Dr Tegnell, how do you justify fast-tracked coronavirus vaccination in Sweden, based on mortality figures for COVID-19?
According to Statista[5], as of 17 December 2020, 7,893 deaths have been attributed to COVID-19 over the past nearly 10 months. 5,465 of these deaths were in people aged over 80 years, including 2,150 over 90 years. 1,654 deaths were in the 70-79 year age group, making a total 7,119 deaths in people aged over 70 years. 494 deaths in the age group 60- 69 years. 185 deaths in the age group 50-59 years. And 95 deaths in the age group 0-49 years.
This is in a population of around 10.4 million[6], with expected annual deaths of around 90 odd thousand[7]. Deaths attributed to COVID-19, mainly in elderly people with comorbidities, have to be seen in this context.
According to EUROMOMO, Sweden currently has 'low excess deaths'[8], and the number of deaths in Sweden reported by Statista as of 11 December 2020 (89,491)[7] does not look on track to excessively exceed the numbers of other years. Even if it does eventuate there are a few thousand extra deaths due to this coronavirus, does this justify actions that will impact on the entire population for years to come, i.e. the implementation of annual, and possibly even more frequent, coronavirus vaccination?
Dr Tegnell, given most of the deaths attributed to COVID-19 in Sweden are in people aged over 70 years, is it appropriate and ethical to implement experimental, fast-tracked vaccine products for the Swedish population?
Who ARE these ‘doctors’ and ‘professors’ to be demanding people submit to vaccination against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people?
This is the most appalling situation, as literally billions of people around the world have been tricked into these medical interventions, without valid consent.
In this regard, see my formal complaint about the Chief Medical Officer in Australia, Paul Kelly, who violated voluntary informed consent by capitulating to then prime minister Scott Morrison’s and National Cabinet’s demand that aged care workers be subject to mandatory vaccination to maintain their livelihood.
This violation of voluntary informed consent for one group set the precedent, and a cascade of vaccination mandates followed, impacting on millions of people in Australia.
Yes, real experts like John Iaonnidis at Stanford predicted from the outset that the survival rate from SC-2 would be in the order of 99.7% overall and 99.95% for the cohort below age 70. This turned out to be accurate although Dr Iaonnidid was, of course, "cancelled" abused and censored.
The issue from the outset was the Risk/Benefit analysis, which was never done. That became even more egregious when it came to recommendation to vaccinate pregat women and young adults, children and babies..
This was a shocking assault on humanity and we truly need to keep pursuing it until we get answers and, hopefully, accountability.
I have no idea, you did the right thing in asking him because only he knows. But very few got it all right and that wasn't my point. He DID get it right, very early on, regarding the real IFR. Which is what an Epidemiologist is supposed to do?
As for epidemiologists, and the rest of the parasites who hang around in universities exerting control over our lives, I very much want to see the back of them.
This entire thing was a beat-up, a pandemic of testing to implement what they really wanted, which was digital ID, a social credit system, and people being lined up to be exploited with medical interventions on demand of puppet governments.
Elizabeth - I have just had a look at the PDF of your email about Australian Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly’s violation of the Nuremberg principle of ‘informed consent’ – well done! I hope that one day he and the other key players in Australia who had a hand in mandating the experimental mRNA genetic injectables end up serving substantial prison terms for what they have done.
Morrison was an accidental ‘default’ prime minister who was clearly unsuited for such a national leadership position. He repeatedly showed wretchedly poor political judgement. His term as PM was marked by political and managerial incompetence and this was especially so with regard to the response to Covid - a response that has ended up destroying the health of so many Australians who were lied to and dragooned into accepting the inadequately tested mRNA injectables as a ‘magic elixir’ – falsely asserted to be ‘Safe & Effective’. One of my best friends – a former colleague – mysteriously died of heart failure a couple of weeks after getting ‘jabbed’. He did not have a history of cardiac disease.
One characteristic of Scott Morrison that quickly became clear to his Labor opponents was his proclivity for shallow knee-jerk decision-making, combined with a fixation on following every twist and turn of the opinion polls and focus groups. Because of this he became the unwitting puppet of the Labor Opposition, who took on the role of puppet masters. They were able to play him politically like a fiddle. Because Morrison’s understanding of even very basic science was zero, he thus became susceptible to the deeply flawed advice of an equally ignorant ‘Yes Minister’ bureaucracy. That’s what happens when a politician has no underlying principles and is obsessed with chasing ephemeral opinion polls.
Morrison’s ejection of Craig Kelly MP from the government party (and effectively from the parliament) shows how really dumb Morrison was as a politician. He preferred the deeply flawed ‘advice’ of a self-serving and largely incompetent bureaucracy over that of one of his own people who had carried out the deep research that the bureaucrats had failed to do.
