I noticed with great interest that Joel’s approach here eliminates any need to determine cause of death. That’s very importantl, because the clinical diagnostic technique, being PCR-based, is awful and in no way can be trusted or relied upon.
Look 👀 out the “Corman Drosten Review” article for details of how deliberately misleading the procedure is.
Stripping back the logical analysis to compare only all-causes mortality by “vaccination” status is a needed review of the data and which, if conducted in an even handed manner, will yield answers to the scenarios that Joel has posed.
Anyone who has studied the topic in depth knows that every aspect of the "vaccine story", starting back in the 1800's up to present, is complete fraud. Vaccines have done nothing but harm people and line the pockets of the medical establishment.
Vaccines are barbaric- all of them.
There has never been a product of any kind so filled with historical misinformation, purposeful deception and outright fraud.
The belief that injecting synthetic chemicals made by habitually criminal companies who profit from perpetual disease somehow produces health is not only ridiculous and unproven— it is a foundational teaching of a dangerous religious cult that western medicine has become.
From their inception to today's mRNA monstrosities vaccines have done nothing but cause massive and systemic harm to the human biological system.
It's amazing in some ways to watch the endless discussions and array of hypotheses on "all things mRNA injections" and on a broader scale "all things Covid." Most of these discussions begin with presuppositions that avoid the core realities of what we are up against.
To put it simply injecting toxic crap into your body will always damage your body. To put faith in any of these so-called products and to believe anything the Pharma Industry (whose history is fraught with deception, corruption and outright mass murder) asserts is a form of madness.
I realize many have spent endless hours delving into the minutiae of "the spike", "furin cleavage" (and with good intent) and on and on but have they ever considered that what they are immersed in is based upon unwarranted assumptions.
The entirety of the Medical Industry is a criminal enterprise that launders money to the very same entities that are wiping out what's left of the social order.
The history of all of this is so very important right now and sadly largely ignored.
Ain't that the truth?! As much as I love to acquire new knowledge, furin cleavage sites, the multitude of immunoglobulins and different modes of iatrogenocide weren't on my knowledge scaffold list for this decade!
The faith in mainstream medical advice by so many is truly astonishing. The idea prevails in the masses, “I will get injection after injection of this untested substance because it can’t possibly do me more harm than good.”
Yes, becoming an expert on 'the spike' and the 'furin cleavage site' based on the asssumption that they've shown to exist in nature as part of a contagion just about says it all about the industry's ability to waste our time and energy.
Fauci would respond “ You don’t know what you’re talking about” or “You don’t understand the science”. Fauci loves to give the listener or challenger the run around. Frankenstein Fauci doesn’t want the truth coming out and certainly doesn’t want an accurate graph chart to prove he’s wrong. He’s all in on reaping dividends pushing his poison.
A few facts. In developed Countries the rate of infection and deaths from things like Measles, Polio, Smallpox decreased significantly PRIOR to vaccination programmes being introduced. This can be explained by better sanitation, hygiene, nutrition and treatments as well as a proportion of the population with natural or acquired immunity. But there is another factor.... Darwin’s theory. Any organism which acquires characteristics via genetic mutation that make it better adapted to its environment will thrive and be more successful at reproducing. Virus/bacteria which cause little adverse effect on their hosts leaving them mobile, will spread and thus reproduce more successfully than those that do the opposite - they will then dominate until an even milder version emerges. It is why every Winter we have Cold & ‘flu epidemics but we don’t have Ebola epidemics. The latter is very serious, mostly fatal, immobilising, easily diagnosed, quickly and easily contained. It must be the case that virus/bacteria once lethal have mutated to increasingly less harmful variants - otherwise Man would have become extinct long ago. It is possible that vaccines are interfering with this and causing break-out strains, some more harmful, and this reinforces the argument for continued vaccination - and more sales/profits. In the UK some years back, the vaccination programme against TB was stopped as no longer being cost effective. It probably never was because antibiotics, better sanitation, hygiene and nutrition beat TB, not vaccines. In the 19th Century England, Manchester I think, a Smallpox outbreak led to compulsory vaccinations. People objected, mostly because it became apparent deaths were highest among the vaccinated. After riots in the street, compulsory vaccination was ceased amid dire warnings from the ‘experts’ that doom would follow. In fact the epidemic very quickly fizzled out. And here we are again, near-compulsory vaccination against a Cold-causing virus with a discrete target cohort where it is serious or fatal, and we see serious infection and deaths in the vaccinated in much higher proportions (and related to number of doses received) than non-vaccinated PLUS a reduced immune response against new strains of the virus. The preponderance of Colds & ‘flu which disappeared during the Covid crisis, invites speculation as to what damage has been done to community immunity with respect to non-CoV 2 pathogens. The future will inform us, but just by ‘coincidence’, here in the UK there has been an upsurge in cases of Shingles. Shingles is caused by dormant chickenpox virus from infections years prior emerging usually in older people as immune systems become weaker. So we have public health announcement about Shingles with the recommendation to get vaccinated - I think it is called creating market demand, then supplying it.There is another aspect of vaccination that gets little mention, but in my view should be investigated. As the number of, and range of vaccinations practiced on children has increased over the last few decades, so have the numbers of asthma sufferers, and people with food allergies. Is there a connexion?
