Once again, we have the vaccine effect. As if care homes were not targeted enough in 2020, January 2021 gave us a preview of what was in store more generally. In that month, weekly care home deaths suddenly leapt by 70% over December levels. This, of course, follows their targeting by vaccines in December.
Patterns of excess death by age group again show the same thing - excess deaths ramping up or accelerating only after the respective groups are targeted.
As shown, the only exception appears to be the highest age group - I guess there just are not enough survivors to get the total numbers up. Really, you have to be impressed by the way the government has relentlessly sought to ensure that there are no witnesses to how the elderly have been brutally put down as a matter of policy.
Of course, under normal circumstances, a major health crisis would be declared with so many younger age groups showing sharp increases in excess deaths. The fact that this catastrophe isn't even mentioned or acknowledged says a great deal.
Remember also, we're just getting started; those who got the ticket to the vaccine party are increasingly finding out that there's only one way they get to leave early.
Quite simply this is the most important perspective any "public health authority" ought to have.
Did we kill people who wouldn't have died, and did they die miserably or unexpectedly. Likely, yes and yes. Will our current policies reverse the trends?
No, it will accelerate it beyond the pale. Because the cure was sold to people who were most vulnerable to the Government subsidized virus, and the governments are addicted to killing the people they proclaim to protect. Then tell the people in grief, fear and anger to direct it at those who stood firm and saw through it all. Has worked so far for them. Will it stop working now?
Jan 8, 2022·edited Jan 8, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
So the whole Covid panic killed a lot of the actively working. I think alongside the “they should not be talked about” serious side effects from the Covid “vaccines”, the constant talks about cases and deaths in media without giving a reference numbers for deaths from other diseases, constant restrictions(regardless of vaccination status/percentage of vaccinated), the desperation from not seeing the end of this and the continued lying from govs/some “scientists” about the whole situation led to this result. I fear, that we will see the result from this stress in the years to come especially in numbers for serious chronic diseases.
Jan 9, 2022·edited Jan 9, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
One major quibble (which you all know anyway) is this is not a "vaccine", it's a cell therapy that causes the body to manufacture spike proteins (the body is effectively creating part of the pathogen itself -- some would call that an autoimmune disease). Pretty much all else follows from that. Calling these shots vaccines gives them historic credibility they do not deserve.
On the differences between 20-24 and 25-29, it might help discern the reason if we knew what the 'normal' causes of death were in those age groups. It is strange that the 25-29 varies so much, as it's a similar magnitude in number. I can't think of any obvious reasons for the variation at all.
The most important view of all cause mortality is the view that gives us a sense of how many years of health did our interventions save vs kill.
Now many people claim "Look at the deaths, it means the vaccines are working!"
So we were sold a cure that killed our seniors faster than the speed of light before the clock could run out in 2020, that made 2021 look better. Then the cure worked so well, we had to lock people down to save their lives. We were able to save their lives from Covid no doubt. Even if it meant letting them die tad earlier.
This was all predictable and we must now restore the equality of harm by jabbing the under 15s with a second to match their older siblings.
Astute observation about the 0-1 year old cohort with inherited antibodies. I believe you will see the difference if you haven't already in their susceptibility to "variants". In short, 2-4 year olds are the last age group in the UK who were showing no discernible difference between infection with variants. Lots of confounders but in my view, the dominating factor is that 2-4 lack any kind of antibody or antigenic imprinting while the rest of the population no longer relies on innate immunity.
That dam will break in a few months. Sad but true.
Thank you for your continuing analysis, it is greatly appreciated. Here in NZ we are still awaiting COVID’s arrival, but local propaganda sources reliably inform me we currently have a 92.4% vaxx rate (all Pfizer). As such, is not NZ mortality data uncontaminated by Covid noise and thus likely to reveal vaxx effects (if any) more clearly than any other country’s dataset?
What makes the numbers even more stark, in my opinion, is that COVID deaths mainly hit those with co-morbidities or otherwise likely to die in the next few years (average age 78). That should have resulted in fewer excess deaths in 2021, especially in the 80+ cohort, since many of those deaths were pulled forward a year. For 2021 to make up that deficit and then equal or exceed 2020 excess deaths is very concerning.
Twelve-sigma increase in deaths in working age Americans. Sure you saw the news story. 40% increase. 10% is a three-sigma event (once in 200 years). Twelve-sigma is an obvious and ominous signal.
On the babies, 2020 looks unusually low. Why would babies in 2020 be dying less frequently than expected?
Given access to health care was reduced, newborn babies were likely to get considerably less medical attention than usual. Normally you'd take your newborn to a clinic once every few weeks to be weighed etc. Did that happen? You would not expect this to have a positive impact on the health of babies.
What babies were NOT getting as regularly & frequently were the usual paediatric vaccinations though. This has been reported by vaccine manufacturers in 2020. Does this indicate that vaccines other than coronavirus ones could account for a sizeable number of deaths? very worrying if so. My children had all their infant vaccinations. Wondering if I did the right thing now.
Once again, we have the vaccine effect. As if care homes were not targeted enough in 2020, January 2021 gave us a preview of what was in store more generally. In that month, weekly care home deaths suddenly leapt by 70% over December levels. This, of course, follows their targeting by vaccines in December.
Patterns of excess death by age group again show the same thing - excess deaths ramping up or accelerating only after the respective groups are targeted.