The political legacy of Scott Morrison is that he left the Liberal Party of R G Menzies in a ruined state – possibly mortally wounded - in addition to the tens of thousands of innocent Australians who now suffer seriously degraded long-term health because of the experimental injectables - as the ‘mysterious’ unexplained excess death rates are now showing. Australia is such a poorly governed country - a pox on all their houses!
Scott Morrison is deeply mired in coercive vaccination policy. He was Social Services Minister in 2015 and was responsible for raising the No Jab, No Pay bill which became the No Jab, No Pay law for coercive vaccination of children in 2016. This was at the behest of the Murdoch empire, with News Corp being a corporate partner with the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute which is involved in vaccine research. Murdoch media ran the No Jab, No Play vaccine campaign for children in its tabloids between 2013-2015, and of course compliant politicians were eager to satisfy the wishes of Murdoch. The ‘No Jab’ concept came to the fore during the Covid response with No Jab, No Job; No Jab, No Travel; No Jab, No Restaurant/Pub; No Jab, No Sport…No Jab, No Life…
In regard to No Jab, No Pay for children, re tax benefits, of course many support vaccination of children, but children are given so many vaccines now, they’re being exploited with the over-use of these medical products, coming to a head now with Covid jabs.
For more background see my email to Scott Morrison in February 2021:
It’s interesting that the Scottish Daily Express has reported that “Nicola Sturgeon is being criminally investigated by homicide police for over 5,500 deaths in care homes during Covid. This would be Scotland’s largest-ever mass-death investigation in its history.”
Did you watch Dr.Crofts testimony past 2 days ? Media hit pieces initiated from day-1. Judge was entirely biased towards jab and even tried to put words in Dr.Crofts mouth. Stunning ! Full vids on official youtube. Full report worth a read.
Upon reviewing the gold standard RCT Cochrane peer reviewed data. The highest level evidence for the Astrazeneca viral vector 'vaccine.'
Dr Croft said:
''You cannot say using this vaccine prevents deaths.''
You did well if you listened to all the inquiry evidence (6 hours on Day 1). I’ve listened to the first hour (while watching golf on the telly) and they still haven’t got beyond examining Dr Ashley Croft’s medical credentials.
The good old Scottish Daily Express saves me the trouble by reporting that his evidence “suggests there was 'insufficient or no evidence' to suggest that lockdowns, social distancing and face masks had any impact on slowing the spread of the virus”.
The limited MSM coverage elsewhere only sought to disparage Dr Ashley, as did the senior council of the Inquiry. This Scottish inquiry is obviously going to be as useless as the London inquiry.
Yes, takes over an hour before they actually start digesting the findings. Joke really. Day-2 is barely even worth watching. The main judge that does most of the talking is NOT impartial when it comes to the vax findings and of course he actually says the vaccine deaths/damage must be co-incidence as MHRA says so. Stunning ! He defends the fake vax on multiple occasions ! They are only setting us up for the next scamdemic. Lockdown harder and faster etc ! See you in the re-education facility ?!
biologyphenom, re the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, was this the one that got the ball rolling?
See my email to Andrew Pollard, the Chief Investigator on the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine trials…he’s also the Chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), i.e. massive conflict of interest…
Excellent email Elizabeth. I have sent similar. It's like they are under a spell. I'm sure Pfizer was the main injection from Dec 2020 then later came Astrazeneca.
The mRNA RCT's all show 'no effect' on lowering mortality rates.
Thank you. I have family in Scotland, Perthshire. Whilst my great aunt was I think 90 years old when she died last year, I wonder if she had the vaxxes and these made her go down hill rapidly.
At the moment collective amnesia appears to have set in, and people have blocked out the tyrannical behaviour of ‘health/medical’ officers and politicians who insisted people be jabbed, or excluded from society.
No Jab, No Job to No Jab, No Life.
Ironically it was the supposedly vulnerable, the elderly, who were most safe from mandates because they weren’t of working age, but grim times for them if they were incarcerated in aged care with all the terrorising about ‘the virus’.
This is the biggest scam of all time, with ginormous social, economic and political damage, the perpetrators must be brought to account.
Finally you have Senator Gerald Rennick in Aus who woke up but from reading recently it appears the average citizen is still sleepwalking into oblivion ... less so in Uk they’re a tad more vociferous but sadly in Spain the new ‘medical science’ 🤣🤣 seems to be to persuade peasants that wearing masks in 40° is still beneficial🙄🤬 in the elderly (presumably deaf and partially sighted ones though no white sticks). Currently pondering is why the WHO aren’t suggesting routine placebos of daily dehydration regimes...... 🤦♀️
As a medical layman who has spent decades refuting the climate change hoax, in which I have BSc (engineering) competence, it is obvious to me that all the evidence points to the Coronavirus debacle also being a globally coordinated hoax, a “plandemic”, with heinous global depopulation and enslavement ulterior motives.
