Again, their call for amnesty is an admission they had declared war on the human population. Event201 was the public declaration of war on the entire world population.
Nov 29, 2022·edited Nov 29, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
It's not only the English who refuse to learn from history; it's the rest of the world also
The main reason you don't get jabbed for smallpox these days is that it was undeniable that those who were dying of smallpox were those who had been vaccinated with the smallpox vaccine. Leicester proved this by stopping the vaccine, but the rest of England ignored it and paid the price much longer through the 19th century.
I don't know, I am not a doctor or a scientist or anything. But, when I heard those news (spike after vax) I hesitated. It is a fucking new product not well tested. It could be that the vax creates those spikes. Are the doctors the most stupid people over this planet?
When they ask for amnesty for their actions over the last 3 years I believe it would be correct to assume that they are really asking for punishment because they believe they deserve it. Their tactics of practicing inversion of all things normal has honed them to become experts of their own making.
'And it couldn’t possibly have been all those healthcare workers getting infected and becoming super-spreaders amongst those immunocompromised seniors in their care, could it?'
- NO it was state sponsored democide. The virus real or otherwise ('flu') was a non event. ''The pandemic'' along with the majority of excess deaths have been deliberately manufactured to sell THE ENTIRE WORLD experimental mRNA genetic injections that breach all 10 points of the Nuremberg code. Really think about that folks !!! https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199711133372006
Great observation, love the comment combined with that picture. The clowns look pretty similar all over the world.
A thought: We know (and have suspected it all the time) now that vaxxed people are only considered vaccinated after weeks of taking the second jab. We had the 'pandemic of the unvaccinated'. Would it be possible to calculate how many of those 'unvaccinated' Covid deaths actually took place within that period where the jabbered were still considered unvaccinated? Guess that data is unavailable.
That's literally why we wait like 40 days to call people vaccinated. We let Big Pharma define the parameters so that these cases would be categorized as 'unvaccinated', thereby 'proving' the efficacy of the jabs!
Here's that PHE study. Here is what they say. They measured a 48% increase in the likelihood of testing positive several days after vaccination compared to unvaccinated. Their explanations for that increase are risible.
"Individuals aged >=80 years vaccinated with BNT162b2 prior to 4th January, had a higher odds of testing positive in the first 9 days after vaccination (odds ratio up to 1.48, 95%CI 1.23-1.77), indicating that those initially targeted had a higher underlying risk of infection.
A key factor that is likely to increase the odds of testing positive in vaccinees (therefore underestimating vaccine effectiveness) is that individuals initially targeted for vaccination may be at increased risk of exposure to COVID-19. For example, those accessing hospital may have been offered vaccine early in hospital hubs but may also be at higher risk of COVID-19. This may explain the higher odds of testing positive in vaccinees in the first few days after vaccination with the BNT162b2 (before they would have been expected to develop an immune response to the vaccine) . . . .
Factors that could increase the risk of COVID-19 in vaccinees (and therefore result in underestimation of vaccine effects) include: individuals may have more risky behaviours after vaccination if they believe they are protected; also, presenting for vaccination may be a risk factor in itself (for example travelling to a vaccination centre with a friend or relative)."
Hang on, I thought people remained unvaccinated officially until after day 28 post stabbing. Are they trying to have their cake and eat it?
What on earth are "health psychologists"? Are these the same people who work in the nudge units?
Again, their call for amnesty is an admission they had declared war on the human population. Event201 was the public declaration of war on the entire world population.
They’re not getting any amnesty from me and that’s a fact
Bingo. All the jabbed became walking asymptomatics. And thus the huge spikes in Covid.
I sat with my mouth open watching this. I am not a scientist, not smart, but Jesus folks if
I coud see the covid taking off after the jabs (and in summer too)...even I could connect the dots.
The only thing missing from that photo is a huge pitcher of purple koolaid, lol.
Over Here, You know you're on to something when everyone's sitting on their hands...
It's not only the English who refuse to learn from history; it's the rest of the world also
The main reason you don't get jabbed for smallpox these days is that it was undeniable that those who were dying of smallpox were those who had been vaccinated with the smallpox vaccine. Leicester proved this by stopping the vaccine, but the rest of England ignored it and paid the price much longer through the 19th century.
See Suzanne Humphries MD, Dissolving Illusions.
Or this summary of the smallpox vaccine disaster: https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/catastrophic-vaccines-this-is-not
I don't know, I am not a doctor or a scientist or anything. But, when I heard those news (spike after vax) I hesitated. It is a fucking new product not well tested. It could be that the vax creates those spikes. Are the doctors the most stupid people over this planet?
When they ask for amnesty for their actions over the last 3 years I believe it would be correct to assume that they are really asking for punishment because they believe they deserve it. Their tactics of practicing inversion of all things normal has honed them to become experts of their own making.
'And it couldn’t possibly have been all those healthcare workers getting infected and becoming super-spreaders amongst those immunocompromised seniors in their care, could it?'
- NO it was state sponsored democide. The virus real or otherwise ('flu') was a non event. ''The pandemic'' along with the majority of excess deaths have been deliberately manufactured to sell THE ENTIRE WORLD experimental mRNA genetic injections that breach all 10 points of the Nuremberg code. Really think about that folks !!! https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199711133372006
Great observation, love the comment combined with that picture. The clowns look pretty similar all over the world.
A thought: We know (and have suspected it all the time) now that vaxxed people are only considered vaccinated after weeks of taking the second jab. We had the 'pandemic of the unvaccinated'. Would it be possible to calculate how many of those 'unvaccinated' Covid deaths actually took place within that period where the jabbered were still considered unvaccinated? Guess that data is unavailable.
Joel! Tops the experts picture!!!!
Talking about clowns.
At least Argentina and Oregon officials gave the Covid numbers on TV dressed as clowns. Don't forget that!
That's literally why we wait like 40 days to call people vaccinated. We let Big Pharma define the parameters so that these cases would be categorized as 'unvaccinated', thereby 'proving' the efficacy of the jabs!
It's pure insanity!
Here's that PHE study. Here is what they say. They measured a 48% increase in the likelihood of testing positive several days after vaccination compared to unvaccinated. Their explanations for that increase are risible.
"Individuals aged >=80 years vaccinated with BNT162b2 prior to 4th January, had a higher odds of testing positive in the first 9 days after vaccination (odds ratio up to 1.48, 95%CI 1.23-1.77), indicating that those initially targeted had a higher underlying risk of infection.
A key factor that is likely to increase the odds of testing positive in vaccinees (therefore underestimating vaccine effectiveness) is that individuals initially targeted for vaccination may be at increased risk of exposure to COVID-19. For example, those accessing hospital may have been offered vaccine early in hospital hubs but may also be at higher risk of COVID-19. This may explain the higher odds of testing positive in vaccinees in the first few days after vaccination with the BNT162b2 (before they would have been expected to develop an immune response to the vaccine) . . . .
Factors that could increase the risk of COVID-19 in vaccinees (and therefore result in underestimation of vaccine effects) include: individuals may have more risky behaviours after vaccination if they believe they are protected; also, presenting for vaccination may be a risk factor in itself (for example travelling to a vaccination centre with a friend or relative)."
Absolute sham.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.01.21252652v1.full-text