that the Covid vaccines are “unsafe” or a poor risk? What would you consider a “safe” vaccine fatality rate?

Expand full comment
Levi's avatar

I'm starting to look through VAERS data on my own. I was interested in looking into the ~11K cases of (I think pediatric) myocarditis mentioned by Dr Peter McCullough. I don't quite understand how to work with the VAERS data. I have a giant (600mb) CSV file "2021VAERSDATA". The term "myocarditis" appears many times in the dataset. But how do we correlate the adverse events reported with a particular vaccine? Is there a structured way to tie a report to a particular vaccine? I have many more questions. Could I email you? :)

Expand full comment
Joel Smalley's avatar

Yes, are you on Twitter?

Expand full comment