That's a great question. The other related question, which I think might be a productive way of getting to the heart of what was clearly a global conspiracy, is "Why was Sweden able to resist the global pressure to conform to the Globalist agenda?". I suspect these two questions are closely related.
The answer to the first question regarding vaccination is probably, I suspect, that the Globalist pressure on Sweden was too much to resist, especally after all the Swedish "dissent" and independent methodology.. The second question is unanswered and is, I suspect, the most realistic way of getting to the truth. Other countries are never going to admit their complicity in a global conspiracy.
Re "Why was Sweden able to resist the global pressure to conform to the Globalist agenda?"
It was deliberately planned that way so as to have a control group for the wise to discern the truth.
As regards medical ethics these were suspended so the Great Vaccine Experiment could take place to prove once and for all that vaccines do not and have never ever been good for health.
I’m actually amazed that the jab didn’t seem to have the impact that it had everywhere else. A hypothesis is that actual immunity was achieved ahead of the jab, therefore negating the detrimental effects.
They were mad for the vaccine however, I can see the first two shots in the death stats. My Mum's Swedish cousin verbally attacked me on Facebook for spreading "fucking misinformation". They may not have locked down, but they stopped critically thinking shortly after. They also killed a lot of people in care homes by withdrawing sunshine and family.
My Swedish stepfather had a complete heart failure (“doctors are baffled”) despite being completely healthy previously a couple of months after his jabs. He’s still alive though, thank goodness.
How terrible. Similarly I had a friend in her late 60s and her son in his early thirties getting myocarditis, again doctors completely baffled. My Mum swears blind her oncologist is marvellous though, I tried explaining to he that they probably feel a little bit guilty!!!!
Oncologists as bad as the rest if they promote big pharma drugs. They did to me in early 2020. I took them until I worked out what was really wrong with me, no thanks to the useless doctors.
'logic not so' is an anagram of oncologist which says it all for me.
Facebook is spyware and full of morons/normies. I deleted mine years ago.
If you are staying on there probably best to avoid anything remotely political/controversial or you'll get responses and interactions like you mentioned.
Well no one has defriended me, some ask questions of what I post, some verbally attack me, however my kids (25 yo twins) know where to find the latest good science. I also explain bio ethics to my friends and family, why it's vital not to trust your government. I am also moderator of a group with 4k of us. We can't post anything, or rather 3 posts go out a month, the link to whatever has to go in as a comment to bypass the censorship. It was something, 4k of us working through the lies together, I stay because of important connections made with likeminded folk. I'm the only anti-vaxxer in my village.
There is a systemic incentive to continue with their lies and we have created no real disincentives. A few limited hangouts kept the narrative core intact. There is more skepticism but we have yet to reach a critical mass, and we may never reach it at this rate. There is nobody going to prison.
Jul 29, 2023·edited Jul 29, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley
Thank you for reporting.
re: "lame-stream" media. Oh, you mean "lame-stream-shilling-murderous-shale media partners"?
For readers who have not seen it, this is the list of US media that took money from the US government for "We Can Do This" the COVID-19 Public Education Campaign, "An initiative to increase confidence in COVID-19 vaccines and reinforce basic prevention measures."
Jul 29, 2023·edited Jul 29, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley
It is still quite astounding to me why so many people who supposedly "get it" still believe in governance. There should have been no "response" from any "authority" or "architect" for any "strategy" on Covid, no diktats. Certainly nothing that was coercive or involuntary. It is a slave mentality to believe that any "authority" has the right or even capability to make decisions for you. Sure, "experts" can put out whatever opinions they choose but I am not obliged to even listen, let alone obey. Even supposedly "red pilled" folks are happy to be willingly subservient to institutions of authority, they just want the "authority" to be someone they agree with, such as Dr Tegnell, etc.
Also, all of the "good guys" like Jay Bhattacharya, etc who advocated locking down/protecting the elderly, via the "Great Barrington Declaration", for their safety were pushing authoritarianism. These people are not remotely pro liberty.
You're conflating organisation/hierarchy with the tyranny of governance, which are 2 different things. The latter being involuntary and enforced under threat of violence. Sure, humans will organise into or form hierarchies but that isn't a problem, provided it is voluntary association.
I can't blame you because this response is a programmed defacto defense of governance/the status quo. It is pretty common and folks barely realise that is what they are doing. Unfortunately it is not logically consistent and it certainly is not moral. Humans have voluntarily associated and organised, free of coercion, from the beginning. It isn't some utopianist impossible concept. Both you and I do it on a daily basis.
Quite a feat to programme people to the degree that they believe humans cannot function without a ruling class diktating under threat of violence. It is actually incredible, when you think about it but as with Covid1984, most people do not think.
Hierarchies should support the masses of the people like an arch supports a building. This is why hierarchies are hier-arch-ies of course.
An anagram is 'I hire arches '. It perhaps should be 'we hire arches' but in any event we hire government to act on our behalf, not the other way round of course.
