My main problem with them is they don’t create mucosal immunity.
The next huge problem is they infect potentially large numbers of cells in extra pulmonary sites & these cells are then killed by our NKT / T-cells.
For reasons I’m too stupid to understand, these agents don’t appear to provide much of any actual protection.
Thank you Dr. Yeadon for all your work exposing vaccine safety problems.
Since you worked on asthma, thought this may be of interest:
Aeroallergen contaminated injected vaccines cause the development of asthma. New CHO cell protein contaminated biologic treatment for asthma - tezepelumab, will cause de novo autoimmune disorders.
That’s a big issue. It’s not surprising that introduction of foreign protein into the airway can result in allergic type responses to subsequent exposure. While that’s certainly a form of immunity, it’s not the kind that’s desirable! We can observe a Type I (acute) & sometimes a Type IV (Cell mediated) allergic reaction.
I’ve often wondered how they ensure this doesn’t happen with nasal vaccines (there I go, presuming intent is to avoid harms!). Nasal flu vaccine is routinely given to English kids at school. I don’t think it’s justified. It’s extraordinarily unusual for a previously healthy child to die of flu. Does this warrant vaccination of almost 100% of kids annually in the hope of saving one life? Again, I doubt it. The reason is how low must the rate be of serious adverse effects for that trade off to make ethical sense? Probably far fewer than 1 in 1 million.
Statistical “powering” to detect such low rates of SAEs is problematic. I doubt it’s possible to test for safety in enough kids even to stand up the intended claim. I’m a risk / benefit person & ideally the same individual gets both. I don’t like most kids bearijg risk in order to benefit one person, it’s unethical.
My main problem with them is they don’t create mucosal immunity.
The next huge problem is they infect potentially large numbers of cells in extra pulmonary sites & these cells are then killed by our NKT / T-cells.
For reasons I’m too stupid to understand, these agents don’t appear to provide much of any actual protection.
Thank you Dr. Yeadon for all your work exposing vaccine safety problems.
Since you worked on asthma, thought this may be of interest:
Aeroallergen contaminated injected vaccines cause the development of asthma. New CHO cell protein contaminated biologic treatment for asthma - tezepelumab, will cause de novo autoimmune disorders.
https://vinuarumugham.substack.com/p/aeroallergen-contaminated-injected?s=w
And the general case:
Vaccines and Biologics injury table based on mechanistic evidence – Feb 2020 Covering over 125 conditions
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2582634
That’s a big issue. It’s not surprising that introduction of foreign protein into the airway can result in allergic type responses to subsequent exposure. While that’s certainly a form of immunity, it’s not the kind that’s desirable! We can observe a Type I (acute) & sometimes a Type IV (Cell mediated) allergic reaction.
I’ve often wondered how they ensure this doesn’t happen with nasal vaccines (there I go, presuming intent is to avoid harms!). Nasal flu vaccine is routinely given to English kids at school. I don’t think it’s justified. It’s extraordinarily unusual for a previously healthy child to die of flu. Does this warrant vaccination of almost 100% of kids annually in the hope of saving one life? Again, I doubt it. The reason is how low must the rate be of serious adverse effects for that trade off to make ethical sense? Probably far fewer than 1 in 1 million.
Statistical “powering” to detect such low rates of SAEs is problematic. I doubt it’s possible to test for safety in enough kids even to stand up the intended claim. I’m a risk / benefit person & ideally the same individual gets both. I don’t like most kids bearijg risk in order to benefit one person, it’s unethical.