I noticed with great interest that Joel’s approach here eliminates any need to determine cause of death. That’s very importantl, because the clinical diagnostic technique, being PCR-based, is awful and in no way can be trusted or relied upon.
Look 👀 out the “Corman Drosten Review” article for details of how deliberately misleading the procedure is.
Stripping back the logical analysis to compare only all-causes mortality by “vaccination” status is a needed review of the data and which, if conducted in an even handed manner, will yield answers to the scenarios that Joel has posed.
Anyone who has studied the topic in depth knows that every aspect of the "vaccine story", starting back in the 1800's up to present, is complete fraud. Vaccines have done nothing but harm people and line the pockets of the medical establishment.
Vaccines are barbaric- all of them.
There has never been a product of any kind so filled with historical misinformation, purposeful deception and outright fraud.
The belief that injecting synthetic chemicals made by habitually criminal companies who profit from perpetual disease somehow produces health is not only ridiculous and unproven— it is a foundational teaching of a dangerous religious cult that western medicine has become.
From their inception to today's mRNA monstrosities vaccines have done nothing but cause massive and systemic harm to the human biological system.
Give me a calculator and enough time to cook up some bullshit and I’ll write a convincing paper (with stats!) that the Nazi redirecting of materials and logistics to round up, deport, then exterminate Jews actually saved millions of lives, and therefore ended up being a good thing.
Would it be possible for you to have a poll on Twitter asking 1250 of your followers (or more) and convincing someone on the other side of this argument to ask 1250 of their followers (or more) the same question to get a meaningful data response? There must be a way to do this without asking the government, which seems to not want to know the answer.
Again, keep up the great work, critical thinking and providing us with your thought-provoking work.
Great work...it seems very labor intensive and merits a double thank you! It would be interesting to see data sets relating to increases of cancers, heart problems, etc. among the vaccinated/unvaccinated and death rate comparatives in 20 -30 year olds pre and post pandemic ..
It seems that everywhere I turn (at work, my gym, family gatherings, etc.) I learn of people who have had re-occurrences of cancers that were in remission and/or heart problems that are worsening. I spoke with a client of mine (we never discuss politics) who runs a funeral home and he advised that he and his staff have noticed a disturbing increase in the deaths of young people, i.e. 20s and 30s. Anyway- thanks again- your labors are much appreciated.
They don’t want to know the truth. The truth has no bearing on their goals. If we are faced with that simple piece of data, maybe our response to all of this should change accordingly. Determine the actual goals. Find ways to defeat those since we can assume those goals are not to our benefit, given they’ve proven they have no interest in the truth of whether their shots are effective or not. Safe or not. Since they are deliberately not looking. Hanging on to proving the things aren’t safe or effective is, perhaps, an indication of some cognitive train wrecks that are still struggling to believe in the malfeasance of our governments. We need to get over those internal dissonances since the realities of the possible goals are going to make these shot things look like pancakes for breakfast.
Was this survey conducted and are those the results published above? I believe you, as I have seen someone else discuss this method, also. I am only asking, because I didn't see a link to the survey data and how it was obtained. Thank you for all of your great articles.
Thanks to Joel’s patience with me, I went back and read this article a second time. I agree with his subtitle that this is his most important article ever.
I noticed with great interest that Joel’s approach here eliminates any need to determine cause of death. That’s very importantl, because the clinical diagnostic technique, being PCR-based, is awful and in no way can be trusted or relied upon.
Look 👀 out the “Corman Drosten Review” article for details of how deliberately misleading the procedure is.
Stripping back the logical analysis to compare only all-causes mortality by “vaccination” status is a needed review of the data and which, if conducted in an even handed manner, will yield answers to the scenarios that Joel has posed.
Will officialdom run such surveys?
Will they heck.
All vaccines are poison. Vaccines create disease.
Anyone who has studied the topic in depth knows that every aspect of the "vaccine story", starting back in the 1800's up to present, is complete fraud. Vaccines have done nothing but harm people and line the pockets of the medical establishment.
Vaccines are barbaric- all of them.
There has never been a product of any kind so filled with historical misinformation, purposeful deception and outright fraud.
The belief that injecting synthetic chemicals made by habitually criminal companies who profit from perpetual disease somehow produces health is not only ridiculous and unproven— it is a foundational teaching of a dangerous religious cult that western medicine has become.
From their inception to today's mRNA monstrosities vaccines have done nothing but cause massive and systemic harm to the human biological system.
“Saved millions of lives.”
Hahahah.
Give me a calculator and enough time to cook up some bullshit and I’ll write a convincing paper (with stats!) that the Nazi redirecting of materials and logistics to round up, deport, then exterminate Jews actually saved millions of lives, and therefore ended up being a good thing.
Boom.
I'm a #PUREBLOOD - I will never forgive & I will never forget . . #RESPECT JOEL SMALLEY
I don't understand the details, but I understand the gist. Thank you!!!!
Thank you.
Would it be possible for you to have a poll on Twitter asking 1250 of your followers (or more) and convincing someone on the other side of this argument to ask 1250 of their followers (or more) the same question to get a meaningful data response? There must be a way to do this without asking the government, which seems to not want to know the answer.
Again, keep up the great work, critical thinking and providing us with your thought-provoking work.
They don't want to fund that study...it will undermine all their other funding (brought to you by Pfizer)!
BREAKING: Two FOIs Prove That There Were Batches of Pfizer Vaccine That Had Killed People and Should Have Failed the Batch Analysis
But they kept jabbing
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/breaking-two-fois-prove-that-there
Dr. Yeadon Warns: So-Called “COVID Vaccines” Are Toxic by Design
"I heartily recommend you take seriously the warning I’m issuing."
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-yeadon-warns-so-called-covid-vaccines
Great work...it seems very labor intensive and merits a double thank you! It would be interesting to see data sets relating to increases of cancers, heart problems, etc. among the vaccinated/unvaccinated and death rate comparatives in 20 -30 year olds pre and post pandemic ..
It seems that everywhere I turn (at work, my gym, family gatherings, etc.) I learn of people who have had re-occurrences of cancers that were in remission and/or heart problems that are worsening. I spoke with a client of mine (we never discuss politics) who runs a funeral home and he advised that he and his staff have noticed a disturbing increase in the deaths of young people, i.e. 20s and 30s. Anyway- thanks again- your labors are much appreciated.
They don’t want to know the truth. The truth has no bearing on their goals. If we are faced with that simple piece of data, maybe our response to all of this should change accordingly. Determine the actual goals. Find ways to defeat those since we can assume those goals are not to our benefit, given they’ve proven they have no interest in the truth of whether their shots are effective or not. Safe or not. Since they are deliberately not looking. Hanging on to proving the things aren’t safe or effective is, perhaps, an indication of some cognitive train wrecks that are still struggling to believe in the malfeasance of our governments. We need to get over those internal dissonances since the realities of the possible goals are going to make these shot things look like pancakes for breakfast.
Your surveys will begin to generate overlap where people will be taking the survey a second time unless you screen for previous respondents.
Was this survey conducted and are those the results published above? I believe you, as I have seen someone else discuss this method, also. I am only asking, because I didn't see a link to the survey data and how it was obtained. Thank you for all of your great articles.
Thanks to Joel’s patience with me, I went back and read this article a second time. I agree with his subtitle that this is his most important article ever.
Hi Joel,
I tried forwarding an email to your Gmail account but got bounceback it was deleted.
Is there anyway you can rebut this? https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/628165
I believe you have signed this petition?
Thank you
And yet we have people like Ron Unz who still think that the jabs are not to blame:
https://www.unz.com/runz/vaxxing-deaths-or-covid-deaths/