They will never admit any mistakes were made because a) the response was orchestrated from the outset and they know that if one country "cracks" it's game over for all b) they are concerned about responsibility and accountability c) they areconcerned that an acknowledged failure of the Covid vaccines will result in a general loss of confidence in ALL vaccines and d) they are scared that if the sheep begin to understand that they were systematically lied to throughot whilst their immune systems were being destroyed, they might get "slightly pissed off" and demand answers and apologies. At leasst.
Particularly when you consider they reelected that schmuck despite the worst economic outcome, worst deaths per capita in Australia despite the longest lockdowns and the police brutality inflicted on protesters.
Indeed, I recall that Tegnell told everyone to wait and come back in a few years before judging Sweden. And he was right. This has to be the most satisfying "I told you so!" in all of recorded history.
This suggests to me, at first sight, that vaccinations don't play a big role in excess death. But things aren't always as simple as they seem. I recall having read that people who were first infected (and note, by far not everyone gets ill) and then vaccinated were better protected against new variants than people who were first injected. Also, I read about the importance of the sequence of different vaccines ("live" vs "non-live") in children on all-cause death. I can therefore imagine that people who were infected before they were injected may overall have a better survival rate (less messed-up immune system? Less organ damage?).
I disagree with your headline. Sweden accepted that deaths would be inevitable before herd immunity would be built, if there was a pandemic. Those deaths were mainly localised to the elderly with weaker immunity. Lockdowns would simply slow the process down and not only burden the entire economy but put enormous pressures on the healthcare system while delaying natural immunity to build up. The only reason Sweden's deaths began increasing and continues to increase like all other fully vaccinated countries is because they went ahead to decide to vaccinate its population when there was no necessity for it.
Why did Sweden vaccinate?
I asked this question on 22 December 2020, i.e.
Dr Tegnell, how do you justify fast-tracked coronavirus vaccination in Sweden, based on mortality figures for COVID-19?
According to Statista[5], as of 17 December 2020, 7,893 deaths have been attributed to COVID-19 over the past nearly 10 months. 5,465 of these deaths were in people aged over 80 years, including 2,150 over 90 years. 1,654 deaths were in the 70-79 year age group, making a total 7,119 deaths in people aged over 70 years. 494 deaths in the age group 60- 69 years. 185 deaths in the age group 50-59 years. And 95 deaths in the age group 0-49 years.
This is in a population of around 10.4 million[6], with expected annual deaths of around 90 odd thousand[7]. Deaths attributed to COVID-19, mainly in elderly people with comorbidities, have to be seen in this context.
According to EUROMOMO, Sweden currently has 'low excess deaths'[8], and the number of deaths in Sweden reported by Statista as of 11 December 2020 (89,491)[7] does not look on track to excessively exceed the numbers of other years. Even if it does eventuate there are a few thousand extra deaths due to this coronavirus, does this justify actions that will impact on the entire population for years to come, i.e. the implementation of annual, and possibly even more frequent, coronavirus vaccination?
Dr Tegnell, given most of the deaths attributed to COVID-19 in Sweden are in people aged over 70 years, is it appropriate and ethical to implement experimental, fast-tracked vaccine products for the Swedish population?
See my full email to Anders Tegnell via this link: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/sweden-coronavirus-vaccination-ethical-considerations.pdf
Amazing. I wrote an almost identical email in early 2021. I got a reply more than a year later, nothing more than a hand wave and denial.
It’s diabolical…
Who ARE these ‘doctors’ and ‘professors’ to be demanding people submit to vaccination against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people?
This is the most appalling situation, as literally billions of people around the world have been tricked into these medical interventions, without valid consent.
In this regard, see my formal complaint about the Chief Medical Officer in Australia, Paul Kelly, who violated voluntary informed consent by capitulating to then prime minister Scott Morrison’s and National Cabinet’s demand that aged care workers be subject to mandatory vaccination to maintain their livelihood.
This violation of voluntary informed consent for one group set the precedent, and a cascade of vaccination mandates followed, impacting on millions of people in Australia.
See the detail here: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2023/06/notification-to-ahpra-re-medical-practitioner-paul-kelly.pdf
Yes, real experts like John Iaonnidis at Stanford predicted from the outset that the survival rate from SC-2 would be in the order of 99.7% overall and 99.95% for the cohort below age 70. This turned out to be accurate although Dr Iaonnidid was, of course, "cancelled" abused and censored.
The issue from the outset was the Risk/Benefit analysis, which was never done. That became even more egregious when it came to recommendation to vaccinate pregat women and young adults, children and babies..
This was a shocking assault on humanity and we truly need to keep pursuing it until we get answers and, hopefully, accountability.
John Ioannidis…hmmmm…
Why did this man push vaccination?
