4 Comments
тна Return to thread

Do you agree that injected-vaccine-induced T cells are no good because they home to the wrong location?

Mechanisms of T cell organotropism

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27038487/

Expand full comment

My main problem with them is they donтАЩt create mucosal immunity.

The next huge problem is they infect potentially large numbers of cells in extra pulmonary sites & these cells are then killed by our NKT / T-cells.

For reasons IтАЩm too stupid to understand, these agents donтАЩt appear to provide much of any actual protection.

Expand full comment

Thank you Dr. Yeadon for all your work exposing vaccine safety problems.

Since you worked on asthma, thought this may be of interest:

Aeroallergen contaminated injected vaccines cause the development of asthma. New CHO cell protein contaminated biologic treatment for asthma - tezepelumab, will cause de novo autoimmune disorders.

https://vinuarumugham.substack.com/p/aeroallergen-contaminated-injected?s=w

And the general case:

Vaccines and Biologics injury table based on mechanistic evidence тАУ Feb 2020 Covering over 125 conditions

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2582634

Expand full comment

ThatтАЩs a big issue. ItтАЩs not surprising that introduction of foreign protein into the airway can result in allergic type responses to subsequent exposure. While thatтАЩs certainly a form of immunity, itтАЩs not the kind thatтАЩs desirable! We can observe a Type I (acute) & sometimes a Type IV (Cell mediated) allergic reaction.

IтАЩve often wondered how they ensure this doesnтАЩt happen with nasal vaccines (there I go, presuming intent is to avoid harms!). Nasal flu vaccine is routinely given to English kids at school. I donтАЩt think itтАЩs justified. ItтАЩs extraordinarily unusual for a previously healthy child to die of flu. Does this warrant vaccination of almost 100% of kids annually in the hope of saving one life? Again, I doubt it. The reason is how low must the rate be of serious adverse effects for that trade off to make ethical sense? Probably far fewer than 1 in 1 million.

Statistical тАЬpoweringтАЭ to detect such low rates of SAEs is problematic. I doubt itтАЩs possible to test for safety in enough kids even to stand up the intended claim. IтАЩm a risk / benefit person & ideally the same individual gets both. I donтАЩt like most kids bearijg risk in order to benefit one person, itтАЩs unethical.

Expand full comment