A little while ago I announced my “retirement” from Substack so that I could focus on the next phase of the fight against totalitarianism and the globalist agenda.
For a multitude of reasons, I’m still here despite standing by what I said - we have produced more than enough evidence to convince those with the capacity to be convinced by data.
So what next?
The new chapter I alluded to is the facilitation of “hyperlocality”. It’s actually a technical term relating to data (so not far from my core theme of my newsletters!), defined in Wikipedia as:
information oriented around a well-defined community with its primary focus directed toward the concerns of the population in that community […] the emergent ecology of data (including textual content), aggregators, publication mechanism and user interactions and behaviors which centre on a resident of a location and the business of being a resident.1
In practical terms, I believe the way to combat the trespass of globalism - “big”: government; tech; pharma; finance - is the creation of multitudinous, self-sufficient, hyperlocal communities, and then for these communities to interconnect and transact with neighbouring communities like they did before any organised systems of governance.
Like many, many others, I believe that blockchain technology is the enabler of this new socio-economic paradigm. However, I do not propose to go into the technology now, except to say, that in my capacity as a blockchain architect with almost 7 years of experience in this still emergent space, I will be sitting down with Mathew Crawford soon on a new podcast series he’s planning for his RTE substack to discuss the technology in this context.
In the meantime, I’d like to share my first project which should hopefully make more sense to the layman anyway.
It is a simple concept:
Obtain land in a country with inalienable land rights that is naturally fertile and unspoilt.
Cultivate the land in harmony with nature to produce an abundance of organic food.
Build a community around the farm to provide other necessary services (healthcare, education, security, etc.).
Build an infrastructure for the community to govern itself and transact with other communities (registers of asset title, records of value exchange).
It might sound fanciful but I believe that this can be achieved with no “contribution” from the conventional public sector because the blockchain technology plays the role more effectively.
On the other hand, it might not sound fanciful at all since there are already many examples of attempts to create these kinds of communities, many of which have largely succeeded. I just believe that the chances of being protected from state intrusion increase, the more decentralised the system of social co-operation.
If you’d like to know more, or indeed if you’d like help setting up a community near you, please join my Telegram Group.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperlocal
Great move!! In many ways, we need to do this. As I wrote in your telegram group, I'm not as positive about blockchain as you are (due to what I've read from Catherine Austin Fitts, who is brilliant and 100% on our side and into our making our own communities). I am 100% into our making our own communities and connections. At some point, we no longer need or desire or are willing to keep proving the proven (the dangers of the injections, etc), we need to put our energies into what gives us life.
Joel, I asked after you at the Better Way Conference where I met Clare Craig. I thought you might be there. I have followed your sage advice and words of wisdom since the beginning of covid. It is hard to say farewell to you. So I will only say thank you. You will be missed on substack. Even though I read the same evidence regarding the dangerous experimental biologicals, in different format, by numerous researchers, doctors and scientists, I always look for your confirmation. It is hard to accept your departure from substack. I have saved all your posts. You are a friend I never met in person, but so pleased to have known you.