See my emails to him:
John Ioannidis urges Australia to "push for vaccination very fast..." Why? September 2021: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/john-ioannidis-urges-australia-to-_push-for-vaccination-very-fast..._-why_.pdf
COVID-19 vaccination in Australia and John Ioannidis' advice, October 2021: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/10/covid-19-vaccination-in-australia-and-john-ioannidis-advice-1.pdf
I have no idea, you did the right thing in asking him because only he knows. But very few got it all right and that wasn't my point. He DID get it right, very early on, regarding the real IFR. Which is what an Epidemiologist is supposed to do?
And then he pushed the jabs…
As for epidemiologists, and the rest of the parasites who hang around in universities exerting control over our lives, I very much want to see the back of them.
This entire thing was a beat-up, a pandemic of testing to implement what they really wanted, which was digital ID, a social credit system, and people being lined up to be exploited with medical interventions on demand of puppet governments.
Cancel John for it but then in late May 2020 the CDC admits it was 0.3% LMAO. Should we cancel the CDC? I'm in!
Elizabeth - I have just had a look at the PDF of your email about Australian Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly’s violation of the Nuremberg principle of ‘informed consent’ – well done! I hope that one day he and the other key players in Australia who had a hand in mandating the experimental mRNA genetic injectables end up serving substantial prison terms for what they have done.
Morrison was an accidental ‘default’ prime minister who was clearly unsuited for such a national leadership position. He repeatedly showed wretchedly poor political judgement. His term as PM was marked by political and managerial incompetence and this was especially so with regard to the response to Covid - a response that has ended up destroying the health of so many Australians who were lied to and dragooned into accepting the inadequately tested mRNA injectables as a ‘magic elixir’ – falsely asserted to be ‘Safe & Effective’. One of my best friends – a former colleague – mysteriously died of heart failure a couple of weeks after getting ‘jabbed’. He did not have a history of cardiac disease.
One characteristic of Scott Morrison that quickly became clear to his Labor opponents was his proclivity for shallow knee-jerk decision-making, combined with a fixation on following every twist and turn of the opinion polls and focus groups. Because of this he became the unwitting puppet of the Labor Opposition, who took on the role of puppet masters. They were able to play him politically like a fiddle. Because Morrison’s understanding of even very basic science was zero, he thus became susceptible to the deeply flawed advice of an equally ignorant ‘Yes Minister’ bureaucracy. That’s what happens when a politician has no underlying principles and is obsessed with chasing ephemeral opinion polls.
Morrison’s ejection of Craig Kelly MP from the government party (and effectively from the parliament) shows how really dumb Morrison was as a politician. He preferred the deeply flawed ‘advice’ of a self-serving and largely incompetent bureaucracy over that of one of his own people who had carried out the deep research that the bureaucrats had failed to do.
The political legacy of Scott Morrison is that he left the Liberal Party of R G Menzies in a ruined state – possibly mortally wounded - in addition to the tens of thousands of innocent Australians who now suffer seriously degraded long-term health because of the experimental injectables - as the ‘mysterious’ unexplained excess death rates are now showing. Australia is such a poorly governed country - a pox on all their houses!
Thanks for your response Lapun.
Scott Morrison is deeply mired in coercive vaccination policy. He was Social Services Minister in 2015 and was responsible for raising the No Jab, No Pay bill which became the No Jab, No Pay law for coercive vaccination of children in 2016. This was at the behest of the Murdoch empire, with News Corp being a corporate partner with the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute which is involved in vaccine research. Murdoch media ran the No Jab, No Play vaccine campaign for children in its tabloids between 2013-2015, and of course compliant politicians were eager to satisfy the wishes of Murdoch. The ‘No Jab’ concept came to the fore during the Covid response with No Jab, No Job; No Jab, No Travel; No Jab, No Restaurant/Pub; No Jab, No Sport…No Jab, No Life…
In regard to No Jab, No Pay for children, re tax benefits, of course many support vaccination of children, but children are given so many vaccines now, they’re being exploited with the over-use of these medical products, coming to a head now with Covid jabs.
For more background see my email to Scott Morrison in February 2021:
No Jab, No Pay/No Play - coercive coronavirus vaccination in Australia - PM Scott Morrison and the Murdoch Media: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/no-jab-no-pay-no-play-coercive-vaccination-in-australia.pdf
Lots more on my website: https://vaccinationispolitical.net
Same in Scotland.
It’s interesting that the Scottish Daily Express has reported that “Nicola Sturgeon is being criminally investigated by homicide police for over 5,500 deaths in care homes during Covid. This would be Scotland’s largest-ever mass-death investigation in its history.”
I haven’t seen any other MSM mention of this.
https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/scottish-news/cold-case-homicide-cops-investigating-30506943.
Yeah for some reason SDE always publish stories much closer to the truth. Even covered the Scottish vaccine injured.
https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/scottish-news/scotlands-vaccine-injured-feel-abandoned-29951760
Did you watch Dr.Crofts testimony past 2 days ? Media hit pieces initiated from day-1. Judge was entirely biased towards jab and even tried to put words in Dr.Crofts mouth. Stunning ! Full vids on official youtube. Full report worth a read.