Give me a calculator and enough time to cook up some bullshit and I’ll write a convincing paper (with stats!) that the Nazi redirecting of materials and logistics to round up, deport, then exterminate Jews actually saved millions of lives, and therefore ended up being a good thing.
Aren’t they already, but extended the scope to everybody? They control the EU, aka Fourth Reich, and have driven the Green Agenda and mass immigration of non-Europeans to fragment the European demographic (divide & rule) - the final solution to how to subjugate and control the masses by a neo-aristocratic elite.
Would it be possible for you to have a poll on Twitter asking 1250 of your followers (or more) and convincing someone on the other side of this argument to ask 1250 of their followers (or more) the same question to get a meaningful data response? There must be a way to do this without asking the government, which seems to not want to know the answer.
Again, keep up the great work, critical thinking and providing us with your thought-provoking work.
Great work...it seems very labor intensive and merits a double thank you! It would be interesting to see data sets relating to increases of cancers, heart problems, etc. among the vaccinated/unvaccinated and death rate comparatives in 20 -30 year olds pre and post pandemic ..
It seems that everywhere I turn (at work, my gym, family gatherings, etc.) I learn of people who have had re-occurrences of cancers that were in remission and/or heart problems that are worsening. I spoke with a client of mine (we never discuss politics) who runs a funeral home and he advised that he and his staff have noticed a disturbing increase in the deaths of young people, i.e. 20s and 30s. Anyway- thanks again- your labors are much appreciated.
I keep running those numbers and the pale into insignificance against the "COVID" deaths. Either they are being miscategorised (and Ethical Skeptic has shown this is quite probable) or my hypothesis is that vax-induced COVID is responsible. Any which path you take, they all lead back to the same place eventually so does it really matter?
They don’t want to know the truth. The truth has no bearing on their goals. If we are faced with that simple piece of data, maybe our response to all of this should change accordingly. Determine the actual goals. Find ways to defeat those since we can assume those goals are not to our benefit, given they’ve proven they have no interest in the truth of whether their shots are effective or not. Safe or not. Since they are deliberately not looking. Hanging on to proving the things aren’t safe or effective is, perhaps, an indication of some cognitive train wrecks that are still struggling to believe in the malfeasance of our governments. We need to get over those internal dissonances since the realities of the possible goals are going to make these shot things look like pancakes for breakfast.
Well, the good thing is that we don't need them top conduct this survey. I suggested they should knowing full well they never would, adding more evidence for us to condemn them. Anyone can run this survey. Eventually, I'll crowdsource this.
I think the masses will be unpersuaded by the word, survey. It is not “scientifically reliable.” They will say people can’t be trusted answering truthfully. Of course this defies common sense, particularly if you randomly select 12 different groups of 1,250.
I would love to get the survey results merely for seeing how closely they compare to what we are being told by our health agencies.
25,000 random out of 18 million. I ran the simulation many times. Never had more than one duplicate. Can't have duplicates in the deaths if you randomly select 25,000 deaths in one go.
Was this survey conducted and are those the results published above? I believe you, as I have seen someone else discuss this method, also. I am only asking, because I didn't see a link to the survey data and how it was obtained. Thank you for all of your great articles.
