The Unofficial UK Covid-19 Inquiry
The Unofficial UK Covid-19 Inquiry
No opinion, just evidence.
The official UK Covid-19 Inquiry has no deadline and will probably run to a cost of over £200 million1. It will serve absolutely no useful purpose because it is asking the wrong questions to the wrong people. It will result in a load of ill-informed opinions (always worthless) and ignore the evidence.
So, here is my unofficial inquiry. It asks no questions of anyone and is completely unopinionated, relying entirely on evidence derived from official UK public data.
The Evidence
1. There was no unusually deadly virus.
A. Deaths of care home residents in England can be accurately predicted as a function of non-resident deaths of those aged 70 and above.
B. The deaths have an 84% correlation and evidently are almost identical in their temporal variability.
C. Prior to “COVID”, around one-third of all deaths of this age cohort are care home resident.
All of this information indicates that seasonal mortality, purported to be driven by respiratory pathogens (corona and influenza viruses), does not disfavour care home residents.
In plain speak, viruses (whether or not you believe they are transmissible, let alone exist) don’t care if you are a care home resident or not.
And yet, during “COVID”, the proportion of care home resident deaths shoots up to over 50% between 23-MAR-20 and 01-JUN-20.
During this same period, is when the first wave of excess mortality occurred.
In the absence of evidence to support a “novel” virus to explain this explosion in mortality (as presented above), we should look at other material factors, especially those that would disfavour care home residents.
I said I would only present evidence here but I am sure you can speculate what those other factors might be?2
2. There was no unusually deadly virus.
A. In spite of “COVID” still showing up on the zealous testing, the following autumn seasonal mortality of 70+ year olds in England, both care home resident and not, shows no materially unusual patterns or magnitude until 21-DEC-20.
B. On this occasion, the trigger does not disfavour care home residents. In other words, it increases mortality in both cohorts equally. This means we cannot rule out a novel virus.
However, there is no evidence supporting the emergence of such a novel virus at that time, only the one purported to have emerged in spring 2020. I do not present the evidence here but it is widely accepted and entirely logical that infectious viruses do not evolve to become more virulent.
So… if the winter 2020 trigger was also not likely to be the emergence of a novel virus, what was it?
And, more importantly, why did it affect care home residents and non-care home residents equally this time?
Again, I’ll let you speculate…
3. There was no unusually deadly virus.
A. Outside of the periods immediately following two pertinent trigger points (16-MAR-20 and 21-DEC-20), there is no materially unusual mortality, despite “evidence” (PCR/lateral flow testing) of the continued existence of an alleged novel, deadly virus.
Conclusion
There was no unusually deadly virus.
There was substantial excess mortality.
Some other interventions were responsible for the excess mortality, other than a “novel, deadly virus”.
N.B. This inquiry took 4 hours to conduct and cost the UK tax payer £0.00.
In case you’re wondering what I’m thinking - Matt Hancock probably has a fair amount of explaining to do. Also this…
Joel, if I may say do, what good value your professional services are!
Exposing evil: nought pence.
I’ve long realised there was no pandemic and it’s a reasonable inference that (even if they existed), there was no novel respiratory virus.
Some argued with me that perhaps there was a pathogen that made people sick but killed nobody. It doesn’t work like that. Outcomes are on a continuum.
In any case, there’s no evidence that influenza like illnesses are transmissible. Numerous attempts to enable transmission experimentally all failed.
Virus “isolation” has never been accomplished.
The molecular biology is trickery, augmented by software & assumptions.
Regardless of where one’s personal confidence sits about the existential side, there are no scenarios where a rush “vaccine” makes sense.
It’s completely impossible to bring forth a new technology “vaccine” or anything based on mRNA/DNA in under several years, if you’re interested in safety and efficacy. Furthermore, manufacturing of a complex biological product takes years to define the path to high volumes of near identical doses.
As it is, these gene-based injections were designed to injure, maim and kill.
If the narrative had been true, use of off-label treatments would have been preferred.
All: please decide to reject digital ID, no matter how inconvenient it certainly will be. The perpetrators are intent on herding us onboard their digital express to hell.
I think digital ID might be the last thing that your active compliance is required by the crooks. After that, it’s on autopilot to the slaughterhouse.
The evidence clearly indicates a harsh and uncomfortable reality - there was no pandemic.
The deeds of the past three years were those of deadly protocols established in the hospitals and nursing homes. There was no epidemiological event- there was iatrogenic mass murder.
We have not been and are not facing what RFK Jr has termed “a mismanaged pandemic,” a stance supported by many “health freedom” celebrites. What we are dealing with is fraud, tyranny and mass murder.
Terrorizing and isolating elderly people especially those living in care homes, denying them visits from relatives and reducing or eliminating in-personal visits from health and social carers became "standard of care."
Mechanical ventilators push oxygen into patients whose lungs are failing. Using the machines involves sedating a patient and sticking a tube into the throat. It was massive overuse of a treatment (ventilation) with no solid evidential basis, now known to be extremely harmful.
Midazolam, Propofol and Morphine cocktails were given to the elderly in hospitals to create the illusion of the first wave of the hoax pandemic.
What if It was an epidemic of government and medical assault, of false attribution of death, and of intense propaganda using fraudulent tests and bogus studies?
Start talking about global operations, conditional Universal Basic Income, programmable Central Bank Digital Currencies, digital slavery, mass surveillance rolled across the world via an endless series of manufactured crises and much of the "health freedom movement" run off.
The catapulting of GoF and "Covid" variants and on and on is part of this Psyop. Those who perpetuate these fabrications are part of the problem, knowingly or not, and are doing the work for the Bio-security State by maintaining and heightening the fear mechanisms.
“It’s just a virus and some bad actors” say the public. “A bioweapon that needs to be contained next time” say the subverted Covid oppositional actors.
Plenty of narrative reinforcement to go around. The “lab leak”, "bioweapon" story has resurfaced and is gaining traction amongst the “acceptable” ‘Covid sceptics.’
The insistence on using the “lab leak” red herring covers up the actual crimes that were committed.
However, if there was no pandemic, no evidence for a virus, what do we do then?
Well, we'd have to hold our government, our health regulatory agencies and our Media to account. The whole system would be exposed as the corrupt house of cards it is. The Lab Leak Theory keeps the whole charade alive and well.
There was no pandemic ever- there is no "lab leak"- there is no "unique viral pathogen"- there is no "China Virus"- there is no "bioweapon"- There is no "There" there.
It was an epidemic of violent government and medical assault against people, of false attribution of death, and of intense propaganda using fraudulent tests and bogus studies.
The official narrative of "Covid" is fictional- all facets of it.