24 Comments

It would be interesting to have data for the excess Remdesivir and Midazolam doses injected during those periods....

Expand full comment

Are you saying only 2k out of 18k MCOD=U07.1 deaths were actually excess deaths?

Do you happen to have UK data on COVID deaths in pregnancy (O98.5+U07.1)? I'd love to see if the same thing I am observing in Germany and the USA happened in the UK as well. Well, In Germany it's just ICU cases with O98.5 - no deaths - but in the US quite a lot of women started dying "of COVID" in 2021. https://vigilance.pervaers.com/p/maternal-deaths-covid-shots-acog

Expand full comment
author
Nov 21, 2023·edited Nov 21, 2023Author

No, I'm saying 18k out of 37k were potentially "COVID". Only 148 are definite "COVID". I haven't done any real work on COD.

Expand full comment

Oh ok, thank you for clearing that up.

Expand full comment

PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))

❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞

https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/protocol-x-preparing-for-power-sars

Expand full comment

Oh and btw, we shouldn't overestimate pull-forward effects.

It really only applies to "vulnerable people" dying. Those who would've soon died anyway.

I am not so sure that's what really happened. We invested quite a lot of energy into killing people after all. Not all of them were just waiting for death.

You could kill a million Scotsmen in a day without seeing any subsequent deficit in mortality per 100k.

Expand full comment
author

Yes, I agree. Still mystified how Ethical Skeptic is so certain about PFE. In reality, you can't know for sure until after the event!

Expand full comment

Well, there are a bunch of peer-reviewed articles on the topic, maybe he is applying one of the methods outlined in those? I briefly considered doing that, but the way I see it messing with the data in such a way is only gonna increase uncertainty and surely won't convince sceptics.

The trend-correction I am applying to isolate cancer and infant mortality signals is already quite questionable...

Expand full comment
author

It's simply not possible except retrospectively. And even then it is potentially obfuscated by new excess.

Expand full comment

So was there a deadly pandemic with safe and effective treatments in December 1989 because I can see a spike!!!!

And only 148 people over 60 died only of Covid?

And I see that Patrick Vallance is busy telling everyone they should never "follow the science" because there is no settled science. Well, if only he'd mentioned that during the pandemic!

Someone needs to kidnap Lady Hallett and force her to read this stuff and keep explaining it to her until she understands because the people she's talking to are not suggesting anything was wrong with anything they all did apart from Boris Johnson who they are going to pin everything onto.

Expand full comment
author

It would take a very long time. And yes, if you read my other article, I allude to the fact that I'm not sure there is anything such as a "bad flu". I think it's something else and not naturally biological.

Expand full comment

Agreed. And Chris Whitty coming over all contrite saying he made a mistake by not pushing for an earlier lockdown in 2020! Are these people for real?

Expand full comment
author

The only benefit of locking down sooner is that clever people wouldn't be able to prove that the curves were all ready on the way down before any interventions could have taken effect and that their course was not altered. That must be their biggest regret.

Expand full comment

True. They can't be so stupid they don't see that. Which means they truly are nothing more than cowardly, barefaced liars. The whole lot of them that stood at the podiums solemnly addressing the nation daily in 2020. And same for the medical establishment that continues to perpetuate the lies.

Expand full comment

_____________________________________________________________________________________

In the shadow of war: Ukraine as the great reset laboratory of the global tech elite . . .

https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/135302021/in-the-shadow-of-war-ukraine-as-the-great-reset-laboratory-of-the-global-tech-elite

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Expand full comment

Yes the vaccines had no effect on saving lives but your numbers are crude deaths, no even population adjusted let alone age adjusted.

When population and age adjusted even 2020 has the same deaths as 2008.

https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/deaths-england-and-wales-2020-2022

Expand full comment

Socrates would be banned if he was alive today. Still, as we celebrate Thanksgiving, I'm thankful the Socratic Method did spread for a couple thousand years.

https://billricejr.substack.com/p/if-he-were-alive-today-socrates-would?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

Expand full comment

I guess you saw this, Joel. A bit confusing, not quite sure who organises this kind of presentations.

But quite damning for the EMA.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzs5RiD7QRU&ab_channel=MarceldeGraaff

Expand full comment

There's a corrected typo in my opening para that isn't being picked up by the quote insert - the second ICD10 code should be U07 2!

Expand full comment