Not yet! I have simulated the surveys to prove that the results would be reliable. It's up to the powers that be or someone with sufficient reach and resources to actually conduct them now.
Kirsch could have resources as well as motivation. Did You approach him with the idea? If i got You correctly, Your approach would be the application of Prof' Fenton's revelation of fake government estimates of the % of vaccinated
Thanks to Joel’s patience with me, I went back and read this article a second time. I agree with his subtitle that this is his most important article ever.
Yeah, simple. Get them to do my survey. If it really meets their standards of safety and effectiveness, it will be clear in the data as I have explained.
I noticed with great interest that Joel’s approach here eliminates any need to determine cause of death. That’s very importantl, because the clinical diagnostic technique, being PCR-based, is awful and in no way can be trusted or relied upon.
Look 👀 out the “Corman Drosten Review” article for details of how deliberately misleading the procedure is.
Stripping back the logical analysis to compare only all-causes mortality by “vaccination” status is a needed review of the data and which, if conducted in an even handed manner, will yield answers to the scenarios that Joel has posed.
Will officialdom run such surveys?
Will they heck.
All vaccines are poison. Vaccines create disease.
Anyone who has studied the topic in depth knows that every aspect of the "vaccine story", starting back in the 1800's up to present, is complete fraud. Vaccines have done nothing but harm people and line the pockets of the medical establishment.
Vaccines are barbaric- all of them.
There has never been a product of any kind so filled with historical misinformation, purposeful deception and outright fraud.
The belief that injecting synthetic chemicals made by habitually criminal companies who profit from perpetual disease somehow produces health is not only ridiculous and unproven— it is a foundational teaching of a dangerous religious cult that western medicine has become.
From their inception to today's mRNA monstrosities vaccines have done nothing but cause massive and systemic harm to the human biological system.
If that's the case with this one, it will show up in this survey.
It's amazing in some ways to watch the endless discussions and array of hypotheses on "all things mRNA injections" and on a broader scale "all things Covid." Most of these discussions begin with presuppositions that avoid the core realities of what we are up against.
To put it simply injecting toxic crap into your body will always damage your body. To put faith in any of these so-called products and to believe anything the Pharma Industry (whose history is fraught with deception, corruption and outright mass murder) asserts is a form of madness.
I realize many have spent endless hours delving into the minutiae of "the spike", "furin cleavage" (and with good intent) and on and on but have they ever considered that what they are immersed in is based upon unwarranted assumptions.
The entirety of the Medical Industry is a criminal enterprise that launders money to the very same entities that are wiping out what's left of the social order.
The history of all of this is so very important right now and sadly largely ignored.
Ain't that the truth?! As much as I love to acquire new knowledge, furin cleavage sites, the multitude of immunoglobulins and different modes of iatrogenocide weren't on my knowledge scaffold list for this decade!
The faith in mainstream medical advice by so many is truly astonishing. The idea prevails in the masses, “I will get injection after injection of this untested substance because it can’t possibly do me more harm than good.”
Yes, becoming an expert on 'the spike' and the 'furin cleavage site' based on the asssumption that they've shown to exist in nature as part of a contagion just about says it all about the industry's ability to waste our time and energy.
https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/x-ray-crystallography-and-3d-computer
https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/spikes-and-knobs
🐒
and yes all vaccines are toxic right from the very first one for smallpox and ever onward. There can be no talk, or shouldn't be, of effectiveness. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/lets-hope-the-monkey-pox-nonsense
I don't think we're going to get out of the viral delusion rabbit hole at this rate before they hit us with pandemic preparedness 2024. We're just walking right into it https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/were-so-far-down-the-rabbit-hole
Jo
see book Turtles all the way down !!
Excellent book that explains vaccines well.
Fauci would respond “ You don’t know what you’re talking about” or “You don’t understand the science”. Fauci loves to give the listener or challenger the run around. Frankenstein Fauci doesn’t want the truth coming out and certainly doesn’t want an accurate graph chart to prove he’s wrong. He’s all in on reaping dividends pushing his poison.