Upon reviewing the gold standard RCT Cochrane peer reviewed data. The highest level evidence for the Astrazeneca viral vector 'vaccine.'
Dr Croft said:
''You cannot say using this vaccine prevents deaths.''
Full report-
https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/hearings/epidemiology-presentation
You did well if you listened to all the inquiry evidence (6 hours on Day 1). I’ve listened to the first hour (while watching golf on the telly) and they still haven’t got beyond examining Dr Ashley Croft’s medical credentials.
The good old Scottish Daily Express saves me the trouble by reporting that his evidence “suggests there was 'insufficient or no evidence' to suggest that lockdowns, social distancing and face masks had any impact on slowing the spread of the virus”.
The limited MSM coverage elsewhere only sought to disparage Dr Ashley, as did the senior council of the Inquiry. This Scottish inquiry is obviously going to be as useless as the London inquiry.
https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/scottish-news/no-evidence-support-covid-lockdowns-30470038.
Yes, takes over an hour before they actually start digesting the findings. Joke really. Day-2 is barely even worth watching. The main judge that does most of the talking is NOT impartial when it comes to the vax findings and of course he actually says the vaccine deaths/damage must be co-incidence as MHRA says so. Stunning ! He defends the fake vax on multiple occasions ! They are only setting us up for the next scamdemic. Lockdown harder and faster etc ! See you in the re-education facility ?!
biologyphenom, re the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, was this the one that got the ball rolling?
See my email to Andrew Pollard, the Chief Investigator on the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine trials…he’s also the Chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), i.e. massive conflict of interest…
Who initiated the plan to vaccinate the entire global population against SARS- CoV-2? https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/who-initiated-the-plan-to-vaccinate-the-entire-global-population-against-sars-cov-2.pdf
Excellent email Elizabeth. I have sent similar. It's like they are under a spell. I'm sure Pfizer was the main injection from Dec 2020 then later came Astrazeneca.
The mRNA RCT's all show 'no effect' on lowering mortality rates.
Well done. Andrew Pollard should be pollarded.
Anything involving Nicola Sturgeon sound fishy for obvious reasons.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/save-the-sturgeon-in-the-uk-an-endangered
Brilliant!
Thank you. I have family in Scotland, Perthshire. Whilst my great aunt was I think 90 years old when she died last year, I wonder if she had the vaxxes and these made her go down hill rapidly.
Hey Joe. Is there a way to communicate with you non publicly? You ought to have my email address via subscription?
I liked your recent post on What Happened to Medical Ethics during the Pandemic? https://dailysceptic.org/2023/07/27/what-happened-to-medical-ethics-during-the-pandemic/.
Thanks Douglas.
The situation in Australia is so dire…
At the moment collective amnesia appears to have set in, and people have blocked out the tyrannical behaviour of ‘health/medical’ officers and politicians who insisted people be jabbed, or excluded from society.
No Jab, No Job to No Jab, No Life.
Ironically it was the supposedly vulnerable, the elderly, who were most safe from mandates because they weren’t of working age, but grim times for them if they were incarcerated in aged care with all the terrorising about ‘the virus’.
This is the biggest scam of all time, with ginormous social, economic and political damage, the perpetrators must be brought to account.
Finally you have Senator Gerald Rennick in Aus who woke up but from reading recently it appears the average citizen is still sleepwalking into oblivion ... less so in Uk they’re a tad more vociferous but sadly in Spain the new ‘medical science’ 🤣🤣 seems to be to persuade peasants that wearing masks in 40° is still beneficial🙄🤬 in the elderly (presumably deaf and partially sighted ones though no white sticks). Currently pondering is why the WHO aren’t suggesting routine placebos of daily dehydration regimes...... 🤦♀️
Senator Rennick has lost his preselection and will not stand for re-election.
He still has a platform - at least try and be positive 🤦♀️
Shame on those dozey bunch of sheep shearers
What, cure people with water, whatever next?? :)
I asked myself regarding paracetamol if it wasn't the glass of water one would normally take with a pill that does the trick.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/paracetamol-branded-as-tylenol-calpol
I go for the water.
As a medical layman who has spent decades refuting the climate change hoax, in which I have BSc (engineering) competence, it is obvious to me that all the evidence points to the Coronavirus debacle also being a globally coordinated hoax, a “plandemic”, with heinous global depopulation and enslavement ulterior motives.
To my mind, nobody has managed to refute the evidence presented at Dr Reiner Fuellmich’s Covid Crimes Against Humanity grand jury model proceedings. I have summarised his trial evidence here: https://metatron.substack.com/p/reiner-fuellmichs-grand-jury-court.
