The Inconvenient and Damning Truth that the Official COVID Inquiry Won't Ever Hear - COVID Killed No-one. It Was All Govt Policy
Another ignorant politician (Kemi Badenoch) takes the stand and moans about conspiracy theories and misinformation, without providing any evidence-based information...
Not surprisingly since it was the Govt policies she supported that were responsible for ALL the excess deaths.
Yesterday, it was the turn of Patrick Vallance. Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson have done a fine job of tearing his arguments to shreds so now it’s my turn to ram home a few more truths for Kemi, who you may already know was unfortunately my “representative” for much of the “pandemic”.
Unfortunate for both of us I’m sure as I would be very disappointed if she did not have me in mind when she was moaning about conspiracy theorists spreading misinformation, given the amount of information I have sent to her directly.
What she really means, of course, like all the ignoramuses in Parliament and the media, is anyone who dares to present carefully curated evidence that contradicts the dogmatic narrative.
Not wishing to disappoint further, here’s my evidence-based counterpoint to Kemi’s tripe.
Here’s the daily excess mortality for men and women born in 1945, who died in England & Wales between 2019 and 2022. For convenience, I have highlighted the periods between 23rd March 2020 and 10th May 2020, and 8th Dec 2020 and 2nd March 2021, being the first lockdown and first bout of mRNA jabbing.
For participants of the official inquiry (and all the other sitting MPs), I’ll describe what they show in very simple terms.
To the exact day, the only periods of unusual excess deaths lie entirely within the periods where the Government intervened.
In case you missed it, this is the implication:
The most logical, plausible explanation is that the Government intervention is responsible for all the excess death. This is Ockam’s Razor. And this is what should be investigated and disproved unequivocally by any decent inquiry, using hard evidence, not dogmatic assertion, even from Experts™.
Here’s another way of looking at it. Let’s simply remove those two periods from the chart.
Can you see the impact of the novel, deadly virus “spreading” across the country since at least the start of 2020 now? Where did it go between 10th May, when the most draconian restrictions were lifted, and 8th Dec, when the first arm was pricked in the mRNA experiment?
It is actually understood that “COVID” may have been circulating in the UK as early as Oct 2019 (although I don’t have a source for this at hand). Whether or not this is true, what the data - the evidence - shows is that there is absolutely no unusual mortality activity prior to 23rd March 2020 - the exact day that the country was shut down.
Just a coincidence?
I mean, what’s the worst that could happen? You don’t know? Don’t worry! Nor did they! And, evidently, they still don’t!!
As usual, that’s only half the story - the spikes. Looking at the periodic data, the full extent of excess mortality is not always apparent because higher nadirs do not stand out like higher peaks. Instead, we need to look at the cumulative excess mortality.
Again, for the politicians and journalists at the back, the steepness of the mortality spikes starting on 23rd March 2020 and 8th Dec 2020 (both marked on the charts above) are not representative of a “spreading virus”.
Think about it! Something that spreads does not manifest all of a sudden, it emerges.
What occurred on 23rd March 2020 and 8th Dec 2020 was a co-ordinated event that hit the entire country simultaneously. This was not the sudden emergence of a virus (or even the sudden mutation of a virus to become super-deadly overnight), it was something else that occurred, literally overnight, that was guaranteed to impact everyone who was susceptible to it - the frail and elderly.
The sudden withdrawal of health and social care;
the sudden withdrawal of basic treatments for preventable, treatable diseases and conditions;
the inappropriate treatment of other conditions; and
the mass administration of an experimental gene therapy;
were responsible for all the excess death in England & Wales in 2020 and early 2021.
It was a pandemic of appalling Government policy. That is and always was the most plausible explanation.
It was evident in mid 2020 when we looked at the hospital occupancy and A&E data.
It was evident in mid 2021 when we looked the correlations between jabbing and deaths and eviscerated the ONS analysis.
It was evident in 2023 when we looked at the prescription data.
I, alone, have written over 500 articles based on separate analyses, all pointing in this direction. There must be tens of thousands in total from all the independent “conspiracy theorists”, diligiently trying to unearth the truth for nothing more than the satisfaction of doing so.
The more data that comes in, the better the quality the data and the better the quality of the analysis (all of which is done outside of public administriation), takes you inexorably further towards that conclusion.
Ironically, those who are most fervent defenders of the “vaccine” will put forward the “collateral harm of lockdown argument” instead, whilst not acknowledging that as the reason for the first wave deaths. What cognitive dissonance!
And of course, if they did, they'd have to then admit that the vaccine could not have saved any lives. What a dilemma! Its much easier to let the evidence lead you to the truth, isn't it?
Only your dogmatic beliefs can maintain your blindness to the truth. And only the blind will pay any attention to the official inquiry that continues to obstinately ignore the evidence in favour of countenancing the opinions of the rubes who were responsible for the debacle.
The choice is yours who to believe and act accordingly the next time because, for sure, there will be a next time.
It's not like it hasn't happened before…
Now, to be clear, this is not to say there was no virus (somewhat novel or otherwise). This is simply proof that the virus, per se, was not responsible for the unusual mortality.
A note on the methodology. I have run this analysis on dozens of other birth cohorts with exactly the same results, which I will expand upon here with the male 1945 cohort.
To begin with, I fit a Gompertz to the monthly data between 2005 and 2019, meaning I capture all of the pertinent demographic temporal dynamics:
I then integrate this model by fitting to the daily data between 2014 and 2019 and the monthly reference points, so that I can get a daily baseline to compare to the empirical daily data:
I then derive the excess/deficit as the difference between this modeled baseline and the actual deaths (by date of occurrence, naturally!).
The rest you have already seen above, i.e zooming in on a single year.
I must apologise to dear Kemi for my conspirational activity in this objective, empirical, mathematical analysis and for sharing it as information on a non state-sanctioned propaganda media outlet. I mean, I would but they wouldn’t let me, so…