A few facts. In developed Countries the rate of infection and deaths from things like Measles, Polio, Smallpox decreased significantly PRIOR to vaccination programmes being introduced. This can be explained by better sanitation, hygiene, nutrition and treatments as well as a proportion of the population with natural or acquired immunity. But there is another factor.... Darwin’s theory. Any organism which acquires characteristics via genetic mutation that make it better adapted to its environment will thrive and be more successful at reproducing. Virus/bacteria which cause little adverse effect on their hosts leaving them mobile, will spread and thus reproduce more successfully than those that do the opposite - they will then dominate until an even milder version emerges. It is why every Winter we have Cold & ‘flu epidemics but we don’t have Ebola epidemics. The latter is very serious, mostly fatal, immobilising, easily diagnosed, quickly and easily contained. It must be the case that virus/bacteria once lethal have mutated to increasingly less harmful variants - otherwise Man would have become extinct long ago. It is possible that vaccines are interfering with this and causing break-out strains, some more harmful, and this reinforces the argument for continued vaccination - and more sales/profits. In the UK some years back, the vaccination programme against TB was stopped as no longer being cost effective. It probably never was because antibiotics, better sanitation, hygiene and nutrition beat TB, not vaccines. In the 19th Century England, Manchester I think, a Smallpox outbreak led to compulsory vaccinations. People objected, mostly because it became apparent deaths were highest among the vaccinated. After riots in the street, compulsory vaccination was ceased amid dire warnings from the ‘experts’ that doom would follow. In fact the epidemic very quickly fizzled out. And here we are again, near-compulsory vaccination against a Cold-causing virus with a discrete target cohort where it is serious or fatal, and we see serious infection and deaths in the vaccinated in much higher proportions (and related to number of doses received) than non-vaccinated PLUS a reduced immune response against new strains of the virus. The preponderance of Colds & ‘flu which disappeared during the Covid crisis, invites speculation as to what damage has been done to community immunity with respect to non-CoV 2 pathogens. The future will inform us, but just by ‘coincidence’, here in the UK there has been an upsurge in cases of Shingles. Shingles is caused by dormant chickenpox virus from infections years prior emerging usually in older people as immune systems become weaker. So we have public health announcement about Shingles with the recommendation to get vaccinated - I think it is called creating market demand, then supplying it.There is another aspect of vaccination that gets little mention, but in my view should be investigated. As the number of, and range of vaccinations practiced on children has increased over the last few decades, so have the numbers of asthma sufferers, and people with food allergies. Is there a connexion?
Hi John,
Have looked into the history of "Ebola?"
Nice post.
Without question the grotesque childhood vaccination schedule plays a big role in all sorts of chronic illnesses.
“Saved millions of lives.”
Hahahah.
Give me a calculator and enough time to cook up some bullshit and I’ll write a convincing paper (with stats!) that the Nazi redirecting of materials and logistics to round up, deport, then exterminate Jews actually saved millions of lives, and therefore ended up being a good thing.
And enough money...
Give me enough money and I can convince the Germans to have another go at it.
They already have.
Hahahaha. Poor Eugyppius
Isn't he Austrian?
Hahahahaha. Touché
Don't know but I think he lives in Germany since he always writes about German affairs.
Aren’t they already, but extended the scope to everybody? They control the EU, aka Fourth Reich, and have driven the Green Agenda and mass immigration of non-Europeans to fragment the European demographic (divide & rule) - the final solution to how to subjugate and control the masses by a neo-aristocratic elite.
Boom.
I got your attention this time?! ;-))
I'm a #PUREBLOOD - I will never forgive & I will never forget . . #RESPECT JOEL SMALLEY
I don't understand the details, but I understand the gist. Thank you!!!!
You don’t need to know how to paint to appreciate art!
Thank you.
Would it be possible for you to have a poll on Twitter asking 1250 of your followers (or more) and convincing someone on the other side of this argument to ask 1250 of their followers (or more) the same question to get a meaningful data response? There must be a way to do this without asking the government, which seems to not want to know the answer.
Again, keep up the great work, critical thinking and providing us with your thought-provoking work.
It wouldn't be a random survey as there is a bias in who follows Joel.
And that is why I suggested maybe getting participants from both sides of the argument (from other substacks that represent the other side). Thank you
The Substack community is itself selective and thus introduces bias.
