Joel Smalley, how many times can I say it, you are awesome. Your opening paragraphs are beyond appreciated by so many of us. Pointing out just the complete lack of concern of the ONS, as it relates to people’s lives is perhaps something the ONS might want to take a look at. And mentioning the Financial Times reporter whose goal in life appears to be to discredit the HART Group, who work diligently to provide all of us accurate, scientific covid data presented with integrity. It would be a pleasure to find just one msm jounalist doing the same.
Now promise to read about the Northern Mariana Islands.💕
Joel, you are a true star of this covid debacle. The first to question jab related consequences and continuing to do so. It’s great to see you on the right side of science and pushing the charlatans aside. Keep up the great work.
Very good points (again) Joel. I wouldn't worry about this Tom fellow, he's laid his bed, as many in academia and the civil service have.
I don't know if you've come across Edward Dowd (former Blackrock Fund Manager) who's been doing the podcast/video interview rounds in the US. He's looked into the Pfizer medical fraud case and delving into 4th Quarter reports from Life Insurers who are paying out substantially over on disabilities and deaths. I've been forwarding his work:
He has strong connections to Wall St – who is listening to him. (Explains why certain big Pharma stocks are tanking). He expects Moderna to go to zero. Let me know if I can help you in any way. Keep up the good fight.
Thanks Joel. Did you see the recent piece from Monica Hughes on the all-cause, excess mortality in NZ? With only 63 reported Covid deaths in 2 years, there were 2000 excess deaths that closely conform to the vax rollout from about Aug 21. Somehow, somewhere, a lot of explanation is required!
"deaths from drowning and gunshot wounds are probably not likely to be caused by the vaccine"
- Someone stroking out or having chest pain in the water might reduce the likelihood of them getting out of it, though, would it not. And after someone drowned, the physician will probably write "drowning" if no obvious bullet wounds or such are visible (I guess).
So there may actually be cases where someone apparently drowned, but really the jab got him, no?
Thank you dr Smalley for another deeply insightful and truly important article! You deserve credit not only for being very observant, but also for acting on your observations in a skilled way that greatly serves mankind.
As for the vaccine fatality rate comparison, here's the way I see it. Ever since the vaccine came, I've been very critical of the way public health authorities the world over compare vaccine injury rates to covid injury rates, because it's simply a ludicrous comparison. I've even had several post-publication peer reviews published about it. How come more people haven't objected to this is beyond me.
But anyways. Obviously, you cannot compare vaccine injury rates to covid injury rates, because when you choose to get vaccinated, it's 100% certain that you get "infected" (with viral RNA), while when you choose to abstain from the vaccine, it's definitely not 100% certain that you get infected (with the virus). In fact, it's far from it; the infection rates I've seen in studies from various countries have ranged between 0.3% (my homeland Sweden) and 14.3% (USA).
Thus, what the vaccine injury rates among vaccinees should be compared to, are the covid injury rates among unvaccinated individuals. And if we look at this specific case, the Northern Mariana Islands during january-july 2021, and begin with the vaccine death injury rate, you correctly nailed it down to 0.03%.
However, we don't have to move one step outside of your article to find the correct figure with which to compare that number, as we actually find the covid death injury rate among unvaccinated on the islands during january-july with help from Figure 7. We can see that during that period, two individuals died with covid.
Now let's say that both of these persons were unvaccinated. If we'd investigate this more, I'm sure we'd discover they weren't, but let's indulge our critics here and say they were. So, those two constitute the numerator in our division, now let's look at the correct denominator.
Again, we don't have to take a single step outside of our article in order to find that figure. According to your own numbers, in july 53 573-29 500=24 073 individuals on the islands were unvaccinated. That gives us a covid death injury rate among the unvaccinated of 0.008%.
I e, on the Northern Mariana Islands (up until the booster launch when things got even worse for the vaccinated) you were at least 3.75 times more likely to die a spike protein derived death if you chose to get vaccinated, as opposed to if you chose to abstain! I wonder what CDC would say about that fetchy risk-benefit analysis?
Excellent as always. It did occur to me that if you had a heart attack whilst swimming you'd be at much higher risk of subsequently drowning; but let's not split hairs : )
So expected deaths for 2021 is 302. We don’t know what it is . Only the covid attributed deaths are shown snd the death of AEs. So we see 1:3 between vaccine deaths to covid deaths . And some will say without the shot it could be 0:100. I think maybe I am
Not getting the full picture that is being presented .
If we look at world data at changes in mortality in various population I think it went from like 7 to 9/1000 or 2 more deaths per 1000 for all cause . It’s possible an island could not be affected if they not exposed , like Australia has interested graphs . But keeping with this idea of an average of 2 more deaths per 1000 that might add an extra 104 deaths due to untreated non vaxxed covid lock downs and what not . Point I am making is that one might take such a world rate of all death mortality and apply it and then compare the vaccinated year with the new expected deaths . So with sars2 infection in population and measures 2021 might expect a total death of 406/54,000. Less then that would be attributed to vaccination affect . So if the numbers are 302+30+11=343 is better then 406 by 63 lives saved . So we need to know the total deaths of 2021 and maybe get a sense of the case rates as well
Joel Smalley, how many times can I say it, you are awesome. Your opening paragraphs are beyond appreciated by so many of us. Pointing out just the complete lack of concern of the ONS, as it relates to people’s lives is perhaps something the ONS might want to take a look at. And mentioning the Financial Times reporter whose goal in life appears to be to discredit the HART Group, who work diligently to provide all of us accurate, scientific covid data presented with integrity. It would be a pleasure to find just one msm jounalist doing the same.