1,000%
He must be trolling given he voted for lockdown TWICE second time into permanent law when harms and lack of efficacy vs 'the virus' were then known.
https://twitter.com/JohnMasonMSP/status/1685043807241293825
That's a great question. The other related question, which I think might be a productive way of getting to the heart of what was clearly a global conspiracy, is "Why was Sweden able to resist the global pressure to conform to the Globalist agenda?". I suspect these two questions are closely related.
The answer to the first question regarding vaccination is probably, I suspect, that the Globalist pressure on Sweden was too much to resist, especally after all the Swedish "dissent" and independent methodology.. The second question is unanswered and is, I suspect, the most realistic way of getting to the truth. Other countries are never going to admit their complicity in a global conspiracy.
Re "Why was Sweden able to resist the global pressure to conform to the Globalist agenda?"
It was deliberately planned that way so as to have a control group for the wise to discern the truth.
As regards medical ethics these were suspended so the Great Vaccine Experiment could take place to prove once and for all that vaccines do not and have never ever been good for health.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/why-vaccines-do-not-work-in-a-nutshell
I’m actually amazed that the jab didn’t seem to have the impact that it had everywhere else. A hypothesis is that actual immunity was achieved ahead of the jab, therefore negating the detrimental effects.
Why does anyone grant Tegnell, or anyone else you don't know, authority to make such decisions or diktats?
This whole thing happened because some folks decided to tell some other folks what to do and those other folks obeyed/complied.
At least you've worked out that Tegnell is not the good guy.
If Anders and Johan had turned away the jabs, the gap would be even bigger.
And if they hadn't sentenced their care home residents to death, a mistake that they admitted to very early on?
They were mad for the vaccine however, I can see the first two shots in the death stats. My Mum's Swedish cousin verbally attacked me on Facebook for spreading "fucking misinformation". They may not have locked down, but they stopped critically thinking shortly after. They also killed a lot of people in care homes by withdrawing sunshine and family.
My Swedish stepfather had a complete heart failure (“doctors are baffled”) despite being completely healthy previously a couple of months after his jabs. He’s still alive though, thank goodness.
My Mum is half Swedish, they seem more trusting than most to me...
How terrible. Similarly I had a friend in her late 60s and her son in his early thirties getting myocarditis, again doctors completely baffled. My Mum swears blind her oncologist is marvellous though, I tried explaining to he that they probably feel a little bit guilty!!!!
Oncologists as bad as the rest if they promote big pharma drugs. They did to me in early 2020. I took them until I worked out what was really wrong with me, no thanks to the useless doctors.
'logic not so' is an anagram of oncologist which says it all for me.
Chemotherapy is such a blunt tool, and a cash cow for big pharma.
Facebook is spyware and full of morons/normies. I deleted mine years ago.
If you are staying on there probably best to avoid anything remotely political/controversial or you'll get responses and interactions like you mentioned.
Well no one has defriended me, some ask questions of what I post, some verbally attack me, however my kids (25 yo twins) know where to find the latest good science. I also explain bio ethics to my friends and family, why it's vital not to trust your government. I am also moderator of a group with 4k of us. We can't post anything, or rather 3 posts go out a month, the link to whatever has to go in as a comment to bypass the censorship. It was something, 4k of us working through the lies together, I stay because of important connections made with likeminded folk. I'm the only anti-vaxxer in my village.
Exactly. Much like the UK care homes. Disgusting.
NB- North Korea eliminated 'COVID' with no vax-only tea and salt water protocols.
''An elderly resident said she was "first scared by Covid," but it turned out to be "not a big deal" after following doctors' advice.''
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/north-korea-tells-citizens-gargle-052817650.html
You should read this report Joel.
https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/20937/2023-07-25-teenpreg-report.pdf
i also urge all to watch and share this - Frightening !
https://twitter.com/CCCAlliance/status/1684594283330908161
Good luck everyone out there !!
There is a systemic incentive to continue with their lies and we have created no real disincentives. A few limited hangouts kept the narrative core intact. There is more skepticism but we have yet to reach a critical mass, and we may never reach it at this rate. There is nobody going to prison.
Thank you for reporting.
re: "lame-stream" media. Oh, you mean "lame-stream-shilling-murderous-shale media partners"?
For readers who have not seen it, this is the list of US media that took money from the US government for "We Can Do This" the COVID-19 Public Education Campaign, "An initiative to increase confidence in COVID-19 vaccines and reinforce basic prevention measures."
https://wecandothis.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Paid%20Media%20List%20for%20Posting%207.12.22_508c.pdf
$50M media tax breaks in NZ alone for media to survive C-19 eg: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/300279296/covid19-the-government-media-bailout--who-got-what
Similar for Australia: https://www.adnews.com.au/news/a-pandemic-relief-package-for-australian-media
I wonder why they always seemed to support the government...