As shown, the only exception appears to be the highest age group - I guess there just are not enough survivors to get the total numbers up. Really, you have to be impressed by the way the government has relentlessly sought to ensure that there are no witnesses to how the elderly have been brutally put down as a matter of policy.
Of course, under normal circumstances, a major health crisis would be declared with so many younger age groups showing sharp increases in excess deaths. The fact that this catastrophe isn't even mentioned or acknowledged says a great deal.
Remember also, we're just getting started; those who got the ticket to the vaccine party are increasingly finding out that there's only one way they get to leave early.
Quite simply this is the most important perspective any "public health authority" ought to have.
Did we kill people who wouldn't have died, and did they die miserably or unexpectedly. Likely, yes and yes. Will our current policies reverse the trends?
No, it will accelerate it beyond the pale. Because the cure was sold to people who were most vulnerable to the Government subsidized virus, and the governments are addicted to killing the people they proclaim to protect. Then tell the people in grief, fear and anger to direct it at those who stood firm and saw through it all. Has worked so far for them. Will it stop working now?
I think so.
So the whole Covid panic killed a lot of the actively working. I think alongside the “they should not be talked about” serious side effects from the Covid “vaccines”, the constant talks about cases and deaths in media without giving a reference numbers for deaths from other diseases, constant restrictions(regardless of vaccination status/percentage of vaccinated), the desperation from not seeing the end of this and the continued lying from govs/some “scientists” about the whole situation led to this result. I fear, that we will see the result from this stress in the years to come especially in numbers for serious chronic diseases.
P.S. Interestingly, these results draw the same picture as an article for insurance company from Indiana, which saw 40% more deaths in the 18-64 year old group: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/insurance-companies-just-like-banking
One major quibble (which you all know anyway) is this is not a "vaccine", it's a cell therapy that causes the body to manufacture spike proteins (the body is effectively creating part of the pathogen itself -- some would call that an autoimmune disease). Pretty much all else follows from that. Calling these shots vaccines gives them historic credibility they do not deserve.
Excellent, thanks!
Deaths in infants might well be due to lower rates of pediatric vaccination during the 2020 lockdowns, going back to normal during 2021. https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2392/rr-1 and https://www.rescuepost.com/files/lessons-from-the-lockdown-vf-6-17-20---new-layout.pdf and
On the differences between 20-24 and 25-29, it might help discern the reason if we knew what the 'normal' causes of death were in those age groups. It is strange that the 25-29 varies so much, as it's a similar magnitude in number. I can't think of any obvious reasons for the variation at all.
The most important view of all cause mortality is the view that gives us a sense of how many years of health did our interventions save vs kill.
Now many people claim "Look at the deaths, it means the vaccines are working!"
So we were sold a cure that killed our seniors faster than the speed of light before the clock could run out in 2020, that made 2021 look better. Then the cure worked so well, we had to lock people down to save their lives. We were able to save their lives from Covid no doubt. Even if it meant letting them die tad earlier.
This was all predictable and we must now restore the equality of harm by jabbing the under 15s with a second to match their older siblings.
Astute observation about the 0-1 year old cohort with inherited antibodies. I believe you will see the difference if you haven't already in their susceptibility to "variants". In short, 2-4 year olds are the last age group in the UK who were showing no discernible difference between infection with variants. Lots of confounders but in my view, the dominating factor is that 2-4 lack any kind of antibody or antigenic imprinting while the rest of the population no longer relies on innate immunity.
That dam will break in a few months. Sad but true.
Thank you for your continuing analysis, it is greatly appreciated. Here in NZ we are still awaiting COVID’s arrival, but local propaganda sources reliably inform me we currently have a 92.4% vaxx rate (all Pfizer). As such, is not NZ mortality data uncontaminated by Covid noise and thus likely to reveal vaxx effects (if any) more clearly than any other country’s dataset?
great analysis...
succinct comparative national analysis here: https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/no-mrnadna-vaccines-no-epidemic?r=296gf
Hi Roger, tnx for the explanation...wow....that is scary stuff...
What makes the numbers even more stark, in my opinion, is that COVID deaths mainly hit those with co-morbidities or otherwise likely to die in the next few years (average age 78). That should have resulted in fewer excess deaths in 2021, especially in the 80+ cohort, since many of those deaths were pulled forward a year. For 2021 to make up that deficit and then equal or exceed 2020 excess deaths is very concerning.
Amazing. Thank you
Twelve-sigma increase in deaths in working age Americans. Sure you saw the news story. 40% increase. 10% is a three-sigma event (once in 200 years). Twelve-sigma is an obvious and ominous signal.
Thanks for the analysis. This was anticipated in May, 2020 by Just the Facts in this article: https://www.justfacts.com/news_covid-19_anxiety_lockdowns_life_destroyed_saved
On the babies, 2020 looks unusually low. Why would babies in 2020 be dying less frequently than expected?
Given access to health care was reduced, newborn babies were likely to get considerably less medical attention than usual. Normally you'd take your newborn to a clinic once every few weeks to be weighed etc. Did that happen? You would not expect this to have a positive impact on the health of babies.
What babies were NOT getting as regularly & frequently were the usual paediatric vaccinations though. This has been reported by vaccine manufacturers in 2020. Does this indicate that vaccines other than coronavirus ones could account for a sizeable number of deaths? very worrying if so. My children had all their infant vaccinations. Wondering if I did the right thing now.
Why is nobody tracking natural immunity ? ((#Positives - #Death)/#Population)*100% ??