Now promise to read about the Northern Mariana Islands.💕
,
Nice detective work. When arriving at an estimate for VFR of 0.03%, had you already taken into account the underreporting factor in VAERS?
Joel, you are a true star of this covid debacle. The first to question jab related consequences and continuing to do so. It’s great to see you on the right side of science and pushing the charlatans aside. Keep up the great work.
Very good points (again) Joel. I wouldn't worry about this Tom fellow, he's laid his bed, as many in academia and the civil service have.
I don't know if you've come across Edward Dowd (former Blackrock Fund Manager) who's been doing the podcast/video interview rounds in the US. He's looked into the Pfizer medical fraud case and delving into 4th Quarter reports from Life Insurers who are paying out substantially over on disabilities and deaths. I've been forwarding his work:
https://journal.rajeshtaylor.com/life-insurance-ceo-says-deaths-up-40-among-those-aged-18-64-in-indiana/
And here:
https://journal.rajeshtaylor.com/further-disturbing-rates-of-disability-mortality-in-life-insurance-data-since-covid-vaccine-rollout/
He has strong connections to Wall St – who is listening to him. (Explains why certain big Pharma stocks are tanking). He expects Moderna to go to zero. Let me know if I can help you in any way. Keep up the good fight.
Thanks Joel. Did you see the recent piece from Monica Hughes on the all-cause, excess mortality in NZ? With only 63 reported Covid deaths in 2 years, there were 2000 excess deaths that closely conform to the vax rollout from about Aug 21. Somehow, somewhere, a lot of explanation is required!
https://themariachiyears.substack.com/p/2000-extra-all-cause-deaths-associated
Another excellent analysis. Thank you!
Awesome work mate !
A big thank you for all of your hard work!
"deaths from drowning and gunshot wounds are probably not likely to be caused by the vaccine"
- Someone stroking out or having chest pain in the water might reduce the likelihood of them getting out of it, though, would it not. And after someone drowned, the physician will probably write "drowning" if no obvious bullet wounds or such are visible (I guess).
So there may actually be cases where someone apparently drowned, but really the jab got him, no?
Thank you dr Smalley for another deeply insightful and truly important article! You deserve credit not only for being very observant, but also for acting on your observations in a skilled way that greatly serves mankind.
As for the vaccine fatality rate comparison, here's the way I see it. Ever since the vaccine came, I've been very critical of the way public health authorities the world over compare vaccine injury rates to covid injury rates, because it's simply a ludicrous comparison. I've even had several post-publication peer reviews published about it. How come more people haven't objected to this is beyond me.
But anyways. Obviously, you cannot compare vaccine injury rates to covid injury rates, because when you choose to get vaccinated, it's 100% certain that you get "infected" (with viral RNA), while when you choose to abstain from the vaccine, it's definitely not 100% certain that you get infected (with the virus). In fact, it's far from it; the infection rates I've seen in studies from various countries have ranged between 0.3% (my homeland Sweden) and 14.3% (USA).
Thus, what the vaccine injury rates among vaccinees should be compared to, are the covid injury rates among unvaccinated individuals. And if we look at this specific case, the Northern Mariana Islands during january-july 2021, and begin with the vaccine death injury rate, you correctly nailed it down to 0.03%.
However, we don't have to move one step outside of your article to find the correct figure with which to compare that number, as we actually find the covid death injury rate among unvaccinated on the islands during january-july with help from Figure 7. We can see that during that period, two individuals died with covid.
Now let's say that both of these persons were unvaccinated. If we'd investigate this more, I'm sure we'd discover they weren't, but let's indulge our critics here and say they were. So, those two constitute the numerator in our division, now let's look at the correct denominator.
Again, we don't have to take a single step outside of our article in order to find that figure. According to your own numbers, in july 53 573-29 500=24 073 individuals on the islands were unvaccinated. That gives us a covid death injury rate among the unvaccinated of 0.008%.
I e, on the Northern Mariana Islands (up until the booster launch when things got even worse for the vaccinated) you were at least 3.75 times more likely to die a spike protein derived death if you chose to get vaccinated, as opposed to if you chose to abstain! I wonder what CDC would say about that fetchy risk-benefit analysis?
Excellent as always. It did occur to me that if you had a heart attack whilst swimming you'd be at much higher risk of subsequently drowning; but let's not split hairs : )
I wonder if covid vaccines could somehow cause a false-positive PCR?
Another great article.
I'm a big fan of the extremal principle, and focusing on cases like this is a great employ of the principle.
Cheers, mate.
Why is their death rate since 2000 steadily increasing? Aging population?
So expected deaths for 2021 is 302. We don’t know what it is . Only the covid attributed deaths are shown snd the death of AEs. So we see 1:3 between vaccine deaths to covid deaths . And some will say without the shot it could be 0:100. I think maybe I am
Not getting the full picture that is being presented .
If we look at world data at changes in mortality in various population I think it went from like 7 to 9/1000 or 2 more deaths per 1000 for all cause . It’s possible an island could not be affected if they not exposed , like Australia has interested graphs . But keeping with this idea of an average of 2 more deaths per 1000 that might add an extra 104 deaths due to untreated non vaxxed covid lock downs and what not . Point I am making is that one might take such a world rate of all death mortality and apply it and then compare the vaccinated year with the new expected deaths . So with sars2 infection in population and measures 2021 might expect a total death of 406/54,000. Less then that would be attributed to vaccination affect . So if the numbers are 302+30+11=343 is better then 406 by 63 lives saved . So we need to know the total deaths of 2021 and maybe get a sense of the case rates as well
Is that deaths per day?