It is still quite astounding to me why so many people who supposedly "get it" still believe in governance. There should have been no "response" from any "authority" or "architect" for any "strategy" on Covid, no diktats. Certainly nothing that was coercive or involuntary. It is a slave mentality to believe that any "authority" has the right or even capability to make decisions for you. Sure, "experts" can put out whatever opinions they choose but I am not obliged to even listen, let alone obey. Even supposedly "red pilled" folks are happy to be willingly subservient to institutions of authority, they just want the "authority" to be someone they agree with, such as Dr Tegnell, etc.
Also, all of the "good guys" like Jay Bhattacharya, etc who advocated locking down/protecting the elderly, via the "Great Barrington Declaration", for their safety were pushing authoritarianism. These people are not remotely pro liberty.
No ruler, no throne.
Whilst I agree that I personally do not appreciate nor want to be told what to do, hierarchies are here to stay. Most people feel comfortable in them.
You're conflating organisation/hierarchy with the tyranny of governance, which are 2 different things. The latter being involuntary and enforced under threat of violence. Sure, humans will organise into or form hierarchies but that isn't a problem, provided it is voluntary association.
I can't blame you because this response is a programmed defacto defense of governance/the status quo. It is pretty common and folks barely realise that is what they are doing. Unfortunately it is not logically consistent and it certainly is not moral. Humans have voluntarily associated and organised, free of coercion, from the beginning. It isn't some utopianist impossible concept. Both you and I do it on a daily basis.
Quite a feat to programme people to the degree that they believe humans cannot function without a ruling class diktating under threat of violence. It is actually incredible, when you think about it but as with Covid1984, most people do not think.
Well said.
Hierarchies should support the masses of the people like an arch supports a building. This is why hierarchies are hier-arch-ies of course.
An anagram is 'I hire arches '. It perhaps should be 'we hire arches' but in any event we hire government to act on our behalf, not the other way round of course.
They will never admit any mistakes were made because a) the response was orchestrated from the outset and they know that if one country "cracks" it's game over for all b) they are concerned about responsibility and accountability c) they areconcerned that an acknowledged failure of the Covid vaccines will result in a general loss of confidence in ALL vaccines and d) they are scared that if the sheep begin to understand that they were systematically lied to throughot whilst their immune systems were being destroyed, they might get "slightly pissed off" and demand answers and apologies. At leasst.
Another email to Pollard, biologyphenom, sent in August 2021…
Why are people not at risk of covid-19 being pressed to have covid-19 injections?
https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/08/why-are-people-not-at-risk-of-covid-19-being-pressed-to-have-covid-19-injections.pdf
And Imagine how skewed the results would have been if they had properly protected the elderly during the first wave.
Indeed, "Stockholm Syndrome" should really be called "Melbourne Syndrome", because #SwedenGotItRight.
Particularly when you consider they reelected that schmuck despite the worst economic outcome, worst deaths per capita in Australia despite the longest lockdowns and the police brutality inflicted on protesters.
ffs
Indeed, I recall that Tegnell told everyone to wait and come back in a few years before judging Sweden. And he was right. This has to be the most satisfying "I told you so!" in all of recorded history.
This suggests to me, at first sight, that vaccinations don't play a big role in excess death. But things aren't always as simple as they seem. I recall having read that people who were first infected (and note, by far not everyone gets ill) and then vaccinated were better protected against new variants than people who were first injected. Also, I read about the importance of the sequence of different vaccines ("live" vs "non-live") in children on all-cause death. I can therefore imagine that people who were infected before they were injected may overall have a better survival rate (less messed-up immune system? Less organ damage?).
You will appreciate the next in the series then?! https://metatron.substack.com/p/is-there-no-end-in-sight-to-the-slaughter
Wow, thanks! :-)
No, that is not the case. Being poisoned/diseased does nothing but weaken you. COVID 19 is the 'flu re-branded and the 'flu is misunderstood.
The variants are merely made up names to fool the unwary.
Vaccines are poisons/foreign bodies pure and simple and merely add to disease. It is very simple.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/why-vaccines-do-not-work-in-a-nutshell
I think the “experts” are just trying to get everyone to forget about everything covid related.
I disagree with your headline. Sweden accepted that deaths would be inevitable before herd immunity would be built, if there was a pandemic. Those deaths were mainly localised to the elderly with weaker immunity. Lockdowns would simply slow the process down and not only burden the entire economy but put enormous pressures on the healthcare system while delaying natural immunity to build up. The only reason Sweden's deaths began increasing and continues to increase like all other fully vaccinated countries is because they went ahead to decide to vaccinate its population when there was no necessity for it.
Not my headline...
Sorry. THE headline...
That is all reasonable except there is no such thing as herd immunity. We are are each individual with individual immune systems in varying states.
We may have similar diets etc. but we cannot acquire immunity by so-called infection with a supposed virus, it is a false premise.
We build up our own immune systems by eating, drinking, breathing, exercising and sleeping well among other things.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/h-is-for-herd-immunity/