You need to randomly sample the population.
They don't want to fund that study...it will undermine all their other funding (brought to you by Pfizer)!
BREAKING: Two FOIs Prove That There Were Batches of Pfizer Vaccine That Had Killed People and Should Have Failed the Batch Analysis
But they kept jabbing
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/breaking-two-fois-prove-that-there
Dr. Yeadon Warns: So-Called “COVID Vaccines” Are Toxic by Design
"I heartily recommend you take seriously the warning I’m issuing."
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-yeadon-warns-so-called-covid-vaccines
Great work...it seems very labor intensive and merits a double thank you! It would be interesting to see data sets relating to increases of cancers, heart problems, etc. among the vaccinated/unvaccinated and death rate comparatives in 20 -30 year olds pre and post pandemic ..
It seems that everywhere I turn (at work, my gym, family gatherings, etc.) I learn of people who have had re-occurrences of cancers that were in remission and/or heart problems that are worsening. I spoke with a client of mine (we never discuss politics) who runs a funeral home and he advised that he and his staff have noticed a disturbing increase in the deaths of young people, i.e. 20s and 30s. Anyway- thanks again- your labors are much appreciated.
I keep running those numbers and the pale into insignificance against the "COVID" deaths. Either they are being miscategorised (and Ethical Skeptic has shown this is quite probable) or my hypothesis is that vax-induced COVID is responsible. Any which path you take, they all lead back to the same place eventually so does it really matter?
I wonder if they have seen clots like they are talking about?
They don’t want to know the truth. The truth has no bearing on their goals. If we are faced with that simple piece of data, maybe our response to all of this should change accordingly. Determine the actual goals. Find ways to defeat those since we can assume those goals are not to our benefit, given they’ve proven they have no interest in the truth of whether their shots are effective or not. Safe or not. Since they are deliberately not looking. Hanging on to proving the things aren’t safe or effective is, perhaps, an indication of some cognitive train wrecks that are still struggling to believe in the malfeasance of our governments. We need to get over those internal dissonances since the realities of the possible goals are going to make these shot things look like pancakes for breakfast.
Well, the good thing is that we don't need them top conduct this survey. I suggested they should knowing full well they never would, adding more evidence for us to condemn them. Anyone can run this survey. Eventually, I'll crowdsource this.
I think the masses will be unpersuaded by the word, survey. It is not “scientifically reliable.” They will say people can’t be trusted answering truthfully. Of course this defies common sense, particularly if you randomly select 12 different groups of 1,250.
I would love to get the survey results merely for seeing how closely they compare to what we are being told by our health agencies.
Your surveys will begin to generate overlap where people will be taking the survey a second time unless you screen for previous respondents.
25,000 random out of 18 million. I ran the simulation many times. Never had more than one duplicate. Can't have duplicates in the deaths if you randomly select 25,000 deaths in one go.
Ok. I didn't know the denominator.
Or maybe you should run the numbers before you open your mouth! Are you a ignorant Troll or just a Grifter?
Cry harder.
The fraud is already obvious.
Was this survey conducted and are those the results published above? I believe you, as I have seen someone else discuss this method, also. I am only asking, because I didn't see a link to the survey data and how it was obtained. Thank you for all of your great articles.
Not yet! I have simulated the surveys to prove that the results would be reliable. It's up to the powers that be or someone with sufficient reach and resources to actually conduct them now.
Kirsch could have resources as well as motivation. Did You approach him with the idea? If i got You correctly, Your approach would be the application of Prof' Fenton's revelation of fake government estimates of the % of vaccinated
Thanks to Joel’s patience with me, I went back and read this article a second time. I agree with his subtitle that this is his most important article ever.
Hi Joel,
I tried forwarding an email to your Gmail account but got bounceback it was deleted.
Is there anyway you can rebut this? https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/628165
I believe you have signed this petition?
Thank you
Yeah, simple. Get them to do my survey. If it really meets their standards of safety and effectiveness, it will be clear in the data as I have explained.
And yet we have people like Ron Unz who still think that the jabs are not to blame:
https://www.unz.com/runz/vaxxing-deaths-or-covid-deaths/