Debunking the lie that COVID "vaccines" saved any lives - they were actually lost!

No more speculation. We finally have the evidence to prove it from the official source.

I am absolutely certain that my two MPs during the COVID atrocities will be delighted to learn that the evidence finally confirms that the COVID “vaccines” didn’t save any lives.

As a reminder of their position:

So, there we have it. Lockdowns were the solution to the greatest challenge since WWII and “vaccines” saved the day (and hundreds of thousands of lives).

But did they?

Being the discerning readers I know you are, you will already be aware of our multifaceted evisceration of the paltry ONS attempts to promote the Safe and Effective™ fallacy and our recent success in getting them to admit the bias in their data?

And now, hot on the heels of that shocking admission, well fifteen months of determined truth-seeking on the part of my dear friend, Clare Craig, at any rate, we finally have the unbiased data and a whole load of missing vaccinated deaths turning up.

I thought we would have to resort to survey data to overcome the pollution of the national datasets but it turns out they can unpollute the data to a certain extent when pushed hard enough.

So, with this new FOI data, I felt compelled to rerun my original analysis of the ONS deaths by vaccination dataset, in fact one of my very first Substack contributions from Dec 2021!

The results will come as no surprise to you. We were right again, of course.

Starting with the over 80s, using only the official, public data (only public due to Clare’s FOI request), it looks like the “vaccine” saved around 13k lives (ironically of those already past life expectancy!). That’s the area between the lower dotted black line and the solid black line.

The FOI data is stratified by month (because disclosure!¹) so I took the NIMS vaccination rate at the start and end of each month and multiplied it by all deaths for the month for that age group to get an expected range. Anything below the range is a “life saved”. Anything above is a “life lost”.

If we’d stopped there, we might forgive dear Julie for exaggerating her tens to hundreds but alas, that isn’t even half the story.

As you can probably already see from the chart, the majority of those “lives saved” were in Feb and March 2021. But, COVID had already substantially waned by then. In fact, there were only a total of 15,000 COVID deaths for all ages for those two months and, as we can see in the chart below, there is no inflection in the curve that would support a hypothesis of fewer deaths than otherwise expected in the over 80s vaccinated population, contributing to that waning.

The waning of COVID mortality started mid-Jan, before any substantial number of people had received their “effective” second jab plus 2 weeks². But, while we're here, let's take a timely reminder of exactly when COVID mortality returned to England - literally the week in which they started the jab campaign. You couldn't make it up!

But it gets worse…

We now have the evidence - official, national data - that clearly shows that the under 80s “vaccinated” died at higher rates than expected.

By the end of 2021, at least 2,500 more deaths in the 65 to 79 year-olds… That’s the area between the solid black line and the top dotted black line, starting around May 2021.

At least 600 more deaths than expected in the 50 to 64 year olds…

At least 1,500 more deaths in the 30 to 49 year-olds, starting from March 2021.

And finally, at least 300 more deaths in the 20 to 29 year-olds, that represent by far the highest in percentage terms and start right from the get-go. Just look how high the vaccinated deaths (proportion of all deaths that are in vaccinated people) run above the expected deaths (vaccinated population percent multiplied by all deaths).

For the under 50s, the rate of mortality in the vaccinated exceeds expectation of a safe but ineffective intervention from inception. So, either they were jabbing the moribund all year or the jab was causing untimely demise in the younger cohorts.

It’s rather sad that we weren’t taken seriously at the time and that it has taken so long for the correct data to be released because, for sure, there were many more thousands of lives lost as a result of non-informed consent to the gene therapy experiment.

---

Finally, for the well-educated folk on LinkedIn, they could even reproduce this for themselves because you know, science… instead of dogma. I’ll even include my worksheet:

https://ln5.sync.com/dl/321e94000/pn8agafm-g5mvaahq-yqrqkatg-8bht5qcs

They might even understand the maths - proportion of all deaths that are of vaccinated people vs proportion of the population that is vaccinated. Stratified by age so there goes that hackneyed argument too…

And while we’re about caveats and confounders - it’s likely that the total population is under-estimated AND the vaccinated population over-estimated (since we have plenty of examples of people with vaccination records who wouldn’t even be in the same room as a syringe filled with the gene poison) and the missing population are more likely to be unvaccinated; and, in spite of this most recent effort in finding a few more of the missing vaccinated deaths, I dare say, they still haven’t found all of them, both of which are also going to skew things in favour of the jab.

And yet, still, there are relatively more vaccinated deaths than vaccinated population…

So, what do you do when you can’t challenge the facts? Censor the information of course!

1. The UKHSA think it's more important to protect the “mental health” of family members of the deceased who might not want the world to know how many jabs their dead relative got than getting to the truth of what killed them. Probably the same relatives who showed no concern about disclosing their own jab status on Facebook, to go on holiday or some pop concert…

2. I try not to speculate but a plausible explanation for this could be mistreatment of the unvaccinated -

Were the unvaccinated treated (literally) differently from the vaccinated?

And then, of course, perhaps we still don't have complete vaccination data? I mean, if you're a care home and half your residents die on vaccination day, I imagine those vaccination records never get updated - for whatever reason… ?

On that last point, looking at the progress of the updates, it does look to me like there are still deaths missing from Dec 2020 to Jan 2021: